<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 7/1/05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/07/01/rapid-fire-7105/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/07/01/rapid-fire-7105/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MD</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/07/01/rapid-fire-7105/#comment-109185</link>
		<dc:creator>MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=29#comment-109185</guid>
		<description>To duplicate that capability [in the United States] would require a heck of a capital investment, said Evancoe.&quot;
I disagree, the guys at www.robarm.com have operational versions of a similar rifle, they&#039;ve built them in Utah, last time I checked, Utah was part of the United States.
The rifle was rejected on dubious grounds however.
The reason reported by robarm is no longer contained in googles cache.
http://www.robarm.com/xcrtm_modular_weapon_system.htm
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To duplicate that capability [in the United States] would require a heck of a capital investment, said Evancoe.“<br />
I disagree, the guys at <a href="http://www.robarm.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.robarm.com</a> have operational versions of a similar rifle, they’ve built them in Utah, last time I checked, Utah was part of the United States.<br />
The rifle was rejected on dubious grounds however.<br />
The reason reported by robarm is no longer contained in googles cache.<br />
<a href="http://www.robarm.com/xcrtm_modular_weapon_system.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.robarm.com/xcrtm_modular_weapon_system.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/07/01/rapid-fire-7105/#comment-4722</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 16:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=29#comment-4722</guid>
		<description>Many of the summer interns working with me at NAVSEA NSWC-PC had to get new assignments after it became apparent that the security clearance forms that were submitted back in February would not be processed by the time the eight-week program was complete.
Darn backlogs.  I just had no idea it was a problem spanning the entire DoD.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of the summer interns working with me at NAVSEA NSWC-PC had to get new assignments after it became apparent that the security clearance forms that were submitted back in February would not be processed by the time the eight-week program was complete.<br />
Darn backlogs.  I just had no idea it was a problem spanning the entire DoD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

