DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bomb Squad » Iran Supplying Iraq’s Bombs?

Iran Supplying Iraq’s Bombs?

On Wednesday, I talked briefly about how Iraqi insur­gents’ are increas­ingly using armor-​​piercing “explo­sively formed pro­jec­tiles” to form the deadly hearts of their impro­vised bombs.
truck_blast3.jpgToday, the Times is report­ing that “many of the new, more sophis­ti­cated road­side bombs… have been designed in Iran.”

The spread of the new weapons seems to sug­gest a new and unusual area of coop­er­a­tion between Iranian Shiites and Iraqi Sunnis to drive American forces out — a pos­si­bil­ity that the com­man­ders said they could make lit­tle sense of given the increas­ing vio­lence between the sects in Iraq.
Unlike the impro­vised explo­sive devices devised from Iraq’s vast stock­piles of mis­siles, artillery shells and other arms, the new weapons are spe­cially designed to destroy armored vehi­cles, mil­i­tary bomb experts say. The bombs fea­ture shaped charges, which pen­e­trate armor by focus­ing explo­sive power in a sin­gle direc­tion and by fir­ing a metal pro­jec­tile embed­ded in the device into the tar­get at high speed. The design is crude but effec­tive if the vehicle’s armor plat­ing is struck at the cor­rect angle, the experts said.
Since they first began appear­ing about two months ago, some of these devices have been seized, includ­ing one large ship­ment that was cap­tured last week in north­east Iraq com­ing from Iran…
Pentagon and intel­li­gence offi­cials say that some ship­ments of the new explo­sives have con­tained both com­po­nents and fully man­u­fac­tured devices, and may have been spir­ited into Iraq along the porous Iranian bor­der by the Iranian-​​backed, anti-​​Israeli ter­ror­ist group Hezbollah, or by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard. American com­man­ders say these bombs closely matched those that Hezbollah has used against Israel.
“The devices we’re see­ing now have been machined,” said a mil­i­tary offi­cial who has access to clas­si­fied report­ing on the insur­gents’ bomb-​​making abil­i­ties. “There is evi­dence of some sophistication.”

Share |

August 6th, 2005 | Bomb Squad | 106102 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/08/06/iran-supplying-iraqs-bombs/Iran+Supplying+Iraq%27s+Bombs%3F2005-08-06+22%3A08%3A29noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 8/​6/​05 | Block That Missile! » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nicholas Weaver says:
    August 6, 2005 at 6:24 pm

    Aren’t there at least 100 TONs of RDX and HMX explo­sive out there looted from but a sin­gle site and Allah (or his ser­vants) only know where? And who knows what else?
    Isn’t the whole point of these explo­sives is there abil­ity to make high qual­ity shaped explo­sive charges?

    Reply
  2. eek says:
    August 6, 2005 at 10:49 pm

    You know, I get a bit tired of see­ing these ‘reports’ in the NYT that offer ‘evi­dence’ on a hearsay basis. How much cre­dence do we give ‘a mil­i­tary offi­cial’ after the bull­shit pub­lished up to the Iraq fiasco.
    Given the level of sophis­ti­ca­tion in Iraqi cul­ture before we bombed ‘em back to the stone age, I’d say there is a good chance they might have a machin­ist or two around with the moti­va­tion and/​or train­ing to pro­duce a device the was ‘machined’ and had a level ‘of some sophis­ti­ca­tion’. CRAP!! If this really is the level of our mil­i­tary Intel, it’s no won­der we are get­ting our butts kicked.…..

    Reply
  3. Aaron says:
    August 6, 2005 at 11:07 pm

    How am I sup­posed to believe any­thing that comes from the NYTimes or the mil­i­tary, or the govt.?
    Does this mean they want to invade Iran???

    Reply
  4. DM says:
    August 6, 2005 at 11:53 pm

    http://​www​.alert​net​.org/​t​h​e​n​e​w​s​/​n​e​w​s​d​e​s​k​/​N​0​5​2​1​1​6​3​8​.​htm
    WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) — The British gen­eral com­mand­ing multi­na­tional troops in south­east­ern Iraq said on Friday that wor­ries about Iranian influ­ence in Iraq appeared to be based largely on spec­u­la­tion, not facts.
    The com­ment to Pentagon reporters by British Royal Marines Maj. Gen. J.B. Dutton came as senior U.S. offi­cials con­tin­ued to charge that Tehran’s gov­ern­ment was actively try­ing to side­track Baghdad’s fledg­ing democ­racy.
    “The ques­tion of Iranian involve­ment is always a dif­fi­cult one because there’s a lot of spec­u­la­tion about it and not many facts,” Dutton said in a tele­con­fer­ence inter­view from his Basra head­quar­ters in south­ern Iraq.

    Reply
  5. Sean Burke says:
    August 7, 2005 at 6:22 am

    What’s Farsi for “Tonkin Gulf”?
    Di di mau, y’all!

    Reply
  6. Noah Shachtman says:
    August 7, 2005 at 11:06 am

    Nick: If I under­stand right, HDX and the like aren’t really what makes shaped charges. The impor­tant part is machin­ing cop­per (or another metal) into the proper form.
    Eek: legit point.

    Reply
  7. Nicholas Weaver says:
    August 7, 2005 at 12:50 pm

    But machin­ing tools is the com­mon stuff. A lathe is not a hor­ri­bly sophis­ti­cated machine, there are HOW many mil­lions of them? And if you are will­ing to be slow, a file and saw may be suf­fi­cient.
    You have three com­po­nents to man­u­fac­ture an effec­tive IED:
    Raw Materials
    Machining Tools
    Skill
    Skill has been democ­ra­tized, we have so much infor­ma­tion already out there about the decen­tral­ized but very effec­tive com­mu­ni­ca­tion infra­struc­tures built: One insur­gent (eg, some for­mer Baath party com­mando) dis­cov­ers some­thing and in a cou­ple weeks, every insur­gent knows it.
    Machining is com­mon: Any metal shop should have the level of machin­ing needed to build these shaped charges: a lathe and a mill. Or, if patient, some of the machin­ing could even be done by hand. Some insur­gent could get grandma to cut cop­per pieces.
    Its often the mate­ri­als that are the limit, at least for any­body in the first world (it was a sig­nif­i­cant limit on the London bombers, if they had HMX or RDX, they would have prob­a­bly killed more peo­ple and been able to det­o­nate more reli­ably). But in Iraq, thanks to our gross mis­han­dling of known caches, com­bined with who knows how many unknown caches, mate­ri­als aren’t a prob­lem either.
    If any­thing, what may be the limit is not explo­sive but COPPER. You need to have a pretty big hunk to machine into what you want (unless the cop­per pieces are mosaics pieced together), so unless you have a fur­nice (and could there­fore cast the parts you need from scrap, and then you would prob­a­bly cast bits, and a fur­nice ain’t quite as stealthy as a machine shop), where is the cop­per com­ming from?
    The proof/​suggestion of some sig­nif­i­cant uni­fied actor would NOT be com­mon design theme (which sug­gests many man­u­fac­tur­ers fol­low­ing the same idea), but com­mon imple­men­ta­tion (eg, IDENTICAL shapes & sizes rather than close. Casting of metal parts intead of machin­ing. Common (sin­gle tool) marks on mul­ti­ple IEDs).
    Some things (eg, mosaic’ed cop­per pieces, evi­dence of hand tools) would strongly sug­gest local design and imple­men­ta­tion.
    So there are things which could tell you whether some sin­gle sig­nif­i­cant enti­tity is mak­ing these IEDs, or we have the dis­trib­uted net­work which appears to be hap­pen­ing. And the pres­ence of shaped and formed explo­sive charges, given the infor­ma­tion and mate­ri­als avail­able in Iraq, is per­fectly con­sis­tent with the distributed-​​network model of the insurgency.

    Reply
  8. Kier says:
    August 7, 2005 at 4:42 pm

    Personally i am appaled that no one in America has yet had the guts to put that nor­we­gian who posted ear­lier in his place. Who does he think he is, telling us how to fight the war on ter­ror when the coun­tries he’s sug­gest­ing we have the balls to fight to begin with. And as for all the bash­ing of amer­i­can mil­i­tary intel­li­gence, ours is the finest mil­i­tary intel­li­gence col­lec­tion in the world. From satelites in space to the marines and sol­diers on the ground every­thing is state of the art and held to high­est lev­els of pro­fee­sion­al­ism. The field of fire doc­trine being bashed by this walk­ing heap euro­trash has gvien us the 100 hour grop­und war, vic­tory in Afghanistan, vic­tory in major com­bat oper­a­tions in Iraq, not to men­tion the break­ing of almost every offen­sive mil­i­tary with the excep­tion of those set by another amer­i­can army, Patton’s third. And as for our alleged greed and facism, would some­body please tell that idiot he would be speak­ing ger­man right now if it weren’t for the greedy facist amer­i­cans. And for nor­ways “50 years of suc­ces­ful peace­keep­ing” when was the last time nor­way had the nuts to stand up for what is right and bring democ­racy to 50 mil­lion peo­ple
    Let me think.… NEVER!
    So until that hap­pens mr. nor­we­gian stop your belly aching and say thank you for once. You owe us your very free­dom, but we’ll set­tle for your respect.

    Reply
  9. Aaron says:
    August 7, 2005 at 8:25 pm

    Further to Kier’s com­ment:
    “America Kicks A-​​S!“
    “YEAH!“
    “You want a piece of this?!?“
    “F–k yeah!”

    Reply
  10. benny deese says:
    August 7, 2005 at 8:30 pm

    as every­one knows,WE DO THE THINGS THAT THE REST OF THE WORLD WANT DO!BUT IN THE END THEY AS A WHOLE ARE GLAD WE DID.REMEMBER COWARDS CAN TALK THE TALK,BUT THEY CANT WALK THE WALK.
    I HAVE BEEN TO IRAQ AND I KNOW ITS WORKING!
    DEESE OUT
    PS-​​THANKS TO OUR ITALIAN FRIENDS ANTICA BABILONIA

    Reply
  11. Infosec Guy says:
    August 7, 2005 at 11:01 pm

    Kier, if American intel is such hot shit, than how come we have NO CLUE as to the Table of Organization of the insur­gents, after nearly two and a half years?
    While their intel is so curst good they can set up and bag an entire squad in sup­port of a Marine sniper team. Which they did, just last week.

    Reply
  12. Just Another Thought says:
    August 8, 2005 at 2:16 am

    I com­pletely agree. American MI needs mas­sive restruc­tur­ing. But I also agree that the U.S. is doing all it can to fight for what it belives in. Aternatively, what other choice does it have? When any super­power is attacked, they will retal­i­ate. And yes, although some of America’s actions have been unwar­ranted to their claim, their actions are still war­ranted nonethe­less. When a coun­tries’ gov­ern­ment is reg­u­larly com­mit­ing war crimes, is not rep­re­sen­ta­tive of its cit­i­zens and is not will­ing to nego­ti­ate or improve itself, then action needs to be taken. Am I imply­ing that America should be the coun­try to take action? no. I agree with the sug­ges­tion about bring­ing in inter­na­tional peace­keep­ing troops. I think that every coun­try should be able to voice its opin­ion and con­tribute to the inter­na­tional cause. But this state­ment falls short when placed into cur­rent con­text. International enforce­ment can­not occur with­out the sup­port from those respec­tive coun­tries. The U.S. is not opposed to out­side help, but thus far, there has been no indi­ca­tion to send such an elite force of 5000 to Iraq. And as far an inter­na­tional aid assis­tance is con­sid­ered, yes Norway has done an incred­i­ble job in regard to assis­tance, and yes the U.S. does have a large amount of tied aid, but is not alone in this respect. Criticism will not resolve the world’s prob­lems, nor will the ill judg­ment of a super­pow­ers mil­i­tary.
    To this day, there has never been des­i­cive mil­i­tary action against two oppos­ing democ­ra­cies, and if democ­racy con­tin­ues to be upheld, there never will be.

    Reply
  13. Alex says:
    August 8, 2005 at 5:44 am

    It’s absurd to sug­gest that the Iranians would be help­ing the *Sunni* insur­gents — as insane as imag­in­ing the Reverend Ian Paisley smug­gling arms for the IRA, or more so. The Iranians want an Iraq dom­i­nated by pro-​​Iranian, Shia politi­cians — in short, SCIRI. They don’t want the peo­ple they fought for nine years. It’s that sim­ple.
    Re: Copper. Anyone care to guess where those power lines they kept cut­ting down went? Everyone thought they were doing it for profit — but who was buy­ing? Classic 4GW — put out the lights, turn a profit, and gain the resources needed to upgrade your bombs all in one insur­gent trifecta.

    Reply
  14. Dayon says:
    August 8, 2005 at 10:31 am

    Does any­one here remem­ber that old mil­i­tary saw, “the enemy of my enemy is my friend”? During the hay­day of the ter­ror­ists 70’s, we had the IRA train­ing in the same camps and net­work­ing with the PLO, Sunni and Shia work­ing together is not really sur­pris­ing or all that unre­al­is­tic. As always, they will turn on each other again, if no other enemy is there. Iran has seemed to have learn a valu­able les­son as well; it is better,less expen­sive, and safer to fight a proxy war than to go head to head with a Superpower. For the price of a few machined parts (the equiv­i­lant of a sin­gle factory’s out­put for a day) they frighten the weak at heart, give ammu­ni­tion to the President’s oppo­si­tion, kill our sol­diers, and receive the praise and accla­ma­tion of those who refuse to stand against fun­da­men­tal evils (such as expressed by even some here). For them, it is a win win sit­u­a­tion with very lit­tle cost. We should raise that cost and make such inter­fer­ence, very, very expen­sive.
    Let us not waste time and our sol­diers lives by invad­ing, let us rather destroy crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture, such as their oil pipelines, their tankers, their comm cen­ters, their nuclear test­ing facil­i­ties. Anything they value of a secu­liar nature is fair game. For every IED that goes off, they lose some­thing. We say noth­ing, we give no warn­ing, we make no state­ment after­wards. We just do it.
    Next, we set up a DMZ. Anything or any­one that attempts to cross is destroyed with­out warn­ing, with­out reprieve, with­out regret or sym­pa­thy. Make them more fright­ened of us than of any­thing else on this planet and let them know the price of their evil is death. However, if they leave us and our friends alone, they keep on breathing.

    Reply
  15. DM says:
    August 8, 2005 at 10:54 am

    Until theres some cred­i­ble evi­dence that the Iranians are try­ing to cre­ate any­thing but a civil soci­ety on their bor­ders, lets keep the Iran war-​​talk to a min­i­mum please.
    Dayon — you sound a bit like bin Laden.
    To all you head cut­ters, spleen ven­ters, and mass mur­der­ers out there (Dayon and Jds, you espe­cially) — you are the prob­lem, or at least, peo­ple like you are the prob­lem. The solu­tion, of course, is to move you all to a small moon around jupiter and arm you with nuclear hand-​​grenades. The cost would be born by tele­vis­ing the events that would fol­low, and human­ity would be rid of a pool of poten­tial war crim­i­nals.
    It just seems so right, ya know.

    Reply
  16. Louie says:
    August 8, 2005 at 7:27 pm

    You do not need a machine shop to make a crude self form­ing pena­tra­tor devise. Shape charges are very sim­ple to make one can use a #10 can and make about a 5 pound shape charge and as far as the pena­tra­tor goes it does not have to be cop­per, cop­per is used because of the way it is affected by heat, cop­per melts very uni­formly. A steal plate shaped for the cone of the charge will also work the devise will just not be as effec­tive. That can be com­pen­sated for by increas­ing the size. Shape charges are not rocket sci­ence I learned this stuff in basic demo classes in the 80’s

    Reply
  17. THEBIGMACM says:
    August 9, 2005 at 3:05 pm

    What “Kerry” wrote should be heard by as AMERICANS as can be. Sure the media is biased. They are the back­bone of the ‘demon-​​craps’. When we can get real news, from real reporters, that will be the only time that the coun­try will believe any­thing. One cor­rec­tion though–This war started in November 1979, by IRAN !! and it con­tin­ued with every bomb­ing of American outposts.We need to get off the polit­i­cal band­wagon and on the side of our fight­ing men & womwn-​​GOD BLESS THEM!!

    Reply
  18. DM says:
    August 9, 2005 at 8:16 pm

    BIGMACM — one cor­rec­tion though — the war was actu­ally started by the US in the 1950s when it over­threw a pop­u­lar­ily elected and demo­c­ra­tic gov­erne­ment in Iran, and installing the bru­tal and repes­sive Shah. When the Iranian pop­u­lar rev­o­lu­tion hap­pened, the US took the Shah in and refused to hand him over. Its a bit as if Russia had offered Hitler refuge at the end of WWI. Only then did the Iranians take hostages. The war by the US on Iran was con­tin­ued through­out the Iran-​​Iraq war when it sup­ported Saddam Hussein, sup­ply­ing him with clus­ter bombs, chem­i­cal weapons, and satelite pho­tog­ra­phy.
    Iran was one of the cra­dles of civil­i­sa­tion, and thou­sands of years before the first ver­stiges of euro­pean civi­la­tion, King Cyrus of Persia was declar­ing that “all men are cre­ated equal”.
    Every nation choses or makes its ene­mies. If there is enimnity, one has to ask where it comes from, and to take some mea­sure of respon­si­bil­ity for it.

    Reply
  19. Dayon says:
    August 10, 2005 at 12:00 pm

    And you, DM, sound a bit like a small, not very bright child who resorts to name call­ing when an intel­lec­tual resonse escape him (the irony does not escape me). We are deal­ing with a real life, and for many civil­ians in Iraqi, death situation(kudos to Kerby, by the way, for his update on the actual sit­u­a­tion in that land).
    You see, the prob­lem is that there are peo­ple who, with no real provo­ca­tion, just lame jus­ti­fi­ca­tions (I and my peo­ple are fail­ures, so it must be all your fault!), attack and mur­der those who have done them no harm. They also attack and butcher those who are even of their own faith who just wish to live their lives in peace and be left alone.
    Additional parts of the prob­lem are peo­ple who would excuse this behav­ior (I and my peo­ple are fail­ures, so it must be all your fault! You’re so right, we’re soo hor­ro­bile, it’s alright if you kill and maim and butcher the inno­cent, so longs as it isn’t me).
    The solu­tions I have offered have worked against the sources of ter­ror­ism before, they will work again. They may not be PC, but they will work. Yes, you may state that my solu­tions are rather bloody, how­ever they are effec­tive in stop­ping a proxy war. So you must decide, do you set some­one like me on these mur­der­ers or do you accept their mur­der of the inno­cent? Do you dry up their resources and deny them safe haven or do you allow their killing of inno­cent men, women, and chil­dren to con­tinue? Come, come, DM, give us a more prac­ti­cal solu­tion than plan­e­tary relo­ca­tion. We could, of course, send you as spe­cial embas­sary to any of the ter­ror­ists cell with arms full of love and flow­ers and good will toward all, and see how long you last. Like you said, “It just seems so right, ya know.”

    Reply
  20. DM says:
    August 10, 2005 at 11:19 pm

    “You see, the prob­lem is that there are peo­ple who, with no real provo­ca­tion, just lame jus­ti­fi­ca­tions, attack and mur­der those who have done them no harm.” — are you refer­ring to the US to to the sui­cide bombers here?
    I wasnt resort­ing to name call­ing, but instead to giv­ing a bit of back­ground. The his­tory of the sit­u­a­tion is quite clear; up until the 50s, the US was a hero in the region, but since then it has become uni­ver­sally reviled. This is par­tially as a result of the actions the US has taken in the region. Therefore, if there is enum­nity, take some respon­si­bil­ity for it.
    Dayon, enimnity towards what is arguably the most demo­c­ra­tic nation in the region serves no-​​one, and cer­tainly doest serve the goal of encour­ag­ing lib­eral democ­racy, as we can see from the results of the recent Iranian elec­tions.
    As for your ret­ri­bu­tion strat­egy, well, you might want to do a google on “iter­ated pris­on­ers dilemma” (I found this intro­duc­tory ref­er­ence http://​www​.netal​ive​.org/​t​o​p​i​c​s​/​1​3​965). Either way, your solu­tion seems extreme.
    Dayon, are you Israeli? You solu­tion reminds me of how the Israelis deal with the Palestinians. I dont think any­one could say that the his­tory of the rela­tion­ship between Israelis and Palestinians could be viewed as any­thing but a disaster.

    Reply
  21. Aaron says:
    August 12, 2005 at 3:58 am

    Its amaz­ing the jus­ti­fi­ca­tions the right wingnuts are throw­ing out. Kerby Did you read the arti­cle: Bush great iraqi adven­ture is bread­ing a new gen­er­a­tion of ter­ror­ists all around the world at a quick­en­ing pace. The result is increases in ter­ror­ist world­wide. We’ve shat­tered our rep­u­ta­tion and with it our abil­ity to build the kinds of inter­na­tional coal­tions that served us so well so many times in the past. And we’ve mas­sively weak­ened the army and marines. And got­ten so many killed. And the only num­bers that are going up are the num­ber of ter­ror­ists and the num­ber of attacks.

    Reply
  22. Dayon says:
    August 12, 2005 at 11:43 am

    Nope, not Jewish, raised as a Jehovah’s Witness. Scottish-​​American with alot of French-​​German )thrown in by Ma’s side of things) ances­try. And a litle his­tory for you. We waged war with Iraqi back when they invaded Kuwait (that was in my days with MI). After that, Suddam had his mil­i­tary fire on our planes (that’s attack­ing Americans, to you boys who don’t think sol­diers count as cit­i­zens) that were fly­ing over­flights to keep him from doing chem­i­cal weapon attacks on the Kurds. Did Suddam have chem­i­cal weapons? There’s a Red Cross film of the Kurdish casu­al­i­ties of such attacks. Ask them.
    And Iran “the most demo­c­ra­tic nation in the region”? Please. That state­ment is so patently wrong, it needs no rebut­tal. Sorry, son, that snake oil don’t sell here.
    As to the Israelies and there deal­ings, didn’t you notice that ter­ror­ists attacks against tar­gets in Israel went down after they built that wall to make inser­tions into their ter­ri­tory more dif­fi­cult and that the Palesitinians of Hamas finally came to the table only after Israel started tar­get­ing the lead­ers of Hamas (as the only “assets” they really val­ued were their own hides)? Funny, the rest of the world did.
    And finally: the major­ity of the peo­ple being mur­dered in Iraqi today, are Iraqies. People in the mar­kets get­ting the day’s food, peo­ple look­ing for work in the police depart­ments and secu­rity forces because they believe it’s right and hon­or­able ser­vice, I say again, are being mur­dered by those you appear to revere. And any who help, sup­port, give aid or com­fort, in what­ever way to those mur­der­ers or who, in any way, approve or excuse what they are doing or for some sick and cow­ardly rea­son try to equate those mur­der­ers with our troops are just as guilty of their crimes. Those that sup­port these mur­der­ers are enablers. In law, it is called “Accessory Before the Fact” and “Accessory After the Fact” to mur­der. And that, dear read­ers is truly the bot­tom line here.

    Reply
  23. l says:
    May 6, 2007 at 1:45 pm

    re: left wingnut new “Aaron“
    “new gen­er­a­tion of ter­ror­ists“
    idjit, they’ve been breed­ing new gens of ter­ror­ists since your man Jimmy Carter caused the fall of iran. Not to men­tion the Israeli expe­ri­ence before and after state­hood. Time to wakey wakey..

    Reply
  24. Hellgate gold says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:42 am

    Finally I also said that the most impor­tant thing is to find them­selves on the state mind, play­ing their own, the same as me that if happy I will spend Hellgate gold to buy many things. I hope every­one can play happy in the game.

    Reply
  25. Silkroad gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    Monster: kill young tiger, tiger, tiger champ, or giant tiger. Some advice, stick with young tigers until level 15. You get more xp per hit on young tigers, trust me. Reward: 15300xp, 4000 Silkroad gold, 5000skill points.

    Reply
  26. Sword of the New World Vis says:
    August 8, 2008 at 10:00 pm

    Each class has its own set of stances, which level sep­a­rately from the char­ac­ter itself, and this Sword of the New World Vis makes each char­ac­ter class highly cus­tomiz­able. From the phys­i­cally impos­ing fighter to the mys­ti­cal wiz­ard to the crafty scout to the pow­er­ful ele­men­tal­ist to the bold mus­ke­teer, the array of skills and abil­i­ties avail­able to play­ers is vast.

    Reply
  27. cheap penya says:
    August 16, 2008 at 12:36 am

    She did not like me help her, so she often search which place sell the cheap penya, although I was very sad, but the same I was very admire her, because she was very strong.
    Will not give up the love, Flyff, let the love to fly.

    Reply
  28. cronous money says:
    August 16, 2008 at 12:40 am

    In the end, I hope all my friends in the game can happy every day and had more and more cro­nous money.

    Reply
  29. cronous money says:
    August 16, 2008 at 12:42 am

    In the end, I hope all my friends in the game can happy every day and had more and more cro­nous money.

    Reply
  30. buy Archlord gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 12:52 am

    I already sati­ated. Before my left buy Archlord gold for her just as the end present

    Reply
  31. cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold says:
    September 2, 2008 at 3:51 am

    Now when I talked with them, I often told them how to bought the cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold, they all said that I had a great changed, I am very happy

    Reply
  32. cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold says:
    September 2, 2008 at 3:52 am

    Now when I talked with them, I often told them how to bought the cheap Final Fantasy XI Gold, they all said that I had a great changed, I am very happy

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • New Army PEO on the way
      To get our AAA quality shoes at reasonable price, Your...
      nike air force ones
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage