DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » BLIMPBALL IN NAVY TESTS

BLIMPBALL IN NAVY TESTS

CyberAerospacePhotos781.jpgThey may look a litle silly — like giant vol­ley­balls, kinda. But the Navy thinks that big, round blimps may just be the key to spy­ing on ter­ror­ist camps, and com­mu­ni­cat­ing with its sailors.
As we’ve men­tioned before, the U.S. mil­i­tary has been on a bit of an air­ship kick, lately. That’s because the helium-​​filled, lighter-​​than-​​air craft can stay in the skies a whole lot longer than fuel-​​eating jets. And that means the blimps could work as float­ing cell tow­ers or obser­va­tion posts.
Round air­ships have some advan­tages over their cigar-​​shaped cousins, said Hokan Colting, who designed the SA-​​60 spher­i­cal blimp for the Navy.

“It’s more maneu­ver­able than a tra­di­tional air­ship,” Colting told Aerospace Daily. “It’s amphibi­ous, it can land and take off from water. And it can go to high alti­tudes. Traditional, cigar-​​shaped air­ships can go to 5,000–6,000 feet … We have been up to 22,000 feet with [a spher­i­cal] air­ship, and that’s the absolute world record in alti­tude for air­ships.“
The SA-​​60 can be trans­ported in a truck and set up by a small group of peo­ple in roughly 24 hours, accord­ing to the com­pa­nies. Although it requires a pilot, the com­pa­nies plan to make the air­ship unmanned to allow for longer flights…
The com­pa­nies are devel­op­ing a larger oper­a­tional ver­sion of the SA-​​60 that would have a diam­e­ter of 76 feet, an oper­a­tional ceil­ing of 16,000 feet, and a flight endurance of roughly two days. In 12 months, the com­pa­nies plan to build a 200-​​foot diam­e­ter ver­sion that would be capa­ble of wide-​​area sur­veil­lance or telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions relay at alti­tudes up to 65,000 feet.

But there are a whole lot of kinks to work out, first. When the SA-​​60 was tested recently by Naval Air Systems Command, the helium gas inside heated and expanded, mak­ing the vehi­cle extra buoy­ant and leav­ing it under­weight. That made it a bitch to bring the orb back to earth.
Aerospace Daily dryly noted, “During some aborted land­ing attempts, the air­ship briefly con­tacted the ground and bounced like an enor­mous beach ball.“
THERE’S MORE: “I know I’m nit­pick­ing here,” says Defense Tech reader GW, “but Hokan Colting needs to check his basic his­tory on air­ships. World War I German air­ships rou­tinely oper­ated at 22,000 ft, and that was in 1916.”

The only rea­son that American air­ships of the 20s and 30s oper­ated with lower max­i­mum ceil­ings was to con­serve helium, an extremely expen­sive gas back then. At one time the U.S. only had enough gas to oper­ate one of their 3 air­ships. German pas­sen­ger zep­pelins (which used cheap, plen­ti­ful hydro­gen) oper­ated at lower alti­tudes for the com­fort of their pas­sen­gers and for greater cargo lift capacity. 

AND MORE: GW “is flat-​​out wrong. According to the Balloon & Airship World Records Homepage, the alti­tude record for an air­ship is 6,234 m or 20,453 feet and was made in June of 2003,” says Defense Tech reader BP. “What GW may have been think­ing of was a bal­loon alti­tude. According to the same site, the cur­rent alti­tude record for a bal­loon is 34,668 m or 113,740 feet which was made in 1961.”

Share |

July 6th, 2004 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « G.I.‘S GAME TO LEARN ARABIC | “HUNDREDS” OF PATRIOT FALSE ALARMS » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage