DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » FLOPS, NEW THREATS BEHIND STAR WARS CUTS

FLOPS, NEW THREATS BEHIND STAR WARS CUTS

Sure, the Bush Administration’s mis­sile defense sys­tem has flopped just about every test it’s faced. But that’s not the only rea­son the pro­gram is being cut by more than a bil­lion dol­lars a year, says BusinessWeek.
“The war on ter­ror and Iraq may have taken their toll on mis­sile defense and changed the way Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld assesses poten­tial threats,” the mag­a­zine notes. Worries about incom­ing mis­siles have given way to 9/​11-​​style ter­ror­ism fears, and the war in Iraq.

ift9f.jpg “The Rumsfeld vision of future war­fare has had a severe col­li­sion with real­ity,” says Loren Thompson, chief oper­at­ing offi­cer of the Lexington Institute, a con­ser­v­a­tive think tank in Arlington, Va. The prob­lems fac­ing mis­sile defense, he says, are “the rel­a­tively weak case for the over­all mis­sion and the need to spend money in other ways.
Consider as well the dif­fer­ence between the 2000 elec­tion and last year’s. Five years ago, mis­sile defense was one of Bush’s key issues… “America must build effec­tive mis­sile defenses based on the best avail­able options at the ear­li­est pos­si­ble date,” he declared dur­ing his first run for the White House.
Since then, despite the roughly $10 bil­lion a year that has poured into the pro­gram, Rumsfeld has con­ceded the sys­tem doesn’t have to be 100% effec­tive. It just has to work well enough to change the cal­cu­la­tion of an enemy think­ing about loft­ing a mis­sile at Los Angeles or New York. Problem is, it doesn’t even seem capa­ble of doing that, as [a botched] December test showed…
And as the American pro­gram strug­gles, other coun­tries are mak­ing head­way in pur­su­ing new tech­nolo­gies. Scott Ritter, the for­mer arms inspec­tor in Iraq who cor­rectly con­cluded Baghdad had no weapons of mass destruc­tion, now says Russia has tested an SS-​​27 Topol-​​M mobile bal­lis­tic mis­sile that would ren­der the cur­rent Star Wars scheme use­less. It is too fast to hit right after take­off unless the inter­cep­tor is lucky enough to be really close to the launch pad.
Also, the SS-​​27 is hard­ened against lasers, so the Airborne Laser — a pro­gram already way behind sched­ule — wouldn’t work. And because it’s maneu­ver­able and capa­ble of releas­ing three war­heads and four decoys, it would be much harder to defeat as it falls in the ter­mi­nal stage of flight.
[Missile Defense Agency] spokesman Lehner says Ritter’s objec­tion misses the point of his agency’s goal, which is to address “the more rudi­men­tary mis­siles North Korea and Iran are devel­op­ing.” But what if Pyongyang or Tehran buys an SS-​​27? “I don’t know about that,” he told
BusinessWeek Online. 

THERE’S MORE: Despite a litany of bro­ken bud­gets and shat­tered dead­lines, it looks like the Airborne Laser (ABL) is return­ing to the fore­front of mis­sile defend­ers’ minds.
abl_refuel.jpg The laser-​​firing 747 last year achieved “first light” — suc­cess­fully test­ing its ray gun. And now, “agency offi­cials con­sider the pro­gram ‘quite healthy,’ and they are plan­ning to attempt a tar­get shoot-​​down in 2008,” Inside Defense says. Just last month, an MDA offi­cial refused to give a date for when that test might go down.
“It is rev­o­lu­tion­ary, it is dis­rup­tive, mean­ing this required inven­tions and doing things that have never been done before,” a Pentagon offi­cial told the AFP, liken­ing the poten­tial impact on war­fare of the air­borne laser to the advent of nuclear power. “And it has done so well, cer­tainly in the last ten months that we really need to pur­sue this to a con­clu­sion. Were encour­aged by every­thing weve seen.“
The MDA has long been con­cerned about knock­ing a mis­sile down right when it takes off, in its so-​​called “boost phase.” But the task has been deemed all-​​but-​​impossible by a col­lec­tion of lead­ing physi­cists. And, one by one, the tech­nolo­gies the MDA to pur­sue this task have failed to deliver. Now, there’s only a sin­gle “boost phase” option left for the MDA. And that’s the laser jet.

Share |

February 8th, 2005 | Missiles | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « “FUTURE COMBAT” GETS FUNDS | PREDATOR ATTACKS ON TAPE » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
      Should wikipedia Ned Kelly.He used armour that worked in...
      Nick
    • UPDATED: Details on Army’s New Afghanistan Duds
      Marines win agin hoo rur
      greg
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      To the poster "batvette" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
      gee lets forget about winning a war as long...
      greg stocks
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage