I meant to link to this before, but was off in holiday la-la land. Last week, the Washington Post put together a really excellent series on the real likelihood of terrorists getting nuclear, biological, or chemical arms.
The short answer is: no on nukes, maybe on bio, and sure could be on chem. It’s about what I would have guessed. But the series is definitely worth a read, nonetheless.
TERROR WMD — WHAT ARE THE CHANCES?By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement |

Recent Comments
They are going to have to look at the whole...
Wembley
Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
Zandor
I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
JimboJones
Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
JimboJones
I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
Nadnerbus
Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
freefallingbomb
Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
freefallingbomb
Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
freefallingbomb
Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
freefallingbomb
Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
freefallingbomb