DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » “RATS, BUGS, BOYS: ATTACK!”

“RATS, BUGS, BOYS: ATTACK!”

rats.jpgInstead of using guns and bombs, let’s attack the ene­mies of free­dom with bugs, rats, and horny gay men.
That seems to be the sen­ti­ment behind a 1994 Air Force pro­posal, unearthed by bioweapons-​​watchers at the Sunshine Project.
The doc­u­ment — enti­tled “Harrassing, Annoying, and ‘Bad Guy’ Identifying Chemicals” — strings together a cou­ple of ideas for non-​​lethal agents that could mark an oppo­nent, tem­porar­ily change his behav­ior, or “attract annoy­ing crea­tures to an enemy posi­tion.“
Were any of these pro­pos­als ever approved? I doubt it. But, boy, do I love the idea of Pentagon pro­gram man­agers dream­ing up ways to use “sex attrac­tant chem­i­cals for bugs” as weapons. Or employ­ing a “‘sting/​attack me’ chem­i­cal that causes bees to attack.” Such an agent “would espe­cially effec­tive for infil­tra­tion routes,” the paper observes.
“Rodents and larger ani­mals would [also] be can­di­dates to be drawn to enemy posi­tions,” accord­ing to the pro­posal. So would other “sting­ing and bit­ing bugs.“
But as irri­tat­ing as a swarm of bees or rats might be, it’s noth­ing com­pared to the dis­trac­tion gen­er­ated by a man in heat. No won­der, then, that the Air Force doc­u­ment calls for “chem­i­cals that affect human behav­ior so that dis­ci­pline and morale in enemy units is adversely effected. One dis­taste­ful but com­pletely non-​​lethal exam­ple would be strong aphro­disi­acs, espe­cially if the chem­i­cal also caused homo­sex­ual behav­ior.“
If, for some rea­son, mil­i­tary sci­en­tists couldn’t come up with an effec­tive, sprayable Spanish Fly, well, there are still other pos­si­bil­i­ties to be explored. For instance: “a low tox­i­c­ity com­pound” that cre­ates “severe and last­ing hal­i­to­sis.“
Bad breath, in other words.
THERE’S MORE: As if sprays to induce homo­sex­ual dal­liances and rat attacks weren’t prob­lem­atic enough. In 1997, the Army let loose a pro­posal, call­ing for the “prepa­ra­tion of an ‘odor index’ to match known dis­agree­able odors to a spe­cific cul­ture, political/​religious group or geo­graph­i­cal region.“
The work looks lov­ing back on a 1944 project, “Who Me,” that gave French resis­tance fight­ers lead foil tubes, packed with chem­i­cals that pro­duced a “fecal odor.” But the plan back­fired, this doc­u­ment notes, “when it was found that peo­ple in many areas of the world do not find ‘fecal odor’ to be offen­sive.“
It’s one of a num­ber of Pentagon brain­storms, to try to tar­get cer­tain eth­nic or geo­graphic groups with non-​​lethal chem­i­cal weapons. The Sunshine Project details more here.
AND MORE: On the Defense Tech forum, reader DB drops some sci­ence on the poop-​​smell project.
AND MORE: These ideas “might not be so far away from real­ity as [they] might ini­tially seem,” the Sunshine Project’s Edward Hammond says in the forum.

Share |

January 6th, 2005 | Bizarro | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « ARE YOU HOT OR NOT? PILL GIVES ANSWERS | TERROR WMD — WHAT ARE THE CHANCES? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
      Awesome. Now to be a *real* military contract we have to spend $40...
      jmatt
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage