<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Rose By Any Other Name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BJ</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101741</link>
		<dc:creator>BJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2005 03:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101741</guid>
		<description>Good stuff. I dropped &#039;napalm&#039; in Nam. BLU1-Bs. They were filled with straight styrene monomer so very technically and with lawyer-like spinning they were not Napalm, which was gasoline thinckened with sodium palmitate, among other stuff. I suppose the USN&#039;s mixing the monomer with JP8 to save money. Best thing about using the stuff is 1) you can get right in their face and not worry about bomb frag getting you and 2) it&#039;s an area weapon. As for what it does on the other end, tough. If they can&#039;t take a joke they shouldn&#039;t be there.
BJ - once Gunfighter 40
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff. I dropped ‘napalm’ in Nam. BLU1-Bs. They were filled with straight styrene monomer so very technically and with lawyer-like spinning they were not Napalm, which was gasoline thinckened with sodium palmitate, among other stuff. I suppose the USN’s mixing the monomer with JP8 to save money. Best thing about using the stuff is 1) you can get right in their face and not worry about bomb frag getting you and 2) it’s an area weapon. As for what it does on the other end, tough. If they can’t take a joke they shouldn’t be there.<br />
BJ — once Gunfighter 40</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Skinner</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101740</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101740</guid>
		<description>A question here,
Napalm is bad it burns and causes the bad guys a terriable death, but one it is done it is done.
On the other hand CBU&#039;s are good they air burst but about 10% are duds that litter the battle area for years and can be picked up by kids and become duds no longer.
Tell me again why napalm is bad and CBU&#039;s are not bad?
Allons,
Byron Skinner
&quot;Stewart&#039;s Platoon&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question here,<br />
Napalm is bad it burns and causes the bad guys a terriable death, but one it is done it is done.<br />
On the other hand CBU’s are good they air burst but about 10% are duds that litter the battle area for years and can be picked up by kids and become duds no longer.<br />
Tell me again why napalm is bad and CBU’s are not bad?<br />
Allons,<br />
Byron Skinner<br />
“Stewart’s Platoon”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P Hampton</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101739</link>
		<dc:creator>P Hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101739</guid>
		<description>I say use it and any other weapon we have at our disposal.  If it brings our guys and girls home safe and sound, it is worth every cent regardless of what the nay-sayers may think, say, or do.  Put them out there, let them get shot at, and then get their behind saved by an incendiary device of any kind and they will change their tune.  If not, they are simply too stupid to listen to.  Again, if it keeps our soldiers safe, use it often and use it well.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say use it and any other weapon we have at our disposal.  If it brings our guys and girls home safe and sound, it is worth every cent regardless of what the nay-sayers may think, say, or do.  Put them out there, let them get shot at, and then get their behind saved by an incendiary device of any kind and they will change their tune.  If not, they are simply too stupid to listen to.  Again, if it keeps our soldiers safe, use it often and use it well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT Burgess Carter,USA,Ret.</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101738</link>
		<dc:creator>CPT Burgess Carter,USA,Ret.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101738</guid>
		<description>Remember the Anti-war movies thet were so prevalent after the Vietmam debacle that your polititions placed us in. One stated,erroniously, that he &quot;loved the smell of Napalm in the morning, smells like---Victory&quot; or something of that ilk. The napalm-like bombs use was something to see, especially if it was between the enemy and our troops, or better yet, on the enemy concentrations. If I had been a commander of ground troops, I would have used everything available to protect my troops.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember the Anti-war movies thet were so prevalent after the Vietmam debacle that your polititions placed us in. One stated,erroniously, that he “loved the smell of Napalm in the morning, smells like—Victory” or something of that ilk. The napalm-like bombs use was something to see, especially if it was between the enemy and our troops, or better yet, on the enemy concentrations. If I had been a commander of ground troops, I would have used everything available to protect my troops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CPT Burgess Carter,USA,Ret.</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101737</link>
		<dc:creator>CPT Burgess Carter,USA,Ret.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 21:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101737</guid>
		<description>The spin-docs will spin wheather we like it or not. Some will eat-this-stuff-up as if were served on a silver platter. If it will save one of my three sons in the military-by all means use it.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spin-docs will spin wheather we like it or not. Some will eat-this-stuff-up as if were served on a silver platter. If it will save one of my three sons in the military-by all means use it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101736</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101736</guid>
		<description>oops, forgot to read the title of the entry.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, forgot to read the title of the entry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101735</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 18:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101735</guid>
		<description>a rose by any other name...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a rose by any other name…</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSAllison</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101734</link>
		<dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101734</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, and is it just me or has the military lately been steppin in the doo through what could charitably be called spin-doctoring?  They should stick with the truth, it&#039;s what they&#039;re good at.  You reading this, Rummy?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, and is it just me or has the military lately been steppin in the doo through what could charitably be called spin-doctoring?  They should stick with the truth, it’s what they’re good at.  You reading this, Rummy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSAllison</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101733</link>
		<dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/2005/06/20/a-rose-by-any-other-name/#comment-101733</guid>
		<description>One of &#039;napalmlike&#039; weapons&#039; other virtues is that even if you miss your target, they&#039;re real hard to ignore.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of ‘napalmlike’ weapons’ other virtues is that even if you miss your target, they’re real hard to ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

