DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Stanford Beats Odds, Wins Robo-Race

Stanford Beats Odds, Wins Robo-Race

gc_stanford.jpgEighteen months ago, when Darpa held its “Grand Challenge” — a $1 million, all-robot rally across the Mojave desert — none of the competitors could get past mile seven of the 150 mile-long course.
That was then, this is now.
A second, slightly shorter, Grand Challenge went down yesterday. And three robo-cars managed to complete the entire 132-mile race. Two were from Carnegie Mellon’s massive robotics program. Finishing just a few minutes ahead, with an average speed of 17 miles per hour, was Stanley, a modified Volkswagen Touareg from Stanford University.
It’s an incredible feat. Giving robots the intelligence and the vision to manuever over all that rough terrain was considered closer to science fiction than science fantasy not too long ago. I’m beyond impressed. And so is the Pentagon. “I don’t know if I’d go ‘moon shot,’” Darpa director Anthony Tether told the Merc-News. “It’s closer to the Wright brothers.”

Share |

October 9th, 2005 | Drones | 169410 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/Stanford+Beats+Odds%2C+Wins+Robo-Race2005-10-09+14%3A10%3A13dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Sign Language | Rapid Fire 10/10/05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Pedestrian says:
    October 9, 2005 at 10:29 am

    How many scientists about one hundred years ago would predict we would have aircrafts that would fly in sky? How may people one century ago would have thought some of the Mad Scientist Tesla’s inventions would have been used in public? How many people decades ago would have thought lasers and rail connon weapons would become reality, at least at testing phase by the Department of Defense? Science has the potential to make science fiction become science, and we are seeing it happening again. Maybe we would see anti-gravity crafts being invented hundred years later, which not many have thought would become possible and just laugh at it as science fiction. Well, those who tend to think science fiction will remain science fiction are the people who will be laughed back. Never underestimate the potentials of science making science fiction a reality.

    Reply
  2. Ken Layne says:
    October 9, 2005 at 5:34 pm

    As much as I would’ve loved to see this robot race in person, the whole event radiates creepiness thanks to the Official Sponsor. DARPA? What the hell? If DARPA is involved, you can bet these robot vehicles will be up to No Good At All & will quickly be “helping” the Pentagon spy on Americans at home.

    Reply
  3. Pedestrian says:
    October 10, 2005 at 2:23 am

    In terms of spy, I agree for the concerns of foreigners within certain teams of the Grand Challenge Race. I won’t mention specific teams and names, but I have noticed Chinese and Russians within teams, and this is a real concern if these people leak information to their homeland. I wish DARPA would have not accept foreigners and foreign firms to be involved, at least those which are from unfriendly countires. French and Israelis should not be allowed as well even they were allies for France and Israel to attempt many times to steal valuable military information.

    Reply
  4. Neil Calvin says:
    October 10, 2005 at 10:20 am

    Personally, I’m glad to see an international presence in this civilian race. It subtly shakes any belief that we Americans are inherently superior in any or all aspects of creativity and imagination, and that we are intellectually independent from the rest of the world. Chinese, Russian, French, Israeli…all good to have here with us.

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    October 11, 2005 at 12:26 am

    Lets test them in the US Mex border.
    & Iraq & Pakistan/India border.
    Imagine whole drone fleets moving troops & Recon & MedEvac role.
    Guided by Predator UAV C3I plane???
    C130 CP?
    Send in stealth drone vehicles into Mexican borderlands for 24/7 stealth mode.
    Great for SWAT use & FD use.
    Save lives & time.
    Test with Minigun module & Sonic emiiters & Rockets.
    Nice battering Ram for LAPD forces etc. nationwide.
    OR carry gold bullion vs manned armored vehicles.
    Nice.

    Reply
  6. Donald Dillaby says:
    October 14, 2005 at 10:11 am

    There were FOUR vehicles which completed the course. Although the last vehicle, Oshkosh Truck’s Terra-Max, did not finish within the required timeframe, it was probably the only one of the competing vehicles which could have hauled a significant cargo load.

    Reply
  7. Donald Dillaby says:
    October 14, 2005 at 10:25 am

    Oops! There were FIVE vehicles which finished the course, not four. My apologies. Terra-Max seems like more of a realistic integration of the autonomous vehicle technology since it used a military transport vehicle with considerable off-road and on-road cargo capacity.

    Reply
  8. Richard says:
    October 17, 2005 at 11:50 am

    Pretty smart waiting one year until the prize money increased. No sense claiming $1mm when $2mm is better. Have to hand it to those folks not only are they Tech smart they have financial insight as well.
    Well done!

    Reply
  9. Chris says:
    February 23, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    Let me get this straight; Hundreds of our top scientists spend millions of dollars and dozens of man-years of research with the very leading edge of technology to accomplish what any moderately skilled 13 year-old could’ve done. Is that about right?
    Secondly, to the snotty-nosed comment “…shakes any belief that we Americans are inherently superior in any or all aspects of creativity and imagination, and that we are intellectually independent from the rest of the world.” First of all, we Americans ARE superior to the rest of the world, overall. No, we don’t have a corner on the market of intellectual property and no, we don’t have ALL of the great ideas. But I’d stack American accomplishments overall against any and all other nations since the dawn of time! Secondly, only we Americans would allow other nations to participate in such a contest and willingly cooperate with them in their efforts. (Try imagining a similar French contest and what they would and wouldn’t allow). Third of all, maybe guilt lurks in the heart of the writer of this comment, but not in mine. I know what Americans have done and continue to do for the rest of the world. I am not, and never will be ashamed of our superiority, but I also will never be arrogant about it. True Americans never are.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
    • South of the Border Mayhem
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
    Recent Comments
    • Petraeus to SASC Today; Israel-Palestine to Come Up? (Updated)
      And who exactly are you...
      Jack Frost
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Use Google to look for Harrier or VAAC Harrier – by comparison...
      Hx2
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
      RE: "The JOE discusses at length perilous...
      SMSgt Mac
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      I'm sure they will solve...
      STemplar
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
      So there is your Affordable Weapon....
      drm
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just found out that Taiwan's...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      Just keep in mind that the current...
      Reverse Kanga
    • F-16 Sale to Taiwan, Would It Make A Difference?
      For once I have to agree with Byron Skinner....
      pfcem
    • Trainer Shoots Down F-22 or What?
      f-22 article by bill sweetMan (page no. 102):...
      popular science
    • And, the Vertical Landing
      Thunder350, There is no 'out of control' cost increase....
      pfcem
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage