DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » 'Canes » Army Tests Super-​​Levees

Army Tests Super-​​Levees

“With New Orleans in ruins, hydro­log­i­cal engi­neers are look­ing to new tech­nolo­gies to bol­ster aging earthen levee sys­tems,” Defense Tech pal John Gartner reports in today’s Wired News.
army_levees.jpg

The Army is cur­rently test­ing prod­ucts that can tem­porar­ily raise the height of lev­ees to deter­mine if they can be assem­bled faster than the usual defense of fill­ing and stack­ing sand­bags.
The Rapid Deployment Flood Wall from Geocell Systems is a series of inter­lock­ing sec­tions of plas­tic that are filled at the scene with sand or soil and can be lay­ered as high as nec­es­sary.
The Hesco wall is a metal bas­ket with fab­ric sides that is filled with soil. Hesco walls can be folded flat for easy ship­ment, accord­ing to Hesco Bastion direc­tor of oper­a­tions Jared Lyons, who said his prod­ucts are being used to pro­tect against flood­wa­ters in Texas and Florida.
The Portadam sys­tem is a series of metal rods that are bolted together and do not have to be filled with soil…
But so far, at least, the prob­lem of hold­ing back flood­wa­ters has pro­gressed lit­tle beyond the ancient and time-​​consuming tech­nique of pil­ing on more dirt.

THERE’S MORE: “It occurred to me that there might be a way to use super­ab­sorbent poly­mers to form self-​​building flood pro­tec­tion bar­ri­ers or to slow the flow through a breach,” says reader KP, a CalTech Ph.D. can­di­date in engi­neer­ing. “Sure enough, a quick search reveals a cou­ple of solu­tions already out there.”

http://​www​.finetech​.bz/​p​a​g​e​s​/​4​/​p​a​g​e​4​.​h​t​m​l​?​r​e​f​r​e​s​h​=​1​0​9​2​8​1​5​6​3​2​729
http://​www​.pro​tec​tion​con​nect​.com/​s​a​n​d​l​e​s​s​.​h​tml

As best I can tell the mech­a­nism of swelling is osmotic pres­sure, so these bags would not per­form as well for sea­wa­ter as they would for fresh water. Also, its not clear how well the bag con­tents would resist defor­ma­tion due to water pres­sure. Neverthless, reduc­ing the mass logis­tics of a flood wall by a fac­tor 10,100, or 1000 is a big deal, and I expect that an imag­i­na­tive indi­vid­ual could find a way to make it work.

Share |

September 6th, 2005 | 'Canes, Homeland Security | 16033 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/06/army-tests-super-levees/Army+Tests+Super-Levees2005-09-07+01%3A27%3A07noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Geek Rescue Squad Needs Gear | Ham Radio’s Helping Hand » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. LTC EdSalmon, USAF (RET) says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:18 pm

    How much of the flood­ing prob­lem was caused by the Corps past attempt at flood con­trol and eas­ing nav­i­ga­tion dif­fi­cul­ties on the Mississippi River? I’m remem­ber­ing the recent deci­sion to go back into Florida and re-​​do a lot of the past flood con­trol work to stop all of the prob­lems that their past work caused. Like straign­ten­ing the rivers , etc. Someone once said that the biggest thing the Corps ever built was itself(Along with pork from Congress)!

    Reply
  2. Robert Millman says:
    September 7, 2005 at 9:07 am

    I watched not too long ago on National Geographic Television about the Dikes in the Neitherlands. And they have high­ways going across the large bod­ies of water and they can con­trol the dames and dikes to elim­i­nate the flood­ing. Why don’t we learn from them?

    Reply
  3. Chrialex says:
    September 7, 2005 at 9:23 am

    Well, how much of New Orleans will need to be rebuilt and how much is safe as-​​is? Another option, though most likely not the cheap­est, would be to just scrap the whole city and raise it above sea-​​level. Then you wouldn’t have to worry so much about the water pour­ing in because the city wouldn’t be lower. Just a thought.

    Reply
  4. stephen russell says:
    September 7, 2005 at 9:56 am

    I agree, maybe the whole city should be flooded & rebuilt 100 miles north & the new body of water named Lake New Orleans.
    OR move sub­urbs to the N,NE,NW from the dwtn area & the leave the rest as a Flood Plain.
    Hell, theyre tear­ing down the Superdome alone.
    80% of the homes are ruined IE to be bull­dozed any­way.
    OR build a huge dike levee wall from the MS River to the S,SE,SW of city spaces & remove flood­wa­ters alone.
    Install bet­ter pumps & tur­bine dri­ves.
    Do it on a com­puter map of the City spaces.
    Use CAD CAM.
    Relocate the French Qtr to Baton Rogue???
    Shereveport?
    Bigger French Qtr??
    Build a chan­nel to the west to TX for TX crops from NO area alone.

    Reply
  5. Brad says:
    September 7, 2005 at 11:36 am

    Yeah, but they don’t have to deal with hur­ri­canes in Holland. I imag­ine it makes there work a lit­tle easier.

    Reply
  6. Dennis F. Abrams says:
    September 7, 2005 at 11:50 am

    I read about the inter­lock­ing sys­tems that are filled with dirt,sand etc. I would think that time is a fac­tor when you are set­ting these sys­tems up and putting in sand and dirt would would be time con­sum­ing. First you have to have the man­power to bring in the sand or what­ever. Then you have to have the man­power to fill the con­tain­ers. I would think that if you had con­tain­ers that only needed to be filled with water would be bet­ter and quicker. I would think that when a sec­tion of the levee fails some­thing that is sim­i­lar to a barge could be brought in and sunk in place would help plug the breach faster than so many sand bags, but what do I know.

    Reply
  7. The Cenobyte says:
    September 7, 2005 at 12:12 pm

    This is not the fault of the corp of Eng. Those guys are top shelf and when it comes down to it they never do any­thing that they are not asked to do by the civil­ian govt.
    As to New Orleans and other flood planes. I see no rea­son for the aver­age per­son to be allowed to live and work in a flood plane. There are busi­nesses (Agro, ports, per­toleum and gas stor­age and pip­ing cen­ter) that are always going to need to be in flood planes, but schools, homes, malls, govt. builds, sta­di­ums, etc are just silly. If peo­ple for the most part did not live in the flood planes then most of this prob­lem would not exist.

    Reply
  8. Edward Liu says:
    September 7, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    Everything you ever wanted to know about the advanced levee sys­tems in Amsterdam and London, unless you’re a civil engi­neer and want the hard math. Noah linked to this arti­cle a few days ago.
    With a price tag of $8 bil­lion over 25 years, though, I’m afraid that Congressional amd polit­i­cal machin­ery that cut out pre­ven­ta­tive levee work in the first place are going to mean that we shall pay any price and bear any bur­den for such a sys­tem, as long as it isn’t too expen­sive or too difficult.

    Reply
  9. bauwens says:
    September 7, 2005 at 1:56 pm

    Its all­ways the price tag? We will rebuild so we can have peo­ple come in as tourist again wich is start­ing! The Shuttle will go up again so we can watch that, Be glad that we can­not change the weather the way wede like.And most off all no more wars!!

    Reply
  10. Ryoushi says:
    September 8, 2005 at 1:45 am

    In an arti­cle about Shell’s oil shale exper­i­ments the tech­nique they used to pre­vent the con­t­a­m­i­nated waters from the extrac­tion process from leak­ing into the water table was to freeze the walls of the cham­bers (ice is imper­me­able to water turns out, so long as it stays frozen).
    This has me think­ing that a pos­si­ble fast tem­po­rary levee breach patch could be done using refrig­er­a­tion units to cre­ate a tem­po­rary ice dam that could with­hold the con­stant ero­sion of the water pres­sure so long as you keep it frozen.
    There are prob­a­bly phys­i­cal lim­i­ta­tions I haven’t con­sid­ered as to why that method hasn’t been tried, or maybe some­one who knows some­thing can tell me why this would or wouldn’t be possible.

    Reply
  11. Hendrik J. Kaput says:
    September 13, 2005 at 5:42 am

    I was schocked to see the New Orleans Levees on CNN.
    In Holland the most pop­u­lated land lies till 30 feet below sea-​​level. After severe storms in 1953 many lev­ees (dijken) blow away. Many peo­ple drowned. We decided to rebuild the lev­ees and put all the knowl­edge we had in our lev­ees. Millions of peo­ple would be drowned now if the lev­ees would break. From the moment I saw your New Orleans lev­ees it was clear to me that they never could with­stand the water. You can’t let peo­ple live behind such lev­ees. I don’t know if there is enough knowl­edge about lev­ees in the United States, if not, I would imme­di­atly con­tact the Dutch author­i­ties to see what they could do for you.
    Half a mil­lion peo­ple behind such lev­ees is a crim­i­nal act.

    Reply
  12. Steven says:
    September 21, 2005 at 4:59 pm

    how old is the old­est part of the levee sys­tem in new orleans?

    Reply
  13. flyff money says:
    August 8, 2008 at 9:11 pm

    Even if I do not play this game, my res and flyff money can give my good friends, but my num­ber do not delete~~

    Reply
  14. 2moons gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 9:14 pm

    Each group fights was broth­ers of one mind with leader

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage