DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » War Update » Bedlam Follows Basra Intrigue

Bedlam Follows Basra Intrigue

Of all the insane sto­ries that have come out of the war in Iraq, this might just be the cra­zi­est.
soldier_fire.jpg“Two unknown gun­men in full Arabic dress began fir­ing on civil­ians in cen­tral Basra, wound­ing sev­eral, includ­ing a traf­fic police offi­cer,” CNN reports. “The two gun­men fled the scene but were cap­tured and taken in for ques­tion­ing, admit­ting they were British Marines car­ry­ing out a ‘spe­cial secu­rity task.’”
“Iraqi secu­rity offi­cials… accused the two Britons they detained of… try­ing to plant explo­sives,” the Washington Post notes.
Members of the Mahdi Army, the mili­tia loyal to the rebel­lious Shiite cleric Moktada al-​​Sadr, then “con­verged on the police sta­tion hold­ing the British men, appar­ently hop­ing to seize them in order to free… three col­leagues in British cus­tody,” the New York Times says. “[They] begun attack­ing the sta­tion with assault rifles and rocket-​​propelled grenades, and… British troops soon responded to defend it…
“British armored vehi­cles… fired on the sta­tion, head­quar­ters of the major crimes unit in cen­tral Basra, and [broke] through its outer wall. Troops then stormed in and freed the two [Marines].“
brit_marine_captive.jpgThe pair were “sprung only hours after British forces had encir­cled the build­ing but were forced to flee by a vio­lent mob hurl­ing stones and Molotov cock­tails,” the Times of London reports. “Two Iraqi civil­ians were report­edly killed in the riots, dur­ing which two UK Warrior armoured vehi­cles were set alight.“
According to the AP, “150 Iraqi pris­on­ers [also] fled as British com­man­dos stormed inside and res­cued their com­rades.“
THERE’S MORE: The BBC says the marines were actu­ally being held in a mili­tia safe­house. It’s one of a num­ber of dis­crep­an­cies in the news accounts of this con­fus­ing story. There are sure to be more.
Juan Cole has put together a time­line of the events, and a pos­si­ble explanation.

Share |

September 20th, 2005 | War Update | 189156 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/20/bedlam-follows-basra-intrigue/Bedlam+Follows+Basra+Intrigue2005-09-20+14%3A53%3A38noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Propaganda, Inc. | U.S. Lags in Civilian Bots » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Ray says:
    September 24, 2005 at 12:20 pm

    From what I have read thus far, not many of you seem to know the all-​​encompassing roll that any SOF is play­ing in this War on Terror. Most of you should stop try­ing to wrap your heads around it. It’s way above your pay grade. XGman when you refer to west­ern inter­ven­tion, You would be refer­ing to Operations like “Overlord”. You may want to ask the Americans, British, and Canadians who are buried on foriegn soil about west­ern inter­ven­tion. Oh, or just ask your friends the french about west­ern inter­ven­tion. There is alot of fin­ger point­ing, and the blame game going on here. Let’s remem­ber how we got to this point. 19 ISLAMIC TERRORIST used planes as missles and destroyed lives, and prop­erty on US soil, right under our noises. They lied to achieve their mis­sion. Islamic ter­ror­ist will lie again to gain jobs, sta­tus, and power for THE SAME MISSION of destroy­ing lives,property and invok­ing fear. Now that we have come this far, some of you would like to turn back the clock and leave Iraq help­less to defend itself. XGman, diplo­macy is great. But it only goes so far when you have peo­ple who only under­stand an “Iron Fist of Saddam”. We have formed a “Coalition” of forces to acheive democ­racy in Iraq. I have per­son­ally lost friends here. Do not triv­i­al­ize there efforts in Iraq, by “pulling chaulks” before the job is com­plete. I applaude the Brits on the suc­cess­ful res­cue mis­sion of thier own. If I was one of those Marines or SAS, even if I lose my life, I want to know that some­ones com­ing for me, and I won’t be left behind.We need the Brits, Aussies, and the rest of the coali­tion in estab­lish­ing new direc­tions in an ever chang­ing com­bat envi­ron­ment. I pre­fer to keep the War on Terror in Iraq, Iran, Syrian, any­where but my back­yard again. Oh XGman, the FREE flow of oil is cur­rently cost­ing about $3.50 in the US.

    Reply
  2. Trooping_the_Colour says:
    September 24, 2005 at 5:14 pm

    “You are fake Americans and you should go back to Britain where you prob­a­bly immi­grated here from.“
    Grammar aside, jtw, I’m not a fake American, and niether are any of the other British on this site that have stood up for them­selves, their broth­ers in arms and their coun­try.
    but what’s more, I AM in Britain right now in England to be pre­sise, in the city of Lancaster. (that would be the real one, as opposed to the one in California, Phillidelphia, Texas, or any other US state.) Actually that’s a good point… How many of your cities are named after ours? New YORK? Birmingham,Alabama? Manchester, New Hampshire? hey, on that one you took a city AND a county name! any more? it’s intrest­ing
    I would like to take time out to say that I DO like the US and it’s peo­ples, it’s just so dis-​​heartening when you actu­ally dis­cover and talk to the igno­rant ones.
    Oz– I love the crack about the American Beer…

    Reply
  3. Bill Hamilton says:
    September 24, 2005 at 6:37 pm

    As a polit­i­cal sci­ence major and viet­nam vet­eran the 9\11 “attack” never passed the “sniff test”. Now sev­eral books have been pub­lished directly link­ing the Bush admin­is­tra­tion to 9\11. Impeach hell, if not for our gut­less con­gres­sional reps Bush and his cronies should be strung up from the near­est tree. By the way I am against cap­i­tal punishment.

    Reply
  4. jtw says:
    September 25, 2005 at 10:09 am

    I have no prob­lems with Scotland. Im sure after N. Ireland, it will be Scotland that wants inde­pen­dance. When I say Britain I say England. I dont con­sider Scotland, Wales and N.Ireland a part of Britain.
    You never explained to me the tac­tic involved in dress­ing up like Arabs and killing Iraqi police. If these Iraqi police deserved it wouldnt it make sense to kill them with­out decep­tion? I would like your expla­na­tion. Oh wait, you prob­a­bly dont have free­dom of speech. The King will have you thrown in the tor­ture cham­ber some­where in the church base­ment for trea­son and speak­ing out. Its ok I understand.

    Reply
  5. Billy says:
    September 25, 2005 at 11:43 am

    the rea­sons are not going to be told for why they went on that oper­a­tion, most likely they were crack­ing down on a high rank­ing ter­ror­ist group to do with muk­tadar al sadr, the SAS then were con­fronted by iraqi police now maybe they didnt stop and the police started fir­ing i dont know but most likely the SAS have gone in again and got the job done oh and quite a res­cue mis­sion wasnt it! last thing we have a queen not a king them laws are long gone and only a small num­ber of Scots want inde­pen­dence prob­a­bly as much as the south USA dont like the north which is prob­a­bly not that much these days.

    Reply
  6. Billy says:
    September 25, 2005 at 11:47 am

    Another thing as another amer­i­can men­tioned, yes there was the rev­o­lu­tion­ary war but the USA has had more pos­i­tive his­tory with Great Britain than any other coun­try in the world and still are today now the United Kingdom might seem a small coun­try but it is within the top 5 most wealthy nations so yeh a good ally!

    Reply
  7. Geff Davey says:
    September 25, 2005 at 12:51 pm

    JTW,
    Next time you feel like insult­ing my com­rades in arms, have the balls to do it in per­son, not on a web­site.
    You are with­out doubt one of the most igno­rant idiots Ive ever had the mis­for­tune to have to read about.
    People like you do not deserve the pro­tec­tion of the Armed Forces of any the great nations fight­ing in Iraq. I dont care about the polit­i­cal argu­ments of should we be there or not, we are and our sol­diers are pay­ing with thier lives for the deci­sions of our politi­cians. You vote dont you? Then you are respon­si­ble!
    As for your dri­vel about the IRA, stick to talk­ing about what you know very lit­tle about, stay away from top­icks you know noth­ing about and youll only look like a halfwit instead of the no-​​wits at all you really are.

    Reply
  8. Billy says:
    September 25, 2005 at 5:59 pm

    So JTW,
    i hope you have a bet­ter idea about the United Kingdom im glad you at least show some intrest for our nation unfor­tu­nately some of it is wrong scot­land has its own coun­try and its own national anthem but it is part of the UK, only a small per­cent­age of peo­ple want inde­pen­dance from the rest of Great Britain prob­a­bly as much as south­ern peo­ple want the con­fed­er­ate states of amer­ica today, and as for Northern Ireland they are more proud to be British than the English, as for Wales well thats prac­ti­cally England just a dif­fer­ent name, i have mates in all 3 coun­trys thats also how i know, but you should have your own coun­try to worry about. The US is a good place to live and visit but there is still alot of down­sides to the coun­try now im not say­ing Britain is bet­ter because it isnt.

    Reply
  9. Ibblehibben says:
    September 25, 2005 at 11:17 pm

    Bill Hamilton a Viet Nam vet? If he was, he was prob­a­bly one of the 5th colum­nist REMF’s who went around stur­ing up racial shit so the press could report on it. That’s assum­ing that he wasn’t actu­ally dri­ving a truck on a base back in the states.

    Reply
  10. Clark says:
    September 26, 2005 at 7:25 am

    Bill Hamilton,
    I would think that some­one with the edu­ca­tion that you claim to have wouldn’t believe Michael Moore’s movie Fahrenheit 9/​11. But I guess you still believe in Santa Claus to. (Sorry for ruin­ing it for you). But while we’re on the sub­ject, did you hear how if you fold the $20 bill to resem­ble a paper air­plane you can see the two tow­ers after they have been hit? I’m sure you and your con­spir­acy bud­dies can have a long talk about that one.

    Reply
  11. adam says:
    September 27, 2005 at 3:15 pm

    Its get­ting quiet on here

    Reply
  12. js says:
    September 27, 2005 at 6:17 pm

    What they were obvi­ously doing was gath­er­ing intel­li­gence — which is one of the things the SAS does. If they had in fact been on a bombing/​shooting mis­sion, there would have been an extrac­tion team stand­ing by and they never would have been caught.
    The impor­tant thing is for the US to not do what was done in Guatemala, El Salvador, etc. Train locals to kill per­sons who dis­agree with US com­pa­nies. These Brits weren’t likely to be doing this for the CIA.

    Reply
  13. Billy says:
    September 27, 2005 at 6:52 pm

    Yeh thats right if the SAS was on a shoot­ing mis­sion 1 they wouldnt of got caught and 2 there would have been more than 2 of them there would of been about 4, but keep it up the US & Britain are doing a good job.

    Reply
  14. kondor says:
    September 28, 2005 at 8:25 am

    Having read the clear,concise and dis­pas­sion­ate out­line of UK actions by JTW, I can’t but agree with him that some­body is out of their mind, but it is not Britan JTW, may I sug­gest that you look in the mirror?

    Reply
  15. jimmybuck says:
    October 1, 2005 at 5:04 pm

    To that of the ques­tion posted by Desert Rat, right now i think our biggest con­cern is afghanistan over iraq sim­ply because of the fact that bin laden is in the sur­round­ing areas and most of the high rank­ing ter­ror­ists. This is my oppin­ion of what should now be done…America should set up around 4–5 major bases in the coun­try and with­draw the troops into them and send some to afgan­istan. As for the Brits who have approx 8.500 troops in iraq should set up around 2 major bases in the south and with­draw around 2.000 troops to be sent to afghanistan.

    Reply
  16. win says:
    October 11, 2005 at 6:37 pm

    People, you should not let JTW get to you so. This per­son is obvi­ously a child or, if not, an adult with the men­tal­ity of a child and there­fore should not be taken too seri­ously. On the other hand, I do agree that he needs to have his ass kicked.

    Reply
  17. Neil Reinhardt says:
    October 12, 2005 at 9:21 pm

    To the Clueless asses who think I can be told what to believe, think and/​or sup­port by ANYONE!
    You are IDIOTS and you have NO clue about me because if you did you NEVER would have said I am led any­where by any­one.
    Were I that type of per­son I would still be a Christian rather than tak­ing the time-​​effort to study-​​research and become a proud Atheist.
    Our actions in rmov­ing Saddam from power and free­ing the Iraq peo­ple are a nec­es­sary part of our war on ter­ror. Anyone who does not know that is either igno­rant of SUFFICENT facts, OR they are too “F“ing STUPID to under­stand the facts. (Most prob­a­bly the lat­ter.)
    Neil C. Reinhardt

    Reply
  18. Neil Reinhardt says:
    October 12, 2005 at 9:28 pm

    JTW,
    YOU ARE AN IDIOT!
    The SAS is one of the best, if not the best mil­i­tary unit in the world.
    The Brits are great!
    Neil C. Reinhardt

    Reply
  19. Neil Reinhardt says:
    October 12, 2005 at 9:53 pm

    And Steve,
    Your IDIOT com­ments show it is you who is unin­formed! I’ll bet you believe the world is flat and that gold comes from lead.
    Your knowl­edge of Saddam & how he got into power proves that fat ugly stu­pid M. Moore leads you around by the nose.
    What is you IQ level — 2?
    Want to buy some Pacific beach front prop­erty in Kansas? As clue­less as you are I am sure you would jump at that.
    Neil C. Reinhardt
    PS. I play beach vol­ley­ball every Sat. & Sun. on the courts at 29th & the Stand in Manhattan Beach, Ca. So do not think I hide behind my com­puter when I call peo­ple what they are. Please note I also use my full name.

    Reply
  20. Jim Ickes says:
    October 17, 2005 at 5:25 pm

    Stop The Hating!

    Reply
  21. Neil Reinhardt says:
    April 12, 2006 at 11:13 pm

    Well, Bill Hamilton, Bush had NOTHING to do with caus­ing 9/​11 and any­oone who says he did is an IDIOT!
    I most cer­tainly do not like Bush push­ing his reli­gion and some of his pro­grams. Still, that does not mean I will stand by and let idiots like you lie about him.
    Neil C. Reinhardt

    Reply
  22. WARLOCK says:
    June 18, 2008 at 4:55 am

    Obama bin Laden and his merry men
    looked into the wood
    and what did they see

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
      Awesome. Now to be a *real* military contract we have to spend $40...
      jmatt
    • Keep it Simple
      Anybody who went to basic training will never forget about weight. Like...
      Big Daddy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      It had been a while since I came by the site- and now I...
      Mod
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      In DTI this article is credited to Sharon...
      Wembley
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Jews wasn't a threat for anyone, that's why this was a tragedie
      A.g.
    • Quick-Deploy 120mm Mortar
      The 120 is mounted in the back of a mortar track and...
      SSG Knapp 11C3O
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I am a New Yorker, and have seen the holes in the ground where...
      Sam
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "This is not the first Muslim soldier to commit treason against his...
      Sam
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage