About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Archive for April, 2003

DEFENSE TECH ON AIR

Wednesday, April 30th, 2003

For the first time in its 60-​​year his­tory, the University of California’s $2.2 bil­lion con­tract with the gov­ern­ment to run Los Alamos National Laboratory will be put up for com­pet­i­tive bid.
Tomorrow’s Wired News will have my take on this devel­op­ment. But before then, you can hear me blab about Los Alamos on Los Angeles’ KNX radio tonight. Thursday morn­ing, I’ll be a guest on Future Tense, a National Public Radio/​Public Radio International show.
For past Defense Tech cov­er­age of the series of scan­dals at the world’s most impor­tant nuclear lab, click here.

COPS STILL DON’T HAVE GOOD TERROR “WATCH LISTS”

Wednesday, April 30th, 2003

The 9/​11 hijack­ers were allowed to get into the coun­try, and get on planes, because var­i­ous fed­eral agen­cies didn’t share their watch lists — their reg­is­ters of ter­ror­ist sus­pects.
But 20 months after the 9/​11 attacks, ABC News reports, “the U.S. gov­ern­ment still lacks a con­sol­i­dated ter­ror­ism watch list that is eas­ily acces­si­ble to all law enforce­ment.

Nine dif­fer­ent fed­eral agen­cies run at least 12 dif­fer­ent watch lists, and frus­trated local police fear the same sort of infor­ma­tion break­down could hap­pen again.
“I truly believe that we are not get­ting the infor­ma­tion that’s needed to pro­tect our com­mu­nity mem­bers,” said Michael Chitwood, the police chief in Portland, Maine, one of the nation’s busiest sea­ports and the place where Mohamed Atta and another 9/​11 hijacker boarded a plane to attack the World Trade Center.
“It’s out­ra­geous. It does not make any sense.” 

U.S. TROOPS FIRE ON IRAQI PROTESTERS — IS THIS THE ONLY WAY?

Wednesday, April 30th, 2003

U.S. troops have once again fired on pro­test­ers in the Iraqi city of Fallujah, the Associated Press reports. In less than 48 hours, at least 15 Iraqi civil­ians have been killed.
Is this the only way to do crowd con­trol? A recent Tech Central Station arti­cle of mine looks at high-​​tech police aids that might help save lives.

PORN SAVES FILE-​​SHARING NETS

Wednesday, April 30th, 2003

It has noth­ing to do with mil­i­tary tech­nol­ogy. But my lat­est Wired News arti­cle does deal with two of the day’s most weighty issues: online music and porn.

By most accounts, Apple’s new iTunes music down­load ser­vice is pretty cool — the first legit­i­mate alter­na­tive to the song swap­ping on Kazaa, Morpheus and other file-​​trading ser­vices.
But Apple’s move won’t slow down the manic expan­sion of these trad­ing net­works. Why not?
Here’s a one-​​word answer: porn.
Kazaa and com­pany are increas­ingly traf­fick­ing in dirty video clips. And until Apple starts offer­ing up Christy Canyon down­loads, the swap­ping ser­vices can sleep easy.

E.P.A. CONCENTRATING ON TERROR

Tuesday, April 29th, 2003

You’d think that the Environmental Protection Agency’s inves­ti­ga­tors would con­cen­trate on crimes against Mother Nature. But you’d be wrong.
Since 9/​11, the 220 sleuths in the Agency’s crim­i­nal divi­sion have focused on counter-​​terror efforts, the New York Times reports, and shied away from envi­ron­men­tal inquiries.
“They have dropped the ‘E’ in the E.P.A. and have become just a pro­tec­tion agency,” one gov­ern­ment watch­dog told the paper.
According to the Times, “annual crim­i­nal refer­rals made by the envi­ron­men­tal agency to the Justice Department had dropped about 30 per­cent, from 481 in 2000 to 341 in 2002.”

THOUSANDS OF LOS ALAMOS COMPUTERS M.I.A.

Tuesday, April 29th, 2003

Los Alamos National Laboratory hasn’t kept track of thou­sands of its com­put­ers — includ­ing ones con­tain­ing clas­si­fied infor­ma­tion. The lab’s own guards stole four of the machines. And employ­ees didn’t have to pay the gov­ern­ment back when their lap­tops sud­denly went miss­ing.
Those are just a few of the con­clu­sions of a dis­turb­ing report from the Department of Energy’s Inspector General, who has been exam­in­ing how the world’s best-​​known nuclear lab han­dles its inven­tory of lap­top and desk­top PCs. The University of California oper­ates Los Alamos on the Energy Department’s behalf.
As Defense Tech read­ers know, Los Alamos has been involved for months in a series of scan­dals involv­ing nod-​​off man­age­ment and droopy-​​eyed secu­rity. This lat­est report offers more evi­dence for just how nar­colep­tic lab offi­cials have been.
Many lap­top com­put­ers that couldn’t be found were sim­ply “written-​​off,” with­out a for­mal inquiry. One was used for clas­si­fied work, with­out proper approval. And 762 com­put­ers bought with gov­ern­ment credit cards didn’t receive “prop­erty num­bers,” which are required to track all “sen­si­tive items” at the lab.
To Project on Government Oversight’s Peter Stockton, a long­time lab critic, this report gives fur­ther evi­dence that “these char­ac­ters run­ning the lab are out of con­trol.“
Stockton’s watch­dog group today sent a let­ter to Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham, ask­ing him to put the $2 billion-​​per-​​year Los Alamos up for bid now, instead of wait­ing until 2005, when the agree­ment runs out.
On Thursday, the House Energy Committee will hold the last of three hear­ings into the lab’s man­age­ment. Witnesses will include Energy Department Inspector General Gregory Friedman and University of California pres­i­dent Richard Atkinson.

ANTHRAX SUSPECTED IN EGYPTIAN SAILOR’S DEATH

Tuesday, April 29th, 2003

An Egyptian sailor has died in north­ern Brazil — and anthrax is sus­pected in his death.
Details are sketchy in this case. But accord­ing to wire reports, the man, Ibrahim Saved Soliman Ibrahim, had trav­eled from Cairo to the Amazon state of Para about two and a half weeks ago. There he was to meet a ship, des­tined for a smelter on the Saguenay River in Quebec. But before he could get on board, Ibrahim died in his hotel room, after vom­it­ing, inter­nal bleed­ing and mul­ti­ple organ fail­ure.
A spokesman for Brazilian police said that anthrax was respon­si­ble for the death. Ibrahim was given a suit­case in Cairo by an uniden­ti­fied per­son and was due to deliver it to some­body in Canada, accord­ing to the spokesman. But he fell ill after open­ing the case.
Canadian author­i­ties now have the ship in quar­an­tine, 1,000 meters off the Nova Scotian port of Halifax. But they’re not con­vinced that anthrax is to blame for the sailor’s death.
“I can assure you we’ve dis­cov­ered no threat to Canada, crim­i­nally or terrorism-​​wise,” a Canadian inspec­tor in Halifax told Canada Press. “Right now it’s just a story.“
Health Canada offi­cials are expect­ing defin­i­tive test results on sam­ples taken from the ship “early this week.“
For back­ground infor­ma­tion on anthrax, click here.
THERE’S MORE: Now Brazilian health offi­cials are say­ing that what­ever killed the sailor, “it is not anthrax.”

SUPERFAST MISSILE FOR FUTURE SADDAMS

Monday, April 28th, 2003

If the reports are right, two U.S. strikes dur­ing Gulf War II missed Saddam by min­utes.
So it’s no won­der that AFP is report­ing a new Pentagon push for a faster ver­sion of the Tomahawk mis­sile — one that can go as much as 12 times the speed of sound.
The Defense Department is ask­ing for an extra $150 mil­lion in research funds for this so-​​called “Fasthawk.“
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense Michael Wynne told a Senate sub­com­mit­tee recently that “we believe that demon­stra­tions of Mach 12 by 2012 are within reach.”

MORE CONFUSION OVER IRAQ CHEMICALS

Monday, April 28th, 2003

It’s hap­pen­ing again. A chem­i­cal cache first touted as pos­si­ble “smok­ing gun” evi­dence for Saddam’s WMD pro­grams is now being called into ques­tion.
“Initial tests indi­cated the pres­ence of the deadly nerve agent cyclosarin and an unspec­i­fied blis­ter agent in a stash of 55-​​gallon drums, about 130 miles north of Baghdad,” says CNN.
But a later test on the mate­r­ial turned out neg­a­tive. Now, the chem­i­cals are being flown back to the U.S. for defin­i­tive exams.
Why the con­flict­ing answers? A recent Tech Central Station story of mine has the answers.

NIXING NUKES IN NAM: A LOOK BACK

Monday, April 28th, 2003

The Bush Administration is begin­ning to build a new arse­nal of “tac­ti­cal” nuclear weapons — small Bombs, used in dis­creet areas, like under­ground biochem labs. So it’s help­ful to look at another time when such weapons were also being con­sid­ered. This month’s Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has such a view.

As the Vietnam War esca­lated in spring 1966, a high-​​ranking Pentagon offi­cial with access to President Lyndon Johnson was heard by sci­en­tist Freeman Dyson to say, “It might be a good idea to toss in a nuke from time to time, just to keep the other side guess­ing.”


So Dyson and a hand­ful of other sci­en­tists con­ducted a study to see just how effec­tive tac­ti­cal nukes would be. Their con­clu­sion:

It would take 3,000 tac­ti­cal nuclear weapons (TNW) per year to inter­dict sup­ply routes like the Ho Chi Minh trail. More prob­lem­at­i­cally, U.S. forces might become vul­ner­a­ble to a Soviet-​​orchestrated coun­ter­at­tack; and the first use of tac­ti­cal nuclear weapons against guer­ril­las might set a prece­dent that would lead to use of sim­i­lar weapons by guer­ril­las against U.S. targets.


Read the rest of the story here. (There’s also a funny wrap-​​up of reac­tions to my February excur­sion to Los Alamos. I’ll link to the arti­cle once it comes on-​​line.)
THERE’S MORE: One Defense Tech reader isn’t buy­ing the study. “If there was one thing the Johnson Administration was good at, it was throw­ing out wild num­bers to jus­tify a point of view,” he writes. “Dyson’s num­bers are inflated.”