DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Space » Marines in Spaaaaaace!

Marines in Spaaaaaace!

“After three years of being laughed out of meet­ings, the U.S. Marine Corps’ futur­is­tic plans to deploy through space may finally be get­ting some trac­tion,” notes Aviation Week’s spunky new spin-​​off, Defense Technology International.
marines_in_space.jpg

Although the chuckle fac­tor hasn’t alto­gether dis­ap­peared, the Air Force Research Laboratory and Darpa are begin­ning a study of options for a reusable upper-​​stage space travel vehi­cle — the same kind of tech­nol­ogy that the Marines might need for a ride halfway across the globe.
The effort is called “Hot Eagle,” and it could be the first step for­ward in the Marine Corps’ hopes for space travel. Within min­utes of burst­ing into the atmos­phere beyond the speed of sound — and dis­patch­ing that omi­nous sonic boom — a small squad of Marines could be on the ground and ready to take care of busi­ness within 2 hours.
[One pre­sen­ta­tion muses that the cap­sule might later be picked up by a Osprey or by a “bal­loon cable and C-​​17″ trans­port plane. Or, the Marines might “hike out,” and “leave [the] crew cap­sule behind.” — ed.]
The Marine Corps calls the con­cept the Small Unit Space Transport and Insertion Capability (Sustain). This plan, a grow­ing group of Marine sup­port­ers say, is the nat­ural evo­lu­tion of the service’s pro­cliv­ity for expe­di­tionary war­fare that began decades ago with amphibi­ous land­ings…
The con­cept is to deliver strate­gic equip­ment or a small squad of sol­diers to any point on the globe — even the most hard-​​to-​​reach loca­tion — within hours of need. Once on the ground, those sol­diers can carry out strate­gi­cally crit­i­cal mis­sions like recon­nais­sance or destroy­ing a spe­cific tar­get.
At least, that’s their pitch. 

THERE’S MORE: Speaking of space, Popular Mechanics is all over NASA’s return-​​to-​​the-​​moon announcement.

Share |

September 19th, 2005 | Space | 186118 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/19/marines-in-spaaaaaace/Marines+in+Spaaaaaace%212005-09-19+15%3A53%3A38noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « North Korea Pledges No Nukes | Rapid Fire 9/​19/​05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. CFloyd says:
    September 27, 2005 at 1:37 am

    .…been watch­ing for awhile now, and I find your sense of cred­i­bilty is about to break.
    First of all if you know half as much as you think, then you would know that the Marine Corps was founded before the United States of America
    United States Marine Corps, U.S. mil­i­tary corps that forms a sep­a­rate ser­vice »>within the U.S. Dept. of the Navy«<. The Commandant of the Marine Corps is a mem­ber of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. During con­flicts, the Corps is charged with con­duct­ing all land oper­a­tions essen­tial to the suc­cess­ful pros­e­cu­tion of a naval cam­paign; dur­ing peace­time, its top pri­or­ity is com­bat readi­ness. Famous for its esprit de corps, the Corps empha­sizes phys­i­cal fit­ness and inten­sive train­ing. In 1775, the Continental Congress cre­ated two fed­eral bat­tal­ions of marines to serve as naval infantry. In 1798, the United States Marine Corps was estab­lished and placed under the con­trol of the Secretary of the Navy. Marines have par­tic­i­pated in every major war, espe­cially the Mexican War; World War I; World War II; the Korean War; and the Vietnam War. They have devel­oped exper­tise in coun­terin­sur­gency and guer­rilla war­fare, as well as in com­mando oper­a­tions and amphibi­ous war­fare. Marine units are self-​​sufficient, with their own tanks and other armor, artillery, and air forces.
    Now lets look at the facts.
    1) If The Marine Corps was not a depart­ment of the Navy then then you may be able to look at it’s bud­get inde­pen­dently and among other branches of the United States Military. how­evr because it isn’t your point of the Marine Corps being the most costly is null. In actu­al­ity the oper­at­ing bud­get of the United States Marine Corps is appx. 1/​4 o fthe total oper­at­ing bud­get of the Department of the Navy.
    2)Your point about the M16A2 is null and void as well.
    The Marine Corps has and for­ever will prove to show that it can do more with less. We hav­ing been for­ever been the DRMO for what the Army beleive to be old weapons sys­tems. When I left the Marine Corps it was just begin­ing to receive the M240g, yes in 1998 we were still using M60(Echos). The M4 Carbine was appx 4yrs on the hori­zon as for the Reservists which you call an eco­nom­i­cal bud­get, They were just receiv­ing M16A2’s yea reservists were in Desert Storm with M16A1’s buddy. Now you wanna talk Tanks? I saw with my own eyes Marines dri­ving M16A1’s not A2’s. It’s some­thing that peo­ple of our resiliance are capa­ble of deal­ing with. We don’t sleep with mommy at night, we pro­tect her ass.
    As your mom said come strong or don’t come! By the way where are your “Records” I find it hard to beleive that you are a true Veteran, rather one hid­ing behind oth­ers actions in your hope to become rec­og­nized.
    Maybe it’s because I am a Marine that I havn’t ever met another per­son of the armed forces that doesn’t hold a high degree of respect for the Marine corps. I have never met one that beleives that the Marine Corps is a defunct ser­vice. We clear the beach, air­field, and towns, allow you to plant your base of oper­a­tions and then we come back and bail your ass’ out when you can’t hold the lines. Which is where most of our casu­al­ties come from. Your polit­i­cal psycho-​​babble just shows your igno­rance, If half the men read this you would have a pla­toon at your door.….Luckily for you they are keep­ing you safe.
    Semper Fi

    Reply
  2. TheMasterTimekeeper says:
    September 27, 2005 at 1:30 pm

    If only ol’ Bobby Heinlein were here today… Between air-​​express Marines and the pow­ered exoskele­tons DARPA is fund­ing, we have the seeds of real cap troop­ers.
    I for one see two prob­lems here; one is com­bat power and the other is safe deliv­ery.
    The MI in Starship Troopers were fea­si­ble because each man had the fire­power and suriv­i­a­bil­ity of an MBT com­bined with high mobil­ity, the likes of which I’ve only seen in video games.
    And here we’re talk­ing about send­ing a bunch of frag­ile, unar­mored men down whose heav­i­est weapon *might* be an anti­tank rocket.
    We also have to deal with the fact that this sys­tem is going to be exremely vul­ner­a­ble in the “deliv­ery” phase– between atmos­pheric reen­try and hit­ting ground, those Marines are going to be vul­ner­a­ble in ways that make me shud­der. They either come down like mete­ors, leav­ing an IR sig­na­ture you couldn’t miss, and brake the last mile with ‘chutes (and spend the next few min­utes swing­ing under those canopies, wait­ing for AAA and every peas­ant with a rifle to notice them) or else they use an air­frame to “glide” down as the Space Shuttle did. Either way, they’re just as vul­ner­a­ble as a con­ven­tional air inser­tion.
    Oh, may I remind the audi­ence how often our launches (manned and oth­er­wise) are can­celled becaue of weather or minor glitches? Yet this is to be a rapid reac­tion force.
    So– the design­ers need to con­tend with over­all econ­omy, vul­ner­a­bil­ity the “drop pod”, reli­a­bil­ity of our launch sys­tems, sup­port and sup­ply prob­lems (we don’t have orbital bom­bard­ments yet!) and over­all deliv­ery pre­ci­sion. (I see a trade­off between sur­viv­abil­ity and pre­ci­sion.)
    It’s a use­ful con­cept; we need to develop the hell out of it for it to be mil­i­tar­ily useful.

    Reply
  3. Black Watch says:
    September 28, 2005 at 2:16 pm

    prac­ti­cally this is surely way in the future. bet­ter spend the US govt’s money reduc­ing emmi­sions to slow global warming.….…rather than buy­ing up other coun­tries pol­lu­tion allowances
    we need to wise up oth­er­wise there wont be much of a future!

    Reply
  4. Joshua Blum says:
    October 1, 2005 at 1:56 am

    byron, you don’t deserve to live in this great nation, if you even deserve to breath at all. Your dis­re­spect for the United States Marine Corps is com­pletely unac­cept­able. It is due to the brave sol­diers that travel the great pas­sage of the Marine Corps that even gives you the right to say what you will and show your dis­gust­ing opin­ion toward them.

    Reply
  5. Amardillo skunk says:
    October 2, 2005 at 9:21 am

    hey, this aint about the US Marines Corp. Its AN ALL NEW DIVISION…so drop the space dreams of you sea and land­lub­bers and spare us the USMC angst.
    Its gonna be called US Space Marines Division with a new his­tory and tra­di­tion to cre­ate, new mil­tary fund­ing and pack­age. So dont link sempi fi with USSMD!.…the new motto’s gonna be ‘WE SAW, WE DROPPED AND WE CONQUERED!’ :-p
    And how we gonna fund this division?…easy…raise taxes of every American cit­i­zen by 2 dol­lars a year and make sure the tar­get for­eign nation’s gold bul­lion is the first drop of visit. Raid em and blame it on ter­ror­ists or the anar­chist. In times of peace, send em to the moon with a shovel instead of a rifle and dig some moon­dust for sale on earth!

    Reply
  6. you aint the best, face the truth says:
    November 25, 2005 at 5:10 am

    The Marine Corps is where the hard­est of the hard go, plain and sim­ple.
    I think you are mis­tak­ing them for the SAS and the even harder SBS — both of which would have any of your marines fro break­fast and not break a sweat.

    Reply
  7. Poor Man's Archer says:
    February 11, 2006 at 1:46 am

    Bryon Skinner, I think this is an argue­ment that you aren’t going to win, espe­cially not with future, cur­rent, and retired mem­bers of the USMC. You have exer­cised your free­dom of speech to state your opin­ion that the Marines are no longer needed. In turn, these Marines, along with mem­bers of the other ser­vices, have exer­cised their own free­dom of speech to, in essence, tell you to go sodom­ize your­self.
    I can see why they would respond this way; because you are treat­ing them like noth­ing more than mere tools: you use them and then cast them away. These peo­ple, and peo­ple they know, have fought, bled and died in order to pro­tect your right to say your opin­ion. Then you come along and tell them that they are no longer needed. It is a response that every mem­ber of the mil­i­tary abhors, but prob­a­bly expects from the pub­lic. You should remem­ber, even if you are retired mil­i­tary, that “good peo­ple are able to sleep soundly at night, because rough men stand ready to do vio­lence on their behalf.” You should also remem­ber that “just because you believe some­thing is true, doesn’t make it true.“
    Marines, you remem­ber, “just because some­thing is true, doesn’t mean you have to believe it is.” IF the USMC is des­tined to be dis­banded and for­got­ten (which I do NOT think that it is), you will be able to look back and remem­ber that you are, and always will be, one of “The Few, The Proud.” You will be able to remem­ber that you were part of the great­est fight­ing force on the planet.
    In regards to this idea, I believe that if this tech­nol­ogy is fea­si­ble, we should go for it. To be able to deploy forces any­where in the world within 2–4 hours, com­pared to the cur­rent “within 48 hours,” would be sim­ply astound­ing. Also, I vote that the Marines recieve pri­or­ity for this sys­tem, see­ing as how that is their mis­sion: to pro­vide a quick reac­tion force capa­ble of deploy­ing any­where on the planet. The other ser­vices would cer­tainly ben­e­fit from this, but the Marines would the most. Have the Marines mobi­lize like this, and then have the Army rein­force them within a week via naval land­ings and C-​​5s or C-​​17s.
    As for myself, I do not believe, nor hope, that the Marines are unneeded. In fact, I would say that they are needed now more than ever. I hold all Marines, and what they do, in the utmost awe, and I plan on mak­ing every effort to prove myself wor­thy to join this elite group of war­riors. That is, of course, once I fin­ish high school.
    To my (hope­fully) future broth­ers– and sisters-​​in-​​arms: Keep up the good work!

    Reply
  8. John Smith says:
    March 27, 2006 at 1:22 pm

    I won­der what Games Workshop would have to say about all of this.

    Reply
  9. Will says:
    April 28, 2006 at 3:38 pm

    I am far from being a mil­i­tary expert, but it seems that being able to respond so quickly would have enor­mous polit­i­cal ben­e­fits (Being able to respond to a sit­u­a­tion with ‘con­ven­tional’ forces within one news cycle, for exam­ple).
    If you can deploy men from space, then you can also deploy loi­ter­ing HARM mis­siles, UAVs and UCAVs in the same way; although of course men would be able per­form sub­tle and dis­creet mis­sions in a way that no UCAV could. So there are plenty of mil­i­tary pos­si­bil­i­ties for such a ‘work-​​horse’ heavy-​​lift ICBM & reen­try sys­tem.
    I am pretty sure this sys­tem vio­lates some non­pro­lif­er­a­tion treaty or other though, not to men­tion the HUGE amount of money it will cost.
    But then again, who cares? Hey, I am not a US tax­payer, so go ahead, it ain’t my money you are spend­ing, and I still get to watch the kick-​​ass cool videos of US space marines on the news in a few years time.

    Reply
  10. naggs says:
    July 11, 2006 at 1:13 am

    there are treaties ban­ning the use of loi­ter­ing orbit weapons. noth­ing about loi­ter­ing orbit troops though.

    Reply
  11. B Goldsmith says:
    July 14, 2006 at 1:11 am

    This is a lovely, utterly impos­si­ble idea. At $5,000-$10,000 per lb to orbit, assum­ing a Marine is 300 lbs with gear (it wouldn’t sur­prise me if it were higher), that’s $1.5 to $3.0 mil­lion per Marine per launch. Then tack on the fact that land­ing a space­craft is hardly pre­cise, space­craft are frag­ile (let’s hope no one tries to shoot at it while it’s land­ing), launches can take a sub­stan­tial amount of time to pre­pare, and no one has ever tried to build a vehi­cle that could do any­thing remotely like this.…well, let’s just say the Marines are get­ting a bit ahead of themselves

    Reply
  12. John M.(USMC 67-70) says:
    September 6, 2006 at 4:48 pm

    Given what the world thought of peo­ple jump­ing out of air­planes in mass, this is not as out of the ques­tion as one may think.
    One hun­dred years ago, we finally got off the ground. Fifty years ago, we broke the sound bar­rier. Just in the 50’s (some­how) the bar­rier was pushed to speeds we are just now com­ing to grips with to exceed. But the job of the USMC is to take the bat­tle to the enemy and kick his butt. Even if the times have changed, the same job is asked of these young men. Every avenue avail­able should be used to give these men the nec­es­sary to respond to ever grow­ing and sophis­ti­cated enemy. Time is at a pre­mium now and it is time we give that weapon to the fight­ing man. Semper Fi and on earth, the sea, and air (includ­ing space): GET ER DONE!

    Reply
  13. Blob says:
    September 22, 2006 at 5:38 pm

    “you secure that sh_​t, Hudson!”

    Reply
  14. faydenway says:
    September 22, 2006 at 5:39 pm

    How about we spend tax-​​payer money on some­thing a lit­tle bit more fea­si­ble. Perhaps some mil-​​tech that won’t require 20 years of fund­ing before it even becomes *fea­si­ble*.
    Let the pri­vate sec­tor and NASA do some grunt work on sub-​​orbital launches for a decade before the mil­i­tary gets involved. After all the mil­i­tary is much bet­ter at tak­ing exist­ing tech­nol­ogy and turn­ing it to mil­i­tary appli­ca­tions.
    Also, a response time of 2 hours is a pipe-​​dream except in very very spe­cific sit­u­a­tions. The first time a President inserted an American mil­i­tary force into a for­eign nation within a 2 hour period with­out even con­sult­ing mem­bers of congress…well, that mis­sion bet­ter come off as a spec­tac­u­lar suc­cess oth­er­wise some­body just comit­ted polit­i­cal suicide.

    Reply
  15. Brett says:
    September 22, 2006 at 6:47 pm

    Great… put some more use­less holes in our atmosphere..

    Reply
  16. F.Baube says:
    September 22, 2006 at 8:38 pm

    If the job of art is to pre­dict real­ity, then “Starship Troopers” is art :)

    Reply
  17. nikolai says:
    September 23, 2006 at 2:11 am

    This reminds me of the glid­ers in the ETO on
    D-​​Day, only more hi-​​tech. It’s a neat idea, but the D-​​Day glid­ers turned out to be dan­ger­ous, frag­ile, too heavy, unwieldy, and eas­ily thwarted by string­ing cables and felling trees in their paths. Many sol­diers were killed before ever get­ting on the ground, or were killed by slam­ming into the ground upon attempt­ing to land. How about a space “heli­copter” with wings and retractable blades instead?

    Reply
  18. Bug Stomper says:
    September 23, 2006 at 1:44 pm

    There’s reports of an Al-​​Queda base on LV-​​426 with pos­si­ble xenomorph involve­ment.
    Go get ‘em!
    P.S. Dropships 4tw

    Reply
  19. Sam says:
    September 25, 2006 at 4:47 pm

    Adeptus Astartes FTW

    Reply
  20. Gangsto says:
    September 30, 2006 at 6:15 am

    I believe I remem­ber a treaty which bans all weapons in space, which the US will have to break in order to do this…

    Reply
  21. Tig 'ol Bitties says:
    December 7, 2006 at 7:19 pm

    FOR THE EMPEROR!!!

    Reply
  22. SGT. Jacobsen says:
    December 12, 2006 at 5:17 pm

    A combo of Marine Corps, NASA and the United States Air Force should head this domain. NASA because they have a lot of expe­ri­ence in the space field. USMC for the kick@$$ fight­ing force, and the USAF for the Airospace domain, it seems they should help in this idea.

    Reply
  23. LtCol Jim Sanny, USMC says:
    December 18, 2006 at 11:21 am

    While on active duty and a stu­dent at the Naval War College, I sub­mit­ted a paper called, “Marines in Space.” I was laughed at by all the Marine stu­dents and the senior Marine there. The civil­ian pro­fes­sors loved the paper! Just goes to demon­strate that noth­ing is impossible!

    Reply
  24. A. De Jesus says:
    December 25, 2006 at 6:54 pm

    At long last, the dream is slowly real­ized. I’ve believed in the con­cept of the “Extraplanetary Marine Force” of the U.S.M.C. since I saw them deploy in the James Bond movie “Moonraker”. Sadly, with the way pol­i­tics is now, we may not see fruition until after we are gone. My hope is that my grand­chil­dren will live to see and per­haps par­tic­i­pate in the mil­i­tary con­quest of space.
    And for you P.C. “Flower-​​Children” out there, suck it up. It’s going to hap­pen, and the United States of America is lead­ing the way!

    Reply
  25. Joe says:
    December 30, 2006 at 12:40 am

    I agree with SGT. Jacobsen. It would be awsome to be apart of a space crew for the Marines.

    Reply
  26. JoSchmo says:
    February 10, 2007 at 7:04 am

    “Remember your train­ing, and you will prevail!”

    Reply
  27. JoSchmo says:
    February 10, 2007 at 7:09 am

    We’re creep­ing into Airborn Territory here.

    Reply
  28. Shocku992 says:
    February 23, 2007 at 1:00 pm

    Some care to tell me how they will get out…great idea to get in but not so good for get­ting out.…

    Reply
  29. Russell Fenders says:
    March 2, 2007 at 3:20 pm

    Look .…. pol­i­tics aside. How about a lit­tle shred of fis­cal responsibility..let’s call it fis­cal real­ity here. A “small squad of Marines.” Is that .…. 15 or 20 troops ? What are the chances of them being lost to an acci­dent in this con­trap­tion ? And bejeezus…what is this thing going to cost per unit ???? To get them there a few hours faster than if by C-​​17 ?
    Why doesn’t the Navy develop a “Cargo” ver­sion of the ven­er­a­ble ship­board S-​​2 Viking ? You have your Marines on the air­craft carrier.…you take ‘em up in the C-​​Viking and pop them out into the airstream at 20,000 feet above the LZ. At infin­tes­i­mal cost com­pared to the space boon­dog­gle. However you’ve gotta like the movie tie-​​in to the Aliens series.

    Reply
  30. R Bates says:
    March 10, 2007 at 6:50 am

    Yeah, thats what im talk­ing about. Hopefully some aliens will try and invade and we can have some inter­stella war on, unless they are like the aliens out of star trek then i will have to bone them instead.…

    Reply
  31. R Bates says:
    March 10, 2007 at 6:53 am

    All i know if the future is above where the eagles fly then i have to be part of it

    Reply
  32. R Bates says:
    March 10, 2007 at 7:12 am

    hey send the air­born they suposed to be surounded son, yeah and what about the deep sea, may­bee theres some sort of inter­gal­lac­tic space shark why not send the marines to investergate…launch thun­der­bird 4

    Reply
  33. LtCol Jim Sanny, USMC, (Ret) says:
    April 2, 2007 at 11:47 am

    Byron Skinner! You must be ex Army as the say­ing goes, not for­mer, like Marines, and or you are a com­plete idiot! The Army has been try­ing for decades to get rid of the Corps, but as usual, the Corps is always called upon to really get the job done. The Army is just a huge con­glom­er­a­tion of bureau­crats who once in a while prove their worth. The Army doesn’t have total coor­di­nated orches­trated pack­age like the Corps! Just like they said Leonardo Divinci was a fool to exper­i­ment with fly­ing, you are a fool to ignore what real­ity will come regard­less of how far fetched the ideas are.

    Reply
  34. Bob says:
    May 30, 2007 at 10:47 pm

    I don’t get the ‘chuckle’ bit.
    Seems like a log­i­cal pro­gres­sion to me.
    Add a capa­bil­ity to your mil­i­tary you don’t yet have.
    Outstanding.
    Think of the war against Al Qaeda. Decapitation is the way, but Intel gets real old real fast.
    The abil­ity to send a snatch squad any­where in the world, quick and clear, is an abil­ity the US needs but doesn’t have.
    Makes sense.
    Not that the USMC aren’t propos­ing this pri­mar­ily coz of the ‘wheeeeeeeeeeeee’ fac­tor, but there you go ;D

    Reply
  35. Eddie says:
    July 5, 2007 at 12:28 pm

    I think you clowns need to get out more!

    Reply
  36. jim raynor says:
    August 19, 2007 at 8:17 am

    omg it takes 2 hours for the troops to arrive , and thats not reliable

    Reply
  37. tewkewl says:
    December 27, 2007 at 2:15 am

    This is not only a log­i­cal prgres­sion, it’s a kick ass con­cept! but it would take a bunch of train­ing for the force recon con­tingient within socom. Damn. this is a new level of train­ing. Some Force Recon Marines would have air­borne wings AND astro­naut wings. that would look so bad ass, no one would get in their way.
    Forget HAHO and HALO… this is being shot up in a reusable can­is­ter into space at high speed only to fall back down a few min­utes later at equally high speed (con­trolled by gps to exactly where they need to be)! Hopefully they can cover this cap­sule with a stealth coat­ing… or make it appear as if it was a way­ward mete­orite on radar. we wouldn’t want folks know­ing we came in unan­nounced! we could be in an out with­out warn­ing any­where any time! They could drop in from space, secure the tar­get and either hump out or get picked up (the stealth would be elim­i­nated at this point, but it would be too late for the badguys by this time).
    After it’s proved by the recon boys, i’m sure the delta guys, seals, and para­jumpers will get in on the act. could you imag­ine? a pilot goes down in the cen­tral asia far away from any base, and we shoot a rocket full a para­jumpers from texas to pick him up in just 2 hours? catch 22 no more! damn.
    or we find bin laden in some bar some­hwere in some unreach­able moun­tain hide­away… well delta boys drop in like death from above.
    this con­cept is golden, if expensive…

    Reply
  38. Puckett, Cianan JT says:
    February 8, 2008 at 1:10 pm

    Feasible, Fundable, and Fun.…Just the thing for the Corps. This idea is not that far fetched. I only see one prob­lem: Geneva Convention wussies (The Marines are weapons, are they not?) get­ting antsy on the Arms in Space treaty.
    Something else to con­sider: The Corps dreams it up, builds it, has suc­cess. Instantly, some US Army (Probably Special Forces before the pukes) unit tries it, unqual­i­fied and untrained, and gets like 15 guys killed. The project gets scrapped.
    KEEP IT WITH THE ONES WHO PLANNED IT, AND TRAIN THEM UP ON IT.
    To the attack of “hope some­one doesn’t shoot at it”… High tem­per­a­ture super­al­loys. Say, tita­nium outer shell, with enough Kevlar inside to stop a 25mm auto­can­non round. The only rea­son stuff like this is “impos­si­ble” is because idiot politi­cians and unin­tel­li­gent civil­ians (myself some­times) decide that every­thing has to make money within the next 5 microsec­onds, and it has to be 60 digit pay­back. THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN! YOU CANNOT PUT A PRICE ON PROTECTING THE NATION WE LOVE!
    Semper Fi,
    Cianan JT Puckett (Hopefully join­ing the ranks of the USMC soon)

    Reply
  39. Jeremy Plimpton says:
    February 25, 2008 at 10:27 pm

    I believe that it will be the best thing for all MARINES. It will give them a chance to show the world and every other idiot, “that when you play with fire, you will get burned.” People “need” to respect the MARINES and every­thing that they do for us. I say,“why not give them every­thing that they want.” When they com­plete this new journey,I hope every per­son that chuck­les or laughs,will think about weather or not they are wor­thy of the MARINES to pro­tect them. I believe in every­thing that the MARINES do and stand for. If it were not for them, we would have lost alot of bat­tles. I say that they are the best thing that has ever hap­pened to this coun­try. For any body that does not like the fact of what they do, try being in there shoes and dying if need be for this coun­try and allow­ing us to live free and peace­ful at night know­ing that they are there watch­ing over us so we dont have to. Yes, I love the MARINES and will join shortly myself. I believe every body needs to fight for them to suc­ceed in gain­ing the space program.

    Reply
  40. ant says:
    May 8, 2008 at 8:54 am

    What hap­pens if an hour after lift off you realise the mis­sion is com­pro­mised and the LZ is a bust? Have you just bal­lis­ti­cally deployed a bunch of marines on a one way trip to shit city?

    Reply
  41. Jason Tanner says:
    September 27, 2008 at 8:01 pm

    Outstanding, just freak­ing Oustanding. A new capa­bil­ity for a quick strike. Of course this capa­bil­ity sould fall under the pre­view of the Corps, it would just be an exten­sion or improve­ment on the Corps’ cur­rent reapid deploy­ment capa­bil­i­ties. Of course it would also have appli­ca­tions for the air farce’s PJ’s and for delta. The abil­ity to insert a small force any­where on the globe in under three or four hours instead of days, the impli­ca­tions bog­gle the mind. And yes I’m another for­mer jar­head, that don’t mean that I am prej­u­dice toward the Corps on a project like this. The impli­ca­tions for a capa­bil­ity like this are just too great to think about, much less to enu­mer­ate in less that two or three hun­dred pages.

    Reply
  42. Johno says:
    December 20, 2008 at 7:36 am

    You marines take your­selves way to seri­ously.
    Your giv­ing your­self a bad image to the rest of the world :P
    i dont know any­thing about the dif­fer­ences between the army and the marines in the USA
    but i do know that in any defence force, all dif­fer­ent corps, regiments,air forces, navies, armies they all rely on each other to get suc­sess
    maybe if you blokes did that Iraq wouldve been an eas­ier cam­paign.
    hahaha and dont get me started on Mc Arthur in the phillipines

    Reply
  43. Dale Swanson says:
    January 26, 2009 at 12:33 pm

    I see com­ments from folks who can’t spell or form a com­plete sen­tence.
    Why would any­one take them seriously?

    Reply
  44. Dale Swanson says:
    January 26, 2009 at 12:42 pm

    For Byron:
    There are only two kinds of peo­ple,
    Marines and those who want to be.

    Reply
  45. Justin Credible says:
    March 11, 2009 at 12:00 pm

    I think this project is gonna EPIC FAIL now, Space Marines are no match for the the Credit Crunch! Told them they should just make Space Marine power armor and bolters instead..

    Reply
  46. tom leon says:
    May 16, 2009 at 4:40 pm

    i am look­ing for my 214 records and tele­phone number

    Reply
  47. Pierre says:
    June 8, 2009 at 3:09 am

    What is this I dont’ even
    Has any­one ever really even want to do look more like?

    Reply
  48. Andy says:
    July 17, 2009 at 10:11 pm

    Sow how does one recover one’s multi-​​million dol­lar space­ship after fir­ing it deep into enemy ter­ri­tory, I won­der?
    Just a thought

    Reply
  49. Brandon says:
    September 22, 2009 at 8:09 pm

    LOL to all those who com­mented about Army Airborne. The USARMY for­got how to jump off a plane after WW2. Space is con­sid­ered the “vast sea of space” which the marines are used for land­ings on the sea, hence its our ter­ri­tory. Show me some Army guy who would be stu­pid enough to try this. They would not do it unless they were promised a $50K bonus. In the marines some new recruit would be suck­ered by the recruiter into think­ing he would be a admin guy or Motor T and then sent to this by the non-​​ob MOS con­tract. The Marines are the Best, the dumb­est at times, and the best for this new tech­nol­ogy. OOORAH

    Reply
  50. kz77 says:
    October 20, 2009 at 1:44 pm

    maybe some peo­ple in the armed forces should stop play­ing Halo:ODST.
    NASA can’t keep up a steady pro­gram for com­mer­cial flights where big­ger amounts of money are being shelled out for com­mer­cial inter­ests –than the measly gov­ern­ment funds for defence– and they think you can do this rou­tinely? keep on dream­nig for another 20 yrs…
    one last thing :
    if the u.s. wants to pro­tect their nation, they a) should stop pok­ing their noses into other nations’ busi­ness just to make a buck out of it,
    b)-in rela­tion to a)- should be more care­ful what allies they choose because your friend today can be your foe tom­morow and vice versa.
    then you won’t need space marines, rock­ets, aliens or whatever

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage