Home » News » Homeland Security » DHS WTF?

DHS WTF?

Organizing thousands and thousands of people, in hellish conditions and in a hurry, is tough work. Let’s take that as a given. But still: We’re now a work week into a natural disaster that had been forecast for years, and New Orleans “is being run by thugs,” the city’s emergency preparedness director tells the Times. “Some people there have not eaten or drunk water for three or four days, which is inexcusable.“
Damn right. And this Slate article on the Department of Homeland Security’s underwhelming response to Katrina is absolutely dead-on. (Click here for ways you can help.)

How is it possible that with the fourth anniversary of 9/11 almost upon us, the federal government doesn’t have in hand the capability to prepare for and then manage a large urban disaster, natural or man-made? In terms of the challenge to government, there is little difference between a terrorist attack that wounds many people and renders a significant portion of a city uninhabitable, and the fallout this week from the failure of one of New Orleans’ major levees. Indeed, a terrorist could have chosen a levee for his target. Or a dirty-bomb attack in New Orleans could have caused the same sort of forced evacuation we are seeing and the widespread sickness that is likely to follow.
Chertoff’s Department of Homeland Security demonstrated today that it could organize an impressive press conference in Washington, lining up every participating civilian or military service from the Coast Guard to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to promise its cooperation. But on the ground in Louisiana, where it counts, DHS is turning out to be the sum of its inefficient parts. The department looks like what its biggest critics predicted: a new level of bureaucracy grafted onto a collection of largely ineffectual under-agencies.
What has DHS been doing if not readying itself and its subcomponents for a likely disaster? The collapse of a New Orleans levee has long led a list of worst-case urban crisis scenarios. The dots had already been connected
Located only three hours from New Orleans is Fort Polk, home of the 4th Brigade of the 10th Mountain Division, a light infantry unit with about 3,000 soldiers. Also at Fort Polk is the Joint Readiness Training Center, which prepares military units to respond rapidly to crises abroad. The 4th Brigade has been training for duty in Afghanistan. Why was it also not ready to take on a local disaster scenario in hurricane season? Or at the least, once the National Hurricane Center predicted that the eye of Katrina would come close to New Orleans, couldn’t DHS have deployed the military to help shore up the levees?
And in the event of a WMD attack, when there would likely be no warning at all, what is DHS’s contingency plan for moving into position the army or the marines to restore order and sustain life? In the wake of Katrina and the breached levee, the answer seems to be not much of one. In the wake of 9/11, that is worse than incomprehensible. It is unforgivable.

And one other thing: on my plane ride back to New York from Oakland tonight, I saw Chertoff and FEMA director Michael Brown on every two-bit cable talk show on Jet Blue’s dial. Why exactly are these guys taking the time to chat with Hannity and Colmes? Don’t these guys have, y’know, jobs to go do at a time like this?
Besides, the best on-air commentary of the flight came from Jack Cafferty, who’s gone from local-news-stuffed-shirt to don’t-give-a-fuck-TV-truth-teller:

I gotta tell you something, we got five or six hundred letters before the show actually went on the air, and no one — no one — is saying the government is doing a good job in handling one of the most atrocious and embarrassing and far-reaching and calamatous things that has come along in this country in my lifetime. I’m 62. I remember the riots in Watts, I remember the earthquake in San Francisco, I remember a lot of things. I have never, ever, seen anything as bungled and as poorly handled as this situation in New Orleans. Where the hell is the water for these people? Why can’t sandwiches be dropped to those people in the Superdome. What is going on? This is Thursday! This storm happened 5 days ago. This is a disgrace. And don’t think the world isn’t watching. This is the government that the taxpayers are paying for, and it’s fallen right flat on its face as far as I can see.

THERE’S MORE: Even the President is now saying that the relief efforts “are not acceptable.”

Share |

{ 38 comments… read them below or add one }

max September 2, 2005 at 7:28 am

Uhh…. Dead on-except I don’t think That Brigade at Fort Polk’s stood up yet. In fact it won’t be ready for quite some time.
Which makes me wonder if any of this is accurate.

Reply

JSAllison September 2, 2005 at 9:07 am

The same folk that have been screeching for the last 5 years about anything and everything that they could possibly get their hands on to beat up on the administration are at it again. Color me unimpressed. I don’t see any of them trying to make positive things happen, just politics as usual for that crowd. Clinton in his joint interview on CNN with Bush ’41 did a better job and demonstrated that he actually gave some thought to the matter instead of kneejerking.

Reply

Noah Shachtman September 2, 2005 at 9:22 am

Max: I’ll make some calls later on today. But according to local news reports like this one, the 4/10th is very much stood up. http://www.leesvilledailyleader.com/articles/2005/08/26/news/news2.txt
nms

Reply

DW September 2, 2005 at 9:56 am

Are you blind? Can’t you see that there are thousands of soldiers performing rescue efforts in the entire south and southeastern U.S. Those people on TV who are bitching and complaining are ALIVE. They don’t need to be rescued! The government has trucks lined-up for miles to bring in relief supplies, but how do you get there when there are no roads? There are helicopters being shot at and they can’t shoot back, so do you just force them to “take a bullet for the team” to “drop sandwiches” to people?
To pull the soldiers from Fort Polk to perform rescue operations doesn’t make any sense! Those soldiers are preparing to relieve others who have been in Iraq for a year, or more. There are plenty of National Guard soldiers and helicopters carrying supplies and equipment, and performing search and rescue operations in and around the area. You don’t see people being plucked from their rooftops every few minutes now, do you? No, of course not, it’s sporadic, therefore, not news-worthy. What is news-worthy? What attracts viewers? Human suffering! And we will continue to hear and see the news reporters focus on the human suffering, or anything else they can get “good video” of, for days so they can attract all the viewers they can.
Get a grip and look at what’s happening down there. Soldiers, civilians, everyone that can, is trying to get into the area and help. But ABSOLUTELY NO ONE could have predicted the scope of the devastation. And no one could have predicted that some idiots would actually shoot at the rescue helicopters! What kind of a person takes the mindset that they shoot loot TVs from stores and shoot at their rescuers? Animals, that’s who!
If anyone should have had a plan in place, it should have been the governmental body of New Orleans. They live there! They should have understood the extent of the potential damage! They should have had a disaster preparedness plan in place that they could utilize, then use federal assistance to bolster that plan! But THEY DIDN’T! Why? Because NO ONE could know the extent of this type of disaster.

Reply

Tom Ames September 2, 2005 at 10:58 am

Quotes from yesterday:
President Bush: “I don’t think anyone anticipated the breach of the levees.”
FEMA chief Brown: “[...] the federal government did not even know about the Convention Center people until today.”
You can certainly blame the local and state governments. But disasters of this magnitude have ALWAYS involved a federal response. And this disaster, of PRECISELY this magnitude, has been predicted for DECADES.
The fact that YOU (DW) and GW Bush have been ignorant of this doesn’t absolve the federal government of any responsibility for responding.
Now tell us with a straight face that this administration has any shred of compassion or competence.
(And it must be nice for you that you can comfortably write off the refugees who are “bitching and complaining” as “animals” so that you don’t have to feel any discomfort at their plight.)

Reply

uurf September 2, 2005 at 11:00 am

And so DW throws up the new R talking points:
“It’s Not Our Fault”:
No one could have predicted this! (Except, they did, and the organizations in question are tasked with planning for exactly these sorts of things.)
“Racism”:
They’re animals! (Put you and your loved ones and a firearm on the roof of an inundated house for 5 days and see what your reaction is when that helicopter passes you over AGAIN. Turns out your decision processes can be impaired by extreme dehydration…)
“It’s actually the Dems fault!”
In the absence of the ability to blame Clinton (although I’m sure it’s coming), blame the Dem Governor, not Bush. (Except that the DHS has absorbed most of the funding and the authority that the states used to wield in these matters.)
Remember when Republicans were in favor of accountability? I guess it’s less attractive when you have lapses to be accountable for…

Reply

The Cenobyte September 2, 2005 at 11:19 am

There has always been lots of predictions of idiots acting the way they are in N.O. They say that there is only 5 days between Civilization and Anarchy. But I don’t blame anymore except the people that didn’t leave when they where suppose to. The skies over N.O are filled with Helos day and night and they are trying to move people out and food and water in as fast as they can. But people hundreds of Thousands of them that didn’t leave when they where told it was that or face death are now facing the death that they where told about. Much of the city is impassable making moving the millions of meals and bottles of water difficult at best. I don’t blame people for going after water and food really but they are in this spot because they didn’t listen. Now they are in trouble and they cant get out and the supplies they need cant get in. Helos are not going to supply to cargo capacity to move enough food and water for 60k+ in the superdome, 10k+ in the convention center, and the thousands and thousands of other people stranded all over the city.
They should have gotten out when they where told to. Don’t give me the they can’t afford it bit, $20 gets a bus ticket to a town 100 miles away which would have been more than far enough.
Oh and BTW, in case everyone has forgotten the military cant be used to police civilians in this country. The National Guard can, and the Coast Guard can but not the Army, Navy, Air Force or Marines.

Reply

Tom Ames September 2, 2005 at 11:32 am

Cenobyte joins the blithe chorus of those who have no clue. A $20 bus ticet out of town? Just how many busses does he think Greyhound was running in the days between the evacuation order and the hurricane strike? Was the private sector supposed to be ready for this where the government couldn’t handle it?
There’s a point at which this lack of compassion resembles rank stupidity more than anything else.
Maybe like DW he’d like to see the victims of this disaster just die quickly, so they’ll stop “bitching and complaining”.

Reply

Greg Krsak September 2, 2005 at 11:45 am

Don’t be stupid.
Bush is a figurehead; a political decision-maker and policy-shaper. He is not in a position to actually get anything done.
What do you want him to say to make DHS and FEMA do a better job? His words don’t smooth-over incompetence, and certainly don’t widen bureaucratic bottlenecks.
Bush will never be realistically at fault for doing anything. He is responsible for the concepts behind what everyone else does. How they are executed on a tactical level is out of his control.
It seems inexcusable, however, to allow a major U.S. city to be one material failure away from elimination. For years. How many presidents have allowed this to stand?
Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot?

Reply

The Cenobyte September 2, 2005 at 11:57 am

No I would not like to see them die quickly, but the idea that they are totally not responcible to trying to take can of themselves is rediculous. I gave the bus ticket as one option, I mean hell from the time the evacuation order was given until the time the store hit you could have walked some place that as of Wednesday had power and never lost water.
There are people that could not get out for one reason or another, but lots and lots and lots of people that could (Far more than half the people left behind) had a way out and choose not to, now they and the unfortunate few that couldn’t get out are paying for their mistake.
The 2000 U.S. Census reports that 26 percent of New Orleans’ has no access to an automobile. That’s about 126,000 people and apparently not a single one of them found another way out of the city (bus, a friends car, on foot). I feel bad for them but I do think that at least part of this is the fault of the masses of people that didn’t leave.

Reply

Noah Shachtman September 2, 2005 at 12:48 pm

Cenobyte:
You don’t get it. The 15,000 people stranded at the New Orleans Convention Center — it’s not that they “didn’t leave when they where suppose to.” [sic] Those people were *told* to evacuate there. The Convention Center was the safe haven, they were told. Everything will be OK there.
And then, once those people got there, they were abandoned, without food or water or medical care. Left to die, in other words.
Maybe these people should have been smart enough to ignore the directions. But shouldn’t the officials who sent them there and then promptly forgot them take a whole lot more of the blame?
nms

Reply

The Cenobyte September 2, 2005 at 1:14 pm

Obviously I am in a minority when it comes to personal responsibility. Everyone seems to think that they should just get a hand out even if they make no effort to help themselves.
1) I suggest they move inland from the storm. Perhaps to a number of inland shelters setup. If not their then parking deck would work, just get inland. They must have said this on the news a million times before the storm. I don’t have a suggestion of where to go as I don’t live there, but I know that 20 miles outside of N.O. there are shelters with power, water, food and bathrooms.
2) The convention center was not a evacuation point for N.O. These people looking for a place to go after it was to late broke into the building and used it as a shelter. I understand why they did it but they can’t blame the releif workers for not helping people they didn’t know where there. Beyond that, they are trying to help them in a difficult situation, while they get blamed for people failing to follow the evacuation order.
3) As for missing a hot meal. When I ws younger I made my fair share of mistakes and found myself on the streets. It was hard but I worked my way out of it and could easily be called upper middle class today. I did this without ever taking a dime of govt help. I worked daily work for daily pay until I could get myself up on my feet again. So lets stop throwing insults around shall we?

Reply

rap September 2, 2005 at 1:36 pm

I served 10 years in the florida national guard, and my wife and I are currently volunteer with the Red Cross in the big bend of florida. playing the blame game is stupid. Figure out where the damn problems are, figure out the best way to fix it, and get it done! Once the problems are solved, figure out the lessons learned and do what you can to prepare for the next one.

Reply

Indy September 2, 2005 at 1:47 pm

I see all the questions and statements about the federal government not responding quick enough or not acting on the leeves sooner, but where is the Louisiana government and the City of New Orleans action plans for such disaster. If this has been expected for years, why is there not a plan in effect to do what everyone is complaining about.

Reply

Tom Ames September 2, 2005 at 2:15 pm

As to figuring out what the problems are so that they can be fixed for the next disaster: I suggest that we start with the fact that the federal disaster preparedness agencies have been headed by political hacks in what amounts to a dispensation of patronage.
There are lots of other problems, but that seems to me to be the one that has the most potential to affect us all.

Reply

The Cenobyte September 2, 2005 at 2:35 pm

Tom, I only talked about my past problems because you acted as if you know everything about me. Which obviously you do not.
I would talk about how easy it would be to loose people only a few blocks away with no communication, or how many tons of food and water was pre-staged. I could talk to you about how hard it is to move supplies in a flooded area. Or how many of the people stuck actually are getting food and water… But lets be honest, you don’t care, you want to blame those trying to help because it’s easier than suggesting people should try and help themselves or think ahead. Some people don’t think they should ever be responsible for their own actions, and should never suffer the consequences of their own mistakes. Oh well…

Reply

Tom Ames September 2, 2005 at 2:54 pm

Yes, I know that some people are getting rescued, and that some are getting the supplies they need. And yes, I know that “it’s hard work”.
And I’m not blaming those who are helping. I want to blame those who failed to do their jobs and are not trying enough to help now.
As we all should be blaming them. It’s called “accountability,” and though it seems to be out of fashion these days, it’s a prerequisite for a functioning democracy.
Another prerequisite for a functioning democracy is that citizens understand that sacrifices are necessary for the common good. And that out of a sense of decency and empathy for one’s fellow citizens one might restrain oneself from blaming the dying for their predicament.
But empathy and decency, like standards of accountability for public servants, seem to be quaint notions these days. It’s far more fashionable to criticize the powerless.

Reply

Noah Shachtman September 2, 2005 at 4:23 pm

John:
You think that this is just “the same folk that have been screeching for the last 5 years… beat[ing] up on the administration… again”?
John, we’ve traded e-mail a thousand times. I like you and respect you. But in this case, my friend, you are way off-base.
Check out what Joe Scarborough — former Republican congressman Joe Scarborough — had to say:
SCARBOROUGH: When hurricanes crash across America`s coastline, citizens can usually count on a quick, efficient response. That`s what Florida Governor Jeb Bush and the feds gave Floridians four times this last year. But the fed`s response this week, from New Orleans to Biloxi, has been heartbreakingly slow, confused, and, in some places, nonexistent.
And that`s left some Gulf Coast residents seeing red.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: If we can send money to Iraq, why can`t our president come down here? It`s not over. You know, it — I don`t understand this. We have waited five days for relief
SCARBOROUGH (voice-over): When I showed up in Biloxi the day after the storm, there were no police officers, no National Guardsmen, no relief agents.
(on camera): So, you have been in the shelter since almost the storm began, and this is the — these are the first supplies today that you got?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes.
SCARBOROUGH: You haven`t seen the state government here?
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Nobody, nobody.
SCARBOROUGH (voice-over): My wife, Susan, was so distressed by what she saw that she and her friends launched a fund-raising drive through a local charity. By the time we arrived in Biloxi, we were besieged by residents, who told us four days later that we were some of the first relief workers they had seen.
That had many of my wife`s Republican friends asking where the president they voted for has been for the past week.
UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I am very disappointed. And, you know, you want to go to the very top and complain. And I have voted for Bush, but I am sort of disappointed. I mean, I feel like, if I was in charge right now, there are a lot of things I would be doing differently. I mean, there was a military base right across the street from where we were handing stuff out. And why are there not gigantic helicopters full of water and stuff bringing it into these people? There was no one on the base.
SCARBOROUGH: A local pastor called the relief effort dismal.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: What we have seen today is a huge tragedy. And just a few moments ago, I was speaking with some newspeople from Barcelona, Spain, who came over and said, when you are in trouble — when we are in trouble, you come immediately to our aid. Where are your people that help? He said, I don`t see anybody.
And I had to confess, neither do I. We made the drive over. We didn`t see any relief trucks. I think we saw one police car, no state troopers, no military help on the roads. That`s my biggest impression. We have driven in here, and as far as I know, we are the only relief agency that has come in today.
SCARBOROUGH: And most of the people that we spoke to today simply believe the federal government and the state government have forgotten them.
UNIDENTIFIED MALE: This is not a disaster. This is a catastrophe. I don`t think America ever seen anything like this. I mean, this is like a Third World country. And this is the most powerful country on Earth, and they can`t come down here and help us?
(END VIDEOTAPE)
SCARBOROUGH: The most powerful country on Earth, and yet, again, I have been here for three days now. You have, too. I wrote it down. Today, at 5:11 p.m., was the first time I saw a National Guardsman out on the street. What is going on here

Reply

Leon September 2, 2005 at 4:33 pm

I think we need to calm down a bit and look at both sides.
It looks like the city dropped the ball on the evacuation and is trying to push blame on the feds. The feds got caught with their pants down and are trying to play catch-up.
Another problem is they may have had plans or supplies but was it communicated properly? Did the people left behind know?
And my first instinct on the people who stayed behind was “what a bunch of friggin’ morons”. It now appears that most of those were people without the resources to just move. Some may not have been able to leave ahead of time because of work. Some may have stayed out of fear of the unkown. I’m not saying we should provide 5-star accomadations for evacuees, but every person in New Orleans should have been aware they could get a cot and a hot meal somewhere.
It appears there’s enough slaps to go around: officials playing CYA, those who had the means to leave and stayed, the idiots taking potshots and the looters (I will exclude those hungry and thristy persons who only looted food or other critical supplies, double slaps for those punks seen running off with clothing).

Reply

patriot September 2, 2005 at 6:10 pm

I agree with rap. I don’t see why people have to go around blaming others for something that nobody had control over. Ok, maybe some things here and there could have been done earlier, but nothing could have been done to prevent a tragedy like this.

Reply

Tom Ames September 2, 2005 at 6:43 pm

“Not having control over” and “not responding competently to” are two different things entirely.
And the blame (or “accountability” as some might say) for an incompetent response should surely be assigned.
One of these tragedies (the direct effects of the hurricane) could not have been prevented. The indirect effects surely could have. And they’d been predicted by many experts for many years. It’s just that no-one cared to spend what it took to evacuate the poor from NOLA.
This is OUR government, that has been using OUR money to (they claim) prepare for disasters both man-made and natural. I think we as a country have every right to demand for an accounting of how those resources were spent.
If they don’t intend to respond, they should stop pretending to be in charge so we can choose to elect someone who cares about this kind of problem. Someone who knows their ass from a hole in the ground. Someone who does more than set up press conferences while citizens are dying.

Reply

anonymous September 2, 2005 at 7:26 pm

> Oh and BTW, in case everyone has forgotten the
> military cant be used to police civilians in
> this country. The National Guard can, and the
> Coast Guard can but not the Army, Navy, Air
> Force or Marines.
That’s a load of hooie and you know it.
I still remember the little trip the Marines made from Camp Pendelton to squelch the LA riots.
The guard is as unprepared to handle wide-spread emergent hostile activity as choir boys in a whorehouse (well, maybe less so after spending a few years in Iraq, but still…)
The *ONLY* reason that the military isn’t more often used in these types of situations is the impact that it might have on the all “volunteer” force.

Reply

stephen russell September 2, 2005 at 9:37 pm

I blame this fiasco on MORE GOVT & Less Independent minded citizenry & the NO citizens who DID NOT LEAVE WHEN ORDERED & Blame the State & City for NO DISASTER PLANS IF ANY.
I heard the NO Mayor radio talk & He never did refer to a Master Disaster Plan for NO.
Nothing.
Blame local politics, racisim, the KKK,
& US Govt.
Dump the parrish system & move NO 100 miles north & flood Orig NO for LAKE NEW ORLEANS.
City would need Megaenginering to rebuild levees, RR etc alone.
Any takers here.
& then to renovate French Qtr & Superbowl.
More $$$$$$.
Fix City politics.

Reply

Robert Bonomo September 2, 2005 at 11:41 pm

All I could think of, today, when I was watching the news, was: Now I know why I fear my government. There’s a bunch of morons running this country.

Reply

Strak September 3, 2005 at 3:11 am

I guess it would take a few days to first
plan, then implement, then organize private
organizations into the mix. Information has to
be gathered first to make a rational decision.
Clothes, food and WHATEVER is required is fair game for New Orleans citizens, we can’t judge them.
People capping at each other is NOT acceptable
but doesn’t a three gunshot signal into the air mean distress internationaly?
Perhaps the people weren’t aiming at the helicoptors after all.
Don’t be surprised if despirate people do despirate things. They are in a unenviable position right now.
Soon ,the help will be overwhelming..but there
is only enough room for so many cooks in the
kitchen right now. I feel for them too.
The brave men and women at ground zero
are doing a heroic job.
Resources are getting gathered.
It will be OK.

Reply

highlanderburial September 3, 2005 at 4:03 am

A very heart warming thread….
I am slated to go to NO on the 14th as a releif for command and control staff. I don’t pretend to make excuses for the DHS. The effort has some holes in it to be sure, but those who compare this to 9/11 should be whacked in the back of the head. FEMA is taking a LOT of criticism over this. FEMA was never designed to stand up a full organization by itself. It was designed to come in once a state response was 80% exhausted. This is the FIRST time I ever recall where FEMA has tried to build the entire organization from the ground up. The State and Local forces are non-exsistant. Infrastructure is completely deystroyed. In the past I have found FEMA FAR too reliant on cell phones, just like many organizations that exsist in this “just in time” economy. Give me a good ole fashioned motorolla any day. With communications goes decent logistics and personnel management.
While the DHS was flamed as an innefectual collection of agencies, how ’bout that Coast Guard. 5000 people rescued by helo, and another 2000 rescued by boat! with only 70 assets in the region you can do the math to see how hard those boys and girls are working. At least one part of DHS is firing on all cylinders.

Reply

Keith Yerian September 3, 2005 at 8:11 am

Lets allow for some personal responsibility while we are dumping on FEMA and the federal government. This problem would be much smaller if people that could have left prior to the storm had done so.
After every hurricane there are news stories about people that chose to stay for one reason or another and end up regretting the decision. While there are substantial numbers of people that did not have transportation out of NO I am certain that there are some that chose to stay. (I watched a news report yesterday where a man was apologizing to his dogs because he chose to stay.)
If the estimate I read of 200,000 staying in NO is correct with 120,000 not owning transportation then 75,000 made a choice to stay. I also suspect that some of the 120,000 without transportation were moved from NO by friends, relatives, and neighbors. Or at least had offers to leave.
And give me a break taking jewelry, TVs and piles of NFL sports clothing is base thievery.

Reply

Tom Ames September 3, 2005 at 8:31 am

Still and yet, where is the machinery of Homeland Security that has been (we were told) developed over the last 4 years?
If the levee breaches had been the result of a terrorist attack, would the response haave been any different?
If so, why? If not, WHY not?

Reply

Tom Ames September 3, 2005 at 8:47 am

“If we can’t respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days, then why do we think we’re prepared to respond to a nuclear or biological attack?” asked former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, a Republican.
Republican Gov. Mitt Romney of Massachusetts called the government’s response “an embarrassment.”

Reply

Keith Yerian September 3, 2005 at 9:56 am

RE: If the levee breaches had been the result of a terrorist attack, would the response haave been any different?
Levee breaches would have been significantly different in that it would have been much easier to get to the city – perhaps not around the city – but at least to the city. This is a multistate disaster. If terrorists had breached the levees then the airports, major roads, and rivers would have been open and movement within the state would have been much easier. So relief would have been there in hours. However, the number of dead would have been vastly larger since the residents would not have had an opportunity to move out of harms way.
RE: “If we can’t respond faster than this to an event we saw coming across the Gulf for days…”
So – looking backward… when have we ever responded better? We have always hoped for the best. NO is very fortunate that the storm reached Cat 5 before dropping back to Cat 4. Otherwise I suspect the number of residents choosing to stay would have been much higher. And I also suspect that – if a simular storm heads toward NO in a couple of year – many more residents will leave.

Reply

Tom Ames September 3, 2005 at 10:07 am

“We have always hoped for the best.” sounds like a Bush administration mantra.
Right up there with “no one thought the leveees might break.”

Reply

Keith Yerian September 3, 2005 at 10:22 am

This is no “Bush administration mantra”. It is a fact. All across our coasts we have always had people building homes and businesses in harms way – hoping it will not happen to them. We have had people staying in their homes during the storms – hoping that it would veer left or right. We wait until too late to order evacuations hoping the storm goes another direction. Lets not blame all this on the government and begin to take personal responsibility for ourselves and our choices. And everyone – having guessed wrong on this one lets face up to it and clean up the mess.

Reply

Citizen_Militias_Now! September 3, 2005 at 6:47 pm

You are the most intelligent message posters on the internet, by the way. Support HR.3622 was coming up for a vote sometime..to have congress do its job re: citizen militias in every state.
I Wrote:
United States House of Representatives
1110 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515-0001
Dear Representative X,
As your constituent, I urgently and strongly urge you to cosponsor and support passage of Rep. John Culberson’s (R-TX) Border Protection Corps Act of 2005 (H.R. 3622).
H.R. 3622 is necessary because federal authorities do not currently have the manpower, the willpower, nor the resources to protect America’s international borders like they are in their interests in Iraq.
We now have sworn testimony by top federal law enforcement officials that potential terrorists from countries with known Al Qaeda connections are entering the United States in significant numbers by assuming false Hispanic identities and hiding among the flood of illegal immigrants pouring across our southern border!
Extremely violent and dangerous criminal gangs like MS-13 and drug smugglers are crossing our southern borders in growing numbers. We must act now or it maybe too late.
This bill enables law-abiding American citizens to help defend our country as a member of a lawful militia force organized into a modern neighborhood watch border patrol program under the direct control of the State’s governor and working in close cooperation with State and Federal law enforcement authorities.
I hope you will consider my concerns and cosponsor this important legislation. I also respectfully request that you respond to my letter, explaining your position on the Border Protection Corps Act.
Sincerely,
Ms. x
(HR3622 would work for crisis management until the Local, state, Fedgov forces can take over. Like in NOLA, right??)

Reply

Concerned Citizen September 3, 2005 at 11:02 pm

Ms. Citizen Militia etc.
Are you insane? No, really, are you posting from the Nut House? Citizen Militias patrolling the border? Sounds like an invitation for white supremicists to head south and show what all those years of target practice in Idaho can do, now with real live moving human beings for targets. Every discruntled Tim McVeigh type will pile in thier pick-up trucks to fight thier own desert war if we have militias patrolling, aka hunting Mexicans, along our southern border.
Besides, why would Congress pass such a law? All the border states in the south are already red. All the nutjobs that would join this “militia” vote republican anyway, and no Congressman’s job is at stake. No political advantage gained.
No, keep the rascists, gun nuts, and criminals away from the border and demand Congress increase the military and mandate a physical border patrol mission and presence by the trained military.

Reply

Dan September 4, 2005 at 3:08 am

1. Rey, You are dead on many of your points. I lived in New Orleans for 4 years. The local and state government needed to take on a bigger role with the evacuation. They had all those school buses that they could have used but now are useless because of water damage. While the federal government is to blame, the local and state government share the same blame if not more.
2. What happened to New Orleans had been predicted for decades, they had dodged the bullet more than once. I think when Hurricane Andrew made land fall west of New Orleans in 1992 should have been a wake-up call. People in Florida heed the mandatory evacuation order. Active Duty military personnel stationed in the region were a mandatory order to leave with the exception of essential personnel. The President of Jefferson Parish stated before the Hurricane hit there are die hards out there who will not leave, and unfortunately some will die hard.
3. The people that took food, medical and baby supplies I find nothing wrong with what they did. They did it to survive. When you steal computers, electronics, TV sets and jewelry I do have a problem with that. You are a looter at that point. Tell me how will those electronic devices work without any electricity? I saw a clip on Fox News today that showed some New Orleans Police Officers who had to abandon their precinct when the floodwater rose. They took over a Wal-Mart and they stuff that had been looted was the clothes, electronics and jewelry. What was left was the school supplies, power tools and other items. There are many people down there who depend on the government to take care of them. Why not give them a gold spoon.
4. To Anonymous, BTW is right your wrong. Here is what the Posse Comitatus Act is and how its used. Federal troops cannot be used to enforce civilian laws. That is the responsibility of the National Guard since they fall under control of the Governor. POSSE COMITATUS ACT” (18 USC 1385): A Reconstruction Era criminal law proscribing use of Army (later, Air Force) to “execute the laws” except where expressly authorized by Constitution or Congress. Limit on use of military for civilian law enforcement also applies to Navy by regulation. Dec ’81 additional laws were enacted (codified 10 USC 371-78) clarifying permissible military assistance to civilian law enforcement agencies–including the Coast Guard–especially in combating drug smuggling into the United States. Posse Comitatus clarifications emphasize supportive and technical assistance (e.g., use of facilities, vessels, aircraft, intelligence, tech aid, surveillance, etc.) while generally prohibiting direct participation of DoD personnel in law enforcement (e.g., search, seizure, and arrests). For example, Coast Guard Law Enforcement Detachments (LEDETS) serve aboard Navy vessels and perform the actual boardings of interdicted suspect drug smuggling vessels and, if needed, arrest their crews). Positive results have been realized especially from Navy ship/aircraft involvement.
5. My last comment is to the New Orleans Police Officers who resigned. They showed their true colors when they put their tails between their legs and deserted their fellow

Reply

Rey September 4, 2005 at 5:04 pm

Mr. Skinner,
How can you live your life with such a poisoned heart? I have read many of you posts, and the vast majority of them are full of cynicism, hatred, paranoia, and a general lack of intelligence. Instead of spewing your ignorance and general hatred towards the government here on a daily, almost hourly basis, I would suggest you channel your boundless energy towards volunteer work.

Reply

Byron Skinner September 4, 2005 at 7:12 pm

Good Afternoon Ray,
I don’t care much for personal attack Ray and will go to much effort to avoid it, but in your case you have elimated any options of a rational discoure. The only reason I assume is that you have no other way to defend you position and to express your opinions.
You have love of ones country confused with following blindly a “Mad” man.
From 1774-1781 another group of people refused to fallow another “Mad” man named George. Today they are affectionly called “Patriots”.
You may challenge my ignorance all you like as I may yours. Thats call debate and it is healthy.
If refuseing to support the irrational, cowardly and insane policies of a failed Predidency is being un-Patriotic then I’m, the same as my brothers since 1774 who have stood on ground saturated with their own blood staring down those who would oppress this country that awards you and others of your mind set the right to critize us.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
“Stewart’s Platoon”

Reply

Buechel September 4, 2005 at 10:37 pm

Watching the media reports of the washing away of the southern half of the region near Boloxi and the New Orleans area it surprises me to see the individuals LACK of planning at the home. During a cataclysmic event as an event 4 hurricane expect baseline services such as power which drives much of the our modern world to be put back to the early 1800 existance. That also includes eccess to modern medicines and services.To blame a government official for lack of having water and food for more than several days was short sighted. Further too if you had so planned but your house flooded away literally your planning was in error. The choice of the incoming vehicles (air support) first was to be givin to the need to baseline survival. As in not drowning.
There are no reports of other groups the Red Cross or other groups getting in early either. Mostly due to gun crime. When bullets fly in your direction it does get your attention. To mobilize multiple government services with fuel,vehicles capapble of travering high water,food with and security hasn’t seen or talked with people who are in war zone or disaster. Roads cleared and bridges pushed to limits had to be inspected. The communities on the off ramps passed by the units likely were also helped. Before the event why hadn’t the wise critasizing media implanted themselve into the supply rescue teams. They decided to be at the beach instead of in the trenches. It is easy to watch by camera a child crying. It is harder to see the person getting the bottle for the mother. Not noticing thier hard work and planning. He or she walks away unoticed. The hazards by all getting there where chosen by the parents and answered by the a group of individual working hard now to feed hundreds of thousand who made the same error.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: