<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 8/10/05</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/08/10/rapid-fire-81005/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/08/10/rapid-fire-81005/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 08:29:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSAllison</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/08/10/rapid-fire-81005/#comment-110629</link>
		<dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=111#comment-110629</guid>
		<description>Have to wait for the votes to come in on the tele-operated recon vehicle.  Looks like it&#039;d be fairly vulnerable.  Not going to be well armored due to it&#039;s size.  Looks to have a limited ability to see it&#039;s surroundings as in, large, persistent blind spots.  Like to see heavier armament in the javelin class for targets too tough for the MG shown.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to wait for the votes to come in on the tele-operated recon vehicle.  Looks like it’d be fairly vulnerable.  Not going to be well armored due to it’s size.  Looks to have a limited ability to see it’s surroundings as in, large, persistent blind spots.  Like to see heavier armament in the javelin class for targets too tough for the MG shown.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

