DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Homeland Security » Chem Plant Defense, For Real

Chem Plant Defense, For Real

Y’know, I’m beginning to like this Chertoff guy…

Voluntary efforts to protect chemical plants from terrorist attacks are inadequate, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has concluded, and Congress should adopt federal standards to do so…
chemplant.jpgThe department envisions a federally enforced scale of protective steps, with the greatest security restrictions imposed on plants deemed the most vulnerable to attack, and on those where a release of chemicals would pose the greatest danger to surrounding communities.
[This is similar to Chertoff’s seemingly common-sense approach to homeland security overall — ed.]
Senator Susan Collins, the Maine Republican who is chairwoman of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee… said Tuesday that the department’s decision was a shift for the Bush administration.
“For the first time,” Ms. Collins said, “the administration is stating clearly before Congress that current laws are not adequate to the task of improving security of chemical plants. Federal legislation is needed…“
After the Sept. 11 attacks, Tom Ridge, as homeland security adviser to President Bush, and Christine Todd Whitman, then administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, pushed for chemical plant safety rules. But the effort stalled, Ms. Whitman has said, after industry objections.
Instead, the industry, led by the American Chemistry Council, set up a voluntary system that encouraged plant owners to conduct self-assessments and take steps to eliminate vulnerabilities: installing security cameras, fences, barriers or other means of controlling access.
But only 1,100 or so of the 15,000 plants with large amounts of dangerous chemicals participated in the voluntary program, according to a recent report by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

Share |

June 15th, 2005 | Homeland Security | 16456 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/06/15/chem-plant-defense-for-real/Chem+Plant+Defense%2C+For+Real2005-06-15+14%3A39%3A13noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Israel, France Team Up for Killer Drones | Rapid Fire 6/16/05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Billy B Miller says:
    June 15, 2005 at 7:52 pm

    NEED NATIONAL ID, And GOVERNMENT PLAMT SECURITY.
    In the Military we had ID.

    Reply
  2. john shoemaker says:
    June 16, 2005 at 4:59 am

    Establish list of acceptable consultant companies.
    Give companies with appreciable security problems the choice of hiring consultants or proceed with government regulation
    In my opinion the greatest chemical threat to health is the effluent of pills and the taught terror of not taking them

    Reply
  3. voice of reason says:
    June 16, 2005 at 8:32 am

    Why secure the plants from attack when the operators of those plants are already delivering the deadly chemicals to our local population. What we need is some securing of the waste products from these said chemical factories. Companies blatantly dump it into the environment time and time again, and CEOs get a slap on the wrist and a get out of jail free card. America is poisoning itself not just, iraq and afghanistan. Rocket fuel in our water from negligent military manufacturies, leaking chemical weapons fuel dumps… at least our used nuclear fuel rods get exported, in one shell at a time… yee-haw. Forget about getting attacked these guys are the only terrorists we need to worry about.

    Reply
  4. Dd says:
    June 16, 2005 at 10:50 am

    Dear voice of “reason,“
    Way to stay on topic there, ace. I’ll bet you had a lot of report cards that read, “Cannot stay on task.“
    More government interference is a bad thing, however, I know that the security at these plants is below par. The Responsible Care program implemented by the ACC and SOCMA are a step in the right direction, but security is like cancer from cigarettes, everyone believes nothing will happen to them. Additional steps need to be taken in order to secure our freedom that we take for granted. Incentives to companies don’t always work, sometimes legislation has to.
    I would like to have a world in which my children feel safe going to school, work or a store. A gas mask really obscures my view of the landscape. Terrorism could make that a reality.
    Having never experienced life where terrorism is a reality, such as Israel, you have no idea what it is like to walk into a mall and have your bags searched every single time…not a as matter of being on high alert.
    The terrorists don’t hate us merely because we are in their countries, they hate us because of what we represent. Much of what we represent is brought about because of the freedoms that we enjoy as a result of the efforts of soldiers past and present. My honor and respect go out to each and every one of them. Ignorance of who we are and what we represent is what motivates the terrorists and those who hate the US. Ignorance is fostered and taught; until we chnage their thinking, people like bin Laden and al-arqawi will continue to try to find ways to eliminate the “infidels.” That’s you and me and anyone on this soil, o comfortable one.
    So, if you really want to take a stand against chemical companies, stop using the products that you take for granted every day. Stop applying makeup, stop driving your car, stop using your cell phone and your PC, both of which contain plastics made by…petrochemical companies. Use that freedom of speech to make a difference instead of spouting tired old rhetoric.
    Dd

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      Re: LAAR–just expand the UAV programs
      bjackson
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Even if you reduced the buy to zero you’d still be...
      Blight
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage