DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Los Alamos and Labs » SANDIA CHIEF LEADING LOS ALAMOS BID

SANDIA CHIEF LEADING LOS ALAMOS BID

For a while, it looked like no one would chal­lenge the University of California for con­trol of Los Alamos, the world’s lead­ing nuclear lab. Not any more.
paul_robinson.gifLockheed Martin, the country’s biggest defense con­trac­tor, is prep­ping for a mon­ster bid for Los Alamos. And the com­pany has tapped the long­time chief of Sandia National Laboratories, Los Alamos’ more buttoned-​​down sis­ter to the south, to head the effort.
Lockheed already runs Sandia for the Energy Department. And for nearly ten years, the for­mer Los Alamos physi­cist C. Paul Robinson, has been the company’s point man there. It’s been a rel­a­tively calm period for the Sandia, with only a faint whiff of the cor­rup­tion and shaky secu­rity that has stunk up Los Alamos over the last decade.
But Sandia has also missed the flashes of scary bril­liance that the world has come to expect from Los Alamos. Sandia is known more as an engi­neer­ing cen­ter.
Last August, Lockheed dropped out of the run­ning for Los Alamos. The retainer for run­ning the lab was puny. And early drafts of the request for bids seemed heav­ily slanted in California’s favor.
But “Lockheed Martin jumped back into the fray after the DOE pro­posed changes to the Los Alamos con­tract, includ­ing increas­ing the manager’s fee from 0.6 per­cent of the lab’s $2 bil­lion annual bud­get to 3 per­cent,” the Contra Costa Times says.
And now, it looks like a sec­ond dis­cour­aged Los Alamos bid­der, the University of Texas, may be com­ing back to the table, as well. Lockheed and Texas offi­cials are talk­ing about team­ing up to run the lab.
In recent years, many Los Alamos sci­en­tists have been vocal in their dis­taste for both Texas and Lockheed. “We’ve estab­lished a rep­u­ta­tion as an idea lab, and I think you’d lose that if the man­age­ment went to a cor­po­ra­tion,” Los Alamos non­pro­lif­er­a­tion sci­en­tist Bill Priedhorsky told me back in 2003. “I think you’d see the bet­ter peo­ple flee.“
This morn­ing, some­one posted to Los Alamos employee blog LANL: The Real Story a Photoshopped memo from Paul Robinson. He’s wear­ing a Hitler mous­tache in it.
But atti­tudes may be soft­en­ing, a bit. “I’m mid-​​career, and frankly am ready to work for a man­ager that’s com­pe­tent, deft, astute, respected, effi­cient, ratio­nal, self-​​disciplined, and under­stands what we do and how hard it is to do it,” writes one LANL: The Real Story poster. “LockMart & C. Paul Robinson sure look like they got a good oppor­tu­nity to ful­fill that poten­tial.“
“What a dif­fer­ence a year makes!” another writes. “Can you imag­ine any­one at LANL [Los Alamos National Laboratory] say­ing a year ago, ‘Gee, I wish LockMart would take over from that incom­pe­tent bunch at UC…’ Now, we hear, ‘Paul! Save us! Bring in some san­ity from Lockheed Martin! You can even change our name to Sandia National Laboratories at Los Alamos! We don’t care! Just SAVE us!’

Share |

April 12th, 2005 | Los Alamos and Labs | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW | SENATORS LARD UP WAR BILL » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage