About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Archive for August, 2005

Katrina: Relief Links

Wednesday, August 31st, 2005

My brother Dan was one of the lucky ones; he left New Orleans long before Katrina made land­fall. But even the for­tu­nate, like him, have no idea whether they will have homes or jobs when they return — and may not know for weeks, or even months.
Dan is about to start the 1400-​​mile drive to our folks’ house, to wait things out for a while. Many oth­ers don’t have that lux­ury. Give to one of the char­i­ties linked here.

Giant Blimp on the Rise

Wednesday, August 31st, 2005

The idea is pretty wild, even for the dream­ers at Darpa: build a giant blimp that can haul 1,800 sol­diers and their gear 12,000 nau­ti­cal miles, in less than a week.
wired_blimp.jpgBut the Pentagon’s research arm is seri­ous enough about the project, code-​​named Walrus, to hand out more than $6 mil­lion to Lockheed Martin and Aeros Aeronautical Group to start design­ing the thing.
The Defense Department has renewed its inter­est in blimps in recent years; a pair of teth­ered air­ships kept watch over the giant American mil­i­tary com­plex near the Baghdad air­port, when I was there. The “tri-​​phibian” (air, land, sea) Walrus is par­tic­u­larly intrigu­ing because the Pentagon is try­ing to fig­ure out ways to make American forces less reliant on deep-​​water ports, for­eign bases, and billion-​​dollar air­ports to wage war. The Army’s Surface Deployment and Distribution Command has its own plans for a such an air­ship.
Darpa hopes the designs they’ve just funded will lead to a small-​​scale Walrus, capa­ble of cart­ing 30 tons, by 2008, Defense Industry Daily notes. That’s as much as today’s C-​​130 trans­port planes. But it’s only a frac­tion of the mil­lion pounds that the agency wants the Walrus will ulti­mately be able to lug around.
(Illustration by John MacNeill, used with premission.)

Laser Sat’s Big Pipes

Tuesday, August 30th, 2005

“Todays mil­i­tary satel­lites “take about two min­utes to trans­fer a sim­ple photo,” Defense News notes. “That same image could take about 23 sec­onds on the next-​​generation Advanced Extremely High Frequency satel­lites, which will start to go up in the next few years.“
tsat_md.jpgThe third wave of U.S. orbiters, sched­uled for launch in the mid-​​2010s, “could move the image in far less than a sec­ond.” And they’d use lasers to do it.

Such blind­ing speed could finally bring to life the Pentagons visions of net­worked sen­sors and shoot­ers unmanned aer­ial vehi­cles, Joint Strike Fighters, war­ships and troops on the ground trad­ing instant images and video any­where in the world.
The Air Force’s Transformational Satellite System (TSAT) pro­gram got off the ground about two years ago.. Boeing and Lockheed, which each have half-​​billion-​​dollar con­tracts to develop ini­tial TSAT sys­tems, are com­pet­ing for a final pro­duc­tion con­tract to be awarded in a year or so. Both have reported ini­tial suc­cess in basic laser com­mu­ni­ca­tions and other fea­tures.
TSAT will offer jam-​​proof radio and laser con­nec­tions to com­pact sur­face receivers. Instead of lug­ging around brick-​​sized satel­lite phones, troops will sport BlackBerries that deliver space intel­li­gence on the run.


Sounds great. But the Air Force fig­ures it’ll take $12-$18 bil­lion to put the five-​​satellite con­stel­la­tion in orbit. And, given the mil­i­tary space program’s track record of leg­en­dar­ily large screw-​​ups, it’s far from clear whether Congress will pony up for TSAT.

During the 2005 bud­get process, law­mak­ers cut $300 mil­lion from the $775 mil­lion request. In 2006, the Air Force is ask­ing for $836 mil­lion. The House Armed Services Committee has rec­om­mended only about half that be approved, while the Senate Armed Services would like a cut of about $200 million.

THERE’S MORE: The Air Force is adding four more anti-​​satellite jam­mers to its arse­nal of orbiter stop­pers, Inside Defense reports.

Rapid Fire 8/​29/​05

Monday, August 29th, 2005

* Cops n’ robot in Chicago stand­off
* Get your secret gov­ern­ment dossier
* Navy’s giant, float­ing run­way
* FBI: peace marchers = ter­ror­ists
* Unmanned fire­fight­ers
(back­ground here)
* Dumb, needy, lov­able compu-​​brains


(Big ups: JQP)

Army Doc: “Bring Us Home”

Monday, August 29th, 2005

Captain Daniel Green is an bat­tle­field sur­geon, treat­ing sol­diers and Iraqi civil­ians around Baghdad’s Green Zone. He has seen more casu­al­ties — and inter­acted with more Iraqis — than the vast major­ity of GIs over there. And that has given the cap­tain a dif­fer­ent per­spec­tive on this war. He isn’t happy with how it’s being run. In an e-​​mail to friends and fam­ily back home, Green says that it’s time for U.S. forces to get out of Iraq.

I don’t rightly know what your US news is say­ing, but here are a few of my own obser­va­tions… The US Army is putting forth its main effort to train Iraqi sol­diers… It will real­is­ti­cally take years before their Army and police are suf­fi­cient to pro­tect the peo­ple and resist inter­nal cor­rup­tion. The reports that the com­mands are mak­ing to the higher-​​ups are biased and sugar-​​coated. The cor­rup­tion is under­played and the achievements/​milestones exag­ger­ated. The results how­ever, may con­vince Congress and that a suc­cess­ful pull-​​out is close.
At this point I’d appre­ci­ate [it]. I’ve done my part. I’ve per­son­ally come to the law-​​of-​​diminishing-​​returns. The remain­ing process will be slow and ardu­ous. Increasing finan­cial expen­di­tures and man-​​hours are going to be needed to sus­tain any sig­nif­i­cant growth.
It’s sim­i­lar to build­ing a house. From the ini­tial ground-​​breaking to foun­da­tion and fram­ing, things seem to go remark­ably fast, giv­ing the home own­ers an unre­al­is­tic sense of impend­ing move-​​in. Then the minor details like out­lets, appli­ances, trim work, and cab­i­netry begin and lit­tle progress is noted after long peri­ods. The tenants-​​to-​​be get anx­ious. The same is tak­ing place here. The American pub­lic will not be able to con­sciously mea­sure our pro­duc­tiv­ity even with the best of media report­ing.
Besides, I think the mil­i­tary is the wrong force at this point. We deal effec­tively with the com­bat train­ing, but this cor­rup­tion is a new species. We need Americans more attune to the nui­sances of inter­nal gov­ern­men­tal fraud…people more like our own law­mak­ers. Soldiers need to focus on com­bat, not mafia arbi­tra­tion.
I wit­nessed a com­pany com­man­der a few months ago try to expose and bring to jus­tice the per­pe­tra­tors of an intri­cately weaved plot of elec­tric­ity theft. The King-​​Pin of the scheme was none other than the chair­man of the city coun­cil. That went over well…
If it moves shoot it. If it doesn’t move, shoot it any­way, and leave the rest to the State Department. Bring us home.

THERE’S MORE: As Jon reminds us in the com­ments, Michael Yon has been doing great fron­line blog­ging from Mosul.

Styrofoam First, Lightning Guns Later

Sunday, August 28th, 2005

The line between envy and admi­ra­tion can be pretty thin, when you’re a free­lance writer. Take, for exam­ple, Defense Tech pal Sharon Weinberger’s story in today’s Washington Post Magazine.
stunbeam.jpgIt’s genius: a heart­felt, quirky, sub­tly snarky pro­file of Pete Bitar, an Anderson, Indiana sty­ro­foam recy­cling entre­pre­neur who’s now mar­ket­ing non-​​lethal light­ning guns to the Pentagon. How, she asks, did a guy with no engi­neer­ing back­ground man­age to get a mil­lion bucks from the Defense Department to develop a “StunStrike” weapon?
Great ques­tion — one I wished I had asked at the Virginia “directed energy” con­fer­ence where both Weinberger and I met Bitar for this first time. Anyway, go read her piece. I’ll be fin­ished kick­ing myself by the time you’re done.
THERE’S MORE: Speaking of kick­ing myself, mil­i­tary thinkers have been telling me for months about their idea for bring­ing some order to Iraq. I never got around to writ­ing about it. The New York Times’ David Brooks just did.

You set up safe havens where you can estab­lish good secu­rity. Because you don’t have enough man­power to do this every­where at once, you select a few key cities and take con­trol. Then you slowly expand the size of your safe havens, like an oil spot spread­ing across the pave­ment.
Once you’ve secured a town or city, you throw in all the eco­nomic and polit­i­cal resources you have to make that place grow. The locals see the ben­e­fits of work­ing with you. Your own troops and the folks back home watch­ing on TV can see con­crete signs of progress in these newly regen­er­ated neigh­bor­hoods. You mix your troops in with indige­nous secu­rity forces, and through inti­mate con­tact with the locals you begin to even out the intel­li­gence advan­tage that oth­er­wise goes to the insurgents.

AND MORE: Armchair Generalist has a good round-​​up of the “oil spot” buzz.

M-​​4s? Not so Fast…

Sunday, August 28th, 2005

The Times has an inter­est­ing story on American rel­cu­tance to give Iraqi army units the machine guns and armored Humvees they want.

Simply put, Iraq remains too frag­ile for any plan­ner to know what shape the coun­try will be in six months or a year from now — whether it will reach com­pro­mises and hold together or split apart in a civil war.
And that presents a conun­drum for American mil­i­tary plan­ners. With those ques­tions up in the air, they have to fear that any heavy arms dis­trib­uted now could end up aimed at American forces or feed­ing a grow­ing civil con­flict. And the longer Iraq’s army has to wait for sophis­ti­cated weapons, the longer American forces are likely to be needed in Iraq as a bul­wark against chaos.

New Sensor: Naturally Rad

Friday, August 26th, 2005

total-recall.jpgOhio State is work­ing on a sim­ple new sen­sor that could one day put other detec­tors out to pasture.

Unlike X-​​ray machines or radar instru­ments, the sen­sor doesn’t have to gen­er­ate a sig­nal to detect objects it spots them based on how brightly they reflect the nat­ural radi­a­tion that is all around us every day.
There is always a cer­tain amount of radi­a­tion light, heat, and even microwaves in the envi­ron­ment. Every object the human body, a gun or knife, or an asphalt run­way reflects this ambi­ent radi­a­tion dif­fer­ently.
Paul Berger, pro­fes­sor of elec­tri­cal and com­puter engi­neer­ing and physics at Ohio State and head of the team that is devel­op­ing the sen­sor, likened this reflec­tion to the way glossy and satin-​​finish paints reflect light dif­fer­ently to the eye.
Once the sen­sor is fur­ther devel­oped, it could be used to scan peo­ple or lug­gage with­out sub­ject­ing them to X-​​rays or other radi­a­tion. And if the sen­sor were embed­ded in an air­plane nose, it might help pilots see a run­way dur­ing bad weather.


(Big ups: Schneier. And yeah, that’s a screen grab from Total Recall)

Rapid Fire 8/​25/​05

Thursday, August 25th, 2005

* Police vest can’t stop bul­lets
* Robo-​​guards to Iraq
* Honest-​​to-​​God Bat-​​rope
* Catfish = evil­do­ers?
* Real, vir­tual war games mash up

(Big ups: TT, GO, RC, Sploid)

Baghdad Battle, First Hand

Thursday, August 25th, 2005

Pick up the paper today, and you’ll read reports of “fierce gun bat­tles [that] erupted between about 40 insur­gents and the police… in west­ern Baghdad.“
Here’s what those bat­tles looked like, from a sol­dier who was there. He was kind enough to copy me on an e-​​mail he wrote home imme­di­ately after the fighting.

I just strolled back in to the safety net of my sur­round­ings and have been dragged through chaos the past cou­ple of hours. My brain is still spin­ning and I am not sure where to even start.
102_0699.JPGWe received a request to con­duct a post-​​blast inves­ti­ga­tion of a VBIED (Vehicle Borne Improvised Explosive Device) that det­o­nated near the base camp. The ini­tial report indi­cated that the tar­get was an Iraqi Police (IP) car. We responded to the inci­dent site and found the smol­der­ing remains of a cou­ple of vehi­cles in the mid­dle of the road. It appeared at first glance that the only fatal­i­ties resulted from the sui­cide bomber in the car and per­haps the occu­pants of the IP car. As we walked from our vehi­cles to the inci­dent site, we heard another car bomb det­o­nat­ing near an IP sta­tion approx­i­mately 2 kilo­me­ters away.
We soon received a request to respond. We quickly fin­ished up with the first inci­dent site, but not before we found addi­tional casu­al­ties per­sons in the near vicin­ity. While we pre­pared for move­ment to the sec­ond site, we heard on the radio that the sec­ond site was now get­ting hit peo­ple were dri­ving past the IP sta­tion, and fir­ing RPG’s [rocket pro­pelled grenades] at IP’s in their vehi­cles. We con­ducted move­ment to the IP sta­tion and when we arrived, the scene was full of chaos.
IP’s were fran­ti­cally run­ning down the streets help­ing injured per­sons. IP vehi­cles were speed­ing up and down the streets look­ing for the cul­prits. Vehicles were burn­ing. Gun fire erupted in the back­ground and we just pulled our vehi­cles into a for­ma­tion to pro­vide a good tac­ti­cal pos­ture and pre­pared to unleash a heavy vol­ley of steel. After every­thing set­tled down, we con­tin­ued to do our work. We found an IED nearby that was meant to add to the attack.
I don’t usu­ally write home and talk about the details of spe­cific inci­dents because I feel com­pelled to keep the chaos out of the homes of fam­ily and friends. But today felt dif­fer­ent. I don’t know why I had the need or desire to talk about today’s events — other than the fact that per­haps it was time to vent some fumes. All of my sol­diers deal with the real­ity of what we face every­day in dif­fer­ent ways. Some have made pacts to not write home and pos­si­bly worry fam­ily. Perhaps I am wrong in doing so, but I thought I would pro­vide some insight to what you might not see on the news tonight. You will not be able to smell the burnt remains of the sui­cide bombers or the IP’s. You prob­a­bly won’t see the charred remains of per­sons in the vehi­cles. And you won’t be able to see the full effects of a care­fully placed VBIED with a follow-​​up attack with RPG’s and small arms fire.
While writ­ing, I decided to comb through my pic­tures and add one. But I’ll adhere to my promise to not send any­thing too graphic. Perhaps, if you catch the news, you might just see that sui­cide bombers once again rocked Baghdad.