We’ve got a war or two going on. So, obviously, the Defense Department’s budget is going to grow. But there’s an equally-important reason for the Pentagon’s bottom line bloat, Defense News’ Greg Grant reports.
The Army could find itself in a simultaneous fight against lightly armed guerrillas, an enemys armored forces or terrorists and must prepare to defeat all three…
Lt. Gen. Joseph Yakovac, the Armys acquisition chief… said it was difficult to plan and make choices in the absence of a clearly identifiable threat and an ambiguous and uncertain strategic environment.
From a weapons and equipment standpoint, what is not important? Nobody has articulated that. So I dont know how to prepare for that without having the resources, and equipping to account for all of those contingencies, he said. Now, the Army must be outfitted to defeat a wider variety of threats than at any time in its history.
{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }
Memoranda to: Generals, P. Schoomaker and Joint Staff Directorate:
Date: 10 October 2,005
From: IM2AUFO Dugway Culprits
Have you seriously thought about What Steve Schofer and his DESBIC AGENDA can do for us. In terms of solutions and magician abuse of power; since I too can view the map apparitions I’d have to size it up as so to advise and discuss this further.
I tend to believe in the accuracy and the legitimacy’s of Steven’s Contentions, perspective that, Franz Harary and others made all those stadiums and shuttles- Russia’s too now- disappear, and re-appear in front of NASA Engineers and police and millions ot audiences.
Such is the Einsteins Theory’s on deductive reasoning gotcha, needs to know it from cool handed handy- the dandy1 you see. I side so that is why I will said to me.
So don’t be irreverent about someones needle nosing in my attaches off the mark said discuss? Discuss why fore the local committee on insubordination think they had a say over sentry with plasmaphotonic sidesmenship’s where abouts? Knife field me sane. ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ So there we had it
And of that budgetary shortfall when it falls it will amount to sender return all because that Steven V. Arroyo was the real Jewish Messiah that everyone seemed to be at elbows with,
I know his website or two he goes by his birthright names as Schofer; it’s at
http://understandwordlove.blogspot.com and follow the profiles. He ain’t that good but I know he’s only been on thew computer maybe just about a year. I can’t call him because he has ” Confessors” ESP and he knows what I done but others should try to give his platform a comp Check.
See Steven V. Schofer; I am paying my debts back to society. The act nor facts said statewardly is a money matter by almost every conflict integration With Best Regards their Sir. Handy-Dandy1
Use the Bush doctrine- throw as much money as possible at the problem. preferably in inverse order of likelyhood. Billions for missile defense anyone? Not enough to properly outfit all the ground troops in combat? Hey, you gotta have priorities. and then invert them.
Solutions:
CUT DoD bureaucracy alone.
Combine Navy SEAL & Army Spec Forces into 1 Training Regime.
Combine like projects
Fund Comanche copter project
Defund F22
Fund JSF Project
Close more bases
Consolidate logistics more
CUT Perks in Pentagon
Hire more civilians for Food Services, Maint, IT
(non secure), etc.
More bidding for projects.
Hire Dev Disabled adults
Hire ex veterans more.
Steamline Procurement process
Streamline Commands IE Northern Command etc.
Or combine.
DARPA as 1 source R&D for all armed forces.
Combine Navy & AF ,Army Times into
Uniformed Services Times.
& more alone.
Automate ships more in Mn Eng alone.
Automate bases more in Logistics.
Hire seasoned vets with skills.
TDY & rate & rank IF needed.
Combine Intelligence into 1 body.
CUT flag officers in the DOD alone.
OK Basic Training base in CA for Pac Forces needs.
No one seems to be addressing the hyper expansion of the DC surrounding communities and suburbs. It sure reminds me of Silicon Valley during the mego money flow days. What happens when the spicket is turned off. It will be just like the DOT COM bust on that local economy. Defense and Defense IT, DHS is driving the micro economics of the area. There are cuts that could be made ofcourse and some of the above list is not all such a bad set of choices. But Government’s number one jon is to protect the people. Why not cut the budget on the other bureaucracy out there first. We as a civilization are a wasteful group indeed. But cutting military, dumb idea. As far as R and D, we need to up the ante, not cut budgets. Some liason, streamlining could help, better information flow and get rid of the leaks in the DC Gay Bar scenes around K-Street and loose lip politician Lawyers. In fact if we cut all the lawyer costs, I bet we could shave some costs in the military.
22 October 2,005
Defense Tech of whose shoes it will be received as worthy to build upon in an allegorically cynical May Day Posting Sir.
Now the news and views,
Firstly besides the point Schoomaker Jumper, and all the Has bros in Arlington Lad all know that a direct hit or three kamikaze style on a nuclear utility reactor silo sinners with meltdown expectibly liquifaction sequences in sequence will address another launch code to the disaster instilled without a sence of second handed considerations Sir to the largest 40 multi megaton explosive frequency resonances hereaswhy it now that it is I Steven V’ Schofer who is like unto the Jewish Messiah who cometh like a thief in the night; sabres drawn against the hands of a Lawman tools of the trade so try to ascertain the agenda considerations Schoomaker and Jumper and Sharon’s innuendo’s I confessed to they as follows:
MULTIMEGATON WEAPONS PROTOCOL OF
MULTI-MEGATON ATTRIBUTION DESBIC AGENDA
The Largest Nuclear Weapons
Reliable Sources 19 June 2005
Seat also Multi-megaton Weapons:
The largest nuclear weapons.
Contents:
High-yield thermonuclear weapons: overview
United States:
o U.S. nuclear warheads with yield over
4.5 megatons (table)
o The largest U.S. nuclear weapon
o The first U.S. high-yield nuclear weapons
o Mass produced multi-megaton weapons
o The Titan II heavy ICBM
o The Spartan ABM
o The last U.S. high-yield nuclear weapon
USSR/Russia:
o Soviet/Russian nuclear warheads with yield
over 4.5 megatons (table)
o The largest Soviet nuclear weapons
o The R-9 and R-16 ICBMs
o The R-36 heavy ICBM
o The R-36M, R-36MUTTKh, and R-36M2 heavy ICBMs
o The RS-16 and RS-18 ICBMs
The largest PRC nuclear weapon
1. High-yield thermonuclear weapons: Notice of intention to disband and assimilate to non-proliferation a specification table, enclosed Sirs, Sir.
6 Explanation of terms
Weapon name: designation and/or name assigned by respective country Warhead designation (for US, UK, and France): designation for nuclear warhead Western designation (for all other countries): U.S. and NATO designations-
Weapon type:
AAM – air-to-air missile
ABM – anti-ballistic missile
ADM – atomic demolition munition
AFAP – artillery-fired atomic projectile
ALBM – air-launched ballistic missile
(range over 1000 km)
ALCM – air-launched cruise missile (range over 1000 km)
ASAT – anti-satellite weapon
ASCM – anti-ship cruise missile
ASM – air-to-surface missile (range under 1000 km)
ASW – anti-submarine weapon
ATBM – anti-tactical ballistic missile
DEW – directed energy weapon
FOBS – fractional orbit bombardment system
GLCM – ground-launched cruise missile
(range between 1000 km and 5500 km)
ICBM – intercontinental ballistic missile
(range over 5500 km)
ICCM – intercontinental cruise missile
(range over 5500 km)
IRBM – intermediate-range ballistic missile
(range between 1000 km and 2500 km)
MICBM- mobile intercontinental ballistic missile
MRBM – medium-range ballistic missile
(range between 2500 km and 5500 km)
NDB – nuclear depth bomb
NGB – nuclear gravity bomb
SAM – surface-to-air missile
SLBM – submarine-launched ballistic missile
SLCM – submarine-launched cruise missile
(range over 1000 km)
SRBM – short-range ballistic missile
(range under 1000 km)
7. Stock entry: date when first warheads entered nuclear stockpile IOC: initial operational capability, or date of first alert capability-off alert: date when alert capability ended Retire stock: date when last warheads dismantled
8.WH type: type of nuclear device:
BF – boosted fission
ER – enhanced radiation
FI – implosion, unspecified fission
GA – gun assembly, uranium fission
IC – implosion, fission, composite core
IM – implosion, fission, various cores
IP – implosion, plutonium fission
IU – implosion, uranium fission
LC – “Sloika” thermonuclear
LI – linear implosion, plutonium
PG – gun assembly, plutonium fission
TC – multi-stage thermonuclear, clean (
TD – multi-stage thermonuclear, dirty (>65% fission)
TN – multi-stage thermonuclear
TS – multi-stage thermonuclear, standard (25%-65% fission)
9. No. built: total number of warheads built
10. Yield: explosive yield in kilotons (kt) or megatons (mt), with notes as follows:
DV – different versions (warhead stocks include separate versions with different yields)
S – selectable yield (individual warhead yield may be selected from several options)
SC – separate cores (individual warhead yield determined by which of several interchangable fissile cores is used)
V – variable yield (individual warhead yield may be set within a continuously variable range)
MRVs, MIRVs, or MARVs – multiple reentry vehicles, multiple independently-targetable reentry vehicles, and maneuverable reentry vehicles, respectively (figures indicate warhead loading per missile)
11. The above accounts and description of the Annex of Terminal Attribution, pursuant to the classifications ascribed of in Chapter’s 6 of this Provision, shall be subject to the limitations provided for under this Treaty and considered an integral priority undertaking on the elimination of Weapons of Mass Destruction to be phased out, decommisioned and destroyed, as an display of civil obedience therewith our star elder presences instilled.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF 22 October 2,005 OF FAITH WHEREBY