About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Archive for March, 2003

MORE MILITARY SATELLITES ON THE WAY

Monday, March 31st, 2003

The U.S. mil­i­tary is grow­ing increas­ingly reliant on satel­lites to direct pre­ci­sion bombs, relay sol­diers’ orders, and give a pic­ture of the bat­tle­ground. But such depen­dence is only the begin­ning, the New York Times reports.
12 national-​​security space launches are sched­uled for 2003; only one was con­ducted last year. On March 10, the mil­i­tary launched a $200 mil­lion satel­lite for relay­ing voice and data com­mu­ni­ca­tions. An Air Force GPS satel­lite is set to be sent into the skies later today.

BW WOWED BY MILITARY TECH

Monday, March 31st, 2003

BusinessWeek doing a cover story on “The Doctrine of Digital War?” Cool. BusinessWeek using head­lines like “Point, Click…Fire: Awesome tech­nol­ogy gets a hel­luva field test?” Puh-​​leeze.
Why do hyper-​​skeptical edi­tors sud­denly fall to their knees when mil­i­tary hard­ware is rolled out?
Go read Drew Park’s expose of EDS (in the same issue) instead.

TEN TYPES OF DRONES IN IRAQ

Monday, March 31st, 2003

Turn on the tube, and the only drones you’ll see oper­at­ing in Iraq are the Predators and Global Hawks. But there are at least ten dif­fer­ent types of unmanned planes being used by the U.S. mil­i­tary in Gulf War II, accord­ing to Aviation Week.
Drones listed by the Pentagon included the Army’s Hunter, Pointer and Shadow; the Marine Corps’ Dragon Eye and Pioneer; and the Air Force’s Force Protection Surveillance System, Global Hawk and Predator. The brand-​​new Silver Fox, first reported here, was not men­tioned.
In Afghanistan, only three types of drones were used.
THERE’S MORE: “In the Army of the future, a (3000–5000 per­son) brigade would bring to the bat­tle no less than 200 unmanned air­craft, rang­ing from small platoon-​​class vehi­cles to larger, high-​​endurance air­craft equipped with heat-​​seeking mis­siles,” accord­ing to National Defense magazine.

U.S. MILITARY BANS REPORTERS’ SATELLITE PHONES

Monday, March 31st, 2003

U.S. Central Command has told reporters embed­ded with mil­i­tary units in Iraq to shut off their Thuraya satel­lite phones, Reuters says. The phones could be used to zero in on where troops are — they’re equipped with GPS, and have a location-​​finding sys­tem that’s accu­rate to 100 meters. Phones from Thuraya’s military-​​backed rival, Iridium, aren’t as pre­cise.
(via /​.)

AL JAZEERA HACKERS: LAME

Monday, March 31st, 2003

The hack­ing of al Jazeera’s web­site has many Defense Tech read­ers won­der­ing: “Is this (the work of) a new breed of patri­otic, nation­al­is­tic hacker? Or is some ten­u­ous pro­pa­ganda arm of our own gov­ern­ment involved?“
Neither. It’s a cry for atten­tion by a cou­ple of no-​​skills “script kid­dies” try­ing to show off to their sunken-​​chested pals.
“Every time there is a polit­i­cal tar­get of oppor­tu­nity, some kid­die will use it as jus­ti­fi­ca­tion for a (web­site) deface­ment or DOS (denial-​​of-​​service attack),” secu­rity researcher Robert Ferrell tells Wired News’ Michelle Delio.
“This kind of thing goes on con­stantly. The only rea­son it’s news at all is because…we hap­pen to be at war with Iraq,” he adds. “Al-​​Jazeera may be a major news ser­vice, but a web­site is a web­site, whether it belongs to Billy Bob or Time Warner. Knocking one off the Internet isn’t a dif­fi­cult propo­si­tion.“
But it’s a crime, nonethe­less. Last year, 18 year-​​old Robert Lyttle defaced dozens of gov­ern­ment web­sites, sup­pos­edly to show how easy it would be for ter­ror­ists to gain access to our national elec­tronic infra­struc­ture. The gov­ern­ment thanked him with an FBI raid and a house arrest.
At the time, vet­eran hacker Oxblood Ruffin called Lyttle and his part­ner “pim­ply nitwits from the ‘burbs out look­ing for some rep.“
He added, “It’s just this kind of stu­pid­ity that gives hack­ing a bad name.”

AFTER-​​SCHOOL BEERS BECAME BATTLE PLAN FOR IRAQ

Friday, March 28th, 2003

The U.S. military’s bat­tle plan for Iraq began as “a what-​​if ses­sion over beers among a hand­ful of Army majors nearly 17 months ago,” the National Journal reports in a must-​​read article.

They were all stu­dents at the Army’s School for Advanced Military Studies, known col­lo­qui­ally as SAMS, at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., where the Army’s most promis­ing plan­ners take a grad­u­ate course in strate­gic cam­paigns. The young majors brain­stormed about a march on Baghdad to dis­pose of Saddam Hussein. In its ear­li­est ver­sions, the plan envi­sioned a 125-​​day cam­paign by a U.S. force nearly twice the size of that now in Iraq.
Maj. Kevin Marcus, a SAMS grad­u­ate now attached to V Corps head­quar­ters, helped develop the plan from a back-​​of-​​an-​​envelope exer­cise into a PowerPoint pre­sen­ta­tion that within days of being fin­ished ended up on the desk of the pres­i­dent of the United States. Though any mil­i­tary cam­paign plan of the size of Iraqi Freedom has many mid­wivesand for this one, they include Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld him­self, who prod­ded plan­ners to think out­side the box]Marcus saw it develop from infancy to fruition.
From the very begin­ning, he says, the need to syn­chro­nize a rapid, combined-​​arms cam­paign to seize the ini­tia­tive with “shock and awe“roughly the modern-​​day equiv­a­lent of armored blitzkrieg war­fare­oleapt out at plan­ners deter­mined to limit the oppor­tu­nity for Iraqi forces to employ chem­i­cal weapons, wreak envi­ron­men­tal havoc, or orga­nize a coor­di­nated defense. In bull­fighter par­lance, they wanted to go for a quick kill before the bull learned the trick of the cape…


Changes to Marcus’ plan may have under­mined its effec­tive­ness, how­ever.

Right up until the launch of the war, the plan kept chang­ing… Just days before the war began, U.S. com­man­ders had also seri­ously con­sid­ered chang­ing the bat­tle plan to allow for a strate­gic pause at the key south­ern cross­roads city of An Nasiriya. Such a pause would give U.S. forces time to accept the expected sur­ren­der of the 11th Division of the reg­u­lar Iraqi army that defends that city, and give Republican Guard forces near Baghdad an oppor­tu­nity to capit­u­late as well. The plan was dropped at the last minute…
By far the most dra­matic and dis­rup­tive change to the bat­tle plan, how­ever, was Rumsfeld’s deci­sion last November to slash Central Command’s request for forces. This sin­gle deci­sion essen­tially cut the size of the antic­i­pated assault force in half in the final stages of plan­ning, and it had a rip­ple effect on Central Command and Army plan­ning that con­tin­ues to color oper­a­tions to this day.
Notably, the Pentagon scrapped the Time Phased Force Deployment Data, or “TipFid,” by which regional com­man­ders would iden­tify forces needed for a spe­cific cam­paign, and the indi­vid­ual armed ser­vices would man­age their deploy­ments by order of pri­or­ity. The result has meant that even as Central Command chief Gen. Tommy Franks was launch­ing the war, forces iden­ti­fied for the fight con­tin­ued to pour off ships in Kuwait, and not nec­es­sar­ily in the order of first priority.

BUNKER BUSTERS ON BAGHDAD

Friday, March 28th, 2003

For the first time in Gulf War II, the U.S. Air Force has hit down­town Baghdad with “bunker bust­ing” bombs. A B-​​2 stealth bomber dropped two of the 4,700-pound, satellite-​​guided GBU-​​28 muni­tions on a major com­mu­ni­ca­tions tower on the east bank of Tigris River, accord­ing to Ha’Aretz.
The bunker-​​busters were parts of mas­sive coali­tion bomb­ing effort last night. Combat air­craft dropped bombs “just about as fast as we can load them,” Capt. Thomas Parker, aboard the USS Kitty Hawk in the Persian Gulf, told the paper.

DRONES NOT REALLY “UNMANNED”

Friday, March 28th, 2003

Just because they’re called “unmanned aer­ial vehi­cles” doesn’t mean they don’t have a crew. StrategyPage looks at the assign­ments for the three-​​person team assigned to oper­ate the Predator drone.

IRAQIS CAPTURE BRITISH DRONE

Friday, March 28th, 2003

The Iraqi troops claim to have shot down and cap­tured a British Army Phoenix drone near Basra, accord­ing to Jane’s Defence Weekly.
The truck-​​launched, 5.5 meter wide Phoenix unmanned planes have been used for nearly five years as recon­nais­sance planes; they put in over 2,000 hours of flights over Kosovo.
But in Gulf War II, the drones took on a new mis­sion: to iden­tify tar­gets for British artillery, like the AS90 155mm self-​​propelled how­itzer and Multiple Launch Rocket System.
Unlike the Afghan con­flict, we haven’t heard much about drones get­ting shot down in Gulf War II. Why not? My guess is that the slow, steady bomb­ing of Iraqi anti-​​aircraft posi­tions in the months lead­ing up to ground com­bat have given unmanned planes like the Predator unfet­tered access to the skies. And, of course, the Iraqis have tens of thou­sands of sol­diers on the ground to worry about. Maybe they can’t be both­ered with a few robots in the air.

AIR FORCE PROGRAM MAY LET PILOTS SEE IN SANDSTORMS

Thursday, March 27th, 2003

Nature accom­plished ear­lier this week what Iraq’s Republican Guard could not: Blinding sand­storms par­a­lyzed the American air cam­paign, ground­ing heli­copters and cut­ting bomb­ing runs by as much as 85 per­cent in some areas.
But there’s an Air Force pro­gram in the works that may enable pilots to plow through just about any foe — even an Iraqi sand­storm.
The solu­tion is an onboard com­puter that dig­i­tally ren­ders the pilots’ sur­round­ings when they can’t rely on the real one to guide them. It’s called “syn­thetic vision,” and its back­ers are promis­ing that the sys­tem will let pilots see in nasty weather, just like night-​​vision gog­gles let troop­ers roam around in the dark.
Read all about it in my lat­est Wired News story.
THERE’S MORE: An Air Force source believes that syn­thetic vision will be used more for drones than for manned air­craft. Seeing through a UAV’s eyes is already tough; using them in a sand­storm is pretty much impos­si­ble. But oper­at­ing a UAV while look­ing at a ren­dered world? That could work.