DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Brilliant Pebbles Returns

Brilliant Pebbles Returns

BP.jpg
Long-​​time space-​​based mis­sile defense advo­cate Lowell Wood, offi­cially a sci­en­tist at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, has been talk­ing up the Brilliant Pebbles con­cept that he pushed dur­ing the bet­ter part of my ele­men­tary school years.
Wood was at the Capitol Hill Club for an event spon­sored by the American Foreign Policy Council and the Marshall Institute. Sharon Weinberger at Defense Daily sum­ma­rizes Wood’s talk (sub­scrip­tion only, I am afraid).
Wood’s pre­sen­ta­tion was enti­tled “Ballistic Missile Defense in an Ideal World”.
Wood’s “ideal world” is one, pre­sum­ably, where the laws of physics are sub­stan­tially relaxed. One of his slides caught my eye:

Total life-​​cycle cost to the Nation to own the Brilliant Pebbles defen­sive sys­tem was $11 B $11 B (89 $)
CAIG-​​validated, DoD-​​certified-​​to-​​Congress cost esti­mate
Tight con­sen­sus of 3 from the bot­tom up cost-​​estimation projects
All RDT&E, all production-&-deployment; 2 decades ops
Total deployed con­stel­la­tion of 2000 Pebbles
Worst-​​case GPALS threat: Typhoon salvo-​​launching off Bermuda
Clearly met Reagans ..impo­tent and obso­lete.. spec for the SDI
Higher cost esti­mates come from critics-&-opponents
Manifestly, pro­fes­sional nafs ?Will you believe this?!?

Whatever you think of the crit­ics, the American Physical Society and Congressional Budget Office (1996, 2002 and 2004) are not staffed by “pro­fes­sional nafs.“
Of all peo­ple to hurl this charge, Dr. Wood is not the per­son with the most cred­i­bil­ity.
His days pimp­ing the X-​​Ray laser remain a source of con­tro­versy. Worse, in my view, the tech­ni­cally savy Dr. Wood encrypted his .pdf file — some­thing that took me three sec­onds to defeat with Elcomsoft.
Let’s hope Brilliant Pebbles fares bet­ter than Wood’s encryp­tion when deal­ing with adver­sary coun­ter­mea­sures.
– posted by Jeffrey Lewis.

Share |

July 20th, 2005 | Missiles | 668 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/07/20/brilliant-pebbles-returns/Brilliant+Pebbles+Returns2005-07-20+18%3A06%3A15wonk You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « G.I. T.V. | North Korea’s One Ton Bomb? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. conrad says:
    July 20, 2005 at 4:51 pm

    It’s a ter­ri­ble idea that won’t die, both because it’s a money maker and because the egos of guys like this are invested in it.
    Dr. Strangelove rides again!

    Reply
  2. stephen says:
    July 20, 2005 at 5:04 pm

    Bravo, Dr. Wood. Good ideas, tech­ni­cal fea­si­bil­ity, and solid strate­gic vision remain your hall­mark. The coun­try needs more of this.

    Reply
  3. jtw says:
    July 20, 2005 at 10:19 pm

    This peb­bles has been talked about since the early 1990’s.
    If these peo­ple couldnt develop it in 10 years since it has been con­veived, they prob­a­bly arent qual­i­fied to do so.
    Its a good idea, but its also a com­mon sense idea. And doesnt auto­mat­i­cally mean they should receive fund­ing or are bril­liant.
    But if peb­bles worked per­fect, it would be a good com­pli­ment to a ground based mis­sile inter­cep­tor type defense sys­tem.
    But what if peo­ple shoot things from space, their idea is directed to mis­siles that could fly in “earths orbit range”.
    What is Russia or China already has nuclear mis­siles float­ing around mil­lion of miles away from Earth ready to launch back at the Earth from a sort of autonomous remote space sta­tion.
    THen this sys­tem would fail.

    Reply
  4. Directorate says:
    July 21, 2005 at 4:24 am

    The idea is not a bad idea, it is sim­ply the lack of com­pet­ing tech­no­log­i­cal inno­va­tions that give it longevity. The US is expe­ri­enc­ing a seri­ous brain-​​gap. All those hours on the web, in front of the TV or on the X-​​box instead of the draw­ing boards will even­tu­ally do the US in. Old cre­ative ideas have an ever-​​longer shelf life. Such explains the remak­ing of 30 year old tv shows into films. Creativity is sti­fled by paci­fi­ca­tion. Technology users and wide­spread sci­en­tific ignoarance in the US go hand-​​in-​​hand.

    Reply
  5. Chris Werkshage says:
    February 1, 2006 at 7:52 pm

    Space Based weapons have a few advan­tages.
    1-​​Mantinence is nill. But there is always the prob­lem with mis-​​firing. For instance, durig any armor traing there is that pos­si­bil­ity of a com­plete fail­ure on both;
    a. The pow­der primer and;
    b. the elec­tri­cal fir­ing mech­a­nism.
    2-​​But in non-​​essential tar­get­ing or low-​​prioity tar­get, this method would be the best to advert any dan­ger to U.S. troops with no need to enter that arena of bat­tle.
    * Eletronic Warfare (such a the PREDATOR drone) has proved more than a use­ful tool in com­bat. But we may at times to fail to rec­og­nize what we tend to call ‘Dug-​​in’ troops. Fortified posi­tions will for­ever require:
    SEALs
    Delta Force, includ­ing al of the 1st Special Ops.
    And just well trained sol­diers. *
    Chris Werkshage
    Looking to tan soon.
    Brooklyn, New York.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage