DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » BLIMPBALL IN NAVY TESTS

BLIMPBALL IN NAVY TESTS

CyberAerospacePhotos781.jpgThey may look a litle silly — like giant vol­ley­balls, kinda. But the Navy thinks that big, round blimps may just be the key to spy­ing on ter­ror­ist camps, and com­mu­ni­cat­ing with its sailors.
As we’ve men­tioned before, the U.S. mil­i­tary has been on a bit of an air­ship kick, lately. That’s because the helium-​​filled, lighter-​​than-​​air craft can stay in the skies a whole lot longer than fuel-​​eating jets. And that means the blimps could work as float­ing cell tow­ers or obser­va­tion posts.
Round air­ships have some advan­tages over their cigar-​​shaped cousins, said Hokan Colting, who designed the SA-​​60 spher­i­cal blimp for the Navy.

“It’s more maneu­ver­able than a tra­di­tional air­ship,” Colting told Aerospace Daily. “It’s amphibi­ous, it can land and take off from water. And it can go to high alti­tudes. Traditional, cigar-​​shaped air­ships can go to 5,000–6,000 feet … We have been up to 22,000 feet with [a spher­i­cal] air­ship, and that’s the absolute world record in alti­tude for air­ships.“
The SA-​​60 can be trans­ported in a truck and set up by a small group of peo­ple in roughly 24 hours, accord­ing to the com­pa­nies. Although it requires a pilot, the com­pa­nies plan to make the air­ship unmanned to allow for longer flights…
The com­pa­nies are devel­op­ing a larger oper­a­tional ver­sion of the SA-​​60 that would have a diam­e­ter of 76 feet, an oper­a­tional ceil­ing of 16,000 feet, and a flight endurance of roughly two days. In 12 months, the com­pa­nies plan to build a 200-​​foot diam­e­ter ver­sion that would be capa­ble of wide-​​area sur­veil­lance or telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions relay at alti­tudes up to 65,000 feet.

But there are a whole lot of kinks to work out, first. When the SA-​​60 was tested recently by Naval Air Systems Command, the helium gas inside heated and expanded, mak­ing the vehi­cle extra buoy­ant and leav­ing it under­weight. That made it a bitch to bring the orb back to earth.
Aerospace Daily dryly noted, “During some aborted land­ing attempts, the air­ship briefly con­tacted the ground and bounced like an enor­mous beach ball.“
THERE’S MORE: “I know I’m nit­pick­ing here,” says Defense Tech reader GW, “but Hokan Colting needs to check his basic his­tory on air­ships. World War I German air­ships rou­tinely oper­ated at 22,000 ft, and that was in 1916.”

The only rea­son that American air­ships of the 20s and 30s oper­ated with lower max­i­mum ceil­ings was to con­serve helium, an extremely expen­sive gas back then. At one time the U.S. only had enough gas to oper­ate one of their 3 air­ships. German pas­sen­ger zep­pelins (which used cheap, plen­ti­ful hydro­gen) oper­ated at lower alti­tudes for the com­fort of their pas­sen­gers and for greater cargo lift capacity. 

AND MORE: GW “is flat-​​out wrong. According to the Balloon & Airship World Records Homepage, the alti­tude record for an air­ship is 6,234 m or 20,453 feet and was made in June of 2003,” says Defense Tech reader BP. “What GW may have been think­ing of was a bal­loon alti­tude. According to the same site, the cur­rent alti­tude record for a bal­loon is 34,668 m or 113,740 feet which was made in 1961.”

Share |

July 6th, 2004 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « G.I.‘S GAME TO LEARN ARABIC | “HUNDREDS” OF PATRIOT FALSE ALARMS » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part IV : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : But beam-riding isn't used by bombers...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      To the poster "Charles" : Part I :...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Good observations about drones. The real potential of laser...
      Will
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The most simple thing is have 2 basic issued uniforms....
      Big Daddy
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Valid observation, Charles. This is all so new that it's hard...
      Will
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : But, as I said in a previous comment, I...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : The Bushmaster's machine-cannon...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : Why doesn't this article, or even...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage