DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » War Update » U.S. Ships Attacked

U.S. Ships Attacked

040620-N-2972R- 180.jpg“A rocket was fired early today at two American naval ships docked in south­ern Jordan, killing a Jordanian sol­dier and mark­ing the first attack on American mil­i­tary ships in the region in five years,” the Times reports.

A rocket was fired at the same time from appar­ently the same area at an air­port in a neigh­bor­ing Israeli port, hit­ting a stretch of road and wound­ing a taxi dri­ver, news agen­cies reported, cit­ing Israeli offi­cials and wit­nesses. A third pro­jec­tile was fired at a Jordanian hos­pi­tal around the south­ern port of Aqaba but did no dam­age.
No one claimed imme­di­ate respon­si­bil­ity for the simul­ta­ne­ous attacks, which dis­played audac­ity in their use of military-​​style weapons and tech­niques. In October 2000, two sui­cide bombers det­o­nated a launch loaded with explo­sives next to the American destroyer Cole as it was refu­el­ing in a port in Yemen. That attack, which killed 17 peo­ple and wounded 39 oth­ers, was attrib­uted to Al Qaeda.
The attack today on the American ves­sels, the dock land­ing ship Ashland and the amphibi­ous assault ship Kearsarge, took place around 8:44 a.m. and missed two naval ships at dock in Aqaba, said Capt. Ryan Fitzgerald of the United States Air Force, a spokesman for the American mil­i­tary com­mand in the Middle East. The tocket flew over the ships and landed on a ware­house at the pier, he said.

THERE’S MORE: Suspects have been arrested. And the Iraqi Prime Minister is accus­ing Jordan of allow­ing Saddam;s fam­ily “to finance an insur­gent cam­paign to desta­bi­lize Iraq.”

Share |

August 19th, 2005 | War Update | 1307 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/08/19/u-s-ships-attacked/U.S.+Ships+Attacked2005-08-19+17%3A15%3A53noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « More Cash for Human Ray Gun Tests | Jet Defense Gets Off Ground » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Darren says:
    August 19, 2005 at 1:41 pm

    Interesting how the ship defense sys­tems were not used to inter­cept the missles? any thoughts?

    Reply
  2. Kurt Plummer says:
    August 19, 2005 at 3:40 pm

    I doubt seri­ously if the CIWS or RAM were active at the time of launch and NSS is too slow to react. Katyusha is a rel­a­tively fast, small, tar­get and so it is ques­tion­able as to whether R2 could han­dle mul­ti­ple inbound rounds regard­less.
    In any case, this is like unto one of those ‘drive by’ sce­nar­ios in a movie whereby the enraged home owner comes out and caps off a few rounds after the teenage gun­men have squib-​​shattered a few pot­ted plants on his front porch.
    Unfortunately, while nobody con­sid­ers what is _​DOWNRANGE_​ of the flee­ing vehi­cle that junior and his dou­ble bar­rel shot­gun are aimed at in Hollyweird; the USN is all too cog­nizant of what hap­pens to the nom­i­nal ‘inno­cents’ when a rotary gun caps off 500rds on a high graz­ing angle try­ing to inter­cept a mis­sile com­ing in from across a crowded har­bor or city.
    In such a for-​​grins instance, about the best you can do is put your­self on the oppo­site side of a restricted access/​monitored head­land or behind arab fishing/​junk type tar­gets so as to deny the use of laser rangefind­ing and make all shots unaimed.
    I sup­pose fit­ting the deck edges with LWR might at least pro­vide a cue to a gun­ship on DLI alert and smoke pots might be a wise invest­ment if fur­ther (con­cen­trated) attacks are likely.
    I would also sug­gest mov­ing the ship to slightly dif­fer­ent loca­tions through the course of the day and, par­tic­u­larly at night, tak­ing fur­ther mine/​satchel pro­tec­tion mea­sures with nets and fixed under­wa­ter sen­sors.
    Where this means hav­ing an inde­pen­dent tug (Again, I doubt if a ship that big is going to have instan­ta­neous abil­ity to get under­way) force, you prob­a­bly need to bring them on the well deck. Obviously, con­tract boats only bring with them a poten­tial secu­rity con­flict with onboard explo­sives in close prox­im­ity.
    It seems clear that the U.S. pres­ence, while offi­cially ‘tol­er­ated’, is under-​​the-​​table being pres­sured to either alter their course in Iraq or be con­sid­ered defacto _​unwelcome_​ through­out the ME/​PG.
    TRUTH: We _​NEED_​ to get Sea Light or a THEL/​Nautilus equiv­a­lent on these ships. After all, is the mini-​​MRL inter­cept mis­sion not what the role that bloody Israeli’s orig­i­nally cast the need for a DEW in?
    Much bet­ter aim­point con­trol (the tar­get absorbs 90%+ of the energy and any det­o­na­tion fur­ther anaprop dif­fuses the beam), much faster reac­tion and, unlike a DIRCM, it is _​hardkill_​ solu­tion which means guid­ance or no makes lit­tle difference.

    Reply
  3. rutty says:
    August 19, 2005 at 8:10 pm

    Just googling around for info on this rocket and it looks like the real deal (as com­pared to the “home­made” ones they fire from Gaza, which is what I expected when I first heard this story). How the hell could they have missed? That is one big tar­get, espe­cialy it they fired at it broad­side. Are they just that bad that they have to have a human either fly or drive every­thing into its target?

    Reply
  4. Aaron says:
    August 20, 2005 at 1:42 am

    rutty: ‘how did they miss?‘
    A: inderect fire. no sight.

    Reply
  5. Steven Snell says:
    August 22, 2005 at 7:24 am

    http://​www​.petra​.gov​.jo/​n​e​p​r​a​s​/​2​0​0​5​/​A​u​g​/​1​9​/​2​6​9​6​8​0​0​0​.​htm
    From the Jordanian News Agency off­i­cal source.
    It seems that the ware­house was owned by the Jordanian mil­i­tary and so too was the hos­pi­tal. The only sol­dier killed was Jordanian. Could it be the attack was against Jordanian tar­gets as a result of US coop­er­a­tion in the GWOT? as the news item states the fir­ing posi­tion used was a ware­house rented by Iraqis/​Egyptians days before.
    If the attack was against US ships the head­line should surely read “American ships missed three times in a row” or :“US ship near rocket attack as Jordanian sol­dier killed”.
    I’m sure ‘the onion’ will resolve any con­fu­sion fol­low­ing their insight­ful nuke­hav­is­tan expose.

    Reply
  6. Tom Meyer says:
    August 22, 2005 at 10:48 am

    I thought news reports men­tioned that they were Katyusha rock­ets, which are area weapons, not pre­ci­sion ones. Simliar to 2.75″ FFAR or Zuni rock­ets. Basically, an unguided bal­lis­tic weapon.
    So, tough to accu­rately aim.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    Recent Comments
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      Yeah, I don't get it. The "Dragon...
      Ptsfp
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage