Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.
Tip for Defense Tech?
SEND IT!
It’s Confidential!
|
Home » Archives for December 2003
Archive for December, 2003
Monday, December 29th, 2003
Defense Tech will be back next Monday.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Tuesday, December 23rd, 2003
The current “orange alert” appears to be more than scaremongering.
“Unlike past elevations of the terrorism threat level, the decision to raise the alert to orange this time was unanimous and decisive, because it was based on what senior Bush administration officials described as the most alarming, credible and specific information they had ever seen,” reports the Los Angeles Times.
“I have never seen the national security leadership as tense and anxious as they are right now,” a senior federal law enforcement official tells the paper.
The threat is thought to be in the skies.
“According to data received as recently as Monday, officials remain primarily concerned about Al Qaeda operatives plotting to hijack passenger and cargo planes and fly them into U.S. targets,” the Times says.
CNN notes that, because of the alert, the Pentagon his holding a “continuity-of-government” exercise today — a drill to make sure the government can keep operating in the face of disaster.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Tuesday, December 23rd, 2003
Maybe the U.S. military has been too focused on drones, Army leaders are now saying.
During the past two years, “our work has been very ‘unmanned-centric,’” John Davis, chief of advanced aviation design at the Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, tells National Defense magazine. “Within the last few months, I think we have been really trying to evolve back into a balance between the manned and the unmanned systems.“
“Perhaps the pendulum swung too far in favor of unmanned systems,” Maj. Gen. Joseph Bergantz adds.
Specifically, Davis and Bergantz want to reinvigorate the Army’s helicopter programs. That’s sure to draw fire from some critics, who think big parts of the Army’s rotorcraft fleet (like the Apache helicopter) should be scrapped.
OR TOO FEW? “The Pentagon plans to aggressively expand its inventory of tactical and smaller UAVs, Dyke Weatherington, a Defense Department official in charge of unmanned systems, tells Aviation Week. The number of tactical-class UAVs is likely to grow from fewer than 200 to more than 500 in the next several years, with annual spending on unmanned aircraft likely to reach $3–4 billion. In the small-UAV category, the Pentagon has already begun increasing its inventory, with recent orders for around 1,700 such vehicles, he said. They include the Army’s and Air Force’s Raven, the Marine Corps’ Dragon Eye and USAF’s Desert Hawk.“
Strategy Page notes that “While the RQ-4A Global Hawk UAV flew only four percent of the recon missions during the Iraq campaign, it located 55 percent of the time sensitive targets.” Why? Because the Hawk has bigger, more sensitive sensors than other drones. And it can linger in the air for much, much longer.
Posted in Drones | Comments Off
Monday, December 22nd, 2003
“Los Alamos National Laboratory employees and managers have been placed on paid investigative leave as a result of security problems that surfaced at the lab earlier this month,” Internet Week reports.
“The trouble stems from missing storage devices, which may or may not have been properly destroyed. Officials said earlier this month that they can’t account for a high-capacity disk and nine diskettes used at the lab.“
Notra Trulock, the Energy Department’s former intelligence director, has background on Los Alamos’ computer security woes.
Posted in Los Alamos and Labs | Comments Off
Monday, December 22nd, 2003
The Pakistani government was the Taliban’s best friend. And they sold nuclear weapons technology to Iran and North Korea.
So tell me again: why is the Bush administration — so worried about weapons of mass destruction, and so concerned about coddlers of Al-Qaeda — now cozy with Pakistan?
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Monday, December 22nd, 2003
Citizens of Patuxent River, Maryland, do not be alarmed. When you see a flying saucer overhead sometime in 2007, it will not be a sign of alien attack.
Instead, the strange craft in the skies will mean that the Russians are finally here — with a little help from the U.S. Navy.
For more than two decades, engineers at a former Soviet aerospace plant have been toiling on a drone aircraft that looks a whole lot like a prop from Plan 9 From Outer Space. But financial woes have frozen progress on the pita-bread-shaped, stubby-winged, wheel-less, unmanned ship, dubbed the Ekip (short for ecology and progress).
Momentum on the project may pick up again soon, however. After an introduction from an American congressman, the Ekip’s designers at the Saratov Aviation Plant have a new partner: the U.S. Naval Air Systems Command, or NAVAIR, which has agreed to join in the development of the unorthodox drone over the next several years. Test flights are tentatively scheduled for 2007 at Webster Field, near Patuxent River.
My Wired News story has more — including some of the oddest of the odd-ball attempts at real-world flying saucers since World War II.
THERE’S MORE: A great discussion of flying saucers, real and imagined, is going on now at /.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Sunday, December 21st, 2003
I’ll be on BBC Radio’s “Up All Night” at 9:15 pm eastern time tonight, talking about real-life flying saucers.
Last week, I spoke with NPR’s “Future Tense” about non-lethal weapons. You can hear me stumble through that interview here.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Sunday, December 21st, 2003
Here’s your Sunday round-up:
– Time has made a great pick for its 2003 “Person of the Year”: the American soldier.
– New-fangled Stryker armored vehicles and satellite-guided JDAM bombs are among the advanced weaponry that the U.S. military has brought to South Korea, the L.A. Times reports.
– Employers and parents are increasingly using the GPS chips in cell phones to keep tabs on their workers and kids, notes the New York Times.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Saturday, December 20th, 2003
A slew of new technologies may give the American military non-lethal ways to slow down terror incursions in Iraq: A fast-hardening foam could render munitions stockpiles useless; a portable netting system could stop vehicles in their tracks; and a microwave-like “pain ray” could scatter a crowd without a drop of blood being spilled.
But there are still a number of technical and bureaucratic hurdles these systems have to leap before they make it into Iraq. The foam and the netting have to go through the long, hard slog that is the Pentagon’s buying chain. The pain-ray delivery system must be shrunk down to fit on the back of a Humvee. And, oh yeah, military researchers want to make sure it doesn’t cause cancer or anything, either.
Today, U.S. forces do have a few non-lethal weapons–devices that are designed to hurt, not to kill–in their arsenal. Some of these have been distributed to Iraq, including electricity-firing tasers, rubber bullets and old-fashioned riot batons.
But “the state of the art for non-lethal is primitive,” said Charles “Sid” Heal, an authority on non-lethal weapons who is a commander in the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. “There’s nothing out there with what the military considers sufficient range providing adequate protection against a lethal countermeasure.” Rubber bullets, flash-bang grenades and other non-lethal weapons travel only a few hundred feet.
But the pain ray being developed by the Air Force Research Laboratory, with a reported range of more than 700 yards, could make the grade. Officially designated the Active Denial System, the system fires millimeter-wave electromagnetic energy–like microwaves but in a different bandwidth. Penetrating just a 64th of inch beneath the skin, the waves feel “like a hot iron on you,” Heal said.
The burning sensation is bad enough that people have to run away from them, quick. And that causes mobs to break up in a hurry. It’s no wonder, then, why Heal calls the ray the “Holy Grail of crowd control.“
My Chicago Tribune article has details.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
Friday, December 19th, 2003
Jeremy Botter says he’s a medic in the 1st Squadron, 10th U.S. Cavalry — one of the groups in the 4th Infantry Division that helped catpure Saddam Hussein.
In his weblog, Botter promises a first-hand, blow-by-blow of “Operation Red Dawn,” the mission that got Saddam. Today, he has up a fascinating backgrounder on the events leading up to the raid. Stay tuned.
Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off
|
|
Recent Comments
Part IV : …………...
freefallingbomb
Part III : …………...
freefallingbomb
Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
freefallingbomb
To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
freefallingbomb
Good observations about drones. The real potential of laser...
Will
The most simple thing is have 2 basic issued uniforms....
Big Daddy
Valid observation, Charles. This is all so new that it's hard...
Will
Part III : But, as I said in a previous comment, I...
freefallingbomb
Part II : The Bushmaster's machine-cannon...
freefallingbomb
Part I : Why doesn't this article, or even...
freefallingbomb