DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » SPEED KILLS, MILITARY WANTS MORE

SPEED KILLS, MILITARY WANTS MORE

550 miles per hour is too slow. And a 1,500-mile range just isn’t big enough.
The Tomahawk cruise mis­sile may seem fast and far-​​reaching. But Pentagon plan­ners want more. Late last week, they handed out con­tracts to 10 firms to start design­ing a hyper­sonic mis­sile that can out­run the now-​​retired Concorde, and can hit a ter­ror­ist nest in Europe from the East Coast.
The Falcon, or Force Application and Launch from the Continental United States, project aims to fire a bunker-​​busting bomb into near-​​space, and then send it crash­ing into a tar­get more than 3,000 miles away, at four times the speed of sound.
Speed is becom­ing an increas­ingly cru­cial com­po­nent of how American forces fight. In the Gulf War, it took days for the U.S. mil­i­tary to iden­tify a tar­get and put a bomb on it. In recent engage­ments in Afghanistan and Iraq, that process was cut to as lit­tle as 20 min­utes, in some cases.
But this quick response only hap­pens when there are bombers and cruise mis­siles in the imme­di­ate neigh­bor­hood. If U.S. forces receive a tip that ter­ror­ists are in a part of the world where they don’t have American planes in the sky, it can take hours, or days, to act on that infor­ma­tion.
With its pro­posed speed and range, the Falcon project — co-​​sponsored by the Air Force and Darpa, the Pentagon’s research arm — aims to make just about the whole world a dan­ger­ous place to be a bad guy.
“When Osama’s bad brother Larry shows up sud­denly in Niger, this is some­thing we can tar­get him with imme­di­ately,” said Daniel Goure, a mil­i­tary ana­lyst at the Lexington Institute, a think tank in Arlington, Virginia.
My Wired News arti­cle has details on the Falcon effort.
THERE’S MORE: A German mis­sile sys­tems com­pany, Lenkflugkrpersysteme, “has for the first time con­ducted a test fir­ing of a hyper­sonic mis­sile sur­pass­ing Mach 7,” says Jane’s International Defence Review. “But the fir­ing, on 23 October at Germany’s Meppen prov­ing range, may be the last in LFK’s hyper­sonic mis­sile devel­op­ment pro­gram now that the German defense min­istry has with­drawn all fund­ing as of January 2004, the company’s new tech­nolo­gies and stud­ies chief engi­neer Peter Gleich has told IDR.” An LFK press release about the event is here.
AND MORE: In the 60’s, Defense Tech pal Jim Lewis notes, the U.S. built a drone that could go Mach 3 — and even flew it over China a few times.
AND MORE: Air Force fore­cast­ers pre­dict that by 2015, America’s foes will be able to keep most U.S. planes 250–300 nau­ti­cal miles away. That’s one of the rea­sons that Air Force is so keen on Falcon, accord­ing to a recent Inside the Air Force report.

Share |

November 20th, 2003 | Missiles | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « WILL AGGRO TACTICS IN IRAQ WORK? | FBI USED ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE TO SNOOP » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No, I am not a muslim. And no, the Koran does not say anything about...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You aren't. You're just annoying. Like a paper cut between...
      bdwilcox
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      Zandor, Don't you have to go play in traffic or play...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Welcome to paralysis induced by political correctness.
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It's too bad a brave soul like you wasn't in that room....
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Zandor, You're obviously and expert on religion and religious...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Cannon, please stop bringing relevant facts and arguments into this. The...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage