DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » 'Canes » Army Tests Super-Levees

Army Tests Super-Levees

“With New Orleans in ruins, hydrological engineers are looking to new technologies to bolster aging earthen levee systems,” Defense Tech pal John Gartner reports in today’s Wired News.
army_levees.jpg

The Army is currently testing products that can temporarily raise the height of levees to determine if they can be assembled faster than the usual defense of filling and stacking sandbags.
The Rapid Deployment Flood Wall from Geocell Systems is a series of interlocking sections of plastic that are filled at the scene with sand or soil and can be layered as high as necessary.
The Hesco wall is a metal basket with fabric sides that is filled with soil. Hesco walls can be folded flat for easy shipment, according to Hesco Bastion director of operations Jared Lyons, who said his products are being used to protect against floodwaters in Texas and Florida.
The Portadam system is a series of metal rods that are bolted together and do not have to be filled with soil…
But so far, at least, the problem of holding back floodwaters has progressed little beyond the ancient and time-consuming technique of piling on more dirt.

THERE’S MORE: “It occurred to me that there might be a way to use superabsorbent polymers to form self-building flood protection barriers or to slow the flow through a breach,” says reader KP, a CalTech Ph.D. candidate in engineering. “Sure enough, a quick search reveals a couple of solutions already out there.”

http://​www​.finetech​.bz/​p​a​g​e​s​/​4​/​p​a​g​e​4​.​h​t​m​l​?​r​e​f​r​e​s​h​=​1​0​9​2​8​1​5​6​3​2​729
http://​www​.protectionconnect​.com/​s​a​n​d​l​e​s​s​.​h​tml

As best I can tell the mechanism of swelling is osmotic pressure, so these bags would not perform as well for seawater as they would for fresh water. Also, its not clear how well the bag contents would resist deformation due to water pressure. Neverthless, reducing the mass logistics of a flood wall by a factor 10,100, or 1000 is a big deal, and I expect that an imaginative individual could find a way to make it work.

Share |

September 6th, 2005 | 'Canes, Homeland Security | 16033 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/06/army-tests-super-levees/Army+Tests+Super-Levees2005-09-07+01%3A27%3A07noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Geek Rescue Squad Needs Gear | Ham Radio’s Helping Hand » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. LTC EdSalmon, USAF (RET) says:
    September 6, 2005 at 10:18 pm

    How much of the flooding problem was caused by the Corps past attempt at flood control and easing navigation difficulties on the Mississippi River? I’m remembering the recent decision to go back into Florida and re-do a lot of the past flood control work to stop all of the problems that their past work caused. Like straigntening the rivers , etc. Someone once said that the biggest thing the Corps ever built was itself(Along with pork from Congress)!

    Reply
  2. Robert Millman says:
    September 7, 2005 at 9:07 am

    I watched not too long ago on National Geographic Television about the Dikes in the Neitherlands. And they have highways going across the large bodies of water and they can control the dames and dikes to eliminate the flooding. Why don’t we learn from them?

    Reply
  3. Chrialex says:
    September 7, 2005 at 9:23 am

    Well, how much of New Orleans will need to be rebuilt and how much is safe as-is? Another option, though most likely not the cheapest, would be to just scrap the whole city and raise it above sea-level. Then you wouldn’t have to worry so much about the water pouring in because the city wouldn’t be lower. Just a thought.

    Reply
  4. stephen russell says:
    September 7, 2005 at 9:56 am

    I agree, maybe the whole city should be flooded & rebuilt 100 miles north & the new body of water named Lake New Orleans.
    OR move suburbs to the N,NE,NW from the dwtn area & the leave the rest as a Flood Plain.
    Hell, theyre tearing down the Superdome alone.
    80% of the homes are ruined IE to be bulldozed anyway.
    OR build a huge dike levee wall from the MS River to the S,SE,SW of city spaces & remove floodwaters alone.
    Install better pumps & turbine drives.
    Do it on a computer map of the City spaces.
    Use CAD CAM.
    Relocate the French Qtr to Baton Rogue???
    Shereveport?
    Bigger French Qtr??
    Build a channel to the west to TX for TX crops from NO area alone.

    Reply
  5. Brad says:
    September 7, 2005 at 11:36 am

    Yeah, but they don’t have to deal with hurricanes in Holland. I imagine it makes there work a little easier.

    Reply
  6. Dennis F. Abrams says:
    September 7, 2005 at 11:50 am

    I read about the interlocking systems that are filled with dirt,sand etc. I would think that time is a factor when you are setting these systems up and putting in sand and dirt would would be time consuming. First you have to have the manpower to bring in the sand or whatever. Then you have to have the manpower to fill the containers. I would think that if you had containers that only needed to be filled with water would be better and quicker. I would think that when a section of the levee fails something that is similar to a barge could be brought in and sunk in place would help plug the breach faster than so many sand bags, but what do I know.

    Reply
  7. The Cenobyte says:
    September 7, 2005 at 12:12 pm

    This is not the fault of the corp of Eng. Those guys are top shelf and when it comes down to it they never do anything that they are not asked to do by the civilian govt.
    As to New Orleans and other flood planes. I see no reason for the average person to be allowed to live and work in a flood plane. There are businesses (Agro, ports, pertoleum and gas storage and piping center) that are always going to need to be in flood planes, but schools, homes, malls, govt. builds, stadiums, etc are just silly. If people for the most part did not live in the flood planes then most of this problem would not exist.

    Reply
  8. Edward Liu says:
    September 7, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    Everything you ever wanted to know about the advanced levee systems in Amsterdam and London, unless you’re a civil engineer and want the hard math. Noah linked to this article a few days ago.
    With a price tag of $8 billion over 25 years, though, I’m afraid that Congressional amd political machinery that cut out preventative levee work in the first place are going to mean that we shall pay any price and bear any burden for such a system, as long as it isn’t too expensive or too difficult.

    Reply
  9. bauwens says:
    September 7, 2005 at 1:56 pm

    Its allways the price tag? We will rebuild so we can have people come in as tourist again wich is starting! The Shuttle will go up again so we can watch that, Be glad that we cannot change the weather the way wede like.And most off all no more wars!!

    Reply
  10. Ryoushi says:
    September 8, 2005 at 1:45 am

    In an article about Shell’s oil shale experiments the technique they used to prevent the contaminated waters from the extraction process from leaking into the water table was to freeze the walls of the chambers (ice is impermeable to water turns out, so long as it stays frozen).
    This has me thinking that a possible fast temporary levee breach patch could be done using refrigeration units to create a temporary ice dam that could withhold the constant erosion of the water pressure so long as you keep it frozen.
    There are probably physical limitations I haven’t considered as to why that method hasn’t been tried, or maybe someone who knows something can tell me why this would or wouldn’t be possible.

    Reply
  11. Hendrik J. Kaput says:
    September 13, 2005 at 5:42 am

    I was schocked to see the New Orleans Levees on CNN.
    In Holland the most populated land lies till 30 feet below sea-level. After severe storms in 1953 many levees (dijken) blow away. Many people drowned. We decided to rebuild the levees and put all the knowledge we had in our levees. Millions of people would be drowned now if the levees would break. From the moment I saw your New Orleans levees it was clear to me that they never could withstand the water. You can’t let people live behind such levees. I don’t know if there is enough knowledge about levees in the United States, if not, I would immediatly contact the Dutch authorities to see what they could do for you.
    Half a million people behind such levees is a criminal act.

    Reply
  12. Steven says:
    September 21, 2005 at 4:59 pm

    how old is the oldest part of the levee system in new orleans?

    Reply
  13. flyff money says:
    August 8, 2008 at 9:11 pm

    Even if I do not play this game, my res and flyff money can give my good friends, but my number do not delete~~

    Reply
  14. 2moons gold says:
    August 8, 2008 at 9:14 pm

    Each group fights was brothers of one mind with leader

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      RE: "The JOE discusses at length perilous...
      SMSgt Mac
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I'm sure they will solve...
      STemplar
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So there is your Affordable Weapon....
      drm
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just found out that Taiwan's...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just keep in mind that the current...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      For once I have to agree with Byron Skinner....
      pfcem
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      f-22 article by bill sweetMan (page no. 102):...
      popular science
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Thunder350, There is no 'out of control' cost increase....
      pfcem
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
      I would like to see any conclusive data showing the...
      @Earlydawn
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      King of Fighters F-22 Gets Killed by Humble T-38 Training...
      gizmodo
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage