I meant to link to this before, but was off in holiday la-la land. Last week, the Washington Post put together a really excellent series on the real likelihood of terrorists getting nuclear, biological, or chemical arms.
The short answer is: no on nukes, maybe on bio, and sure could be on chem. It’s about what I would have guessed. But the series is definitely worth a read, nonetheless.
TERROR WMD — WHAT ARE THE CHANCES? |

Recent Comments
"And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
bdwilcox
When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
DualityOfMan
Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
DualityOfMan
I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
DualityOfMan
"I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
Sam
No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
Zandor
For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
a1189
These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
WJS
So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
WJS
Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
Zandor