DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Strategery » CHINA THREAT, ROUND THREE

CHINA THREAT, ROUND THREE

Does China’s People’s Liberation Army have the teeth to chomp down on Taiwan? Responding to a twitchy New York Times story from last week, China-​​watcher Jeffrey Lewis said no. But Jane’s Defence Weekly thinks the answer may soon be yes.
china_army.jpg

An emerg­ing con­sen­sus among long-​​time PLA observers, includ­ing within the US intel­li­gence com­mu­nity, is that the Chinese mil­i­tary has suc­cess­fully achieved a far-​​reaching qual­i­ta­tive advance­ment in its war-​​fighting capa­bil­i­ties since the begin­ning of this decade. The PLA is quickly becom­ing an increas­ingly cred­i­ble threat against Taiwan and could even begin to pose a chal­lenge to US mil­i­tary pre­pon­der­ance in East Asia in the next decade if the momen­tum is sus­tained.
The country’s lead­er­ship has given strong back­ing to the PLA’s trans­for­ma­tion and force-​​regeneration efforts, which has trans­lated into a hefty and sus­tained increase in mil­i­tary spend­ing over the past few years. The offi­cially pub­lished defence bud­get has risen on aver­age by 15 per cent over the past five years from 121 bil­lion ($15 bil­lion) in 2001 to 220 bil­lion last year…
The Pentagon and US intel­li­gence com­mu­nity esti­mates that these pub­lished fig­ures rep­re­sent between one-​​third and one half of actual Chinese mil­i­tary expenditures.

Click here to keep read­ing Jane’s analy­sis of the Chinese mil­i­tary — its leaner, better-​​trained ground forces, its grow­ing mis­sile array, and its next-​​gen ships and subs.

The PLA is engaged in a rapid build up of nec­es­sary assets that includes amass­ing a size­able short– and medium-​​range bal­lis­tic mis­sile force, cruise mis­siles and spe­cial oper­a­tions units and strength­en­ing its strate­gic sur­veil­lance, recon­nais­sance and tar­get­ing capa­bil­i­ties. The Taiwanese Defence Ministry in March 2005 reported that the PLA had deployed around 700 bal­lis­tic mis­siles in the vicin­ity of the Taiwan Strait and was also quickly build­ing an arse­nal of at least 200 Hong-​​Niao cruise mis­siles within the next year
To be able to fight high-​​tech wars, the PLA is shift­ing its recruit­ment sys­tem from a reliance on poorly edu­cated con­scripts, who now serve only two years, to empha­sise the devel­op­ment of a pro­fes­sional long-​​serving cadre of troops. The PLA will reduce its man­power from 2.5 mil­lion to 2.3 mil­lion sol­diers by the end of this year. This comes on top of a reduc­tion of 500,000 troops in the late 1990s.
[With the troops that are left] “the PLA has shifted focus towards amphibi­ous oper­a­tions for a sig­nif­i­cant part of the ground forces”, Dennis Blasko, a for­mer US Army attach in China, points out. This has included the reor­gan­i­sa­tion of two motorised infantry divi­sions in the Nanjing and Guangzhou Military Regions into amphibi­ous infantry divi­sions and the trans­fer of another infantry divi­sion to the navy to form a sec­ond marine brigade in the late 1990s.
Blasko esti­mates that around a quar­ter of all PLA manoeu­vre units, which num­ber around 20 divi­sions or brigades, plus sup­port­ing artillery and air-​​defence units, have par­tic­i­pated in train­ing exer­cises for amphibi­ous oper­a­tions
[Meanwhile] The PLA Navy (PLAN) is rapidly trans­form­ing itself from a coastal force into a blue­wa­ter naval power with a force mod­erni­sa­tion drive that is unprece­dented in the post-​​Cold War era. “The range and num­ber of war­ships the Chinese navy is acquir­ing can be com­pared to the Soviet Union’s race to become an ocean-​​going navy to rival the US in the 1970s,” said a China-​​based for­eign naval attach.
The US intel­li­gence com­mu­nity has reported that since 2001, the Chinese ship­build­ing indus­try has pro­duced 23 new amphibi­ous assault ships and 13 con­ven­tional attack sub­marines.
The cur­rent top pri­or­ity for the PLAN is the replace­ment of its fleet of out­dated Soviet-​​era con­ven­tional and nuclear sub­marines with five new advanced mod­els of domes­ti­cally devel­oped and imported Russian ves­sels
The long-​​awaited Type 093 nuclear-​​powered attack sub­ma­rine (SSN) is also close to enter­ing into ser­vice, with the lead ves­sel already under­go­ing sea tri­als and expected to be accepted by the navy this year. There are reports that three hulls of this new class have already been laid?
The Type 094 nuclear-​​powered bal­lis­tic mis­sile sub­ma­rine, said to be an elon­gated ver­sion of the Type 093 and equipped with JL-​​2 sea-​​launched inter­con­ti­nen­tal bal­lis­tic mis­siles, is reported to have been launched last July and could be oper­a­tional within the next cou­ple of years. This is well ahead of Pentagon fore­casts, which had pre­vi­ously esti­mated that the Type 094 would not enter ser­vice until towards the end of this decade.

(Thanks to reader JF for the tip.)

Share |

April 13th, 2005 | Strategery | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « EX-​​SECDEF: RESEARCH CUTS HURT SECURITY | DEADLY FLU SHIPS; BIOSAFETY M.I.A. » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage