DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Uncategorized » NAVY: TATTOOS NOW TABOO

NAVY: TATTOOS NOW TABOO

NAVY: TATTOOS NOW TABOO
Like tomato sauce and pasta, like the Lone Ranger and Tonto, like J. Lo and that big ol’ ass, sailors and their tattoos have long seemed like one of nature’s unalterable combinations.
But now, the U.S. Navy is putting the brakes on some tattoos and ornamentation, according to Stars and Stripes.
“Tattoos/body art/brands that are excessive, obscene, sexually explicit or advocate or symbolize sex, gender, racial, religious, ethnic or national origin discrimination are all out. So are forked tongues. So is branding, or “scarification.“
The other armed services also have limits on “ink.” In the Air Force, taboo tattoos are ones that exceed one-fourth of the exposed body part. Marines can’t have body art on the head or neck. Nor are they allowed “objects, articles, jewelry or ornamentation through their skin, tongue or any other body part.e
“Mom” or “Semper Fi,” written across the shoulder, are, presumably, still allowed.

Share |

January 30th, 2003 | Uncategorized | 28141 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2003/01/30/navy-tattoos-now-taboo/NAVY%3A+TATTOOS+NOW+TABOO2003-01-30+15%3A07%3A54cjmilcom You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « PILOTS’ UNREAL WORLD | DRONE VIDEO ONLINE » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. derek l. eskelson says:
    August 7, 2005 at 5:18 am

    Dear Sir (or Ma’am), I’m an italian american, former DT3 of the US Navy. I think that nobody around this world dislike american sailors because they have tattoos. In Italy, nowadays, even young girls have tattoos. Of course, exagerations may become ridiculous, common sense, but something showing on your arm or neck or wherever is fine, as long as we are nice to people, and plitically correct. Did you know that the sailors of the dutch Navy,(Holland, where Amsterdam is),are allowed to wear ear ring in uniform? And nobody dislike them. America is beautiful because a free country. Please let us not become a bunch of bigots. Please. I love you, God bless America and their friends.

    Reply
  2. Sailor Gary says:
    June 19, 2006 at 12:09 pm

    As a former sailor for 15 yrs and a disabled vet. I am sickened by the stance of the military on tattoos. This is part of the Naval heritage and I think that with the loss of free will of the sailor goes the loss of pride to be one!! I was more old school than even my close friends in the Navy and bucked authority whenever possible and tried to get a tattoo in every port regardless of the consequence. Proud Sailor

    Reply
  3. ACAN LEE says:
    July 1, 2006 at 12:41 am

    Although I am new to the Navy I have 3 tatoos already soon to be 6. I got all of them with in the 1st year I was in the Navy. I think it is B/S what they are doing to tattoo policy!

    Reply
  4. Rande says:
    August 10, 2006 at 6:28 am

    My husband currently serves in the Navy …he was once a boiler tech now he has gone engineman …he followed regs per his command to get a tattoo on his hand of the boiler tech and the engineman cog …his command said no cuz the boiler tech rate is no longer …even though he still works on boilers …but there are guys on his boat that have tattoos on their necks that are very visible in uniform …this new policy sucks

    Reply
  5. Cody says:
    August 13, 2006 at 2:05 am

    Here is what pisses me off. I am getting marriedthe 17 of august and my brother and fiance and I are a really tight nit group. We all believe in mostly the same things. so as a wedding gift my brother was going to take us out and we were all going to get tattoos. well I go to bootcamp in sept. and so i thought i would be kinda smart and call my recruiter and ask if I should wait and he told me if i got the tatto I would be kicked out of bootcamp and the navy altogether. Now normally I could handle this but the fact that it was to be a wedding gift is like a slap in the fae to me because it was something we all were looking forward to. but hey i guess it will all workout for the better,thats what i keep telling myself anyway
    Still a proud sailor though

    Reply
  6. Chris Miller says:
    December 1, 2006 at 1:27 pm

    I have 10 years in and I have had my tattoos for 20 years now the Navy said I must go because they are dis tastfull They should have told me before I joined

    Reply
  7. matthew says:
    December 20, 2006 at 1:57 am

    I’ve been in the navy for 2 years now. the navy’s stance on tattoo’s have changed so many times that no one really understands them, as well with the higher ups. i’ve gotten many tattoo’s on my biceps and forearms without too many questions… just keep posted on the current regs. work with the chain of command, keep them tasteful and you shall not have any problems if you still wish to get tattoos in the navy.

    Reply
  8. Jeremy Greene says:
    January 8, 2007 at 7:43 pm

    I it seems to me we have our interest in the wrong direction, huh on tattoos in the Navy,there is more issues that are more important. ALL Of my (8)uncles and my-self(CORPSMAN/FMF/8404/DV where in Navy. it is a tradtions„, to many poltics huh… GOD SPEED.….

    Reply
  9. Guido says:
    February 5, 2007 at 12:59 am

    I believe that.…If the tatoo you recieve is not “ANTI” anything then it should be favored within the service that protects us “free” Americans. We are not to be “ANTI” anything but share our love FIRST to the US, THEN the world. If the US has it backwards, well then I am sorry, I will say try to keep the faith in God above who will NOT look at your tatoos, but your heart for an entrance to peace forever. Should we represent? The US gov’t WILL NOT buy you a ticket to heaven for sure. OR, maybe we should start praying in the schools for added support from above??

    Reply
  10. RossGerard says:
    April 4, 2007 at 11:43 am

    By taking away the personal freedom of a tattoo is like taking away your religous rights. Just another example of where or country could head if things don’t change.

    Reply
  11. Gary says:
    April 11, 2007 at 10:28 am

    the thing i hated about being in the Navy is different peoples interpretation of rules and regs. you might be in one command and they be ok with the tattoo you got but when you get to your next command they may see it differently and all hell breaks loose. then your a shitbag and forget about evals. one outstanding sailor can go to shit in a blink of an eye just because someone decides to interpret rules and regs their own way. they were made to do that. there is so much leway that everyone gets confused and nothing but bad comes of it.

    Reply
  12. Trent C says:
    May 10, 2007 at 10:55 am

    The nice thing is, all you have to do is “lose” your medical record, blame it on whichever corpsman did your audio gram or whatever, and now you have been grandfathered in. I did this like three times, both my arms are sleeved and so is one calf, also have a cog on my right hand thumb/ index webbing. Yeah, my chief bitched, but at my next command I just told them I’d had them for years and they dropped it. Hasn’t affected my evals or advancement so far.
    EN2(sw)

    Reply
  13. Bill says:
    May 25, 2007 at 9:16 am

    To all of you who keep talking about God and heaven and tattoos in the same sentences need to reread Leviticus 19:28. “Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you: I am the LORD” KJV.

    Reply
  14. shapell says:
    July 24, 2007 at 7:38 pm

    I just wanted to comment Levitius 19:28 Ye shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor print any marks upon you.
    shall I point out the dead for the dead you shall not make any cuttings …dont do those rituals of man to false gods by marking their bodies by cutting themselves.again i say this is not speaking of tatoo’s.

    Reply
  15. Leviticus says:
    August 24, 2007 at 10:50 am

    I wonder what that Leviticus passage really meant in the original tongue and how it has been distorted by poor translations and interpretations? Maybe someone needs have a coke and a smile and just relax.

    Reply
  16. Rachele says:
    September 24, 2007 at 11:14 am

    i have to say that i was quite apalled to discover that the navy is dening people entry due to tattoos. what does the tattoo have to do with how well you are able to defend our country’s freedom? we need to reevealute why this was made a rule because it has nothing to do with tattoos affecting the ability of our officers to serve it came from ignorance in a time that we are preaching acceptance.

    Reply
  17. Mercy says:
    September 24, 2007 at 8:47 pm

    yeah the Navy is getting tough about tattoos. I was in great lakes for navy boot camp in january and one of the guys in my division got kicked out for having a tattoo on his arm, he was kicked out. the only way he can return is if he covers it up or gets it removed.

    Reply
  18. The BigBunner says:
    December 13, 2007 at 9:42 pm

    Headline: Navy Spells Out Policy on Tattoos, Body Art, Piercings
    I was very disturbed to find my son who really loves the Navy may be being put out because of a minor problem with a ship mate where no one got hurt. But then the Tattoos came into it.
    My son is second generation Navy, he has completed 3 pretty tough schools, and now he is CWIS Tech with a NEC. My son let me know after the first week on his ship that retention and moral was bad and I even witnessed this when I visited the ship on more than one occasion.
    The Navy has spent well over 20,000 to train this young man so I cannot believe tattoos, which were a part of Maritime life for centuries are a good reason to lose this time a money invested.
    I worked as a Gunners mate in and out of the Navy for 16 years I love the Navy as corny as it sounds. I need to hear exactly what happened but this has taken the “wind out of my sails“
    Well as always god bless America and have a fine Navy day

    Reply
  19. Abradix says:
    December 25, 2007 at 8:58 pm

    This policy is about keeping up appearances for the Navy. Like it or not many people associate tattoos with gangs and negative things like that; whether or not they actually have something or that nature incorporated into them. Tattoos are a permanent choice that will affect both you both socially and in the work force, this was something that should’ve been considered before getting one thats always visible or that has something distinctly controversial.

    Reply
  20. RL says:
    May 25, 2008 at 11:47 am

    It all comes down to this: Being in the service is not the same as being a regular person outside the service who has rights and can do whatever they want cause its a free country. When your in the service or trying to get in the service, you now have to follow their rules and regs. And your owned by the government. So, you do what they want and follow what they say like it or not. Remember, the price of freedom is not cheap. This should help clear up some confusion. This is there way of weeding out the bad and getting the good. They have always wanted clean cut individuals. So, they can have a good image with the world. Times have changed though and the government doesn’t follow the times. We all know that. And yes, I served in the Navy and didn’t have any tattoos at the time. I wasn’t against them though. Just didn’t care for them. Now, I have several. And they won’t let me in the reserves. I have an anchor with a skull on my arm and they say that regs state you can’t have any showing. Well, I turned around and walked away in disappointment. They just want the good again. That’s life.

    Reply
  21. JJ121 says:
    June 17, 2008 at 12:36 pm

    I have been in the Navy for eight years, and four years before the in the Army. I myself have four tattoos, two large and two mid size, the only one that can be seen in my summer whites is the Navy tattoo on my arm, and the one on my calf when I wear the PT uniform, (yes we now have a PT uniform blah). I have read most of what you all have written, and I would like to add to it. As a Sailor I have heard time and time and time again how as Sailors we should be proud of the Navy’s history, and our heritage, well like it or not, the Navy also should realize that Tattoo’s are part of our heritage, in the 1800’s Sailors would get tattoo’s to show others where they had been around the world, i.e. a shell back tattoo was to show other sailors that he had crossed the line, an anchor would show that he had sailed the Atlantic. So like it or not the Navy can not and should not choose what part of OUR history and heritage to keep and what to get rid of. Now some of you may disagree with me on this next part, I do agree with the Navy’s policy that no tattoos should be above the neck and on the face, we do have to look somewhat clean cut, and younger kids do look up to us. But for the most part the Navy spends time and money on uniform boards, and sending out surveys to see what we as sailors want, maybe they need to send out a few about the current tattoo policy.
    V/R,
    A fellow shipmate.

    Reply
  22. Hellgate London gold says:
    August 2, 2008 at 3:07 am

    You can be too concerned about the injury and will be bogged down in these, only see weak, you can keep playing their first game mentality, the game itself is in order to play. You wanted to earn Hellgate London gold, you can go to earn, if you want not, you can too. Play game you must be very happy, if you angry, in real life has a lot of experience, so why should their spare time to relax, no one knows how the real you, so you can even have their own game of life, would not mind other people said. I think games like reality, life is your own visited, good or bad, people can not participate in.

    Reply
  23. galatasaray says:
    August 6, 2008 at 4:16 pm

    I think wonderful.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gee, I wonder why? Oh! Maybe it's because the...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It would also help, a LOT to 'limit' excess...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And flush ALL those dollars already spent down the...
      WillyPete
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      My personal experience being on the ground in less...
      shark60
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      it wont make any differance what type...
      Roy M Brown
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Estimates on unit cost for new F-22s are at...
      Armchair Warlord
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage