DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » 'Canes » Rita: Watch This Blog

Rita: Watch This Blog

Defense Tech pal Kris Alexander works for Texas’ home­land secu­rity depart­ment. Which makes his blog absolutely essen­tially read­ing, now that a cat­e­gory 5 killer hur­ri­cane is about to put the whomp on the Lone Stars.
Rita3.JPGHe runs down the rea­sons to hope and the poten­tial “fric­tion points” as the state gets ready for a rum­ble — from Texas’ 375,000 Katrina refugees to the hos­pi­tals that have already cleared out. Bottom line:

All of this is hap­pen­ing with­out one bit of fed­eral resources being com­mit­ted. FEMA is at the state oper­a­tions cen­ter, but its a state and local show right now. We never planned on FEMA sav­ing our bacon. And no this plan didn’t hap­pen overnight. It has taken years of detailed plan­ning to reach this point. Will there be screw-​​ups? Yes. Will we do bet­ter than LA and NOLA? Probably.
This isn’t meant as hubris. I feel that too many peo­ple, espe­cially in the left side of the blo­gos­phere, have rushed to defend the LA state and local gov­ern­ments. I dis­agree. I think they screwed up regard­less of whether or not FEMA/​DHS was slow on the draw. I don’t think, knock on wood, that any­one is going to drown and die in a nurs­ing home on the Texas Coast. 

THERE’S MORE: Kris reas­sures us that the big hos­pi­tal on Galveston Island is being evac­u­ated. But what about the “hot zone” biode­fense lab there?
AND MORE: The Journal runs down the gagdets you need to make it through an emer­gency (too bad they didn’t do it before I re-​​stocked my dis­as­ter kit). And Xeni has pics of the sonic blaster we’ve dis­cussed here before.
AND MORE: “Is it my imag­i­na­tion,” asks Kathryn Cramer, “or isn’t the use of sonic blasters as weapons to delib­er­ately inflict pain on crowds ‘tor­ture’ as defined in arti­cle 1 of the UN Convention Against Torture?“
AND MORE: John Little, from Blogs of War, works in down­town Houston. “I have a win­dow office on the eight floor of a build­ing in the Texas Medical Center. I have to assume that in a cou­ple of days I’ll have a win­dow­less office on the eight floor of a build­ing in the Texas Medical Center.” He’s got a great list of resources for folks look­ing to track the storm.

Share |

September 21st, 2005 | 'Canes, Homeland Security | 19252 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/09/21/rita-watch-this-blog/Rita%3A+Watch+This+Blog2005-09-21+23%3A42%3A43noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Spec Ops in DC | Rapid Fire 9/​22/​05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. tewolde abraha says:
    September 22, 2005 at 10:12 am

    first of all i wuold like to say hello . i have to learne more mil­i­tary edu­ca­tion . so send by email ader­res . thank u all of u . bye.

    Reply
  2. Mark says:
    September 22, 2005 at 11:24 am

    I for­warded this seg­ment to a cou­ple of friends because I found it to con­tain a lot of good links and food for thought. One per­son really came unglued because you used the word “refugees” in place of “evac­uees”, and refused to read any fur­ther. Hadn’t fig­ured on small mind­ed­ness of some coworkers.

    Reply
  3. anon says:
    September 22, 2005 at 12:22 pm

    In a Natural Disaster FEMA ASSISTS states. No mat­ter how much pres­sure is put out on the state to do some­thing or to be bet­ter pre­pared its always a state oper­a­tion in terms of response & recov­ery. The feds aren’t allowed to com­pletely take over unless there is a ter­ror­ist event (see NRP). All this ‘inci­dent of national sig­nif­i­cance’ is just to appoint some­one to head up the fed side polit­i­cally to lean more on that state operation.

    Reply
  4. AlphaGeek says:
    September 22, 2005 at 8:00 pm

    Walt Mossberg seems to be on to some­thing with his review of emer­gency gad­gets and power packs. Perhaps he should be reas­signed full-​​time to review­ing periph­er­als, instead of his will­fully igno­rant reviews of more com­plex tech­nol­ogy.
    DailyKos​.com, while nom­i­nally a lib­eral polit­i­cal site, is a great resource for per­sonal, sci­en­tific, and polit­i­cal obser­va­tions of cur­rent events. For exam­ple, a Florida sci­ence writer named DarkSyde is post­ing hourly updates on Rita, as he did with Katrina:
    http://​www​.dai​lykos​.com/​s​t​o​r​y​/​2​0​0​5​/​9​/​2​2​/​1​8​4​2​2​4​/​390
    There are also sto­ries, and ongo­ing dis­cus­sion, posted by folks who are stuck in Houston due to grid­lock:
    http://​www​.dai​lykos​.com/​s​t​o​r​y​/​2​0​0​5​/​9​/​2​2​/​1​4​1​1​5​3​/​665
    Regarding sonic weapons, as men­tioned above: I think their use is eth­i­cally and morally sus­pect, as they are likely to lead to per­ma­nent hear­ing dam­age or deaf­ness. Anyone oper­at­ing these devices under stress or direct threat (e.g. riots) is going to skip the safety pro­to­cols and crank that sucker up to ‘11’. It raises the dif­fi­cult ques­tion of whether it’s bet­ter to shoot 5 peo­ple or per­ma­nently deafen 100.
    –AG

    Reply
  5. rey says:
    September 22, 2005 at 8:37 pm

    I think that the “sonic blaster” is a great idea for crowd con­trol. It is truly non-​​lethal as opposed to other meth­ods, I have yet not seen cred­i­ble evi­dence of long-​​term dam­age if used dur­ing short con­fronta­tions.
    Another thing: Who cares about what the UN says about any­thing?? Even if we fol­low those UN guide­lines, the use of a sonic blaster in riot con­trol does not vio­late those rules. THose guide­lines only apply to pris­on­ers, peo­ple riot­ing have the option of run­ning away from the noise, that’s the whole pur­pose of using it..

    Reply
  6. mama_peggy says:
    September 23, 2005 at 1:13 am

    I was just read­ing the com­ments and noticed Mark’s obser­va­tion that some­body came unglued at the word “refugees” instead of “evac­uees” being used.
    A good deal of the peo­ple who were evac­u­ated were unable to leave on their own, even by walk­ing as far as they could. Whereas those who opted to ride out the storm found out that their safe refuges…the homes that they refused to leave…wound up under­wa­ter. When one runs from dan­ger and finds refuge in other loca­tions, one has become a refugee.
    Either way you look at it, evac­uee or refugee, they needed rescuing…and they needed to find another safe refuge.
    It’s all syman­tics. Evacuee SOUNDS bet­ter than refugee, that’s all. If my loved ones and/​or I was in that sit­u­a­tion and we needed help, it wouldn’t mat­ter one whit what words some­one used to describe us…as long as they saw us and helped us to sur­vive.
    It would be a heck of a note if FEMA or other res­cue orga­ni­za­tions sep­a­rated peo­ple into a ‘refugee’ vs. ‘evac­uee’ cat­e­gory before help­ing. The term ‘refugee’ sounds a lot more desparate than ‘evac­uee’.
    Pride goeth before a fall…sometimes the fall is into the rag­ing water.
    Re: MAD device» If such things can be used respon­si­bly and not as a means to gain power over the gen­eral pop­u­la­tion, I can see it. Used over­seas as a secu­rity enhancement…well, when you con­sider the troops that lose their lives at var­i­ous check­points, I would ven­ture to say that I would rather see a vehi­cle stopped far away than hav­ing the oppor­tu­nity to get close enough to kill our guys.
    I don’t know, I’m just plain folk. I believe in hon­esty and integrity and I would so like to believe that ANY weapons would be used for legit­i­mate pur­poses. Unfortunately there is no real assur­ance that such a thing will not be used wrongly in the future…just like what hap­pened when they learned how to split an atom.

    Reply
  7. mama peggy says:
    September 23, 2005 at 1:22 am

    Incidentally, when I men­tioned split­ting the atom, I was not crit­i­ciz­ing the events at Hiroshima. I meant that now every­body has the things and few seem to care that if every coun­try that has ‘em uses ‘em at the same time…everybody loses!
    Once upon a time, every­one hav­ing the capa­bil­i­ties to blow up the world served as a detain­ing force. Seems like now, how­ever, it’s like the jilted lover who says, “If I can’t have you, won’t nobody have you…”

    Reply
  8. ffff says:
    May 27, 2008 at 12:45 am

    ???? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???,V?? ??? ???

    Reply
  9. rohan gold says:
    August 1, 2008 at 8:34 pm

    At first I did not know any­thing, I had no friends and rohan gold, and soon I knew the first play friend, she had been very good to me my belt, also taught me how to make rohan crone. She is like my sis­ter, and later she mar­ried, she did not too much time play­ing games. So I become a per­son again.

    Reply
  10. 2moons dil says:
    May 9, 2009 at 3:43 am

    Do you know 2moons dil? I like it. My brother often goes to the inter­net bar to buy 2moons gold and play it. After school, He likes play­ing games using these 2moon dil with his friend. I think that it not only costs much money but also spend much time. One day, he give me many buy 2moons dil and play the game with me. I came to the bar fol­low­ing him and found cheap 2moons gold was so cheap.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      News reports have said that this guy has openly stated his...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      Headphones and earplugs are effective, but...
      JustAGuy
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      Liberals just slay me… The liberal news...
      Cannon Fodder
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      It is quite an experience to see fat bellied old men shooting...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      This is for Sam and Duality. It appears that you both are Muslim....
      Cannon Fodder
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I wonder if anyone noticed: This attack happened right after...
      freefallingbomb
    • Keep it Simple
      To the poster "Zandor" : You wrote: "Your last post...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      Part III : You wrote: "These airbags are made similarly, so the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Airbag Defense
      To the educated guesser: Part I : …………...
      freefallingbomb
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      Only two companies in the world are...
      Frank Hols
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage