DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Los Alamos and Labs » PLUTONIUM MISSING FROM LOS ALAMOS

PLUTONIUM MISSING FROM LOS ALAMOS

A container with about 2 grams of weapons-grade plutonium is missing from Los Alamos National Laboratory, the watchdog group Project On Government Oversight (POGO) reports.
It’s not nearly enough plutonium to make a bomb, POGO senior investigator Peter Stockton says. And far larger radioactive caches have disappeared in the past; in 1990, for example, investigators found 62 pounds worth of plutonium stuck in the air ducts of the Energy Department’s now-closed Rocky Flats facility.
But even this small amount is more than enough to generate serious concerns about how the troubled lab accounts for its nuclear material.
According to a POGO press release:

The plutonium has been missing since 2001, but was only reported last week to Department of Energy (DOE) headquarters officials responsible for overseeing the Lab. DOE requires that any missing weapons-grade nuclear material a half-gram or more be reported.
The fact that the missing material was not reported is a violation of department policy and raises serious questions about the level of confidence in the DOEs Material Control and Accountability system that tracks hundreds of tons of weapons grade nuclear material.
A former DOE official advised POGO that even these small quantities of missing plutonium are a potential threat to public health and safety and are taken very seriously. DOE headquarters normally dispatches a “tiger team” from headquarters to investigate what happened to the material and who was responsible. In fact, in the past when quantities even as small as a half-gram of missing nuclear material was reported missing from other Lab facilities, investigators have conducted detailed searches of buildings and even dug up trash heaps, the former official said.


In a statement, Los Alamos officials say that the material was found last week, and not in 2001, as POGO claims; that the plutonium mixture is not all that dangerous; and that all DOE reporting requirements were observed.
“This material has scientific and analytical research value, but is in a low hazard and threat category,” Los Alamos Director George “Pete” Nanos says.
The samples, nuclear material mixed with other inert elements, were stored in glass vials, according to the Lab’s statement. They were part of ongoing experiments on how to best store nuclear waste.
The vials were thrown out properly, Los Alamos contends — put in transuranic waste drums. But the samples weren’t Labeled right, and got mixed up in the Lab’s databases.
THERE’S MORE: Even non-weapons grade plutonium 239 can be a danger, a recent General Accounting Office report concludes:

If these sealed sources fell into the hands of terrorists, they could use them to produce a simple and crude, but potentially dangerous, weapon by packaging explosives, such as dynamite, with the radioactive material, which would be dispersed when the bomb went off…
Depending on the type, amount, and form (powder or solid), the dispersed radioactive material could cause radiation sickness for people nearby and produce serious economic costs and psychological and social disruption associated with the evacuation and subsequent cleanup of the contaminated area.

Share |

June 18th, 2003 | Los Alamos and Labs | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « NORTH KOREA’S SWISS CHEESE BLOCKADE | MISSILE DEFENSE TEST AT SEA FAILS » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      One means of defeating an enemy is to cripple...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      No–but is it necessary for the projected cost per...
      BILL D
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      One fighter for everyone failed once before. However, it may be...
      Cortland
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Iagree that the stealth capabilities of the F22&F35...
      Chops
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Why would the Marines buy A-10s? They are a great...
      chaos0xomega
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      I agree-I noted in other comments that the f16 &f15...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You just keep it up there, you've shown your contempt...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      At a price of 135mil. ea our suspected future enemies...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      The rest of the world must be laughing their asses off...
      BILL D
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Got a program question for you Mac. What is the definition...
      TMB
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage