DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Darpa Wants Mach 2, Uneven Flying Wing

Darpa Wants Mach 2, Uneven Flying Wing

Back in the 1940’s, sci­en­tists sug­gested that a plane with uneven, or oblique, wings might be the best shape for super­sonic travel. Sixty years later, no one has been able to make a work­ing, Mach-​​speed model. Now, the Pentagon’s fringe-​​science arm, Darpa, not only wants to take a whack at the decades-​​old prob­lem — the agency is look­ing for a plane that’s one giant, cock­eyed wing.
flying_wing.JPGOblique wings, in the­ory, pro­vide more lift and less drag than stan­dard air­crafts. But engi­neers haven’t fig­ured out how to build a plane that could han­dle the “aero­dy­namic con­trol, aero-​​structural design, and propul­sion inte­gra­tion” that come with the asym­met­ric approach, Darpa says. There’s not even enough “data to date to assess the fea­si­bil­ity” for a super­sonic oblique fly­ing wing [OFW] design, the agency notes.
In its new “Switchblade” pro­gram, Darpa is aim­ing to “demon­strate the fea­si­bil­ity and con­trol­la­bil­ity of a super­sonic, tail­less, vari­able sweep OFW con­cept; val­i­date the design meth­ods and con­trol approaches for the design; and facil­i­tate con­sid­er­a­tion of an OFW plan­form in the design of poten­tial future oper­a­tional air­craft.“
To start, Darpa wants a good set of OFW plans. They’ll have to include:

Non-​​expendable air­craft with a wheeled, retractable under­car­riage for take-​​off and land­ing
Air breath­ing propul­sion
Supersonic demon­stra­tion at a Mach num­ber greater than or equal to 1.2
Tailless con­fig­u­ra­tion in super­sonic cruise and sub­sonic loi­ter con­di­tions
Variable wing sweep demon­strated in-​​flight from a min­i­mum wing sweep of not more than 30 degrees to a max­i­mum wing sweep of not less than 60 degrees
Aspect ratio greater than or equal to 7 at the min­i­mum sweep con­di­tion
Wingspan greater than or equal to 40 feet at the min­i­mum sweep condition.

Darpa isn’t exactly sure what an OFW craft would do, if it ever got built. But the agency has some ideas about the kind of tasks a fly­ing wing could han­dle. Maybe the OFW would spy on tar­gets 2,500 miles away, loi­ter­ing in the air for 15 hours at a time. Or maybe the plane could become a Mach 2 bomber, dump­ing 15,000 pounds of ord­nance on unsus­pect­ing foes, won­der­ing what the hell that strange thing was, fly­ing over­head.
THERE’S MORE: In the com­ments, Giovanni links to some of NASA’s oblique wing attempts. And Murc points us to Northrop’s response to the “Switchblade” chalenge.

Share |

October 17th, 2005 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 170825 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/10/17/darpa-wants-mach-2-uneven-flying-wing/Darpa+Wants+Mach+2%2C+Uneven+Flying+Wing2005-10-17+19%3A58%3A11dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « I.R.A. Bombs in Iraq | Rapid Fire 10/​18/​05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Robert says:
    October 17, 2005 at 6:38 pm

    Didn’t NASA test w/​ a vari­able sweep OW a/​c back in the 80’s? If I remem­ber — it was a wing tacked on the top of a –104 fuse­lage.…
    Making the whole thing a fly­ing wing — that’s a whole nother beast.

    Reply
  2. Harry Toor says:
    October 17, 2005 at 7:39 pm

    There are a few designs in the patent office if you want to go search­ing there web­site. I know Boeing has a forty year old, or so, design that was two big for con­ven­tional run­ways of the time, our pro­fes­sor showed us the pictures.

    Reply
  3. Murc says:
    October 17, 2005 at 11:46 pm

    Back in 79–82 is when Nasa had one…Called the AD-​​1 Oblique Wing, its wing turned up to a 60 degree angle.
    But this would be much harder to build. Since this would have its engines inter­nal, and would have to go super­sonic, be unmanned, and have a well engi­neered thrust vec­tor­ing system.

    Reply
  4. giovanni says:
    October 18, 2005 at 12:12 am

    AD1 here we go:
    http://​www​.dfrc​.nasa​.gov/​G​a​l​l​e​r​y​/​P​h​o​t​o​/​A​D​-​1​/​H​T​M​L​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml

    Reply
  5. Murc says:
    October 18, 2005 at 1:05 am

    Heres Northrop Grummans con­cept pic, they think they could have it built by 2020.
    They prob­a­bly have the best shot, since they built the B-​​2 bomber, so they have expe­ri­ence with a tai­less fly­ing wing.
    http://​www​.flight​in​ter​na​tional​.com/​A​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​2​0​0​5​/​0​9​/​2​7​/​N​a​v​i​g​a​t​i​o​n​/​2​5​0​/​2​0​1​7​7​5​/​N​o​r​t​h​r​o​p​+​r​e​s​p​o​n​d​s​+​t​o​+​U​S​+​S​w​i​t​c​h​b​l​a​d​e​+​c​h​a​l​l​e​n​g​e​.​h​tml

    Reply
  6. Aaron says:
    October 19, 2005 at 9:41 pm

    sure will be pretty see­ing one fly along… and then it will tum­ble gen­tly down to earth as if falls out of the sky plumet­ing into a huge fire­ball. :(
    Lets hope they do all the flight test­ing with remote con­trol. this looks like a death trap.

    Reply
  7. Ben R. says:
    April 3, 2006 at 12:26 pm

    And now we have a first flight date in 2010 !
    BR

    Reply
  8. gowri says:
    October 26, 2007 at 2:54 am

    The stock has gained 150% from Oct 8, 2007 to Oct 22, 2007.
    By the way check this com­pany MDFI. Their stock is set to increase because of their asso­ci­a­tion with Apple iphone and Complete Care Medical. Find more about this com­pany and stock http://​www​.growur​money​.com/​m​e​d​e​f​i​le/

    Reply
  9. cheap gw gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    Together and he is not a very long time, but I feel very com­fort­able. He was some­time as a child, lovely, sim­ple, not too many wor­ries, likes a fish in a pure travel freely in the sea. He often took his only cheap GW gold send to me. His world sim­ple, but he is happy.

    Reply
  10. cheap rf gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    During the time pass, my union was larger; my union mem­bers are very sol­i­dar­ity, when some peo­ple have dif­fi­cult, we all go to help. I also remem­bered once a people

    Reply
  11. cheap rappelz rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:36 pm

    And I apply a new num­ber, I pre­pared to play with her, upgrade and earn cheap rap­pelz rupees together. I felt she is a good girl, I decided I must change myself for her. Later, we often played together, and we are very happy. She also became my wife. But after a few time, I met many things, I was very sad, and I did not spent a long time to play the game. I did not often to play with her. Finally, I said to her, I will leave the game. I let her find another hus­band. She was very sad, when I left the game, she also left.

    Reply
  12. icoft123 Roke says:
    October 31, 2008 at 3:54 am

    This com­pany stock (ROKE) is set to take off. Worldwide client base in the mobile com­mu­ni­ca­tions space. See the details at
    http://​www​.icoft​.com/​r​o​k​e​.​h​tml
    any clar­i­fi­ca­tion con­tact at
    icoft1​2​3​@​gmail.​com

    Reply
  13. icoft123 Roke says:
    October 31, 2008 at 3:56 am

    This com­pany stock (ROKE) is set to take off. Worldwide client base in the mobile com­mu­ni­ca­tions space. See the details and any clar­i­fi­ca­tion con­tact at
    icoft1​2​3​@​gmail.​com

    Reply
  14. icoft123 Roke says:
    October 31, 2008 at 4:04 am

    Worldwide client base in the mobile com­mu­ni­ca­tions space. See the details and any clar­i­fi­ca­tion at
    icoft1​2​3​@​gmail.​com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "And no, the Koran does not say anything about killing...
      bdwilcox
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      When the Lord your God brings you into the land you are entering to...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Fascism? Last time I heard, the fascists promoted christianity. Or,...
      DualityOfMan
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I see an M16 firing, and I see a 40 mm grenade launcher...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage