DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » UK’S CHICKEN-​​POWERED NUKE

UK’S CHICKEN-​​POWERED NUKE

Like me, you’ve prob­a­bly stayed awake count­less nights won­der­ing, “Did the Brits ever make plans for a nuclear land­mine, pow­ered by chick­ens?“
Well, dear reader, I’m here to tell you that the answer is yes. At least, accord­ing to the UK’s National Archives.

chicken.gifConceived dur­ing the Cold War, the seven tonne device was the size of small truck and was designed to be buried or sub­merged by a British Army retreat­ing from Soviet forces. The land­mine had a plu­to­nium core sur­rounded by high explo­sive and would have been det­o­nated by remote con­trol or timer, caus­ing mass destruc­tion and con­t­a­m­i­na­tion over a wide area to pre­vent sub­se­quent enemy occu­pa­tion.
Scientists work­ing on the project realised that the bomb could fail in win­ter if vital com­po­nents become too cold, so they explored ways of keep­ing the inner work­ings warm. One pro­posal put for­ward con­sisted of fill­ing the cas­ing of the nuke with live chick­ens, who would give off suf­fi­cient heat, prior to suf­fo­cat­ing or starv­ing to death, to keep the del­i­cate explo­sive mech­a­nism from freez­ing. Despite the poten­tial impor­tance of chick­ens to the project, the mine was code­named ‘Blue Peacock’.

“The mines were to be left buried or sub­merged by the British Army of the Rhine. They would then have been det­o­nated by wire from up to five kilo­me­tres away or by an eight-​​day clock­work timer. If dis­turbed or dam­aged, they were primed to explode within 10 sec­onds,” New Scientist explains.

Each mine was expected to pro­duce an explo­sive yield of 10 kilo­tons, about half that of the atom bomb the US dropped on the Japanese city of Nagasaki in 1945…
Blue Peacock was to con­sist of a plu­to­nium core sur­rounded by a sphere of high explo­sives, all encased in steel. The design was based on Blue Danube, a free-​​fall nuclear bomb weigh­ing sev­eral tonnes that was already in ser­vice with the Royal Air Force. But Blue Peacock, weigh­ing over seven tonnes, would have been much more cum­ber­some.
The steel cas­ing was so large that it had to be tested out­doors in a flooded gravel pit near Sevenoaks in Kent. If ques­tions were asked, Nuclear his­to­rian David Hawkings says the army’s cover story was that it was a con­tainer for “an atomic power unit for troops in the field”. In July 1957, army lead­ers decided to order 10 Blue Peacock mines and to sta­tion them in Germany.
Hawkings describes their plans for deploy­ing the weapons in the event of an immi­nent Soviet inva­sion as “some­what the­atri­cal”. One prob­lem was that the mines might not work in win­ter if they became too cold, so the army pro­posed wrap­ping them in fibre­glass pil­lows.
In the end, the risk from radioac­tive fall­out would have been “unac­cept­able”, says Hawkings, and hid­ing nuclear weapons in an allied coun­try was deemed “polit­i­cally flawed”. As a result, the Ministry of Defence can­celled Blue Peacock in February 1958.
(via Linkfilter and Improbable Research)

Share |

April 14th, 2005 | Bizarro | Comments Off Both comments and pings are currently closed.

« « BLIMPS FOR MARINES IN IRAQ | “MINORITY REPORT,” FOR REAL » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

Comments are closed.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    Recent Comments
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Valid observation, Charles. This is all so new that it's hard...
      Will
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : But, as I said in a previous comment, I...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : The Bushmaster's machine-cannon...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : Why doesn't this article, or even...
      freefallingbomb
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I guess camouflaging exposed skin has gone out of...
      Eric daniel
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      The US Military should hold annual fashion shows. The Army...
      Zandor
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'd also like to point out, that soldier systems has been...
      a1189
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Has to do with traverse speed. If the target is close then the...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Totally forgot about astrogation. Star maps loaded into a...
      Charles
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      freefalling: -The Germans used beam-riding during WW2 and it...
      Charles
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage