DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » FLOPS, NEW THREATS BEHIND STAR WARS CUTS

FLOPS, NEW THREATS BEHIND STAR WARS CUTS

Sure, the Bush Administration’s mis­sile defense sys­tem has flopped just about every test it’s faced. But that’s not the only rea­son the pro­gram is being cut by more than a bil­lion dol­lars a year, says BusinessWeek.
“The war on ter­ror and Iraq may have taken their toll on mis­sile defense and changed the way Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld assesses poten­tial threats,” the mag­a­zine notes. Worries about incom­ing mis­siles have given way to 9/​11-​​style ter­ror­ism fears, and the war in Iraq.

ift9f.jpg “The Rumsfeld vision of future war­fare has had a severe col­li­sion with real­ity,” says Loren Thompson, chief oper­at­ing offi­cer of the Lexington Institute, a con­ser­v­a­tive think tank in Arlington, Va. The prob­lems fac­ing mis­sile defense, he says, are “the rel­a­tively weak case for the over­all mis­sion and the need to spend money in other ways.
Consider as well the dif­fer­ence between the 2000 elec­tion and last year’s. Five years ago, mis­sile defense was one of Bush’s key issues… “America must build effec­tive mis­sile defenses based on the best avail­able options at the ear­li­est pos­si­ble date,” he declared dur­ing his first run for the White House.
Since then, despite the roughly $10 bil­lion a year that has poured into the pro­gram, Rumsfeld has con­ceded the sys­tem doesn’t have to be 100% effec­tive. It just has to work well enough to change the cal­cu­la­tion of an enemy think­ing about loft­ing a mis­sile at Los Angeles or New York. Problem is, it doesn’t even seem capa­ble of doing that, as [a botched] December test showed…
And as the American pro­gram strug­gles, other coun­tries are mak­ing head­way in pur­su­ing new tech­nolo­gies. Scott Ritter, the for­mer arms inspec­tor in Iraq who cor­rectly con­cluded Baghdad had no weapons of mass destruc­tion, now says Russia has tested an SS-​​27 Topol-​​M mobile bal­lis­tic mis­sile that would ren­der the cur­rent Star Wars scheme use­less. It is too fast to hit right after take­off unless the inter­cep­tor is lucky enough to be really close to the launch pad.
Also, the SS-​​27 is hard­ened against lasers, so the Airborne Laser — a pro­gram already way behind sched­ule — wouldn’t work. And because it’s maneu­ver­able and capa­ble of releas­ing three war­heads and four decoys, it would be much harder to defeat as it falls in the ter­mi­nal stage of flight.
[Missile Defense Agency] spokesman Lehner says Ritter’s objec­tion misses the point of his agency’s goal, which is to address “the more rudi­men­tary mis­siles North Korea and Iran are devel­op­ing.” But what if Pyongyang or Tehran buys an SS-​​27? “I don’t know about that,” he told
BusinessWeek Online. 

THERE’S MORE: Despite a litany of bro­ken bud­gets and shat­tered dead­lines, it looks like the Airborne Laser (ABL) is return­ing to the fore­front of mis­sile defend­ers’ minds.
abl_refuel.jpg The laser-​​firing 747 last year achieved “first light” — suc­cess­fully test­ing its ray gun. And now, “agency offi­cials con­sider the pro­gram ‘quite healthy,’ and they are plan­ning to attempt a tar­get shoot-​​down in 2008,” Inside Defense says. Just last month, an MDA offi­cial refused to give a date for when that test might go down.
“It is rev­o­lu­tion­ary, it is dis­rup­tive, mean­ing this required inven­tions and doing things that have never been done before,” a Pentagon offi­cial told the AFP, liken­ing the poten­tial impact on war­fare of the air­borne laser to the advent of nuclear power. “And it has done so well, cer­tainly in the last ten months that we really need to pur­sue this to a con­clu­sion. Were encour­aged by every­thing weve seen.“
The MDA has long been con­cerned about knock­ing a mis­sile down right when it takes off, in its so-​​called “boost phase.” But the task has been deemed all-​​but-​​impossible by a col­lec­tion of lead­ing physi­cists. And, one by one, the tech­nolo­gies the MDA to pur­sue this task have failed to deliver. Now, there’s only a sin­gle “boost phase” option left for the MDA. And that’s the laser jet.

Share |

February 8th, 2005 | Missiles | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « “FUTURE COMBAT” GETS FUNDS | PREDATOR ATTACKS ON TAPE » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage