DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » North Korea’s One Ton Bomb?

North Korea’s One Ton Bomb?

The Financial Times reports a North Korean defec­tor claims “Kim Jong-il’s regime has made a one-​​tonne nuclear bomb and is work­ing on lighter weapons that could be fired more reli­ably, accord­ing to a South Korean mag­a­zine.“
Is this plau­si­ble? Yeah, kinda.
I wrote a blog post about this a while back, as did my co-​​blogger Paul Kerr in Arms Control Today.
The unclas­si­fied tes­ti­mony on North Korea and the CTBT sug­gests Pyongyang has “sim­ple fission-​​type nuclear weapons … val­i­dated … with­out con­duct­ing yield-​​producing nuclear tests.
“Simple fission-​​type” is a term of art that means FRICKIN’ HEAVY.
Simple_fission_type_devices.jpg
Not heavy like Liz Taylor, but heavy like the Nagaski device (left, with a friend), which weighed 9,000 lbs. In prac­tice, “sim­ple fission-​​type” means too heavy for a long-​​range bal­lis­tic mis­sile, although the emmi­nent John Holdren allowed that a new nuclear state might pro­duce an unre­li­able war­head that needs test­ing in the 1,0002,000 pound range.
Rowan Scarborough (of the Washington Times) reported on a clas­si­fied DIA report that esti­mated the NORKs couldn’t do bet­ter than 650–750 kg (1,400–1,700 lbs).
So, one ton is at the edge of plau­si­ble, but my guess is they aren’t that good.
– posted by Jeffrey Lewis.

Share |

July 20th, 2005 | Nukes, Those Nutty Norks | 688 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/07/20/north-koreas-one-ton-bomb/North+Korea%27s+One+Ton+Bomb%3F2005-07-20+22%3A55%3A14wonk You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Brilliant Pebbles Returns | End of the Kamikaze? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. kurt says:
    July 21, 2005 at 8:19 am

    oh! they have one or even ten, lets see? ‚how many do we have? and with a touch of a but­ton thou­sands can be launched right at them.we can give them a to go order no prob­lem. “ROCK STEADY”

    Reply
  2. regan says:
    July 21, 2005 at 11:27 am

    i don’t think it mat­ters how many we have as long as they have just one. it only takes one to lose a nuclear war.

    Reply
  3. Byron Skinner says:
    July 21, 2005 at 1:32 pm

    Has any­one seen this weapon?
    Is all we have is the word of some­one in PDRK that such a weapon exist?
    So far every thing the PDRK has said that has been made pub­lic is not quite what we were told?
    I know this report from PDRK has any­thing to do with the Bush Administration’s ask­ing Congress to fund the nuclear pena­tra­tor weapon (B-​​85?) The DOE has refused to put it into their bud­get now it’s the DoD’s turn to try. Or does it?
    Like the old Wendy’s Commerical use to say,“Where’s the beef?”.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner
    “Stewart’s Platoon”

    Reply
  4. Cbab1 says:
    July 21, 2005 at 2:10 pm

    Sounds like a “truck bomb”.

    Reply
  5. GomeTang says:
    July 21, 2005 at 4:47 pm

    First of all, the only coun­try they’d be using the bomb on would be either S. Korea or Japan. That whole area is not that big, and if any type of nuclear war began, Most of Western Asian would be FUBAR.

    Reply
  6. free psp games says:
    July 24, 2008 at 4:24 pm

    hey, what’s up?

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Sexing up the Headline
      a href="http://www.game4pow er.com">Buy wow...
      buy wow  gold
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage