Comments on: US-India Nuclear Cooperation

By: James Millane

James Millane — Fri, 21 Oct 2005 13:15:10 +0000

India developed the bomb in 1974, not now. They have had an exemplary track record (100 times better than china and pakistan) with nuclear non proliferation. How long are we going to keep rewarding nations like pakistan for fear of what bad they can do and ignore India which can do good? In any case, this is inevitable.

By: Greg Pauloson

Greg Pauloson — Wed, 31 Aug 2005 22:26:32 +0000

As someone who has 11 years travelling the continent called India riding a HD, I will support it. I have seen this countrie’s hunger for success & I know they want peace in the world, like we do. Lets support plurarlism, not stalinism!

By: Jay

Jay — Mon, 15 Aug 2005 23:31:34 +0000

Minor point: India is not a Muslim nation.

By: The Cenobyte

The Cenobyte — Wed, 20 Jul 2005 15:06:27 +0000

State players with nukes are really just not the big worry anymore. These guys arn’t the ones that are going to use them against us or even against a country that is not a nuke player. The issue is nuke weapons getting into the hands of non-state players and a good relationship with those that have the bombs might help us keep the bombs from the non-state players that we are so worried about.

By: Byron Skinner

Byron Skinner — Wed, 20 Jul 2005 00:55:15 +0000

For days now the web has been lighted up with stories of Terrorist and nuclear weapons. I’m glad that President Bush just shown exactly where the United States stands in stopping the sale of materials and technology into the Muslim part of the world.
I think I can see the Presidents logic here. It’s better to sell nuclear technology to a country that already has the bomb rather then to a country who wants the bomb. Make new bombs are a no, no make better bombs, well thats ok.
India’s loyality to the United States is only as good as the last tech support contract it gets from HP or Microsoft.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
“Stewart’s Platoon”