DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » 'Canes » Why Katrina Matters

Why Katrina Matters

“I thought the name of this web site was Defense Tech?” asks JD, echo­ing the e-​​mails of sev­eral folks who wrote in over the week­end. “Enough with your per­sonal polit­i­cal views about Katrina. This is not the place for it.“
With all respect, JD, I have to dis­agree. This isn’t about pol­i­tics. This is about all of our safety. Katrina, and the response to Katrina, has become a national secu­rity issue maybe the biggest one the coun­try has faced since 9/​11. As the edi­tor of a web­site devoted to the future of national secu­rity, I can’t and won’t avoid some­thing so impor­tant. It wouldn’t be right.
katrina_copter.jpgAfter the September 11th attacks, the Department of Homeland Security was put together with two major goals in mind: deter fur­ther ter­ror­ist strikes, and respond to dis­as­ters, both nat­ural and man-​​made — since the evac­u­a­tion plans, med­ical responses, and the like are largely the same in either case.
Four years and count­less bil­lions of dol­lars later, we’ve seen a clumsy, ten-​​thumbed response from DHS. Ships and troops were delayed for days before they were ordered to the dis­as­ter zone. Tens of thou­sands were left stranded, with­out food or water or med­ical care, while relief agen­cies were turned away.
All this, after a dis­as­ter every­one knew was com­ing. Now, imag­ine what would have hap­pened after a sur­prise attack. Al Qaeda oper­a­tives have to be won­der­ing the same thing. It’s as if we’ve hung a giant “kick me” sign around the nation’s neck. No won­der Republicans from President Bush to Newt Gingrich to Joe Scarborough have all called the fed­eral effort “not accept­able.“
In the last few days, some have tried to shift the blame onto the state and city author­i­ties. A whole bunch of it is well-​​deserved. The locals had more than their fare share of screw-​​ups. As one home­land secu­rity source told me:

NOLA [city offi­cials] should not have allowed that many folks to stay in a shel­ter of last resort. Why didn’t they get those peo­ple out? Plus, the shel­ter was fucked up. No sup­plies and no san­i­ta­tion. Plus, why did they let spe­cial needs (ederly, infants, med­ically unfit) into the shel­ter. Those peo­ple should have got­ten out. The feds would have pro­vided tons of buses and trans­porta­tion if the need had been iden­ti­fied early on.…like years ago.


But the City of New Orleans’ abil­ity to cope with a cri­sis isn’t a mat­ter of national secu­rity. The Department of Homeland Security’s abil­ity is. Ray Nagin isn’t going to be respond­ing to ter­ror­ist attacks. That’s what DHS Secretary Michael Chertoff and his team have been hired to do.
THERE’S MORE: With fin­gers point­ing in so many direc­tions, there’s been some ques­tion about whether the Feds or the locals are in charge after a cat­a­stro­phe. Here’s what the U. S. Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan has to say about the DHS’ role:

Response — Lead, man­age and coor­di­nate the national response to acts of ter­ror­ism, nat­ural dis­as­ters, or other emer­gen­cies.
Recovery — Lead national, state, local and pri­vate sec­tor efforts to restore ser­vices and rebuild com­mu­ni­ties after acts of ter­ror­ism, nat­ural dis­as­ters, or other emergencies.

Does DHS need the locals’ per­mis­sion in order to act? Nope, says the Department’s National Response Plan. In fact, the doc­u­ment calls for a “proac­tive Federal response to cat­a­strophic events.”

A cat­a­strophic event is any nat­ural or man­made inci­dent, includ­ing ter­ror­ism, that results in extra­or­di­nary lev­els of mass casu­al­ties, dam­age, or dis­rup­tion severely affect­ing the pop­u­la­tion, infra­struc­ture, envi­ron­ment, econ­omy, national morale, and/​or gov­ern­ment func­tions. A cat­a­strophic event could result in sus­tained national impacts over a pro­longed period of time; almost imme­di­ately exceeds resources nor­mally avail­able to State, local, tribal, and private-​​sector author­i­ties in the impacted area; and sig­nif­i­cantly inter­rupts gov­ern­men­tal oper­a­tions and emer­gency ser­vices to such an extent that national secu­rity could be threat­ened. All cat­a­strophic events are Incidents of National Significance…
Guiding prin­ci­ples for proac­tive Federal response include the fol­low­ing:
■ The pri­mary mis­sion is to save lives; pro­tect crit­i­cal infra­struc­ture, prop­erty, and the envi­ron­ment; con­tain the event; and pre­serve national secu­rity.
■ Standard pro­ce­dures regard­ing requests for assis­tance may be expe­dited or, under extreme cir­cum­stances, sus­pended in the imme­di­ate after­math of an event of cat­a­strophic mag­ni­tude.
■ Identified Federal response resources will deploy and begin nec­es­sary oper­a­tions as required to com­mence life-​​safety activ­i­ties.
■ Notification and full coor­di­na­tion with States will occur, but the coor­di­na­tion process must not delay or impede the rapid deploy­ment and use of crit­i­cal resources. States are urged to notify and coor­di­nate with local gov­ern­ments regard­ing a proac­tive Federal response.
■ State and local gov­ern­ments are encour­aged to con­duct col­lab­o­ra­tive plan­ning with the Federal Government as a part of “steady-​​state” pre­pared­ness for cat­a­strophic incidents.

(Big ups: TPM Cafe)

Share |

September 5th, 2005 | 'Canes, Homeland Security | 15654 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/05/why-katrina-matters/Why+Katrina+Matters2005-09-06+01%3A23%3A03noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Drones Over NoLa | Dutch Counter-​​Flood Tech » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. tim fong says:
    September 5, 2005 at 10:13 pm

    Thanks for cov­er­ing this. I com­pletely agree with you that how we respond to the Katrina cri­sis is indica­tive of our abil­ity to respond gen­er­ally. Keep it up!

    Reply
  2. Byron Skinner says:
    September 5, 2005 at 10:35 pm

    Three Cheers Noah,
    National defense and Politics are the same thing. As was so clearly demostrated with Katrina, the mil­i­tary doesn’t make the deci­sion of WHEN to go in the POLITICIANS do.
    It’s the job of the Military to answer the call,not make the call.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner
    “Stewart’s Platoon”

    Reply
  3. Phila says:
    September 5, 2005 at 10:39 pm

    Great post! Anyone who tries to shel­ter the admin­is­tra­tion from its fair share of blame for this dis­as­ter is the worst sort of par­ti­san hack. We’ve given up a cer­tain amount of our con­sti­tu­tional rights, and a huge amount of tax­payer dol­lars, in the name of “home­land secu­rity.” If it doesn’t work prop­erly — and it clearly doesn’t — then peo­ple of every polit­i­cal per­sua­sion ought to be ask­ing why.

    Reply
  4. Mendonsa says:
    September 5, 2005 at 11:31 pm

    Maybe what we need is less bureaucratic-​​style lead­er­ship. It just doesn’t seem to work in mas­sive orga­ni­za­tions like the DHS that need to react to dynamic threats with flex­i­bil­ity and speed. What we need is auf­tragstak­tik. It’s more or less the the­ory of lead­er­ship that the U.S. mil­i­tary aspires it (and it seems to have worked out).
    Joal Mendonsa
    USMC Officer Candidate (will be 2nd Lt. in May)

    Reply
  5. Mendonsa says:
    September 5, 2005 at 11:32 pm

    Here’s a more in-​​depth explo­ration of auf­tragstak­tik:
    http://​carlisle​-www​.army​.mil/​u​s​a​w​c​/​P​a​r​a​m​e​t​e​r​s​/​9​9​a​u​t​u​m​n​/​k​e​i​t​h​l​y​.​htm

    Reply
  6. Kevin Parkin says:
    September 6, 2005 at 3:57 am

    What wor­ries me is that the lessons drawn from this dis­as­ter might not be applied widely enough.
    I think it’s fair to say there is under­in­vest­ment in infra­struc­ture, mis­al­lo­ca­tion of pri­or­i­ties, and lead­ers replaced by com­plaint fol­low­ers through­out many (a major­ity of?) branches of gov­ern­ment right now. On this web­site, we mostly see it in the con­text of mil­i­tary R&D and pro­cure­ment.
    9/​11 exposed FBI and CIA for what they were. Katrina exposed FEMA and DHS for what they are, but will we fix the oth­ers before their hid­den declines come back to haunt us, each in its own way?
    Before Katrina and in some cases 9/​11, many other prob­lems I felt strongly about always came back to one cen­tral prob­lem: Government is not inclined to respond to a new devel­op­ment unless there is a dis­as­ter to point to as a rea­son for change.
    Will unmit­i­gated dis­as­ter con­tinue to be the nec­es­sary con­di­tion for mean­ing­ful change?
    Unless some­one gets a han­dle on the orga­ni­za­tional side of these fail­ings and the pub­lic comes to under­stand them in this more gen­eral way, then we in effect con­cede that dis­as­ters like 9/​11 and Katrina are now — and will con­tinue to be — _​the_​ enabling step for insti­tu­tional renewal within the US government.

    Reply
  7. Dennis says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:53 am

    An hon­est his­to­rian in the future may record the fol­low­ing — Given that China, Japan and some other nations held tremen­dous sums in IOUs cre­ated in part by the Bush admin­is­tra­tion to pay for the Iraq war, plus hugh tax cuts for the already rich and large cor­po­ra­tions; and given the Federal costs of hur­ri­cane Katrina plus the con­tin­u­ing costs of the Iraq war, and, added to that the graft that occured in “high places” — the United Stattes became a third world nation.

    Reply
  8. Larry says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:42 am

    Speaking of local prepa­ra­tions, check out NYC’s hur­ri­cane plans:
    http://​www​.gothamist​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​2​0​0​5​/​0​9​/​0​6​/​n​y​c​s​_​h​u​r​r​i​c​a​n​e​_​p​l​a​n​.​php
    http://​www​.wnbc​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​4​9​3​7​7​5​9​/​d​e​t​a​i​l​.​h​tml
    In many ways, NYC is bet­ter pre­pared and has more capa­bil­i­ties then the Feds do, whether it be ter­ror­ism or nat­ural disaster.

    Reply
  9. bill McCullough says:
    September 6, 2005 at 4:27 pm

    I’m sure that it easy to point the fin­ger of blame and all of a sud­den pres­i­dent Bush was being pointed at! I always thought that the Govenor of each state was in charge of their own National Guard then why are is the press point­ing only at him, I really dont think thats really fair at all! Some other peo­ple have to stand up to what they are sup­pose to do and not shift the blame, Heck point­ing a fin­ger is easy even chil­dre can do that!

    Reply
  10. rutty says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:10 pm

    Noah is right, as are most of the pre­vi­ous com­ments. The big les­son to me, how­ever, is a lit­tle bit dif­fer­ent. I see it like this: dont bet on the gov­ern­ment sav­ing your hide; you and your fam­ily, friends, and neigh­bors have to be pre­pared to look out for one another and assume that the govt. wont be able to do so.
    And, please, all, if you dont have at least two weeks worth of non-​​perishbale food and fresh water at your home, get it, no mat­ter where you live. It is just com­mon sense. Everything from tor­na­dos to a water-​​main break can put you in a bad way.

    Reply
  11. Kevin Parkin says:
    September 6, 2005 at 7:15 pm

    We are all to blame.
    We are the ones who fund this gov­ern­ment and we are the ones who should be hold­ing it accountable.

    Reply
  12. rutty says:
    September 6, 2005 at 8:59 pm

    Per Byron’s com­ments, add at least 500 rounds to what one should always have in one’s home if he is going to be respon­si­ble. Better yet, make that 500 45cal, 500 12-​​gauge, and 500 7.62mm (or 5.56mm).

    Reply
  13. ALadyWhoLikesToRead says:
    September 7, 2005 at 12:52 am

    Here’s a nice lit­tle link on all the excess moola FEMA handed out last year to Miami-​​Dade County, which was 120 from the hur­ri­cane and received very lit­tle dam­age.
    http://​www​.sun​-sen​tinel​.com/​n​e​w​s​/​s​f​l​-​f​e​m​a​c​o​v​e​r​a​g​e​,​0​,​6​6​9​7​3​4​7​.​s​t​o​r​y​g​a​l​l​e​r​y​?​c​o​l​l​=​s​f​l​a​-​n​e​w​s​-​u​t​i​l​ity
    ” A U.S. Senate com­mit­tee found wide­spread fraud and waste in the fed­eral government’s pay­out of $31 mil­lion to Miami-​​Dade County res­i­dents for Hurricane Frances aid.”

    Reply
  14. Kathryn Cramer says:
    September 7, 2005 at 4:03 am

    The phrase that keeps com­ing back to me is “pro­vide for the com­mon defense and pro­mote the gen­eral wel­fare.” Wasn’t that sup­posed to be the whole point of hav­ing a United States? To argue that this is all the fault of local offi­cials seems to me noth­ing short of a betrayal of the prin­ci­ples out­lined in the Declaration of Independence.

    Reply
  15. Dave Bell says:
    September 7, 2005 at 6:14 am

    Thanks for quot­ing the DHS on the was in which Federal resources should have been brought into play. I’ve seen many claims was that the prob­lem was that the State Governors didn’t ask; not only can these claims be dis­proved, it’s clear that the DHS didn’t need to be asked.
    It’s very sug­ges­tive that the Coastguard reacted so dif­fer­ently to the rest, but they do have a long tra­di­tion, and a very clear mis­sion.
    I won­der what Air Force com­bat res­cue assets are left avail­able in the USA, and what they did.
    There’s enough gone wrong, and enough blame, for every level of the dis­as­ter response. But we expect some­thing this big to over­whelm local resources.
    It’s a shock to see it appear­ing to over­whelm the US military.

    Reply
  16. gandalf says:
    September 7, 2005 at 6:35 am

    ccplan­ner is entirely cor­rect.
    In addi­tion, the scale of the infra­struc­ture destruc­tion is enor­mous — equiv­a­lent to the sat­u­ra­tion bomb­ing of an area the size of the United Kingdom. That meant that a mas­sive information-​​gathering process had to take place before resources could be deployed. That took time.
    I thought Defense Tech was mil­i­tary infor­ma­tion con­cen­tra­tor.
    “Why Katrina Matters” is a sopho­moric and politi­cized rant from a posi­tion of almost pre­fect igno­rance.
    It destroys your brand for me — I’m out of here.
    Good luck with the Kos Kidz.

    Reply
  17. Mo says:
    September 7, 2005 at 10:17 am

    Why is it that the folks who are claim­ing that the main prob­lem was the lack of evac­u­a­tion would be the first ones to protest if the National Guard actu­ally did show up and start drag­ging peo­ple out of their houses?
    Every sur­vey taken in New Orleans showed that there would be large num­bers of peo­ple to stay behind. Unless you really want police going door to door, demand­ing YOU leave YOUR house next hur­ri­cane, STFU.

    Reply
  18. Byron Skinner says:
    September 7, 2005 at 2:15 pm

    Now that the blame game is full on, how about this. “FEMA Wants No Photos of Dead” L.A. Times, Pg. A-​​17 From Reuters.
    Lets see is there some pat­tern here, no pho­tos or video footage of dam­aged to or bur­ing of oil infr­tas­truc­ture. No video or report­ing of what hap­pens after dark even though NBC has men­tioned at least three times that a gun bat­tle hap­pened over the week­end on a flooded sec­tion of road that resulted in five killed and three wounded.
    FEMA’s rea­son given: “We requested that no pho­tographs of the deceased be made by the media.” the un named spokes­woman goes on to say “…space was needed on the res­cue boats.“
    This is the kind of report­ing the state ran and con­trolled media of East Germany and the old Soviet Union use to do.
    This blan­tant muz­zling of the media/​press is a direct vio­la­tion of the 1st. Amendment of the Constitution.
    President Bush says he wants to appoint judges who can read the Constition. A ques­tion to Judge Roberts from the Senate Judiciary Committee should be: Since this press cen­sor­ship is in direct vio­la­tion of the Freedoms of the Press granted in the 1st. Amendment would you find the President and his admin­is­tra­tion in vio­la­tion of the law?“
    I for one would be inter­ested how a “Reader of The Constitution” would answer this ques­tion.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner
    “Stewart’s Platoon”

    Reply
  19. Antifa says:
    September 8, 2005 at 2:15 am

    It’s easy to spot com­menters who’ve some mil­i­tary expe­ri­ence — they call fuster­cluck when they see one. Because they know lives are lost when troops eff up, and they damn sure want to know how and why they did. Not to make heads roll — to be sure it doesn’t hap­pen again.
    Katrina mat­ters because it shows dere­lic­tion of duty. FEMA and DHS are our LRRP and sen­tries — and they were sound asleep.
    No need to go into the polit­i­cal muck-​​up. Yeah, our top civil­ian lead­ers were var­i­ously attend­ing Broadway plays, strum­ming gui­tars, buy­ing a man­sion and hang­ing out at a base­ball game while our cit­i­zens were drown­ing and dying of dehy­dra­tion. The vot­ing pop­u­la­tion has that to solve.
    We have to see that this doesn’t hap­pen again.

    Reply
  20. cirby says:
    September 8, 2005 at 4:04 am

    “FEMA and DHS are our LRRP and sen­tries“
    No.
    The LRRPs are the guys who told every­one twenty years back that New Orleans was going to get slammed by a hur­ri­cane.
    The sen­tries are the weather fore­cast­ers.
    FEMA and DHS are the guys back at the sup­ply base, wait­ing for the com­bat units — the state and local respon­ders — to tell them where to send the resup­ply. If nobody tells them they’re out of ammo (or that their unit just got over­run because the com­man­ders are fools), it’s hard to blame the guys ship­ping MREs and writ­ing paychecks.

    Reply
  21. Madame Karnak says:
    September 20, 2005 at 11:31 pm

    First, I want all of you to know that I’d feel really safe if any of you came to help after a dis­as­ter. What I think that Katrina points up to is the screwed up agenda of this entire admin­is­tra­tion. What is the first thing that their favorite polit­i­cal philoso­pher Grover Norquist did? All these peo­ple died, some are dying, the whole city is a dis­as­ter because the rich got 75 per­cent of the tax cuts (which they did not need, but that is another post) and Norquist writes this screwed up fax to Bush say­ing that the min­i­mum wage laws should be sus­pended to save “tax­pay­ers” money. Since Norquist and his rich bud­dies pay very lit­tle of the bills that they run up, I don’t think that he has the right to speak for those of us who do. Wage earn­ers pay more taxes pro­por­tion­ate to their wages than rich folks who have all kinds of loop­holes and so much “wealth” that’s untax­able that it is unreal…yet it is the wealthy who want more cuts. In this instance, the poor folks who return and want some kind of work to fix their houses or what­ever can’t even expect $5.15 an hour for work­ing in a haz­ardous waste dump?
    It’s just plain wrong. There is so much wrong being done that I don’t know where to begin. What do peo­ple expect from a guy who’s failed at every­thing that he has tried? Who got through col­lege because his grandpa was a big fundraiser, not because he made the grades or stud­ied and who doesn’t give a flip about the soli­diers that he sends into war with­out the right armor or the poor left stand­ing beside the Superdome. He only cares about the money fil­ter­ing into the pock­ets of those he des­ig­nates.
    I am dis­gusted and repulsed by what I saw.
    MK

    Reply
  22. Blue Speak says:
    March 2, 2006 at 10:28 pm

    Thank you for your com­ments on the Katrina fiasco. And a fiasco it was when United States cit­i­zens are left to fend for them­selves in the mul­ti­ple thou­sands after a cat­a­clysmic event that was fore­casted for days on end prior to the event.
    There was absolutely *no* sur­prise when the hur­ri­cane hit. It was a Category 5 hur­ri­cane that was larger than Hurricane Andrew which nearly dec­i­mated that part of Florida when it hit.
    And while hur­ri­canes may not be as “sexy” as ter­ror­ist acts, they are no less dev­as­tat­ing to the lives of cit­i­zens caught in harms way.
    Over 1300 peo­ple lost their lives. And count­less tens of thou­sands have been left home­less. This is a shame­ful stain on our nation, and one we will do well to remem­ber.
    And if we do *not* put all of our resouces and energy into fix­ing our first lines of defense against cat­a­stro­phe what then? What hap­pens if a pan­demic bird flu hits, or another dev­as­tat­ing earth­quakes, or “the big one” in California, or, God for­bid, another ter­ror­ist strike?
    As cit­i­zens we owe our­selves the best defense pos­si­ble for our home­land. And if lead­ers of our Homeland Security Department and their bosses can’t see that, then it’s time to clean the slate and bring in a fresh crew who will see this done right.
    Enough is enough.

    Reply
  23. Adolf Blowme says:
    March 16, 2006 at 1:35 pm

    I hate you…soo much…like this much
    Bush is god. Don’t be talkin’ smack ’bout him.
    P.S. your news arti­cles suck anyway…douche

    Reply
  24. Elizabeth Lockhart says:
    August 10, 2006 at 7:40 am

    I find it amaz­ing that no one seems to see the con­nec­tion the dra­matic change in hur­ri­canes from 2004 and 05 with this year. Has HAARP been dis­con­nected? Turned on? What is happening?

    Reply
  25. Jon Cooney says:
    August 19, 2006 at 3:07 pm

    A young tank com­man­der proud of his 3rd duty in Iraq, back to the Cape on RR; upon return­ing to duty was blown up by a land­mine. While he was wait­ing with his 6 year nephew and I with my lit­tle daugh­ter for the bus,I asked him why he was going back.He said “I’m wor­ried about my men.
    “I told him I was very upset about the lie that Rumsfield told to the men while doing ques­tion and answer in Iraq.When asked about the lack of arma­ment on Humvees–he said it was ordered and on the way. Later the armour com­pa­nies said there was no such prod­uct ordered. Our young com­man­der said a lot of the first Hummer had soft side doors
    ini­tially. You can’t even get it like that for Recreational use.That’s what our present lead­ers thank of our boys. Let’s use Rumsfield as a human mine sweep­ing tool, since we can’t afford much machi­nary to pro­tect them. I am both proud and said to have met such a brave man.

    Reply
  26. buy rupees says:
    August 2, 2008 at 12:53 am

    When I was on the uni­ver­sity, I played the Rappelz game under my class­mates intro­duced. At first, I heard Rappelz from my class­mate; I did not feel the game is fun. Until one day, I went on the line, because I had noth­ing to do, so I think I can look at the Rappelz game. When I looked the screen, I was attracted. Then I applied an account and I spent a lit­tle to buy rupees. And I began my Rappelz trip.

    Reply
  27. Buy Tibia Gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 11:23 pm

    As a pre­mium player you will have addi­tional abil­i­ties and advan­tages inside and out­side the game. Buy Tibia Gold to make Tibia even more fun!

    Reply
  28. Requiem gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 11:25 pm

    There is no room for soft­ness or love in the world of Requiem gold. There is only death, car­nage, and sal­va­tion through extreme force.

    Reply
  29. buy flyff penya says:
    August 16, 2008 at 2:03 am

    because she did not have enough money to buy flyff penya, I send some to her she did not accept

    Reply
  30. buy 2moons dil says:
    August 16, 2008 at 2:14 am

    I used my parents

    Reply
  31. buy fiesta Gold says:
    August 16, 2008 at 3:04 am

    I buy fiesta Gold for him, in the end he was send for another people

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage