<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Sat-Guided Cannon Ready to Blast</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: shahid</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-10756</link> <dc:creator>shahid</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:12:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-10756</guid> <description>all the writings are vague and with out any sense </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all the writings are vague and<br /> with out any sense</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 3 cav</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-112745</link> <dc:creator>3 cav</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2005 17:09:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-112745</guid> <description>With a new smart it could very well be effective.  But to tell you one thing i learned as an artillery man, is that the copperhead round has been our laser guided round and it is a big waste of money.  It is old and not effective when it does its own thing.  If you want to build a new round build one that will destroy things better.  Civilian casualties are apart of war and its going to continue for years, so i would not go on and blame arty for every round that goes short or long. We just need better upgrades to a systems that has worked for years. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a new smart it could very well be effective.  But to tell you one thing i learned as an artillery man, is that the copperhead round has been our laser guided round and it is a big waste of money.  It is old and not effective when it does its own thing.  If you want to build a new round build one that will destroy things better.  Civilian casualties are apart of war and its going to continue for years, so i would not go on and blame arty for every round that goes short or long. We just need better upgrades to a systems that has worked for years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: STEFAN MARK SOLVASON</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-10754</link> <dc:creator>STEFAN MARK SOLVASON</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:03:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-10754</guid> <description>THIS IS REALLY GREAT!!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS REALLY GREAT!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rey</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-112743</link> <dc:creator>rey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 21:30:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-112743</guid> <description>Mr. Skynner, Yet again you prove not to have an idea of the lingo involved in this &quot;deactivation.&quot; DIVARTYs do not evaporate, they are split and incorporated into the other brigades. As I wrote in my previous post(you can check it), is that while the DIVARTY is no longer a separate brigade, the units in the DIVARTY are now part of the brigade. Perhaps you have a reading problem... As far as being &quot;disconnected,&quot; far from the truth. I am stationed right here at Fort Hood, home of the 1st Cav, III Corps, 13 COSCOM and 4th ID, later 3rd ACR. Where are you? In a cave hiding from the black helicopters used by the evil military-industrial complex? In my previous post I also noted that our mission is varied: &quot;While we were in Iraq not only did we conduct patrols and convoy ops, but also counterfire missions and fire in support of infantry ops. So trust me, we are still firing...&quot; Did I write that or not Byron? Problems with your reading... Again, as an artillery man, I have far more insight than you on Fort Sill. While they have been traing National Guard troops like every other active post (Ft Hood is doing the same), before sending them overseas, it does not mean they are now National Guard posts. Are they controlled by state officials? I don&#039;t think so Byron. And what&#039;s up with wishing for the death of our Generals Byron? Are you demented? Only someone with a very bad problem, or an enemy of the country, would wish for something like that. It&#039;s okay to dissent, but you are taking it too far... Our Generals have a proven military record and are some of the most brilliant minds in our country. People like you, constantly bitching and moaning about everything the government does or fails to do, only make the job harder for them. So go on patriot, keep making no sense! Thanks!! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Skynner,<br /> Yet again you prove not to have an idea of the lingo involved in this “deactivation.” DIVARTYs do not evaporate, they are split and incorporated into the other brigades. As I wrote in my previous post(you can check it), is that while the DIVARTY is no longer a separate brigade, the units in the DIVARTY are now part of the brigade. Perhaps you have a reading problem…<br /> As far as being “disconnected,” far from the truth. I am stationed right here at Fort Hood, home of the 1st Cav, III Corps, 13 COSCOM and 4th ID, later 3rd ACR. Where are you? In a cave hiding from the black helicopters used by the evil military-industrial complex?<br /> In my previous post I also noted that our mission is varied: “While we were in Iraq not only did we conduct patrols and convoy ops, but also counterfire missions and fire in support of infantry ops. So trust me, we are still firing…” Did I write that or not Byron? Problems with your reading…<br /> Again, as an artillery man, I have far more insight than you on Fort Sill. While they have been traing National Guard troops like every other active post (Ft Hood is doing the same), before sending them overseas, it does not mean they are now National Guard posts. Are they controlled by state officials? I don’t think so Byron.<br /> And what’s up with wishing for the death of our Generals Byron? Are you demented? Only someone with a very bad problem, or an enemy of the country, would wish for something like that. It’s okay to dissent, but you are taking it too far… Our Generals have a proven military record and are some of the most brilliant minds in our country. People like you, constantly bitching and moaning about everything the government does or fails to do, only make the job harder for them. So go on patriot, keep making no sense!<br /> Thanks!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kilo Echo 4</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-10750</link> <dc:creator>Kilo Echo 4</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 17:15:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-10750</guid> <description>&quot;With a 50 meter kill radius for a 155mm HE they might as well load it with concrete and try and hit them in the head to avoid hurting someones feelings. It requires a skilled operator to locate the target to the nearest meter (easting/northing/elevation). A cheaper Laser guided would have been better so as to follow the tgt. Keep giving the contactors BILLIONS and they will say anything.&quot; Good point.  Or maybe a .50 cal with a microchip and sensor in it!  (&quot;Smart munitions&quot;)  Or just send a sniper team after them! Does seem like kind of a waste for a 155mm round.  Maybe this is the biggest &#039;sniper rifle&#039; ever invented!  But who am I to argue with &#039;defense experts?&#039; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“With a 50 meter kill radius for a 155mm HE they might as well load it with concrete and try and hit them in the head to avoid hurting someones feelings. It requires a skilled operator to locate the target to the nearest meter (easting/northing/elevation). A cheaper Laser guided would have been better so as to follow the tgt. Keep giving the contactors BILLIONS and they will say anything.“<br /> Good point.  Or maybe a .50 cal with a microchip and sensor in it!  (“Smart munitions”)  Or just send a sniper team after them!<br /> Does seem like kind of a waste for a 155mm round.  Maybe this is the biggest ‘sniper rifle’ ever invented!  But who am I to argue with ‘defense experts?’</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dorman Davis</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-112741</link> <dc:creator>Dorman Davis</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 02 Oct 2005 14:04:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-112741</guid> <description>They better have their defecation into consolidation, kilo echo has a point !! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They better have their defecation into consolidation, kilo echo has a point !!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kilo Echo 4</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-112740</link> <dc:creator>Kilo Echo 4</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 19:36:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-112740</guid> <description>What worries me about all this satellite dependent stuff is what happens if your satellites get taken out by an EMP blast from a  close proximity missile in space? All the net-centric stuff, the future forces sat-dependent stuff, just how protected is it all from things like EMP, or cyber attack?  And what happens if you loose it?  Can you still function in an older, more conventional way?  What if your carrier battle group is blinded?  Then what? We need Star Wars weapons to protect our Sats. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What worries me about all this satellite dependent stuff is what happens if your satellites get taken out by an EMP blast from a  close proximity missile in space?<br /> All the net-centric stuff, the future forces sat-dependent stuff, just how protected is it all from things like EMP, or cyber attack?  And what happens if you loose it?  Can you still function in an older, more conventional way?  What if your carrier battle group is blinded?  Then what?<br /> We need Star Wars weapons to protect our Sats.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rey</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-112739</link> <dc:creator>rey</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2005 04:31:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-112739</guid> <description>Byron, Byron... Again, you write nonsense. First of all, Field Artillery Battalions are NOT being disbanded. Instead, they are being reorganized. For example, instead of having a DIVARTY acting as an independent brigade, the FA battalions within DIVARTY are now organic to the self-contained brigades. The Battalions eliminated one of the three batteries, but augmented the other two with the former battery&#039;s equipment and personnel. No loss there. Furthermore, fires are now even more responsive than before. While we were in Iraq not only did we conduct patrols and convoy ops, but also counterfire missions and fire in support of infantry ops. So trust me, we are still firing... If you think Ft Sill is a National Guard post, you are sorely mistaken. It is still as vibrant as ever training FA and poised to recieve thousands more troops under BRAC. I am in the Field Artillery, I know. Get your facts straight Mr. Negative, I mean Skinner. Thanks </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byron, Byron…<br /> Again, you write nonsense. First of all, Field Artillery Battalions are NOT being disbanded. Instead, they are being reorganized. For example, instead of having a DIVARTY acting as an independent brigade, the FA battalions within DIVARTY are now organic to the self-contained brigades. The Battalions eliminated one of the three batteries, but augmented the other two with the former battery’s equipment and personnel. No loss there. Furthermore, fires are now even more responsive than before.<br /> While we were in Iraq not only did we conduct patrols and convoy ops, but also counterfire missions and fire in support of infantry ops. So trust me, we are still firing…<br /> If you think Ft Sill is a National Guard post, you are sorely mistaken. It is still as vibrant as ever training FA and poised to recieve thousands more troops under BRAC. I am in the Field Artillery, I know.<br /> Get your facts straight Mr. Negative, I mean Skinner.<br /> Thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: jim lincoln,Colonel,USA,Ret</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-112738</link> <dc:creator>jim lincoln,Colonel,USA,Ret</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 23:48:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-112738</guid> <description>The Chief of Staff of the Army,General Schoomaker needs to be informed about Excalibur (and other very accurate artillery,like Guided MLRS,already used successfully in Iraq). He recently was quoted as saying,&quot;what makes artillery heavy is the ammunition. It takes 70 rounds from one gun at a fixed target to get a high probability of kill.You do the math.Why in the world would we continue to build in that direction instead of turning to precision strike aircraft that don&#039;t depend on ammunition trucks in forward locations...&quot; Please someone let the Chief know he is ill-informed,or just under pressure to do the &quot;joint thing&quot; by telling us to go to the Air Force. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Chief of Staff of the Army,General Schoomaker needs to be informed about Excalibur (and other very accurate artillery,like Guided MLRS,already used successfully in Iraq). He recently was quoted as saying,“what makes artillery heavy is the ammunition. It takes 70 rounds from one gun at a fixed target to get a high probability of kill.You do the math.Why in the world would we continue to build in that direction instead of turning to precision strike aircraft that don’t depend on ammunition trucks in forward locations…“<br /> Please someone let the Chief know he is ill-informed,or just under pressure to do the “joint thing” by telling us to go to the Air Force.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ops chief</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/09/29/sat-guided-cannon-ready-to-blast/#comment-10745</link> <dc:creator>ops chief</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 18:33:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1667#comment-10745</guid> <description>With a 50 meter kill radius for a 155mm HE they might as well load it with concrete and try and hit them in the head to avoid hurting someones feelings. It requires a skilled operator to locate the target to the nearest meter (easting/northing/elevation). A cheaper Laser guided would have been better so as to follow the tgt. Keep giving the contactors BILLIONS and they will say anything. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a 50 meter kill radius for a 155mm HE they might as well load it with concrete and try and hit them in the head to avoid hurting someones feelings. It requires a skilled operator to locate the target to the nearest meter (easting/northing/elevation). A cheaper Laser guided would have been better so as to follow the tgt. Keep giving the contactors BILLIONS and they will say anything.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.003 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 05:49:02 -->
