http://defensetech.org/2005/07/05/two-war-strategy-questioned/ The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:24:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://defensetech.org/2005/07/05/two-war-strategy-questioned/#comment-109187 Darrell Campbell Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:40:39 +0000 http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=30#comment-109187 It really is simple; hidden-in-plain-sight. ANY potential REAL threat to American might, must negate carrier threats and cripple Western economies, at the same time. How? The two most likely candidates at the moment are Iran and North Korea. These have been working hand in hand, both are developing nuclear weapons, they are sharing long range missile development. Both are playing the "talks" routine while they continue to build up their weapons capabilities. How best to use them? First, use quiet electric diesel subs and threats of nuclear mines to fend off carrier attack, threaten neighbors with potential missile attack; and then sink a few tankers to close down the Hormuz straits and Mulacca straits to oil flow to cripple European and Japanes/Tiawan economies (hence the U.S.'s). Result will be catostrophic. Note that I write "will be". It really is simple; hidden-in-plain-sight. ANY potential REAL threat to American might, must negate carrier threats and cripple Western economies, at the same time. How? The two most likely candidates at the moment are Iran and North Korea. These have been working hand in hand, both are developing nuclear weapons, they are sharing long range missile development. Both are playing the “talks” routine while they continue to build up their weapons capabilities.
How best to use them? First, use quiet electric diesel subs and threats of nuclear mines to fend off carrier attack, threaten neighbors with potential missile attack; and then sink a few tankers to close down the Hormuz straits and Mulacca straits to oil flow to cripple European and Japanes/Tiawan economies (hence the U.S.‘s).
Result will be catostrophic.
Note that I write “will be”.

]]>