DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Drones » Stanford Beats Odds, Wins Robo-​​Race

Stanford Beats Odds, Wins Robo-​​Race

gc_stanford.jpgEighteen months ago, when Darpa held its “Grand Challenge” — a $1 mil­lion, all-​​robot rally across the Mojave desert — none of the com­peti­tors could get past mile seven of the 150 mile-​​long course.
That was then, this is now.
A sec­ond, slightly shorter, Grand Challenge went down yes­ter­day. And three robo-​​cars man­aged to com­plete the entire 132-​​mile race. Two were from Carnegie Mellon’s mas­sive robot­ics pro­gram. Finishing just a few min­utes ahead, with an aver­age speed of 17 miles per hour, was Stanley, a mod­i­fied Volkswagen Touareg from Stanford University.
It’s an incred­i­ble feat. Giving robots the intel­li­gence and the vision to manuever over all that rough ter­rain was con­sid­ered closer to sci­ence fic­tion than sci­ence fan­tasy not too long ago. I’m beyond impressed. And so is the Pentagon. “I don’t know if I’d go ‘moon shot,’” Darpa direc­tor Anthony Tether told the Merc-​​News. “It’s closer to the Wright broth­ers.”

Share |

October 9th, 2005 | Drones | 169410 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/Stanford+Beats+Odds%2C+Wins+Robo-Race2005-10-09+14%3A10%3A13dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Sign Language | Rapid Fire 10/​10/​05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Pedestrian says:
    October 9, 2005 at 10:29 am

    How many sci­en­tists about one hun­dred years ago would pre­dict we would have air­crafts that would fly in sky? How may peo­ple one cen­tury ago would have thought some of the Mad Scientist Tesla’s inven­tions would have been used in pub­lic? How many peo­ple decades ago would have thought lasers and rail con­non weapons would become real­ity, at least at test­ing phase by the Department of Defense? Science has the poten­tial to make sci­ence fic­tion become sci­ence, and we are see­ing it hap­pen­ing again. Maybe we would see anti-​​gravity crafts being invented hun­dred years later, which not many have thought would become pos­si­ble and just laugh at it as sci­ence fic­tion. Well, those who tend to think sci­ence fic­tion will remain sci­ence fic­tion are the peo­ple who will be laughed back. Never under­es­ti­mate the poten­tials of sci­ence mak­ing sci­ence fic­tion a reality.

    Reply
  2. Ken Layne says:
    October 9, 2005 at 5:34 pm

    As much as I would’ve loved to see this robot race in per­son, the whole event radi­ates creepi­ness thanks to the Official Sponsor. DARPA? What the hell? If DARPA is involved, you can bet these robot vehi­cles will be up to No Good At All & will quickly be “help­ing” the Pentagon spy on Americans at home.

    Reply
  3. Pedestrian says:
    October 10, 2005 at 2:23 am

    In terms of spy, I agree for the con­cerns of for­eign­ers within cer­tain teams of the Grand Challenge Race. I won’t men­tion spe­cific teams and names, but I have noticed Chinese and Russians within teams, and this is a real con­cern if these peo­ple leak infor­ma­tion to their home­land. I wish DARPA would have not accept for­eign­ers and for­eign firms to be involved, at least those which are from unfriendly coun­tires. French and Israelis should not be allowed as well even they were allies for France and Israel to attempt many times to steal valu­able mil­i­tary information.

    Reply
  4. Neil Calvin says:
    October 10, 2005 at 10:20 am

    Personally, I’m glad to see an inter­na­tional pres­ence in this civil­ian race. It sub­tly shakes any belief that we Americans are inher­ently supe­rior in any or all aspects of cre­ativ­ity and imag­i­na­tion, and that we are intel­lec­tu­ally inde­pen­dent from the rest of the world. Chinese, Russian, French, Israeli…all good to have here with us.

    Reply
  5. stephen russell says:
    October 11, 2005 at 12:26 am

    Lets test them in the US Mex bor­der.
    & Iraq & Pakistan/​India bor­der.
    Imagine whole drone fleets mov­ing troops & Recon & MedEvac role.
    Guided by Predator UAV C3I plane???
    C130 CP?
    Send in stealth drone vehi­cles into Mexican bor­der­lands for 24/​7 stealth mode.
    Great for SWAT use & FD use.
    Save lives & time.
    Test with Minigun mod­ule & Sonic emi­iters & Rockets.
    Nice bat­ter­ing Ram for LAPD forces etc. nation­wide.
    OR carry gold bul­lion vs manned armored vehi­cles.
    Nice.

    Reply
  6. Donald Dillaby says:
    October 14, 2005 at 10:11 am

    There were FOUR vehi­cles which com­pleted the course. Although the last vehi­cle, Oshkosh Truck’s Terra-​​Max, did not fin­ish within the required time­frame, it was prob­a­bly the only one of the com­pet­ing vehi­cles which could have hauled a sig­nif­i­cant cargo load.

    Reply
  7. Donald Dillaby says:
    October 14, 2005 at 10:25 am

    Oops! There were FIVE vehi­cles which fin­ished the course, not four. My apolo­gies. Terra-​​Max seems like more of a real­is­tic inte­gra­tion of the autonomous vehi­cle tech­nol­ogy since it used a mil­i­tary trans­port vehi­cle with con­sid­er­able off-​​road and on-​​road cargo capacity.

    Reply
  8. Richard says:
    October 17, 2005 at 11:50 am

    Pretty smart wait­ing one year until the prize money increased. No sense claim­ing $1mm when $2mm is bet­ter. Have to hand it to those folks not only are they Tech smart they have finan­cial insight as well.
    Well done!

    Reply
  9. Chris says:
    February 23, 2006 at 1:20 pm

    Let me get this straight; Hundreds of our top sci­en­tists spend mil­lions of dol­lars and dozens of man-​​years of research with the very lead­ing edge of tech­nol­ogy to accom­plish what any mod­er­ately skilled 13 year-​​old could’ve done. Is that about right?
    Secondly, to the snotty-​​nosed com­ment “…shakes any belief that we Americans are inher­ently supe­rior in any or all aspects of cre­ativ­ity and imag­i­na­tion, and that we are intel­lec­tu­ally inde­pen­dent from the rest of the world.” First of all, we Americans ARE supe­rior to the rest of the world, over­all. No, we don’t have a cor­ner on the mar­ket of intel­lec­tual prop­erty and no, we don’t have ALL of the great ideas. But I’d stack American accom­plish­ments over­all against any and all other nations since the dawn of time! Secondly, only we Americans would allow other nations to par­tic­i­pate in such a con­test and will­ingly coop­er­ate with them in their efforts. (Try imag­in­ing a sim­i­lar French con­test and what they would and wouldn’t allow). Third of all, maybe guilt lurks in the heart of the writer of this com­ment, but not in mine. I know what Americans have done and con­tinue to do for the rest of the world. I am not, and never will be ashamed of our supe­ri­or­ity, but I also will never be arro­gant about it. True Americans never are.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "Now please tell me where in the Bible Jesus or his disciples...
      DualityOfMan
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage