DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Retro-Futuro » WORLD WAR II FOLLY: BRITS’ ICEBERG SHIPS

WORLD WAR II FOLLY: BRITS’ ICEBERG SHIPS

As the Allies pre­pared to invade occu­pied Europe in 1942, a truly nutty idea swept through the British mil­i­tary hier­ar­chy: build giant air­craft car­ri­ers made of ice.
The ships could be made cheaply, they fig­ured. And, maybe, they could be con­structed tough enough to with­stand bul­lets and tor­pe­does.
With Churchill’s bless­ing, Lord Louis Mountbatten, Chief of Combined Operations, began the task of devel­op­ing “berg-​​ships” up to 4,000 feet long, 600 feet wide and 130 feet in depth.
His task seemed to get eas­ier when, in early 1943, “two American pro­fes­sors dis­cov­ered that a very tough mate­r­ial could be pro­duced by adding a small amount of wood pulp to water before freez­ing. They called this mate­r­ial pykrete, in hon­our of (Mountbatten’s sci­en­tific advi­sor) Geoffrey Pyke,” Combinedrops​.com says.

Lord Mountbatten had a block of pykrete pre­pared by a Canadian engi­neer­ing com­pany, and took this block to the Quebec Conference in the fall of 1943. As it appeared that “Habbakuk” would run into sup­ply and tech­ni­cal prob­lems, not to men­tion the high costs ($100 mil­lion for the first ship), it was Mountbattens aim to get the Americans to take over the project. It is reported that he fired a revolver at the pykrete block dur­ing a cof­fee break, and the bul­let bounced off and struck one of the senior offi­cers who were present — thank­fully with­out seri­ous injury!


Defense Tech Dad Tom Shachtman wrote about this folly in Laboratory Warriors : How Allied Science and Technology Tipped the Balance in World War II (out now in paper­back). Take it away, Pop:

To my mind, the major inter­est of the story of this absurd enter­prise is how far it went before the bub­ble was burst. This was a loony idea all along, and its premise was eas­ily refuted by sci­ence and even eas­ier by math­e­mat­ics — you just had to com­pute how much of the stuff would be needed to make a float­ing air­field, plug in a few fig­ures about the out­put of wood from Canadian forests, and real­ize that it would take the entire country’s forests to make one field.
But because the idea had pow­er­ful patrons, Churchill and Mountbatten, who were not sci­en­tists but politi­cians whose author­ity could direct the spend­ing of mil­lions of tax­payer dol­lars, mil­lions of dol­lars were spent on it. It reminds us that Star Wars is not the only science-​​fiction fan­tasy to enchant the mind of a leader of the Western world. 


(via Boing Boing)
THERE’S MORE: Defense Tech buddy Wyatt Earp points us to great pic­tures and dia­grams of the berg-​​ships here and to a longer essay on the sub­ject here.
AND MORE: Another Defense Tech pal says Mountbatten’s effort wasn’t “really the folly that it seems.“

The coast guard long ago gave up try­ing to destroy ice­bergs and they are sim­ple fresh water bergs, not pykrete. Given the other advances dreamt up by the British that made carrier-​​based jet avi­a­tion prac­ti­cal (and safer) like the angled flight deck and steam cat­a­pults it’s not nec­es­sar­ily some­thing to be dis­missed out of hand. RULCCs (REALLY Ultra Large Crude Carriers) made of ice just might turn out to be struc­turally stronger and more dam­age resis­tant than the cur­rent crop of aging ULCCs rust­ing their way along the sea­ways today. Toss in built-​​in obso­les­cence and easy recycling…

Share |

June 6th, 2003 | Retro-Futuro | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « RIDGE: TERROR ALERT SYSTEM NEEDS FIXING | DOUBTS ON IRAQI BIOTRAILERS » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage