DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Bizarro » Brain Caps and Pentagon Pandas

Brain Caps and Pentagon Pandas

I wasn’t able to make it out to DarpaTech 2005, last week’s get-​​together of the Pentagon’s way-​​out resear­achers. Luckily, Defense Tech spy Catherine Macrae Hockmuth snuck in for all of us. She a vet­eran defense indus­try reporter who’s return­ing to the field after a lit­tle hia­tus. Here’s what she found…
IPTO exhibit.jpgIts amaz­ing how much defense con­fer­ences are like episodes of Law & Order. Even when you stop watch­ing for a time its easy to jump back in because the issues never change. Law & Order is for­ever about per­verts on the loose, peo­ple who kill fam­ily for insur­ance, and weird, doped-​​up rich kids who kill for fun. Speeches at defense con­fer­ences are always about short­en­ing DODs odi­ous pro­cure­ment cycle, man­ag­ing hordes of data, lift­ing the fog of war, and man­ag­ing hordes of data.
DarpaTech, a tech­nol­ogy con­fer­ence held every 18 months in Anaheim by the Defense Departments mad sci­en­tists is no excep­tion. Fortunately, Darpa pro­gram man­agers have always had a cer­tain I-have-no-idea-if-this-will-work,-but charm, and that allows for some wild ani­ma­tion and ideas. And, oh yes, pleas to the defense indus­trial com­plex for help, which is the basic func­tion of DarpaTech. Some 2,500 atten­dees lis­tened atten­tively this week as PMs laid out their big ideas, clos­ing with some vari­a­tion on if you can help make this hap­pen come see me.
At that, a few ideas:
Brain Caps. Navy Cmdr. Dylan Schmorrow wants to put brain caps on sol­diers to improve their abil­ity to take in new infor­ma­tion under stress. Schmorrow, a Darpa pro­gram man­ager in the Information Processing Technology Office, is a naval aero­space exper­i­men­tal psy­chol­o­gist. The con­cept is based on the fact that humans can only han­dle so much infor­ma­tion at any given time. As a result, com­plex human-​​machine inter­ac­tive envi­ron­ments com­mon in the mil­i­tary often fail under stress, accord­ing to a descrip­tion of the pro­gram, Improving Warfighter Information Intake [for­merly known as “Augmented Cognition” –ed.], on IPTOs Web site.
Schmorrow said if you were to ask a per­son whether he wanted lunch while he was giv­ing a pre­sen­ta­tion and simul­ta­ne­ously answer­ing ques­tions from a crowd of peo­ple, you wouldnt get much of an answer. Thats because his brains ver­bal cen­ter is over­loaded. But if you ges­tured to him by sim­u­lat­ing eat­ing a sand­wich, he could prob­a­bly nod or motion yes or no.
Schmorrow said brain caps would not read minds; they would just mea­sure types of activ­ity much the way mood rings report when some­one is stressed out. More broadly, as dis­played in IPTOs giant brain exhibit, arti­fi­cial intel­li­gence researchers are try­ing to teach com­put­ers how to learn and rea­son like us. Its the dif­fer­ence between pro­gram­ming a robot to play soc­cer, and enabling a robot to learn the game.
PANDA. Darpas IXO office wants soft­ware that can ana­lyze strange mar­itime behav­ior, alert­ing the Navy when some­things not right such as a ship­ful of ter­ror­ists trans­port­ing WMDs. Apparently, pirates are some­thing of a men­ace on the high seas, hijack­ing com­mer­cial ves­sels, steal­ing and sell­ing illicit mate­ri­als and wreak­ing havoc on the ship­ping indus­try. PANDA, or pre­dic­tive analy­sis for naval deploy­ment activ­i­ties, would track local and global pat­terns of behav­ior by com­mer­cial ves­sels includ­ing their ship­ping routes and rou­tine detours for fuel or paper­work. That way when a ship that always trav­els between Malaysia and Japan winds up in the Indian Ocean we know some­thing is up.
Information Explotation Office (IXO) Program Manager Kendra Moore said cur­rently this sort of track­ing is done man­u­ally based on a list of about 100 ves­sels that are known to be trou­ble­mak­ers. She plans to issue a broad area announce­ment on the pro­gram in the next cou­ple of weeks. Meanwhile, the Sixth Fleet will soon be the first to deploy new soft­ware that will auto­mate the track­ing process until PANDA comes along. Moore said the automa­tion soft­ware, Fast-​​C2AP, would make track­ing down cer­tain ships more like look­ing for a stock price online.
Multi-​​Modal Missiles. The mil­i­tary has mis­siles that can shoot down planes, and destroy tanks and bunkers, what it doesnt have is a sin­gle mis­sile that can do all of those things. Oh, and, Tactical Technology Office Director Art Morrish asks, can it be hand­held? Morrish asked atten­dees to play other thought games, such as:

What if we didnt have to trade effi­ciency for speed? What if we could make air­craft that could fly in and out of an area at Mach 1.5 or bet­ter and still have tens of hours to days of loi­ter time?

Space Dust. Gary Graham, from the Virtual Space Office, con­tin­ued the game with a call for WMD-​​hunting space dust and other novelties.

The time is ripe for rev­o­lu­tion. What if we could launch many small microsatel­lites and net­work them with WiFi, the way we link lap­tops to the web at Starbucks? What if we could develop a launch vehi­cle so light and reusable that we could move from lim­ited launches to space sor­ties? What if we could develop anten­nas that are small on launch, enor­mous on orbit? Or aper­tures that build them­selves in space? What if we could exploit near space to take advan­tage of the closer dis­tances and elim­i­nate orbital launch require­ments alto­gether? What if, in the quest to mon­i­tor weapons of mass destruc­tion (WMDs), we could sprin­kle large geo­graphic areas with dust that changes in the pres­ence of WMD agents and mon­i­tor all this from space?

Sounds swell, Gary. As long as I’m not aller­gic. For more on Catherine’s take on DarpaTech, click on back tomorrow…

Share |

August 15th, 2005 | Bizarro | 12098 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/08/15/brain-caps-and-pentagon-pandas/Brain+Caps+and+Pentagon+Pandas2005-08-15+13%3A01%3A49noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Special Forces’ Drones | Mag: Tehran’s Iraq Moves “Rival Those of U.S.” » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Neil says:
    August 15, 2005 at 2:08 pm

    While the folks at DARPA can indeed be “whacky” it’s worth remem­ber­ing that it was the folks at DARPA who once won­dered “What if we could build a net­work of com­put­ers that would allow peo­ple all over the world to com­mu­ni­cate?“
    Their char­ter is to push the bounds of what is thought to be possible.

    Reply
  2. Alex says:
    August 16, 2005 at 6:58 am

    That “dust” pro­posal will have the tin­foil fra­ter­nity chat­ter­ing like monkeys

    Reply
  3. Mike says:
    August 16, 2005 at 7:19 am

    All of this stuff in the ‘thought games’ has been achiev­able for years — but nobody has been both­ered to make it hap­pen.
    They should do it soon, not just talk about it, there’s so much more to be done in so many fields of thought.

    Reply
  4. ChuckT says:
    August 17, 2005 at 8:13 pm

    What is the deal with DU ? Where do these peo­ple come from that spout stu­pid state­ments about the half-​​life of an inert chunk of metal? I per­son­ally han­dled large amounts of DU more than 20 years ago for well over a year. I have not been found to have any prob­lems due to that “expo­sure” at all. If DU is not vaprized it is not deadly(period). If it is then you have to breath in enough of it to harm your lungs. The chances of doing that are almost not pos­si­ble. Go out and find out what edu­ca­tion means and stop post­ing stu­pid state­ments. There may be a lot of other rea­sons why Vets will come back from the war ill or what­ever but DU is prob­a­bly way down on the list — like below VD for example.

    Reply
  5. Big Al says:
    August 17, 2005 at 9:29 pm

    NIMRUTH needs to stay away from air­lin­ers since DU is com­monly used for counter weights in the flight con­trols of these air­craft. He also might encounter exces­sive expo­sure to cos­mic rays.

    Reply
  6. Joan Butler says:
    August 17, 2005 at 10:01 pm

    how about they use that money to actu­ally help peo­ple. How about they put all that crap back where it came from! THEIR ASS!

    Reply
  7. Kilroy says:
    August 17, 2005 at 10:12 pm

    Yeah, well, mabey the Gulf War Syndrom is real, but as stated above the lik­ley hood of DU being the cuplrit is incred­abilly low. But what about nerve agents or some­thing along thoes lines, that Sadam “didn’t have” hav­ing long term affects on sol­diers? We’d never know about it, if sad­dam unleashed some­thing, or our sol­diers acci­dently cam in con­ntact with it, or we dis­perssed it when we took out a checmi­cal weapons site, and only today do we see the affects of it. But I guess it is impos­si­ble to look out­wards when some­thing is wrong, its always that evil gov con­spir­acy, huh?
    By the way, the lead­ing researchers into G.W.S. belive it was more than likely caused by expo­sure to chem­i­cal agents in Iraq, not from DU, do some read­ing on the subject.

    Reply
  8. erex says:
    August 17, 2005 at 11:46 pm

    Nimrod does have a point though. It did cost a hell of a lot less to drop all of our con­ven­tional weapons in the deserts of Iraq than to take them home after the cold war folded. I am sure the euro­peans didn’t want mil­lions of tons of old toxic and degrad­ing hard bombs left in thier back yard, and the amer­i­cans back home don’t want incin­er­a­tors in their back­yards. Desert storm I was a war of con­veinience for Bush I and Saddam. We dumped our old junk on the desert on top of Saddam’s excess Shiite men. Bush I and Saddam both won that war.
    erex

    Reply
  9. Brenda VonAhsen says:
    August 18, 2005 at 1:13 am

    Re: Depleted Uranium
    Hey Chuck, DU is not an “inert chunk of metal”. You are right that with proper han­dling it can be.…somewhat safe. Once it has been used it become much more radioac­tive. Sometimes on the order of 260 mil­li­rads an hour. The safe limit is 100 per year.
    “a Geiger counter car­ried by a vis­it­ing reporter starts singing when it nears a DU bul­let frag­ment no big­ger than a pen­cil eraser. It reg­is­ters nearly 1,000 times nor­mal back­ground radi­a­tion lev­els on the dig­i­tal read­out.“
    Aplha par­ti­cles are stopped by the skin or cloth. Handled cor­rectly, they need not be dan­ger­ous. The real issue is what hap­pens once it is inside the human body. Common sense should tell one that highly radioac­tive dust inside the body could eas­ily cause can­cer or a host of other health prob­lems.
    “DU experts say they are most con­cerned at how DU is trans­formed on the bat­tle­field, after burn­ing, into a toxic oxide dust that emits alpha par­ti­cles. While those can be eas­ily stopped by the skin, once inside the body, stud­ies have shown that they can destroy cells in soft tis­sue. While one study on rats linked DU frag­ments in mus­cle tis­sue to increased can­cer risk, health effects on humans remain incon­clu­sive.“
    –
    Back on topic. I think that brain caps sound neat. I want one so I don’t need a key­board or a mon­i­tor. Just hook me in. Reminds me of Arthur C Clark’s 3010. Everyone had a brain cap by then. I think he over esti­mated how long it would take.

    Reply
  10. Brenda VonAhsen says:
    August 18, 2005 at 1:15 am

    Oops! Here’s the URL:
    http://​www​.csmon​i​tor​.com/​2​0​0​3​/​0​5​1​5​/​p​0​1​s​0​2​-​w​o​i​q​.​h​tml
    ta-​​ta

    Reply
  11. Graig Burns says:
    August 18, 2005 at 2:14 am

    DARPA did give us the inter­net. It has given us many use­ful things, good things. We have to do war research in order to pre­vent threats that might be around the cor­ner. Having said that, the West spends ridicu­lous amounts of money on threats that aren’t even there. Why not sim­ply col­lab­o­rate on some skookum research (that’s abo­rig­i­nal American for “neato”) and let’s develop a future of peace? Plan for peace, work for peace, and research why peo­ple like El Quiada, funded orig­i­nally by the CIA— would want to blow us up in the West. Could it be some­thing we did/​do/​may do/​have done? Argh, that old MIRROR, DARPA ought to invent a very big mir­ror for all of us to look into. When you find your navels, let me know. Graig in Soviet Canuckastan to the North, you know, the one you stole the AVRO Arrow from. Tee hee.

    Reply
  12. David Bloomfield says:
    August 18, 2005 at 1:37 pm

    After read­ing through the com­ments above:
    NIMRUTH needs to con­sult a dic­tio­nary.
    Brenda has good answers.
    I would like one of those ‘brain caps’, too.ASAP

    Reply
  13. Gary Smith says:
    August 18, 2005 at 2:03 pm

    If we want the qual­ity of our lives to be bet­ter we have to link the qual­ity of the elected rep­re­sen­ta­tives lives to our eco­nomic real­ity.
    Politics in a cap­i­tal­is­tic soci­ety is dri­ven by the eco­nom­ics of that soci­ety.
    Currently we have allowed big busi­ness to take con­trol of our polit­i­cal sys­tems.
    Big busi­ness is run or dri­ven by the quar­terly report. That means short term think­ing. Which in turn means short term think­ing in our polit­i­cal sys­tems.
    The Citizens of this coun­try mostly you and I or the col­lec­tive “us” are dri­ven by long term think­ing or liv­ing. That period of time usu­ally means 3 linked gen­er­a­tions (Grandparents, Parents, Children).
    The cure for the prob­lems of the cit­i­zens “us” is to take away the ties between big busi­ness and pol­i­tics and return the polit­i­cal rep­re­sen­ta­tion to the Citizens. Most of us know that sounds great in the­ory but we don’t have a way of mak­ing that the­ory a real­ity.
    Actually the way to make it hap­pen is to tie the eco­nomic well being of our elected rep­re­sen­ta­tives to the eco­nomic well being of the Citizens “us” that they are sup­posed to rep­re­sent.
    A very sim­ple way to do this is to make it a con­di­tion for all elected rep­re­sen­ta­tives to live in the same eco­nomic con­di­tions as the aver­age Citizen they rep­re­sent. We must also make it a con­di­tion that they may not be allowed to live above the eco­nomic con­di­tions of the aver­age Citizen after they leave office.
    This will do many things to cor­rect the prob­lems we face now and the ones we will face in the future.
    Imagine how many dif­fer­ent ways pol­i­tics will be changed.
    Here are a few: *********************
    Bi-​​partisan pol­i­tics would dis­s­a­pear.
    Control of elections/​politics by big busi­ness would become point­less. Elected offi­cials leav­ing office would watch the newly elected offi­cials like a hawk. ***********************************
    The job goals of elected offi­cials would have a direct eco­nomic impact on them­selves which in turn would mean a direct impact on the lives of the Citizens they rep­re­sent.
    As the qual­ity of life improves for us it will also improve for busi­ness as it will take away cor­po­rate wel­fare and with an over­all improve­ment in the econ­omy dri­ven by bet­ter eco­nomic con­di­tions for the con­sumers (again “us”) busi­ness will make more money and that will be good for the work­ers “us” because we will have more money to buy the prod­ucts we make.
    Corporate slav­ery will end.
    Outsourcing of Jobs for the Citizens will stop. Corporations that want to do busi­ness in the USA will have to use US Citizens for the work. This will actu­ally help Corporations in the long run as they will have to pay a fair wage for the work done which means the worker/​consumer will have the money to buy the prod­ucts those Companies make.
    Sending our jobs over­seas or out of the coun­try to work­ers who are not being paid enough to buy the things they make will ruin the Corporations and destroy the econ­omy here which will cause a chain reac­tion of destruc­tion of other country’s economies.
    We can’t have free trade with coun­tries that have made slaves of their citizens/​workers.
    If we don’t stop the loss of jobs here we will one day become slaves also.
    We the Citizens of this coun­try must wake up to the fact that the cur­rent polit­i­cal struc­ture is going to ruin us as a peo­ple and as a coun­try.
    We have the right to demand eco­nomic rep­re­sen­ta­tion by our elected rep­re­sen­taives.
    If we do not do this we will be insur­ing the eco­nomic col­lapse of our soci­ety. It will also mean the eco­nomic col­lapse of the world econ­omy.
    If we do change to the new polit­i­cal sys­tem, many other coun­tries will adopt the same basic sys­tem.
    Thank You

    Reply
  14. Brian says:
    August 18, 2005 at 2:15 pm

    I thought Al Gore invented the internet.

    Reply
  15. erex says:
    August 18, 2005 at 3:34 pm

    Re: Depleted Uranium
    Hey Chuck, DU is not an “inert chunk of metal”.
    *************************************
    Metal is never inert bio­log­i­cally.
    Go to a gov­ern­ment lab and you’ll see that zero valent Lead is treated like one of earth’s most dan­ger­ous sub­stances. I am quite sure DU not only has com­pa­ra­ble toxic effects as Pb (or Hg), but also has the radi­a­tion thing going for it.
    Imagine that a cor­po­ra­tion spewed out the same amount of zero valent Pb across amer­ica that our mil­i­tary spewed across Iraq. I am sure the media would want the CEO and cohorts pub­li­cally cru­ci­fied.
    It would make Enron and WorldCom look like a Sunday picnic.

    Reply
  16. stunt tnt says:
    August 18, 2005 at 3:44 pm

    Re: The real haz­ards of Depleted Uranium
    Are slight. We should be more con­cerned with the mil­lions of tons of radioac­tive dust that was thrown up into the upper atmos­phere from all the nuke tests before they were banned. I won­der if the tobacco com­pa­nies are being used as scape­goats to cover the real source of lung can­cer. TTBOMK lung can­cer was not a prob­lem amongst native Americans who intro­duced it to the world.
    Like Agent Orange, Gulf War Syndrome seems to attack the ner­vous sys­tem and immune sys­tem. This sug­gests effects from expo­sure to nerve agents not radi­a­tion, which usu­ally causes can­cer and tis­sue dam­age. There are reli­able reports that some of the ammo dumps destroyed in Iraq did con­tain WMD’s. In small amounts (below ini­tial ter­mi­nal lev­els) Sarin could be the most likely cause.
    I doubt this last war will have high num­bers of DWS.

    Reply
  17. erex says:
    August 18, 2005 at 4:02 pm

    Re: The real haz­ards of Depleted Uranium
    Are slight. We should be more con­cerned with the mil­lions of tons of radioac­tive dust that was thrown up into the upper atmos­phere from all the nuke tests before they were banned.
    ************************************************
    100% I agree. My point was that it isn’t the health affects of Pb, Hg, U.… but the pre­cieved affects.
    As for tobacco, I don’t know if us Red-​​men put any addi­tives in the tobacco like nowa­days. Maybe it is bleached paper that causes lung can­cer(?
    And: How do you know lung can­cer wasn’t a prob­lem with Native Americans? Have you ever read a study in JAMA about it? Be care­ful of knowl­edge, it is never absolute.

    Reply
  18. ltcbj says:
    August 18, 2005 at 5:37 pm

    DU is very deadly if you are on the wrong end of a DU pro­jec­tile. Iraqis are more endan­gered by the (radi­a­tion from the) destruc­tion of the radium dials in their Soviet vehi­cles after being hit by the DU pro­jec­tile. Since we don’t have/​make DU bul­lets that is a red her­ring but if we did they would prob­a­bly go straight through any body they hit caus­ing less dam­age than con­ven­tional bul­lets. DU is used in anti-​​tank (and in tank) weapons, any­thing meant to go through armor, and in armor itself. Being depleted it is not sig­nif­i­cantly radioactive.

    Reply
  19. Adam says:
    August 18, 2005 at 6:01 pm

    Talk about the tin foil hat brigade, NIMRUTH is not only a mem­ber but must be a lead­ing offi­cial. This is what hap­pens on a steady diet of lunatic con­spir­icy the­ory web sites. I would love to see his Bigfoot photo col­lec­tion. Heck, I won­der how often he has been abducted by aliens. A reg­u­lar caller to Art Bell no doubt.

    Reply
  20. erex says:
    August 18, 2005 at 7:50 pm

    Most of these “new” DARPA ideas are just recy­cled from old (1970’s) “Iron Man” Marvel comics. I spent a lot of time in grad school read­ing goofy old gov­ern­ment feasabil­ity stud­ies and stuff (it beat the hell out of writ­ing up) and came across a lot of ideas I was famil­iar with from read­ing Iron Man comics 20 years earlier.

    Reply
  21. Rik says:
    August 19, 2005 at 7:22 am

    in response to NimRuth and all other DU whin­ers — I wouldn’t have had a prob­lem with nuk­ing the whole place in the begin­ning. My com­pas­sion for a land where the local reli­gion teaches that war be brought to any­one who dis­agrees with yours is quite lim­ited, and dimin­ishes to none as soon as you bring death and destruc­tion to 3000 of my broth­ers & sis­ters on our sov­er­eign soil. Sure, SH is gone now, but they let him reign, they did not rise up on their own.
    So, if a lit­tle DU adds to the col­ors of the sun­set, remem­ber, they’re alive. They’re not vapor. They would’ve been if W put a bit more Texas in his response as I would’ve done.
    Rules for war:
    1. Win
    2. Don’t ever lose
    3. When faced with a moral dilemma that could pos­si­bly cre­ate a los­ing sit­u­a­tion, fol­low rules 1 & 2.

    Reply
  22. Daydreamcaster says:
    August 19, 2005 at 7:23 am

    One thing about read­ing comics and sci-​​fi… It is where all the really cool ideas get checked out… Wells and his tanks, Gibson and the wet-​​ware… It is just a mat­ter of time when peo­ple are noth­ing more than the trig­gers or bet­ter yet, the wars are fought by twelve year olds play­ing video games… Oh yeah, Ender’s Game…
    Nt

    Reply
  23. Carl says:
    August 19, 2005 at 11:40 am

    Braincaps = moodrings of the mind = sci­ence? Time to send a cer­tain Lt. Cmdr back to the fleet…preferably oper­at­ing noth­ing with more ton­nage than a launch.

    Reply
  24. Claudia Knight says:
    August 19, 2005 at 11:53 am

    hey i am very inter­ested in the mil­i­tary but i am unable to be in the ser­vice because i have had to mony bro­ken and broke bones ot join and i am a sin­gle mother of 3 chil­dren and my youngest one is a army child because i now have a x-​​husband that is at fort. drumm ny . I have tried every­thing to try to get infor­ma­tion on how to become a pen-​​pal. If any­one can answer it for great email me at texasangel6​9​6​9​2​0​0​2​@​yahoo.​com and i will try to keep u entertained.

    Reply
  25. Flash says:
    August 19, 2005 at 12:21 pm

    Right on, Rik. You said it.
    in response to NimRuth and all other DU whin­ers — I wouldn’t have had a prob­lem with nuk­ing the whole place in the begin­ning. My com­pas­sion for a land where the local reli­gion teaches that war be brought to any­one who dis­agrees with yours is quite lim­ited, and dimin­ishes to none as soon as you bring death and destruc­tion to 3000 of my broth­ers & sis­ters on our sov­er­eign soil. Sure, SH is gone now, but they let him reign, they did not rise up on their own.
    So, if a lit­tle DU adds to the col­ors of the sun­set, remem­ber, they’re alive. They’re not vapor. They would’ve been if W put a bit more Texas in his response as I would’ve done.
    Rules for war:
    1. Win
    2. Don’t ever lose
    3. When faced with a moral dilemma that could pos­si­bly cre­ate a los­ing sit­u­a­tion, fol­low rules 1 & 2.
    Rik, August 19, 2005 07:22 AM

    Reply
  26. Dick Russell says:
    August 19, 2005 at 1:56 pm

    Re the thread on Amerind — Native American — Indian expo­sure to tobacco and DU — Somewhere in the 60’s University of Indiana did a paper on longevity of the pre-​​1492 inhab­i­tants of this repub­lic. The find­ings were that 45 was a ripe old age and infant mor­tal­ity was hor­ren­dous. Since the non-​​smoking dead were no exposed to DU any attempt in 2005 to relate these mat­ters is sim­ply hot air and some­thing less than non­sense.
    Entry 215483

    Reply
  27. David Nelson says:
    August 19, 2005 at 2:16 pm

    1st After 50+yrs of study The Minds that mat­ter are still just fig­ure­ing out all the pos­si­ble long term effects of expo­sure to radioac­tive ele­ments on and in the human body. BESIDES the obvi­ous HAHA YOUR DEAD! So unless your in the imme­di­ate area where DU rounds are impact­ing, thus prone to breath the dust, Then there are prob­a­bly more dan­ger­ous and pre­v­e­lant dan­gers to worry about. Like Lead poi­son­ing from catch­ing a live round in an ambush. That so many of our Brethren are being exposed to for what exactly is still to be deter­mined.
    3rd While Kill’um all and let God sort’em out sounds great. The Bible In the teach­ings of Jesus Tell us to Love thy Neighbor and in the end He’ll deal with all those oth­ers, who think thier going to rule the earth. So In God we trust, God bless America, and to every one else… Have a nice day, You Know who you are.
    2nd The People We have elected to rep­re­sent us, That are shown to be Liars and self serv­ing Corporate whip­ping boys and girls. Should be made to live in the envi­ron­ment that thier actions have cre­ated for so many of the peo­ple that they claim to represent.

    Reply
  28. SC says:
    August 19, 2005 at 2:31 pm

    Wait a minute before every­one starts spew­ing the pro­pa­ganda about DU post by anit amer­i­can sites lets exam DU sci­en­ti­fi­cially. DU mean depleted ura­nium. Depelted indi­cates it is less radioac­tive the nat­u­rally occur­ring ura­nium (40% less actu­ally). Uranium in found as rocks in many loca­tions around the US. Natural ura­nium con­tains 99% U-​​238 ( the rest is U –234(0.2%) and U –235 (0.7%). During the enrich­ment process, U 235 is removed for use in nuclear power plants. As U-​​235 is removed so is about 60% of the radioac­tiv­ity. So DU is fairly benign from a radi­a­tion point of view. BUT, it is a heavy metal tox­i­c­ity prob­lem. Critics of DU (read peo­ple who want to take away our best weapon) sug­gest that we switch to tung­sten rounds. Unfortunately Tungsten has been shown to be a prob­a­ble car­cino­gen.
    As far as Du dust being a haz­ard, it is but only if you are within 50 meters of a vehi­cle when it struck by a DU round (it is such a heavy mol­e­cule it doesn’t travel far or resus­pend eas­ily). From stud­ies con­ducted on Gulf War 1 vets, Du uptake by breath­ing is min­i­mal if any due to the size of the DU atam and the per­me­abil­ity of the lungs to such big mol­e­cules. If you breathe in Du, you are going to cough it up in your spit or swal­low the flem and GI uptake just doesn’t hap­pen. The only vets with issues were those hit by friendly fire and that have frag­ments remain­ing in their bod­ies. The human organ DU can dam­age is the kid­neys, but of the 45 vets tracked none have shown any dam­age.
    the reporter must have held the DU right up against the Du to get a response. this is way we teach our sol­diers that DU is NOT a cool tro­phy to take home. Plus it shouldn’t be eaten.
    As far as doses from DU to our tank crews, assum­ing the lived in the M1-​​A1 24/​7 for a year the dri­ver (the posi­tion with the high­est expo­sure rate) would receive about 1200 mrem per year. This about 3 times what we get from back­ground radi­a­tion in the US, but much less than what a worker in the radi­a­tion field can receive. (or equal to about 6 chest xrays)
    I think the real issue here is how effec­tive of a weapon and shield is it? Ask our tankers and most are enthue­si­as­tic back­ers. a slight dose of radi­a­tion is bet­ter than imme­di­ate lead poi­son­ing (if you get my drift) War is ugly. If you don’t believe me, visit our mil­i­tary burn wards once. Soldiers know that bet­ter than any­one. vol­un­teered to pro­tect our country

    Reply
  29. Malek Qtaish says:
    August 19, 2005 at 8:40 pm

    well I red some thing about An med that was given thrue injeck­tion to sol­dirs for pro­tec­tion for some bio bac­te­ria some thing this med can make alergy to some peo­ple From theire own clos­terol now I did for­get about that exack­tly I was Posted once IN SFTT and an japan­ice guy wrote an book about this , but the truth is yes deplated uranum has an effeckt but on large doses and Na ya , Guess about tech­nol­ogy the futurE lies iN have Interactive geer that is con­neck­ted to an base that mon­i­tors sleap­ing heat every thing , but to tell u the truth the prob­lem with tech­nol­ogy it is start­ing to inte­feer with the cla­sick basick teatch­ings i meaN an sol­dir train­ing dont know how much exack­tly but with tech stuff this means more time not just mak­ing clas­sick skills lessar , as For the prob­lem of armies that they would try stuff on sol­dirs some times with out telling them and some times bye forc­ing an sol­dir thrue hes con­trackt to take some thing , and na ya thats not so good , as as what they have and dont have well at least they would have some tech­nolo­gies that are 20 years advanced . Now Im kinda an per­sone who believes thers an solu­tion to every prob­lem . But what is effct­ing the army is its bioc­racy I mean the romans in thE end did loose much of theire fight­ing spirit because too much bio cracy . but na ya about simo­la­tions and stuff like that they can harm the brain and the data can cause many things to go wrong . so best thing is to have hi tech­nol­ogy but with as much less options because this DATA too much can harm . I mean eaven pilots i thin the future thrue theire body an pc pro­gram would do many things as hight and stuff auto­mate­ckly , and like lock with blink­ing and na ya with tech­nol­ogy thers two things that is hard fots an inven­ter to invent then some one who can som­mel dif­far­ent inven­tions for an cer­tain some thing but some thing elsde hard is to make the inven­tion work with an mech­a­nisem that takes as much less space and gives speed . but I mean ama­gion an pilot that can feal the outer dimen­sions of the Emviorment wile hes om hes plane i mean ama­gion swim­ing with out seen or swim­ing with tank oxygeen it is not like swim­ing Free able to turnm see and hav­ing good dimen­sional manu­ver this means that using the body emo­tion an pilot would in the future deter­main hight speed and other things but the body is liked with some thing smart and outer sen­sors that give to the pilot the feal­ing of the dimens of the emv­ior­ment hes is in . Na ya guess thats since fic­tion lol .

    Reply
  30. erex says:
    August 19, 2005 at 9:00 pm

    Re the thread on Amerind — Native American — Indian expo­sure to tobacco and DU
    A friend of mine worked as an arche­ol­o­gist and he told me that bur­ial sites in PA typ­i­cally had 85% of the buials appear to have cause of death be head wounds and most were quite young folks by our stan­dards, go fig­ure. I think tobacco was the least of their wor­ries.
    **********************************************
    AND THIS POST
    **************************************
    Du uptake by breath­ing is min­i­mal if any due to the size of the DU atam and the per­me­abil­ity of the lungs to such big mol­e­cules
    Don’t believe any of the baloney ‘they’ tell you. I don’t know what you mean by a Du atom but the size dis­tri­b­u­tion of the dust par­ti­cles I would expect are prob­a­bly includes the size of mod­ern diesel exhaust… the worst pos­si­ble size for lungs. Explore how the EPA and our gov­ern­ment man­dated that diesel exhaust be on the 5 to 10u size, then years later learned that that was the worst pos­si­ble size. I am sure the same type half-​​baked stuff goes on in the mil­i­tary with muni­tions.
    erex

    Reply
  31. dipesh says:
    August 20, 2005 at 6:25 am

    want to see the all pre-​​plan of osama .….….. and about the pentagon.….….

    Reply
  32. Randall says:
    August 20, 2005 at 4:56 pm

    I won­der what­ever hap­pened to the inte­grated NBC audio visual pro­tec­tive hel­met designs? I don’t know if I came up with it or just heard of it in some sci­ence fic­tion show. The idea is a Star Wars type full cov­er­ing hel­met with all the bells and whis­tles. In my con­cepts it is very pos­si­ble to use mobile cel­lu­lar phone tow­ers and the eas­ier radio tow­ers to keep every sol­dier in touch. I don’t see why the radios arent’ built in the hel­met instead of strap on. There are also high power infrared see­ing devices that could be used mobile to feed video to a visor. I have seen the newer bat­tle gear on tele­vi­sion and it just doesn’t pro­tect the head, pro­tect the breath­ing, and have voice acti­vated audio, and of course the only visual comes from the sight on the gun, not large “see­ing” devices that could allow sol­diers to move around effec­tively in com­plete zero vis­i­bil­ity due to smoke or CS gas. If this isn’t made yet, it is only due to money, because all the sep­a­rate tech­nolo­gies are mature and should be afford­able to make this inte­grated NBC audio visual hel­met. I will not even get into the laser map­ping, the GPS map­ping feeds, and even greater detail in case it is top secret, or I get to help design it. Any com­ments, links, or sug­ges­tions would be greatly appreciated.

    Reply
  33. Wes says:
    August 21, 2005 at 8:43 pm

    Depleted Uranium not a depleted haz­ard. Although they use the term depleted it is very mis­lead­ing. After read­ing a few of the com­ments by peo­ple on DU I would like to throw my knowl­edge of the DU into the ring. I have worked in the defense busi­ness as a sol­dier, civil­ian, and con­trac­tor for a com­bi­na­tion of 12 years. I have worked with DU for quite a few of them. I am cur­rently and engi­neer and worked with the Dept of the Army as a radi­o­log­i­cal worker and han­dler. First thing on DU is, it is not inert, or user friendly.
    During after the ini­tial Gulf war the Army con­ducted a study on the effects of DU. In 1991, the Army’s lead­ing sci­en­tist work­ing on DU stud­ied how DU effects enemy tanks destroyed and our own tanks hit by it. His find­ing is that we as the defense estab­lish­ment should stop using it imme­di­ately because as was then and as it is now we have no proper safety equip­ment for han­dling, and after action clean up.
    DU in a high veloc­ity strike with an armoed vehi­cle super heats and sharp­ens instead of blunt­ing like tung­sten. It makes for an excel­lent armor pierc­ing muni­tion. The prob­lem is when it super heats it oxi­dizes and emits par­ti­cles into the air that are smaller than .03 microns and becomes more radioac­tive and can­cer caus­ing. DU par­ti­cles that are this size, .03 microns, or smaller than .03 microns are too small to be fil­tered by the NBC mask. So even the pre­cau­tions they give sol­diers in the field aren’t really help­ful. Which state from the CTT man­ual, “go to MOPP 4(which is mask, suit, gloves, and boots.)cordon off the area and call in the NBC unit sup­port. But at .03 microns and smaller DU par­ti­cles can become air­borne and travel miles car­ried by wind cur­rents. Therefore we are endan­ger­ing the life of sol­diers and civlians(our civil­ians also)on the bat­tle­field. Also we are leav­ing the “lib­er­ated Iraqis” a gift that is already deform­ing new born chil­dren in the coun­try and con­tinue to do so for another 4.5 bil­lion years. We maybe very pos­si­bly irra­di­at­ing the whole coun­try of Iraq.
    I love my coun­try and prepar­ing to deploy to Iraq in less than two weeks. I have served it in many ways. But the con­tin­ued use of DU is wrong. It is against Geneva Convention because no muni­tion or agent used in war­fare can have a last­ing effect after the “trig­ger pull”. In other words you aren’t sup­posed to poi­son the coun­try for 4.5 bil­lion years which is the approx­i­mate half life of DU. And to those who say “well its only mildly radi­o­tive” I say to them and arsenic in small doses is only mildly toxic also.

    Reply
  34. Matt says:
    August 22, 2005 at 5:35 pm

    Why is every­one so wor­ried about the health of our ene­mies? I am absolutely stunned by talk of right and wrong muni­tions (i.e. ways to kill thine enemy). There’s only one good enemy, and that’s a dead one. Who gives a spit the way they die. If everyone’s going to com­plain about depleted Uranium, then let’s just give it to them “un-​​cut” (to coin a drug smug­gling phrase). We’re the only soci­ety in his­tory wor­ried more about our ene­mies than our­selves. We should mer­ci­lessly hunt them down and kill them with what­ever works, be it a nuke or a 2x4 across the head! It’s this “we have to be nice and play by the rules” men­tal­ity that is going to cost us our nation. I’m sure glad we had lead­ers in WWII that had the courage to stand up and fight like they wanted to win. Oh by the way, if we had not nuked Japan, their plan B was to nerve gas them into sub­mis­sion (both morally and prac­ti­cally cor­rect deci­sions). If folks like y’all had been in posi­tions of power circa 1945, we’d all be eat­ing sushi or march­ing to Wagner tunes right about now! You make me want to wretch!

    Reply
  35. Macavity says:
    August 23, 2005 at 2:06 pm

    Matt, we care because we’re sup­posed to be bet­ter than our ene­mies. (That’s why the Geneva con­ven­tion was drafted and signed by the ‘civ­i­lized’ nations of the time: so that if those nations went to war, they’d have a set of stan­dard rules and reg­u­la­tions to show other peo­ple that “this is how a war should be fought — yes, you have to kill peo­ple in a war, but there’s no rea­son to be dis­re­spect­ful to your enemy while doing it.”)
    Yes, they’re fight­ing agaist us and killing our peo­ple (not to men­tion their own).
    Yes, we’re fight­ing back and shooting/​killing them.
    But why, why, WHY should we leave behind toxic dusts that’ll harm the inno­cent as well as the guilty? Why should we poi­son the peo­ple we’re sup­posed to be help­ing (i.e., those who, while they may not want us in their coun­try, aren’t out killing our sol­diers)?
    The answer, plain and sim­ple, is that we shouldn’t. Yes, kill the enemy by all means — but don’t leave behind tox­ins (like Agent Orange, mus­tard gas, or radioac­tive waste — and radioac­tive waste is pre­cisely what DU dust is) that’ll kill the inno­cent as well as the guilty is all I’m try­ing to say.
    For the record, that’s why I — and quite likely a major­ity of other peo­ple — are dis­gusted by the nuclear-​​fission bomb: it’s an indis­crim­i­nate weapon, capa­ble of destroy­ing a tar­get as large as New York City with a sin­gle det­o­na­tion and killing not just any sol­diers liv­ing there, but the rest of the city’s pop­u­la­tion too.
    Personally, I’d pre­fer urban com­bat to a nuclear strike — yes, urban com­bat is bloody, messy, and turns cities into meat-​​grinders, but I’d rather have a meat-​​grinder than an unin­hab­it­able radioac­tive crater, thankyouverymuch!

    Reply
  36. Boonierat says:
    August 23, 2005 at 4:58 pm

    Ummm, hello…
    1. DU is used in the form of bul­lets. They are sup­posed to the harm­ful to ones health.
    2. DU exists in nature and has absolutely noth­ing to do with “atomic weapons”.
    3. Of course DU is toxic, so is lead, cop­per, iron, blah blah blah.
    4. Bullets are sup­posed to kill and maim. Get over it.
    5. Get over it and return to reality.

    Reply
  37. tomas says:
    August 23, 2005 at 10:36 pm

    about wars being fought by 12 year olds and such as in the book Enders’ Game, there are var­i­ta­ble rea­sons for that to come true. Just take a look at the air­craft we are man­u­fac­tur­ing. Predator anyone?

    Reply
  38. Wes says:
    August 24, 2005 at 9:26 pm

    My post was sup­posed to first put empha­sis on not how it effects them but more how DU effects US. If you can’t see that because of your blind hate then my con­do­lences. But the PROBLEM with DU is its tox­city and how it effects OUR sol­diers, my broth­ers and sis­ter, your chil­dren, and on a side note pos­si­bly ME while serv­ing in Iraq. DU is a poi­son that is killing not only the “bad guys” but also those who are brave enough to serve our nation(and its polit­cal agenda.) We fight a war fom­mented on on false assump­tions. Dont tell I am wrong I get to see it first hand. Tell the sol­diers in my unit we are here to defend our coun­try and a large per­cent­age will laugh at YOU.
    Second to all you with the “scorched earth” men­tal­ity. I say this, we take an oath to uphold the Constitution and we are trained to fight with honor. We are trained to uphold the rules of war and the rules put in place by the Geneva con­ven­tion. Any sug­ges­tion about nuk­ing them all or lay­ing waste to the place is DISHONORABLE. I as an American am dis­gusted by igno­rant peo­ple who say we should just kill them all. It is sen­ti­ment that now and through­out his­tory has only posed to make an enemy fight harder. Knowing that they have NOTHING to lose peo­ple will fight accord­ingly. DU is a poi­son that is eas­ier dis­pensed through war than put in some­ones back­yard in the Southwest. I hold myself to high stan­dards and dump­ing my trash in some­one else’s back­yard is not hon­or­able even it they are my enenmy.

    Reply
  39. Wes says:
    August 25, 2005 at 11:28 pm

    PS: don’t have a lot of time for proof­read­ing.
    *enemy

    Reply
  40. Arthurus says:
    August 29, 2005 at 12:18 pm

    to Craig Burns: Planning for war IS plan­ning for peace. If a rich coun­try is not able to fight and win what­ever sort of war it might encounter, then war will be thrust on it because it can’t defend itself, it is “easy pick­ins”, as it were.

    Reply
  41. srgio says:
    August 29, 2005 at 12:44 pm

    I like so much the new tec­nol­ogy for every thing
    now i live in mozam­bique but ‚i look for jobs
    i am archt.eng? please give chance for change my life.
    Best regards
    Sergio
    cellfhone n828957220

    Reply
  42. T Jenkins says:
    September 3, 2005 at 6:11 am

    Thank you for the post on what the future my hold. I wish more peo­ple would remem­ber that pos­i­tive changes in war­fare will save lives. To all the fallen, past and future.

    Reply
  43. geroge says:
    September 14, 2005 at 7:28 pm

    you are wor­ried about munni­cia, i want to know when we are going to start using napalm . there is no such thing as a good enemy

    Reply
  44. Wes says:
    September 19, 2005 at 6:45 am

    To George I wish would use Napalm instead of DU at least it has no bad effect for the user. Great neg­a­tive effect for the receiver.
    In Iraq keep­ing sol­diers fight­ing,
    Wes

    Reply
  45. Patalena says:
    June 25, 2008 at 10:10 am

    Don’t reply keep the beauty

    Reply
  46. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 20, 2009 at 4:48 am

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  47. http://www.linksoflondons.co.uk says:
    May 20, 2009 at 4:57 am

    Links of London
    Links of London Jewelry
    Links of London Charm
    Links of London Necklace
    Links of London Bracelets
    Links of London Earrings
    Links of London Rings
    Designer from UK
    Diamond
    Gold&Silver
    Links Jewelry
    Links Necklace
    Links Charm
    Links Earrings
    Links Rings

    Reply
  48. seaaa says:
    September 3, 2009 at 11:27 am

    ed hardy cloth­ing.
    ed hardy jeans
    ed hardy underwear

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage