DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Missiles » Jet Defense Gets Off Ground

Jet Defense Gets Off Ground

It’s taken nearly three years. But the Homeland Security Department is finally ready to start test­ing out mis­sile coun­ter­mea­sures on com­mer­cial planes.
Stinger_missile.jpgBack in November 2002, an Israeli 757 was attacked with two shoulder-​​fired MANPADS (man-​​portable air defense sys­tems) over Kenya. Luckily, the mis­siles didn’t con­nect. But many ana­lysts think it’s only a mat­ter of time before an American jet­liner is hit; MANPADS have killed hun­dreds of air­line pas­sen­gers since the 70’s. And unless some kind of coun­ter­mea­sure is put in place, the planes will con­tinue to be “almost like sit­ting ducks. Those air­craft are very slow… Everyone can [attack them],” an Israeli defense researcher told CNN.
Military planes are already equipped with “Directional InfraRed Counter-​​Measures,” or DIRCMs, which use laser beams to con­fuse the mis­siles’ guid­ance sys­tems. But just slap­ping the mil­i­tary sys­tems on com­mer­cial planes would cost a ton — $11 bil­lion, maybe, to install DIRCM on all 6,800 U.S. com­mer­cial jets, plus another $40 bil­lion in main­te­nance over 10 years, accord­ing to a Rand study.
Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems have been work­ing on cheaper, easier-​​to-​​maintain ver­sions of the coun­ter­mea­sure. And Northrop says it should be ready to begin “oper­a­tional test­ing and eval­u­a­tion… aboard an MD-​​11 air­liner later this month and a Boeing 747 later this year.“
A com­pany spokesper­son says that the sys­tem “will cost air­lines $0.003 to oper­ate per avail­able seat mile or about 70 cents per pas­sen­ger on a 2,000-mi. trip. This is about the cost of a bag of peanuts,” Aviation Week notes. “However, there is a weight penalty with the sys­tem. The Northrop Grumman instal­la­tion weighs 500 lb., includ­ing 350 lb. for the pod, about the weight of two pas­sen­gers and bags.“
It’s still a sig­nif­i­cant cost for already-​​troubled air­line com­pa­nies. But given the count­less thou­sands of MANPADS float­ing around on the inter­na­tional mar­ket — sell­ing for as lit­tle as $5,000, accord­ing to Rand — a bag of peanuts and two extra pas­sen­gers seems like a price worth paying.

Share |

August 22nd, 2005 | Missiles | 1312 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/08/22/jet-defense-gets-off-ground/Jet+Defense+Gets+Off+Ground2005-08-22+13%3A36%3A09noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « U.S. Ships Attacked | Rapid Fire 8/​22/​05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Bill says:
    August 22, 2005 at 1:03 pm

    What’s that old joke:
    Q: What’s the flair/​chaff but­ton?
    A: the but­ton you hit just before you pull the eject handle.

    Reply
  2. stephen russell says:
    September 10, 2005 at 6:00 pm

    I go for the NG BAE System Plan.
    OR install Multiple chaff pods on planes & in the tail sec­tion aft for dis­peral & mini EW array to con­fuse mis­siles.
    Problem: Heat sig­na­ture from engines.
    Otherwise doable if radar guided to plane.
    Testbed plane: AF1, AF2?
    OR Secty State plane.
    Paint ext=AF1 BUT not AF1 for test­ing phase.
    Use idle 747 type for tests.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
      Awesome. Now to be a *real* military contract we have to spend $40...
      jmatt
    • Keep it Simple
      Anybody who went to basic training will never forget about weight. Like...
      Big Daddy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      It had been a while since I came by the site- and now I...
      Mod
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      In DTI this article is credited to Sharon...
      Wembley
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage