DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Sabra Tech » Camera Shoot

Camera Shoot

“In the near future, a soldier who needs a quick look over the next hill will be able to aim his rifle skyward, fire a grenade-sized reconnaissance device and instantly receive imagery on his pocket computer,” writes Defense News’ Barbara Opall-Rome.
firefly.jpg“No special training or adaptation equipment is necessary” to fire the Firefly, from Israel’s Rafael Armament Development Authority, or Israel Military Industry’s Reconnaissance Rifle Grenade.
Grunts just fire the disposable “ballistic cameras” from “standard-issue M203 grenade launchers attached to M16 or other assault rifles,” and then wait for the pictures to come back, 8 seconds and 600 meters later.
In this way, the ballisitc cameras a lot like the pint-sized drones which have become so popular among American company commanders in Iraq.
In 2002, the U.S. Army had 25 year-long Raven unmanned mini-planes; today, company and platoon chiefs are using about 800 in combat.
“Why the boom?” I asked in Wired a few months back.

Eyes in the sky keep soldiers from getting killed. “The way you used to get intel on the battlefield was you fought for it, sending your squad into a building, forcing your way in,” says former Army captain Phillip Carter. Now company commanders can see around corners and over hills — a God’s-eye perspective that once was the domain of generals, with their Predators, manned spy planes, and satellites.

The Ravens are simple to use — one of the best-known operators is a cook. But, with no guidance system to operate, the ballistic cameras would be easier still: “point and shoot,” to use a cliche. Which means the ability to see a battlezone from above could shift from a general to a captain to a buck private, rifle in hand.

Share |

August 2nd, 2005 | Sabra Tech | 939 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/08/02/camera-shoot/Camera+Shoot2005-08-02+20%3A32%3A57noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 8/2/05 | Hear This — or Better Yet, Don’t » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Pedestrian says:
    August 2, 2005 at 10:36 pm

    The question is its cost, and reusability. It is likely cheap but if it is only useful several times, the life cost might be worse than compared with UAV even those cheap like CyberBug. If that is not a problem, it may be worth a try.

    Reply
  2. Walter E. Wallis says:
    August 3, 2005 at 11:11 am

    This needs to be a throwaway, cheap enough so we don’t have to stint on their use.

    Reply
  3. The Cenobyte says:
    August 3, 2005 at 1:56 pm

    TOC (Total cost of ownership) is something I am very familiar with being an IT guy. The TOC on a item like this is a bit like calcutating the worth of insurance. If you never need it, it’s a huge waste of money, when you do it’s worth dozens of times more than it’s cost.
    I say unless the cost of this item is very much higher than traditional UAVs they should roll them out as the use of something that can be at the fire team level is likely so high (How much is Pvt. Joe worth again?)

    Reply
  4. eujinn says:
    August 3, 2005 at 8:45 pm

    I reckon RC (remote controlled) choppers or devices such as the X-UFO should be perfected, made cheaper and smaller…then fitted with cameras. That way the military will have reusable, accurate and reliable means of retrieving surveillance info quickly and easily. The X-UFO for instance can move the same way a chopper can, but is quieter and easier to control.

    Reply
  5. Kevin says:
    August 5, 2005 at 3:56 am

    So, the “basic grunt” now will have to carry a PDA with screen big enough to watch the images, (gprs attached so he can send data to fire support units) Medtech? Yup. Water, food, ammo, a small tent… HUD in the helmet, ceramic plates in the west, cameras on rifles, cameras in grenades, Radio, cables, batteries, TAG gear? Yeah those too… laser-sights and “pointers”… and a 16 wheeler to carry all this stuff while he fights.
    The “wired” soldier concept is getting way too sophiasticated for actual combat.
    Then comes a guy with minimum armor and a good old AK and ruins your day.
    Still it can be a good add-on… but not for a line soldier. You WILL need training, not to use the device, but in small units tactics, as what to use FOR. Old infantry teams had grunts, a heavy gunner (MG), an anti armor guy, and a medtech.
    As precision missiles and TAG technology improves, you need no anti-tank gear…just a laser and a radio to call the suport fire. So you can switch this guy for the above mentioned operator… (or even an ECM-ECCM soldier if the trend escalates so fast.)

    Reply
  6. Raven says:
    August 7, 2005 at 10:52 pm

    This seems like a huge waste of time/money. the average grunt will never use one his commander will say they are just to expencive to use and with budget cuts and all and by the time you shoot round. the pic gets back 8 sec later and your commander’s aid gets the info from intel whom then “advises” your commanders aid who give the info to the commander(and gets it all wrong) who then radios the gunny who then tells the cpl who .. wait 2 days have passed and every thing has changed. Where this is good is a quick over shoot of the enemies base.. wait we use sat’s for that Nvm. Yea these are a brilliant piece of junk and good for the kids to play with.

    Reply
  7. jimbo92107 says:
    September 14, 2005 at 3:19 am

    I think it should be rechargeable and reusable, so little kids can play with them. In most of the battle zones where we send US troops, a lot of homes are flattened by grenades, mortars, etc. So, let kids play with the cool little drones.

    Reply
  8. usschallenger says:
    June 4, 2008 at 9:55 pm

    I think that they are good ideas.If some one can toss a video grenade into a room before going into it that is always a good thing. The only thing that I say is that they should add a small explosive charge to it, just so that when it is done trasnsmitting it won’t fall into the wrong hands so that they can take it apart and figure out how to jam the signal.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gee, I wonder why? Oh! Maybe it's because the...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It would also help, a LOT to 'limit' excess...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      And flush ALL those dollars already spent down the...
      WillyPete
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage