DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » Moon shine

Moon shine

If you believe they put a man on the moon …
… or even (espe­cially?) if you don’t, this one’s for you.
In 2008, NASA says it will send a “Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter” into low orbit around the moon. While it’s pri­mary mis­sion will be to scout for the next manned lunar mis­sion (osten­si­bly planned for around 2020), it also will do some­thing to defeat those wacky con­spir­acy the­o­ries about how and why the United Stats allegedly faked its moon mis­sions.
It’s going to pho­to­graph what astro­nauts left on the moon, “pro­vid­ing the first rec­og­niz­able images of Apollo relics since 1972,” NASA says.
landingsites_270b.gif
There are six land­ing sites scat­tered across the moon’s sur­face, but even the Hubble tele­scope can’t pho­to­graph them.
Apparently, NASA says, the fact that they haven’t been pho­tographed since the Nixon admin­is­tra­tion adds fuel to the con­spir­acy the­ory fires.
Overall, though, the LROC mis­sion is not really about the past.

It will sam­ple the Moon’s radi­a­tion envi­ron­ment, search for patches of frozen water, make laser maps of lunar ter­rain and, using LROC, pho­to­graph the Moon’s entire sur­face. By the time astro­nauts return, they’ll know the best places to land and much of what awaits them.


Two key tar­gets: the moon’s poles. Why? Potential loca­tions for moon bases, of course.
– posted by Dan Dupont

Share |

July 12th, 2005 | Space | 4810 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/07/12/moon-shine/Moon+shine2005-07-12+13%3A08%3A37dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Camp Normal | Rapid fire 7/​12/​05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Fred Witzell says:
    July 12, 2005 at 2:51 pm

    M-​​O-​​O-​​N… That spells moon…

    Reply
  2. Scott Snyder says:
    July 15, 2005 at 8:32 am

    We have had the tech­nol­ogy for a long time to accom­plish ‘just about’ any­thing we wanted to do, within rea­son. I am extremely excited about the prospect of our manned return to the moon. The accu­sa­tions made by a ‘cat rancher’ and his untrust­wor­thy side­kick can­not be jus­ti­fied. Our exit from lunar explo­ration was a bit of a let down since the moon holds so much poten­tial for us as a species. I will eagerly await the devel­ope­ments of this planned return as it progresses.

    Reply
  3. Bill Curtin Smrekar says:
    July 15, 2005 at 9:08 am

    This makes more sense than what seems to be use­less trips to Mars. A pur­pose­ful trip to the moon, hmm.…intrigueing. Perhaps this time it won’t be in the name of a glo­ri­fied rock hobby!

    Reply
  4. Gregg Mouritzen says:
    July 15, 2005 at 9:40 am

    We could have done this 30 years ago. It’s about time. We’ve got the space sta­tion next the moon base. After that who knows how far we can go. I’ve always dreamed of tak­ing a trip to the moon. Soon it may be possible.

    Reply
  5. Jeff Gonzales says:
    July 15, 2005 at 12:46 pm

    Just to add fuel to the con­spir­acy fire…let’s say they do “pho­to­graph” old 1972 Apollo mis­sion rem­nants. With today’s com­puter tech­nol­ogy, it’s noth­ing a good Graphic Artist and Photoshop couldn’t come up with.
    Jeff

    Reply
  6. Ogre says:
    July 15, 2005 at 1:53 pm

    In 1961 we decided to send a man to the moon, and by 1969 it was done. In 2004 we want to send a man to the moon, and it won’t hap­pen until 2020?!

    Reply
  7. Christine says:
    July 15, 2005 at 6:44 pm

    Let’s see here, It’s July 2005, at the time I read this. I am glad I heard of it because I want to man this mis­sion. I have always dreamed of going to the moon or far out in space. It seems far fetched to aver­age day peo­ple. Yet to peo­ple like me who actu­ally accom­plish their dreams, it sounds pretty tan­gi­ble! Now I have some­thing to look for­ward to, in my career with NASA. For now I am just va deter­mined Full time col­lege stu­dent. But in the near future, per­spec­tively by NASA’s time frame… You’ll see my name in head­lines, “Christine Sifuentes”. Call me ridicu­lous or a dreamer, I just call it long term plan­ning! I totally agree with this mis­sion, because it seems like in extra­or­di­nary oppor­tu­nity for America to flour­ish, espe­cially dur­ing these times! I feel like I was made to have pride for the USA. I like to say I was BORN INTO THR NAVY, my Dad was an enlisted sailor since 4 years before I was born, and he’s still in! I may have never been active duty or in ROTC, but I have lived a mil­i­tary life day in and day out. I know how it works, and I am cur­rently head­ing for a mas­ters or PHD, and antic­i­pat­ing my full fledged space jump suit! I think every­one should sup­port this AWESOME inquiry NASA’s doing for not only America, but for his­tory of the World!
    Sincerely,
    Christine Sifuentes

    Reply
  8. Bob Greene says:
    July 15, 2005 at 10:40 pm

    This is enough to make me want to buy Alpha Centauri (a space col­o­niza­tion strat­egy game)!
    As any sol­dier can tell you, after the food con­cerns are fixed, com­mu­ni­ca­tions should be high pri­or­ity to coun­ter­act the social issues that will need addressed. People tend to act a bit strangely when left by them­sleves too much. E-​​mail & video con­fer­enc­ing will keep morale high. After all, we all need to stay in touch w/​ fam­ily.
    It would be inter­est­ing to see if ruggedi­zed green­houses would work on the moon.
    Clearly the areas most often in sun­light should be reserved for solar col­lec­tors for energy gath­er­ing, then stor­age. Habitation struc­tures can radi­ate around this por­tion of the moon.
    If it’s cold enough, refrig­er­a­tion shouldn’t be as much as an issue as long as high san­i­ta­tion stan­dards are fol­lowed. Sounds like the chlo­rine bleach & other clean­ing sup­ply man­u­fac­tur­ers will have an addi­tional mar­ket open­ing up!
    On that topic, we can use the same prin­ci­ples of heat pump/​cooling sys­tems for cli­mate con­trol.
    It may be best to have diverse endeav­ors to dimin­ish secu­rity con­cerns in habi­ta­tion struc­tures. Or, maybe some enter­pris­ing com­pa­nies can set up secu­rity con­tracts, as long as they are clearly neu­tral. So, once again, we have to show diver­sity.
    Every nation involved should real­ize that it is in everyone’s best inter­est to fully coop­er­ate to sim­ply sur­vive together there.

    Reply
  9. Mart says:
    August 9, 2007 at 8:37 pm

    Let’s just face it…
    We all got conned by NASA.
    If we want to send peo­ple through the radi­a­tion belts out­side our planet they’ll be fried in a mat­ter of a minute due to extreme radi­a­tion.
    Even with todays tech­nol­ogy astro­nauts will not be able to sur­vive this radi­a­tion in a space shut­tle or a cap­sule in which they claimed to have used in 1969..which was only a mm thick alu­minum plate.…come on, who are they try­ing to fool?
    And what if they did pull it off,..suppose…
    Why than, did we never turn back again.
    If it was all real events,..shouldn’t we have had a daily ‘air­line’ hop­ping up and down with pas­sen­gers by now?
    Noooo, maybe just maybe they’ll man­age to come up with an idea to get peo­ple to the moon in 2020..
    Hold on…wait a minute..
    How did they do it in 1969 than?
    With all them prim­i­tive com­put­ers and unsta­ble rockets…something smells fishy wouldn’t y’all think?
    And still peo­ple believe this shit?
    Wake up.
    It’s a lie,..and very big lie..
    And NASA has a prob­lem indeed.
    Once you told a huge lie to the world… you can’t ‘de-lie’it any­more.
    I think it’s a joke…and peo­ple who still believe in it…O well…dream on people.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Dear Designer; It is somewhat strange that the German Armed forces...
      Zandor
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage