DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » 'Canes » Drones Over NoLa

Drones Over NoLa

Defense Tech first spot­ted the 8-​​foot long, sausage-​​shaped Silver Fox drone back in early 2003, right before it was headed off to Iraq.
silverfox_small.jpgNow, it looks like five of the robo-​​planes, equipped with ther­mal cam­eras, will be headed to New Orleans, to hunt for Katrina sur­vivors.

Five Silver Fox “unmanned aer­ial vehi­cles,” or UAVs, equipped with ther­mal imag­ing tech­nol­ogy to detect the body heat of storm sur­vivors, are en route to the crip­pled city, Pennsylvania Republican Rep. Curt Weldon said.
Mr. Weldon told reporters in Baton Rouge that he had bypassed gov­ern­ment bureau­cracy to obtain the drones from a pri­vate com­pany to be used in search and res­cue oper­a­tions in New Orleans, scene of one of the worst nat­ural dis­as­ters in US his­tory.
“With ther­mal imag­ing capa­bil­ity … you can actu­ally see into the build­ings and see the body image of a per­son still alive,” Mr Weldon, vice chair­man of the House Armed Services and Homeland Security Committees, said.
“It could help assess whether there are peo­ple trapped alive in attics or upper floors,” he said. “Once you’ve got them pin­pointed you can send res­cue teams in.”

(Big ups: JQP)
THERE’S MORE: Over at Winds of Change, Murdoc has a ter­rific round-​​up of the Navy’s response to Katrina.
AND MORE: A few weeks back, we men­tioned the giant sonic blasters being tested by the L.A. Sherriff’s Department. Some of the screech­ers are about to be shipped to the Gulf Coast, “so author­i­ties can use the tools for crowd con­trol, aid dis­tri­b­u­tion and res­cue oper­a­tions,” Xeni reports in Wired News.

Share |

September 5th, 2005 | 'Canes, Drones, Homeland Security | 15568 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/05/drones-over-nola/Drones+Over+NoLa2005-09-05+14%3A42%3A48noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Feds Gov’t Blocks Red Cross | Why Katrina Matters » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Kirk says:
    September 5, 2005 at 1:39 pm

    “See into build­ings?“
    Sorry but there is too much of a ther­mal lag for those things to ‘see’ into a build­ing. Now if they had the microwave imag­ing devices, that might be dif­fer­ent. I expect bet­ter from the experts than half baked ideas and dead wrong facts.

    Reply
  2. stephen russell says:
    September 5, 2005 at 3:03 pm

    Why not equip drones with IR sen­sors & ‘smell’sensors to ID bod­ies or liv­ing ones amid wreck­age & to sense any gas leaks etc in area. Very doable with soft­ware.
    Need whole fleets to overview NO area alone from bases in OK AR TX GA TN KY.
    Use other drone types with sen­sor pods.
    Or drop Markers for SAR units alone.
    & ORDER THOSE PEOPLE OUT OR RECIEVE NO FOOD IF not leav­ing area ASAP.

    Reply
  3. maynard says:
    September 6, 2005 at 9:35 am

    I think that any­one who feels sorry for the peo­ple of new orleans shouldn’t. The only rea­son this hap­pened is because the gov­ern­ment in NO spent all of the money that they were sup­posed to be using to keep this from hap­pen­ing on some­thing else. The peo­ple of new orleans are say­ing it is because we are racist, that is incor­rect we just don’t have any­where to put thou­sands and thou­sands of the poor­est peo­ple in the world. It is not any­thing to do with race, it just so hap­pens that the poor­est peo­ple in new orleans are black.

    Reply
  4. Brian says:
    September 6, 2005 at 2:21 pm

    I think it is finally refresh­ing to see that the true story of incom­pe­tence is com­ing out — the true story of the incom­pe­tent mayor of New Orleans and the Governor of LA. They did not fol­low their writ­ten dis­as­ter plans. They did not fol­low their own writ­ten evac­u­a­tion plans. It is ille­gal for the fed­eral gov­ern­ment and the mil­i­tary to act with­out being asked by the gov­er­nor. Lousiana law gives the gov­er­nor author­ity over all dis­as­ter response in the state. FEMAs guide­lines states that FEMA is only to assist local and state gov­ern­ments. The local and state gov­ern­ments are sup­posed to estab­lish a com­mand cen­ter and lead the effort. The gov­er­nor refused and still refuses to turn over author­ity to the fed­eral gov­ern­ment. Who is to blame?

    Reply
  5. Jim says:
    September 6, 2005 at 2:41 pm

    Looks like the last 2 com­ments is just typ­i­cal Republican retoric. Tje US gov­ern­ment had a job to do and they failed, it’s not the State of LA or the mayor of NO’s fault. FEMA and the won­der­ful Bush admin. are to blame

    Reply
  6. Chris McClure says:
    September 6, 2005 at 2:44 pm

    Maybe we could use the UAV cam­eras to look at all the hun­dreds of School Buses that the Mayor of NO failed to uti­lize to evac­u­ate the pop­u­la­tion of his city. He knew he had a CAT 5 Hurricane off his coast. He knoew his Levees were weak! He koew that if this Hurricane hit his city it would dec­i­mate it. You all and your blind attackes on Bush fail to under­stand that the real crim­i­nal­ity here is at the local and state level. They bear full repon­si­bil­ity for this dis­as­ter. They say the gov­er­ment didn’t give them enough money to repair the lev­ees. But yet this city had the largest fed­eral wel­fare drain of any US city. Thats where their money went. But they believed that they are NO and every­body loves NO there­fore the Fed should give NO more and more money.
    BTW the con­sti­tu­tion says “Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and col­lect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and pro­vide for the com­mon Defence and gen­eral Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uni­form through­out the United States;” it does not say that the con­gress has the respon­si­bil­ity to bail out a city that has built itself under water. NO has been ask­ing for this dis­as­ter. But they sat on their buts whin­ing that the FEderal Gov’t wasnt giv­ing them enough money and such. Local gov’t are respon­si­ble for the more than gen­eral wel­fare (mean­ing well being) of their con­stituents. People in this coun­try need to quit look­ing to the Feds for every lit­tle thing and start car­ing for them­selves. We need to shrink the FED and not increase it.

    Reply
  7. Ross says:
    September 6, 2005 at 2:57 pm

    First off…its not the President of the United STates duty to evac­u­ate a city.…it is teh gov­er­nor of taht state who is in the lead con­trol. They have the power to request fed­eral assisa­tance and help but that have to do that. LA gov­er­nor did not in fact she refused an offer from the White House prior to the storm and if you notice has rejected fur­ther offers to turn con­trol over to the fed­eral relief com­man­ders and the fed­eral gov­ern­ment. It shows a com­plete lack of under­stand­ing of the chain of com­mand when one says that this is President Bush’s fault. THE PRESIDENT IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR EACH STATES DISASTERS. He has offered help and it has been rejected by the LA gov­er­nor. LAstly but not least keep in mind that the “SITUATION” would not be this bad if the peo­ple had been evac­u­ated to begin with.….once again NOT THE PRESIDENTS RESPONISBILITY, but instead the gov­ern­ment of the state. OHhh thats right most peo­ple refused and still refuse to leave and the ones that wanted out and coudnt get out can ask THEIR elected offi­cials why they didnt help. It sna old sorry argu­ment and very weak per­spec­tive to sim­ply turn to the pres­i­dent and blame every­thing bad that hap­pens on him.….how absurd.

    Reply
  8. John says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:02 pm

    The Governor of Louisiana STILL has yet to release the National Guard to Federal con­trol. In fact, she has retained the coun­sel of a for­mer Clinton advi­sor instead. So the fail­ings of the National Guard are still on the head of the Governor. All they had to do was use the school­buses and get their pop­u­lace through the first three days, and the Mayor and Governor couldn’t even han­dle that…

    Reply
  9. Jersey Dave says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:03 pm

    Man, the worst dis­as­ter in 100 years and when we should be all together, here come the moon­bat Bush bash­ers to jump in the blood and start try­ing to force us apart. They know full well what they are doing, too. Despiciable.

    Reply
  10. Ben Simmons says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:14 pm

    The name of the game in this coun­try is 47%–45% and there is noth­ing that you can do or say which will change it!

    Reply
  11. M S says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:16 pm

    When you rely on gov­er­ment, any gov­er­ment you are likly to be dis­ap­pointed.
    If you read the US Constitution, this dis­as­ter is clearly in the court of state and local gov­er­ment, with the Federal Goverment to assist, Unless and until it is turned over the the Fed’s by the state. Without the Goveners per­mis­sion, the Fed’s tak­ing charge would be unlawful.

    Reply
  12. Chris says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:16 pm

    Jimbo,
    I’m hav­ing trou­ble under­stand­ing how “pro­vid­ing for the com­mon defense” equates “have dis­as­ter recov­ery plan for every city over 5000 peo­ple in place and ready to go at a min­utes notice”.
    The chain of response must start at the city level, and if turns out that city of New Orleans had over 200 school buses at it’s dis­posal, 36 hours in advance of land­fall, then the buck stops there. If you only get 80% of those ‘stranded’ in New Orleans across the Lake Pontchartrain bridge, those remain­ing could have been dealt with pretty effec­tively by state resources.
    As it is a mas­sive fed­eral agency, FEMA is not designed to be a ‘first-​​responder’. The fact that it has got­ten in the way as it has in this case only under­scores that fact. However, this prob­lem (as much as you and Keith Olberman would like to think it is) is not admin­is­tra­tion spe­cific. I will grant that it is more than a lit­tle baf­fling that our FEMA direc­tor would have so much expe­ri­ence with Arabian horses.
    However, a com­par­i­son of the job they do should be judged based on what the agency does to restore New Orleans. FEMA’s response to Flood of 1993 was (at least in Valmeyer, IL) was a stan­dard to be held to. However, there needs to be per­spec­tive when mak­ing this com­par­i­son — Valmeyer was a town of 900 that was moved 1.5 miles away — the entire project cost $8.7 mil­lion (split 75/​25 federal/​state). That project took two years. Anyone expect­ing New Orleans, a town with 500x more cit­i­zen to be rebuilt in any­thing less 5 years is lying to them­selves and to who­ever they try to sell that BS too.
    Should we talk about the lev­ees next?

    Reply
  13. me says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:20 pm

    As a lot on peo­ple know FEMA was really cre­ated to insure the con­tin­u­a­tion of the United States gov­ern­ment if there were a nuclear war. This is the rea­son it was folded into HLS. You can look at FEMAs web site and see that a lot of the jobs require secret or top secret clear­ance. I think the part of FEMA that responds to nat­ural dis­as­ters should be sep­a­rated out and placed on its own.

    Reply
  14. Paul says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:44 pm

    Bureaucracies are, by nature, inef­fi­cient. For years, any Republican that dared to say we need to cut out the fat was excor­ci­ated. Remember how the sug­ges­tion that reduc­ing the per­cent­age increase of growth was por­trayed in the media as a cut. The bureau­cracy grows, con­sumes money and resources and becomes ever more inef­fi­cient.
    The Bush bash­ing crowd is sali­vat­ing over this one. Instead of spew­ing their rea­son of the day to hate the pres­i­dent, they now can say we now have a real rea­son to hate him — He caused a hur­ri­cane to come in and kill the poor blacks he hates so much and then inten­tion­ally pre­vented res­cue relief from arriv­ing! He decided to flood NO because more black poor peo­ple would drown and die and he only sent the hur­ri­cane to wipe out the homes of the rich folks because they can eas­ily rebuild. Amazing (not really) that while bod­ies are being recov­ered, so many look at this as an oppor­tu­nity to gain polit­i­cal points. How sad. Hatred brews hatred — We need to learn from this in order to be bet­ter pre­pared in the future.

    Reply
  15. sean says:
    September 6, 2005 at 4:03 pm

    Yeah, let’s all take turns bash­ing the admin­istar­tion for not respond­ing more pre­sciently to the worst nat­ural dis­as­ter this coun­try has ever seen. Morons… Why not go do some­thing con­struc­tive with your time than post­ing com­plaints here?

    Reply
  16. sean says:
    September 6, 2005 at 4:05 pm

    oops.…sorry about the typos you lack­eys! I’d hate to have my point diluted by my dyslexia.

    Reply
  17. Sam says:
    September 6, 2005 at 4:17 pm

    There are 50 states and hun­dreds of cities. It is the job of each state and each city to have plans for nat­ural and unnat­ural dis­as­ters. The fed­eral gov­ernent can­not con­ceiv­ably man­age thou­sands of dis­as­ter plans.
    There was a a clear warn­ing of the hur­ri­cane. Anyone left in N.O. was doomed. The local and state gov­ern­ments were in charge of the “evac­u­a­tion”. Yet these peo­ple who are whin­ing and blam­ing oth­ers about all the poor who couldnt get out did absolutely noth­ing to get them out.
    The mayor, par­rish heads and gov­er­nor all belong in jail. Instead they are get­ting a com­pletely free ride by the media, who are intent in blam­ing Bush(read Bush..not Federal Gov).
    Who are the morons who sent peo­ple to a sta­dium that didnt have food or water? Who are the morons who left school buses parked and empty?
    The only thing I agree with some of the left­ists on is that the truth is, the poor get screwed. While it is sick and rep­re­hen­si­ble to insin­u­ate that Bush or any­one else inten­tion­ally vic­tim­ized them, they are always last on the totem pole.
    However, what hypocrisy for the mayor of NO, etc etc to be wail­ing and blam­ing others.

    Reply
  18. Chris says:
    September 6, 2005 at 4:22 pm

    Sean,
    Good point.
    I was writ­ing my post from the HMS Sean Penn, but it, uhhhh, sank.

    Reply
  19. Leland says:
    September 6, 2005 at 5:14 pm

    The mayor of NO, the police lead­er­ship, the elected city lead­ers, the fire dept., all failed. Fed bod­ies can­not make a city pre­pare for thier spe­cific risks, only encour­age. The out­rage over fed response is not cor­rect. The city is respon­si­ble for plans to pro­tect the pop.
    It seems that the feel­ing of enti­tle­ment felt by poor and eco­nom­i­cally dis­ad­van­taged peo­ple has made a leap to an entire city, where New Orl is har­bor­ing a sense of enti­tle­ment as expressed by the city lead­ers. Typical for them to cry that some­one else must be at fault.

    Reply
  20. B-Sabre says:
    September 6, 2005 at 5:25 pm

    Of course, when this com­pany shows up in NO and asks the mil­i­tary air­space coor­di­na­tor (who’s busily man­ag­ing 100+ heli­copters exe­cut­ing grid searchs plus 100+ fixed wing relief flights a day) for per­mis­sion to oper­ate a bunch of drones which can nei­ther see nor evade other air traf­fic, he’s going to be thrown out on his ear.
    Maybe the Right Honorable Curt Weldon should have asked some­body who knows some­thing about air space decon­flic­tion before stick­ing his oar in.
    Not to say UAV’s can’t play a role. Using medium to high alti­tude UAV’s like Predator (above the low-​​altitude ops of heli­copters) as comms relay would help to make up for the dis­rupted tele­phone grid.

    Reply
  21. Brian Sloan says:
    September 6, 2005 at 5:32 pm

    WAITED TWO WEEKS?!? The storm hit 8 days ago. There were sev­eral hun­dred miles of road to clear, hun­dred of ware­houses to open and unload, thou­sands of peo­ple to deploy. No mat­ter HOW MANY planes you could land in New Orleans, there was NO WAY to get enough sup­plies there or get enough peo­ple out in that amount of time. TRUCKS needed to be brought in. Can’t even begin to do that until the mil­lions of pounds of debris were removed and parts of the roads were inspected and/​or repaired. Anyone who thinks the gov­ern­ment dropped the ball, has no idea of what it takes to mobi­lize that kind of recov­ery effort.
    I would have fig­ured that on a site like this, peo­ple would be aware of this.…
    Brian Sloan
    Harris County Emergency Management.

    Reply
  22. Derrick says:
    September 6, 2005 at 5:40 pm

    Hello, Democrats? Real world here. Fallible peo­ple. Shit hap­pens. Deal with it. Or would that mean get­ting your hands dirty?
    I know — try telling that to the thou­sands who died because Bush was on vaca­tion, etc., etc. At least he and FEMA and oth­ers are NOW try­ing to do some­thing USEFUL.
    How ’bout you?

    Reply
  23. RonB says:
    September 6, 2005 at 5:56 pm

    Thank you to a few intel­li­gent folks in here for coun­ter­ing the trans­par­ent par­ti­san carp­ing with some facts and a lit­tle com­mon sense.
    The arm-​​chair quar­ter­back­ing from the pro­fes­sional as well as ama­teur com­plain­ers has reached a new level this week.
    As the pres­i­dent said dur­ing the cam­paign, a list of com­plaints is not a plan. Yet, still, we are innun­dated with com­plaints and finger-​​pointing from his detrac­tors, but never a solu­tion.
    BTW, Derrick, Bush had declared the region a dis­as­ter area before Katrina hit, specif­i­cally to remove legal road blocks from the state request­ing aid, etc.

    Reply
  24. Edward Robbeloth says:
    September 6, 2005 at 6:13 pm

    The “Silver Fox” reminds me of the Kettering Aerial Torpedo, nick­named the “Bug”, that was invented by Charles F. Kettering of Dayton, Ohio. It was devel­oped and built by Dayton-​​Wright Airplane Company in 1918 for the U.S. Army Signal Corps. Although the “Bug” had a biplane con­fig­u­ra­tion, the phys­i­cal appear­ance is remark­ably sim­i­lar. You can check the Natinal Museum of the United States Air Force for more info at http://​www​.wpafb​.af​.mil/​m​u​s​e​u​m​/​e​a​r​l​y​_​y​e​a​r​s​/​e​y​3​a​.​htm

    Reply
  25. judy says:
    September 6, 2005 at 6:21 pm

    Sorry, but I’m very famil­iar with ther­mal imag­ing cam­eras and they can­not see peo­ple inside a struc­ture. Handy tools for see­ing in dark­ness or smoke filled rooms, but not through walls or roofs.

    Reply
  26. don says:
    September 6, 2005 at 6:33 pm

    The dead are still uncounted or buried and the LEFT is going off because they see a polit­i­cal opportunity.Shame on them

    Reply
  27. Greg says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:03 pm

    Blah blah blah Bush’s fault blah blah blah impeach Bush blah blah blah bash Bush blah blah blah blame Bush.
    Don’t any of you peo­ple who hate Bush have any orig­i­nal thoughs in your head or are you all just left­ist syn­co­phants?
    I lived in New Orleans over 25 years ago and had many dis­cus­sions about what would hap­pen if a storm like Katrina came and peo­ple didn’t take the PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY and get out of town in advance. I can’t say for sure, but I’m bet­ting the peo­ple who decided to only build the lev­ees to han­dle a Cat III storm were not appointed by or under Bush. I’m also bet­ting those who blame Bush for cuts in levee fund­ing are unaware the Constitution gives the power of the purse to Congress, not the President, or maybe they know this and they’re delib­er­atly mis­lead­ing us when they blame this on Bush.
    This event is proof that peo­ple need to stop depend­ing on gov­ern­ment and start depend­ing on them­selves. As I told Bill O’Reilly last week (and he sub­se­quently included in his “Talking Points” memo):
    Those who rely on gov­ern­ment will inevitably be dis­ap­pointed.
    Oh yeah, one more thing. When you desert in the mil­i­tary it’s grounds for a sum­mary court mar­tial and exe­cu­tion. How about those 500 police­men who aban­doned New Orleans when the going got tough? How many of them you think joined the bands of loot­ers, rapists and murderers?

    Reply
  28. Greg says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:09 pm

    And this: You know every­one is talk­ing about how it’s racist that bet­ter qual­ity help didn’t get to New Orleans faster. They’re try­ing to invoke slav­ery as an issue again. Last time I checked there were no slaves, no chil­dren of slaves and as far as I can tell no grand­chil­dren of slaves left in the U.S. How long will peo­ple use some­thing that hap­pened many gen­er­a­tions ago, and prob­a­bly not even to their ances­tors, as an excuse not to be respon­si­ble and pro­duc­tive?
    I’ll tell you why things got ugly in New Orleans. Because peo­ple like MY FRIENDS AND FAMILY, whom I begged to get out before the storm hit, were com­pla­cent. Now, if they sur­vived it, they are refugees who’ve been through heck. So if you’re going to point your fin­ger at ANYONE (and remem­ber when you do three fin­gers are point­ing back at you) start by point­ing it at those who didn’t find some way out before Katrina hit.
    As for those too poor, why didn’t the mayor use the fleets of busses which stayed to end up under­wa­ter? You know if he had announced pickup points hardly any­one would have shown up…

    Reply
  29. Noah Shachtman says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:21 pm

    Judy’s right: Weldon is exag­ger­at­ing what the ther­mal cam­eras can do.

    Reply
  30. Kevin says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:22 pm

    People on the left and right, too, are going off because they’ve been lied to.
    I have the three days of sup­plies, as the Department of Homeland Security rec­om­mends on their web site. I had pre­sumed that their sug­ges­tion was evi­dence that the cav­alry would ride in after three days.
    Looking at New Orleans (and, hon­estly, the rest of the Gulf Coast), that’s clearly not the case. I’ve done every­thing that they sug­gested, I’ve taken respon­si­bil­ity for my own safety, and I’d still be screwed in the event of a major dis­as­ter in my area.
    Sure, the mayor of New Orleans didn’t do a great job, but you can’t con­vince me that the screwups all of the Gulf states are all the fault of the locals. After four years and bil­lions of dol­lars, I cer­tainly expected bet­ter from DHS.

    Reply
  31. Drudge Lover says:
    September 6, 2005 at 8:00 pm

    “There were sev­eral hun­dred miles of road to clear, hun­dred of ware­houses to open and unload, thou­sands of peo­ple to deploy. “
    And Harry Connick Jr. drove right into town on Tuesday morn­ing.
    In a four-​​door sedan.
    The “Excuses, excuses” admin­is­tra­tion strikes again. Nothing is ever their fault.

    Reply
  32. Whee says:
    September 6, 2005 at 8:15 pm

    A gov­ern­ment for the peo­ple… by the peo­ple…
    the gov­ern­ment isn’t some “thing” over there or over here… it is sup­posed to be the col­lec­tive efforts of the peo­ple. If you think the gov­ern­ment failed, then WE have failed. We keep think­ing the dis­as­ter won’t hap­pen to us or “the gov’t will be able to help us.…” If the sys­tem in place failed, the peo­ple should take con­trol and help them­selves… orga­nize… act… Many exam­ples exist in the Katrina news sto­ries of peo­ple help­ing each other and join­ing together for the bet­ter good… not sit­ting around wait­ing for some­body else to do something.

    Reply
  33. Mike says:
    September 6, 2005 at 9:04 pm

    Was it not in the dis­as­ter plan to use school buses, pri­vate vehi­cles and other modes to get those out that couldn’t get them­selves out? I keep see­ing the pres­i­dent being blamed for being on vaca­tion a day too late, but noth­ing about what the mayor/​governor did to help their own cit­i­zens out before the mas­sive entity known as big gov­ern­ment could have arrived in town.

    Reply
  34. Craig says:
    September 6, 2005 at 9:27 pm

    How is it that my city, Houston, was able to pro­vide for such a large num­ber of folks in such a short time? It’s call emer­gency plan­ning at the LOCAL Level, that’s where it starts. Is it the FEDs or FEMA that are respon­si­ble for a local plan? for every city in the nation.? This storm taught our local emer­gency plan­ners that Houston needs to rewrite our plan. (Houston Chronical Sunday) Anybody with a tv or radio in Houston knows if the big one comes we need to go. So remem­ber it starts at the local level and works up. So play the blame game if you want but look at what Houston can do with a LOCAL PLAN.

    Reply
  35. Ben There says:
    September 6, 2005 at 9:52 pm

    I would like to take a minute out from curs­ing the pres­i­dent to say a few words about those fine cit­i­zens of New Orleans who ignored the order to evac­u­ate, and now have scarce resources tied up res­cu­ing them. This storm didn’t form mon­day morn­ing, there was plenty of warn­ing, and that storm should have hit a ghost towm. Sure, the mayor & gov­er­nor could have done a bet­ter job of get­ting every­one out. There’s rail­roads there too and a box car could hold a nice group. All that was needed ini­tially was to get the peo­ple out­side the lev­ees, then after the storm passed get­ting sup­plies and shel­ter to them would have been much easier.

    Reply
  36. mike says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:22 pm

    it may be worth talk­ing about appoint­ing peo­ple that are not qual­i­fied. because that can be the case many of times. but when there is a mas­sive fail­ure at the local level, the local level needs to be looked at care­fully. and so far, i haven’t seen any­one show­ing a time­line of where the gov­er­nor or mayor were. but there are plenty of time­lines of where bush was. response isn’t from the top down. response is from local level up. if the local level isn’t orga­nized, than the whole thing ends up chaotic. and that is what needs to be addressed. there are so many areas of this dis­as­ter that can be improved on, it just takes peo­ple to stop bitch­ing at one another and get started. but to just start yelling that one group needs to be fired with­out hav­ing the whole pic­ture shown is not right. there are peo­ple that need to be fired on every side every level. gov­ern­ment, the larger it gets, gets uneas­ingly slow. which is why states are placed in charge of first response to begin with. it’s a tragedy that this had to hap­pen to high­light areas that need to be changed. but instead of say­ing it’s an excuse admin­is­tra­tion, take steps back and start where response is sup­posed to start. but in my opin­ion, the local response is where every­thing went wrong. they didn’t come any­where close to exe­cut­ing a some­what decent pre response and first response.

    Reply
  37. Mike says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:25 pm

    Though it is in the great­est tra­di­tions of this great nation to exer­cise free speech, I would cau­tion restraint at this point. Less than a week after land­fall of the most dam­ag­ing hur­ri­cane in the last fifty years, many have decided that all the suf­fer­ing in La is the fault of the cur­rent fed­eral admin­is­tra­tion. My opin­ion is that, though the fed­eral response was dis­jointed and some­what uncoordinated,the vast bulk of the respon­si­bil­ity for this deba­cle will come to rest with State of Louisiana, the City of New Orleans and its peo­ple, who refused to get out of harm’s way. I strongly sug­gest that we all adopt a wait and see atti­tude with regard to the blame game. The truth may sur­prise quite a few of you.

    Reply
  38. mike says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:29 pm

    The BBC actu­ally has a story that car­ries mul­ti­ple points that are worth not­ing. http://​news​.bbc​.co​.uk/​2​/​h​i​/​a​m​e​r​i​c​a​s​/​4​2​1​6​5​0​8​.​stm

    Reply
  39. Jed Dawkins says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:59 pm

    “Baah! Baaaah! The dead are still uncounted or buried and the LEFT is going off because they see a polit­i­cal oppor­tu­nity. Shame on them! Baaaaahh..“
    Actually, you are mis­taken. The right is going off as well.
    And yes, there is a polit­i­cal oppor­tu­nity. An oppor­tu­nity to wake up sheep like you to the fact that the Republican agenda has been lead­ing our coun­try to ruin. Record deficits, more dead in Iraq after Sadaam than dur­ing Sadaam, record high oil prices, Al-​​Queda stronger than ever, schools going with­out fund­ing, rich get­ting tax cuts — you don’t see a prob­lem? Well if you don’t, then yes, this is a polit­i­cal oppor­tu­nity, an oppor­tu­nity for real­ity to pry your wool-​​covered eyes open.

    Reply
  40. James S. Gagliardi says:
    September 6, 2005 at 11:51 pm

    Live each day like it’s your last.

    Reply
  41. Jack says:
    September 7, 2005 at 6:49 am

    When it comes to idiots it takes one to know one.

    Reply
  42. chris says:
    September 7, 2005 at 10:31 am

    According to the NIMS (National Incident Management System) which is designed for occuances such as this, The inci­dent com­man­der is always a local elected offi­cial. Nowhere in the com­mand struc­ture does the Federal Gov’t ever take over and run the show. This is how it is sup­posed to work. But it assumes that the local offi­cials actu­ally give a sh*t about their con­stituents. Obviously the lead­ers of NO didn’t.

    Reply
  43. Madame Karnak says:
    September 7, 2005 at 1:30 pm

    Hal,
    You have inhaled too much DU. You clearly don’t know what you are talk­ing about. I am an inves­tiga­tive jour­nal­ist and I not only have a copy of the request from the local author­i­ties that was not responded to, but a fairly good idea why this hap­pened and it wasn’t due to incom­pe­tence. It was pur­pose­ful. Bush, his daddy, Frank Carlucci and sev­eral oth­ers are all involved. STOP BLAMING THE “LIBERAL” PRESS, the stu­pid peo­ple (and believe me, you are not exempt from that group) and “lib­er­als.” This was orches­trated by neo­cons, their donors and min­ions as pay­off.
    You had bet­ter wake up and soon. You are not part of the “us” that Bush is so fond of, YOU ARE A THEM!!!!!!!!!!!! So is every­one else that is not rich and con­nected to their cir­cle. Get a frig­gin’ clue and call for the removal of these trea­so­nous bas­tards before their is no county left. OH AND THE REFUGEES? Some of them are being detained in “CAMPS” that they can­not leave. The camps are owned or run by FEMA.
    Wake up. The peo­ple that you think are so stu­pid, get what is really going on, while you keep nurs­ing these idi­otic pipe dreams about who the neo­cons are and what they want.

    Reply
  44. Paul says:
    September 7, 2005 at 3:59 pm

    Typing cor­rec­tion to the above:
    2nd para­graph 4th line
    .…now in posi­tions of author­ity.…
    sorry

    Reply
  45. Bill says:
    September 9, 2005 at 7:10 am

    Someone edu­cate me,
    Even if the gov of La had not given the FEDs the OK. What right did FEMA have to turn away help and sup­plies. Could this help have come at the for­mal or implied request of the gov? I am not try­ing to make a point — I only want opinions.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage