<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Stanford Beats Odds, Wins Robo-Race</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Chris</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113215</link> <dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 18:20:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113215</guid> <description>Let me get this straight;  Hundreds of our top scientists spend millions of dollars and dozens of man-years of research with the very leading edge of technology to accomplish what any moderately skilled 13 year-old could&#039;ve done.  Is that about right? Secondly, to the snotty-nosed comment &quot;...shakes any belief that we Americans are inherently superior in any or all aspects of creativity and imagination, and that we are intellectually independent from the rest of the world.&quot;  First of all, we Americans ARE superior to the rest of the world, overall.  No, we don&#039;t have a corner on the market of intellectual property and no, we don&#039;t have ALL of the great ideas.  But I&#039;d stack American accomplishments overall against any and all other nations since the dawn of time!  Secondly, only we Americans would allow other nations to participate in such a contest and willingly cooperate with them in their efforts. (Try imagining a similar French contest and what they would and wouldn&#039;t allow).  Third of all, maybe guilt lurks in the heart of the writer of this comment, but not in mine.  I know what Americans have done and continue to do for the rest of the world.  I am not, and never will be ashamed of our superiority, but I also will never be arrogant about it.  True Americans never are. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me get this straight;  Hundreds of our top scientists spend millions of dollars and dozens of man-years of research with the very leading edge of technology to accomplish what any moderately skilled 13 year-old could’ve done.  Is that about right?<br /> Secondly, to the snotty-nosed comment “…shakes any belief that we Americans are inherently superior in any or all aspects of creativity and imagination, and that we are intellectually independent from the rest of the world.”  First of all, we Americans ARE superior to the rest of the world, overall.  No, we don’t have a corner on the market of intellectual property and no, we don’t have ALL of the great ideas.  But I’d stack American accomplishments overall against any and all other nations since the dawn of time!  Secondly, only we Americans would allow other nations to participate in such a contest and willingly cooperate with them in their efforts. (Try imagining a similar French contest and what they would and wouldn’t allow).  Third of all, maybe guilt lurks in the heart of the writer of this comment, but not in mine.  I know what Americans have done and continue to do for the rest of the world.  I am not, and never will be ashamed of our superiority, but I also will never be arrogant about it.  True Americans never are.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Richard</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-11214</link> <dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2005 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-11214</guid> <description>Pretty smart waiting one year until the prize money increased. No sense claiming $1mm when $2mm is better. Have to hand it to those folks not only are they Tech smart they have financial insight as well. Well done! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty smart waiting one year until the prize money increased. No sense claiming $1mm when $2mm is better. Have to hand it to those folks not only are they Tech smart they have financial insight as well.<br /> Well done!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Donald Dillaby</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113214</link> <dc:creator>Donald Dillaby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:25:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113214</guid> <description>Oops! There were FIVE vehicles which finished the course, not four. My apologies. Terra-Max seems like more of a realistic integration of the autonomous vehicle technology since it used a military transport vehicle with considerable off-road and on-road cargo capacity. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! There were FIVE vehicles which finished the course, not four. My apologies. Terra-Max seems like more of a realistic integration of the autonomous vehicle technology since it used a military transport vehicle with considerable off-road and on-road cargo capacity.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Donald Dillaby</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113213</link> <dc:creator>Donald Dillaby</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:11:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113213</guid> <description>There were FOUR vehicles which completed the course. Although the last vehicle, Oshkosh Truck&#039;s Terra-Max, did not finish within the required timeframe, it was probably the only one of the competing vehicles which could have hauled a significant cargo load. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were FOUR vehicles which completed the course. Although the last vehicle, Oshkosh Truck’s Terra-Max, did not finish within the required timeframe, it was probably the only one of the competing vehicles which could have hauled a significant cargo load.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: stephen russell</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113212</link> <dc:creator>stephen russell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 05:26:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113212</guid> <description>Lets test them in the US Mex border. &amp; Iraq &amp; Pakistan/India border. Imagine whole drone fleets moving troops &amp; Recon &amp; MedEvac role. Guided by Predator UAV C3I plane??? C130 CP? Send in stealth drone vehicles into Mexican borderlands for 24/7 stealth mode. Great for SWAT use &amp; FD use. Save lives &amp; time. Test with Minigun module &amp; Sonic emiiters &amp; Rockets. Nice battering Ram for LAPD forces etc. nationwide. OR carry gold bullion vs manned armored vehicles. Nice. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lets test them in the US Mex border.<br /> &amp; Iraq &amp; Pakistan/India border.<br /> Imagine whole drone fleets moving troops &amp; Recon &amp; MedEvac role.<br /> Guided by Predator UAV C3I plane???<br /> C130 CP?<br /> Send in stealth drone vehicles into Mexican borderlands for 24/7 stealth mode.<br /> Great for SWAT use &amp; FD use.<br /> Save lives &amp; time.<br /> Test with Minigun module &amp; Sonic emiiters &amp; Rockets.<br /> Nice battering Ram for LAPD forces etc. nationwide.<br /> OR carry gold bullion vs manned armored vehicles.<br /> Nice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Neil Calvin</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113211</link> <dc:creator>Neil Calvin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 15:20:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113211</guid> <description>Personally, I&#039;m glad to see an international presence in this civilian race. It subtly shakes any belief that we Americans are inherently superior in any or all aspects of creativity and imagination, and that we are intellectually independent from the rest of the world. Chinese, Russian, French, Israeli...all good to have here with us. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I’m glad to see an international presence in this civilian race. It subtly shakes any belief that we Americans are inherently superior in any or all aspects of creativity and imagination, and that we are intellectually independent from the rest of the world. Chinese, Russian, French, Israeli…all good to have here with us.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pedestrian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113210</link> <dc:creator>Pedestrian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2005 07:23:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113210</guid> <description>In terms of spy, I agree for the concerns of foreigners within certain teams of the Grand Challenge Race. I won&#039;t mention specific teams and names, but I have noticed Chinese and Russians within teams, and this is a real concern if these people leak information to their homeland. I wish DARPA would have not accept foreigners and foreign firms to be involved, at least those which are from unfriendly countires. French and Israelis should not be allowed as well even they were allies for France and Israel to attempt many times to steal valuable military information. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In terms of spy, I agree for the concerns of foreigners within certain teams of the Grand Challenge Race. I won’t mention specific teams and names, but I have noticed Chinese and Russians within teams, and this is a real concern if these people leak information to their homeland. I wish DARPA would have not accept foreigners and foreign firms to be involved, at least those which are from unfriendly countires. French and Israelis should not be allowed as well even they were allies for France and Israel to attempt many times to steal valuable military information.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ken Layne</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113209</link> <dc:creator>Ken Layne</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 22:34:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113209</guid> <description>As much as I would&#039;ve loved to see this robot race in person, the whole event radiates creepiness thanks to the Official Sponsor. DARPA? What the hell? If DARPA is involved, you can bet these robot vehicles will be up to No Good At All &amp; will quickly be &quot;helping&quot; the Pentagon spy on Americans at home. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I would’ve loved to see this robot race in person, the whole event radiates creepiness thanks to the Official Sponsor. DARPA? What the hell? If DARPA is involved, you can bet these robot vehicles will be up to No Good At All &amp; will quickly be “helping” the Pentagon spy on Americans at home.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Pedestrian</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/09/stanford-beats-odds-wins-robo-race/#comment-113208</link> <dc:creator>Pedestrian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1694#comment-113208</guid> <description>How many scientists about one hundred years ago would predict we would have aircrafts that would fly in sky? How may people one century ago would have thought some of the Mad Scientist Tesla&#039;s inventions would have been used in public? How many people decades ago would have thought lasers and rail connon weapons would become reality, at least at testing phase by the Department of Defense? Science has the potential to make science fiction become science, and we are seeing it happening again. Maybe we would see anti-gravity crafts being invented hundred years later, which not many have thought would become possible and just laugh at it as science fiction. Well, those who tend to think science fiction will remain science fiction are the people who will be laughed back. Never underestimate the potentials of science making science fiction a reality. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How many scientists about one hundred years ago would predict we would have aircrafts that would fly in sky? How may people one century ago would have thought some of the Mad Scientist Tesla’s inventions would have been used in public? How many people decades ago would have thought lasers and rail connon weapons would become reality, at least at testing phase by the Department of Defense? Science has the potential to make science fiction become science, and we are seeing it happening again. Maybe we would see anti-gravity crafts being invented hundred years later, which not many have thought would become possible and just laugh at it as science fiction. Well, those who tend to think science fiction will remain science fiction are the people who will be laughed back. Never underestimate the potentials of science making science fiction a reality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 732/736 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 06:04:27 -->
