DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Planes, Copters, Blimps » Darpa Wants Mach 2, Uneven Flying Wing

Darpa Wants Mach 2, Uneven Flying Wing

Back in the 1940’s, scientists suggested that a plane with uneven, or oblique, wings might be the best shape for supersonic travel. Sixty years later, no one has been able to make a working, Mach-speed model. Now, the Pentagon’s fringe-science arm, Darpa, not only wants to take a whack at the decades-old problem — the agency is looking for a plane that’s one giant, cockeyed wing.
flying_wing.JPGOblique wings, in theory, provide more lift and less drag than standard aircrafts. But engineers haven’t figured out how to build a plane that could handle the “aerodynamic control, aero-structural design, and propulsion integration” that come with the asymmetric approach, Darpa says. There’s not even enough “data to date to assess the feasibility” for a supersonic oblique flying wing [OFW] design, the agency notes.
In its new “Switchblade” program, Darpa is aiming to “demonstrate the feasibility and controllability of a supersonic, tailless, variable sweep OFW concept; validate the design methods and control approaches for the design; and facilitate consideration of an OFW planform in the design of potential future operational aircraft.“
To start, Darpa wants a good set of OFW plans. They’ll have to include:

Non-expendable aircraft with a wheeled, retractable undercarriage for take-off and landing
Air breathing propulsion
Supersonic demonstration at a Mach number greater than or equal to 1.2
Tailless configuration in supersonic cruise and subsonic loiter conditions
Variable wing sweep demonstrated in-flight from a minimum wing sweep of not more than 30 degrees to a maximum wing sweep of not less than 60 degrees
Aspect ratio greater than or equal to 7 at the minimum sweep condition
Wingspan greater than or equal to 40 feet at the minimum sweep condition.

Darpa isn’t exactly sure what an OFW craft would do, if it ever got built. But the agency has some ideas about the kind of tasks a flying wing could handle. Maybe the OFW would spy on targets 2,500 miles away, loitering in the air for 15 hours at a time. Or maybe the plane could become a Mach 2 bomber, dumping 15,000 pounds of ordnance on unsuspecting foes, wondering what the hell that strange thing was, flying overhead.
THERE’S MORE: In the comments, Giovanni links to some of NASA’s oblique wing attempts. And Murc points us to Northrop’s response to the “Switchblade” chalenge.

Share |

October 17th, 2005 | Planes, Copters, Blimps | 170825 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/10/17/darpa-wants-mach-2-uneven-flying-wing/Darpa+Wants+Mach+2%2C+Uneven+Flying+Wing2005-10-17+19%3A58%3A11dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « I.R.A. Bombs in Iraq | Rapid Fire 10/18/05 » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Robert says:
    October 17, 2005 at 6:38 pm

    Didn’t NASA test w/ a variable sweep OW a/c back in the 80’s? If I remember — it was a wing tacked on the top of a –104 fuselage.…
    Making the whole thing a flying wing — that’s a whole nother beast.

    Reply
  2. Harry Toor says:
    October 17, 2005 at 7:39 pm

    There are a few designs in the patent office if you want to go searching there website. I know Boeing has a forty year old, or so, design that was two big for conventional runways of the time, our professor showed us the pictures.

    Reply
  3. Murc says:
    October 17, 2005 at 11:46 pm

    Back in 79–82 is when Nasa had one…Called the AD-1 Oblique Wing, its wing turned up to a 60 degree angle.
    But this would be much harder to build. Since this would have its engines internal, and would have to go supersonic, be unmanned, and have a well engineered thrust vectoring system.

    Reply
  4. giovanni says:
    October 18, 2005 at 12:12 am

    AD1 here we go:
    http://​www​.dfrc​.nasa​.gov/​G​a​l​l​e​r​y​/​P​h​o​t​o​/​A​D​-​1​/​H​T​M​L​/​i​n​d​e​x​.​h​tml

    Reply
  5. Murc says:
    October 18, 2005 at 1:05 am

    Heres Northrop Grummans concept pic, they think they could have it built by 2020.
    They probably have the best shot, since they built the B-2 bomber, so they have experience with a tailess flying wing.
    http://​www​.flightinternational​.com/​A​r​t​i​c​l​e​s​/​2​0​0​5​/​0​9​/​2​7​/​N​a​v​i​g​a​t​i​o​n​/​2​5​0​/​2​0​1​7​7​5​/​N​o​r​t​h​r​o​p​+​r​e​s​p​o​n​d​s​+​t​o​+​U​S​+​S​w​i​t​c​h​b​l​a​d​e​+​c​h​a​l​l​e​n​g​e​.​h​tml

    Reply
  6. Aaron says:
    October 19, 2005 at 9:41 pm

    sure will be pretty seeing one fly along… and then it will tumble gently down to earth as if falls out of the sky plumeting into a huge fireball. :(
    Lets hope they do all the flight testing with remote control. this looks like a death trap.

    Reply
  7. Ben R. says:
    April 3, 2006 at 12:26 pm

    And now we have a first flight date in 2010 !
    BR

    Reply
  8. gowri says:
    October 26, 2007 at 2:54 am

    The stock has gained 150% from Oct 8, 2007 to Oct 22, 2007.
    By the way check this company MDFI. Their stock is set to increase because of their association with Apple iphone and Complete Care Medical. Find more about this company and stock http://​www​.growurmoney​.com/​m​e​d​e​f​i​le/

    Reply
  9. cheap gw gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:23 pm

    Together and he is not a very long time, but I feel very comfortable. He was sometime as a child, lovely, simple, not too many worries, likes a fish in a pure travel freely in the sea. He often took his only cheap GW gold send to me. His world simple, but he is happy.

    Reply
  10. cheap rf gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:31 pm

    During the time pass, my union was larger; my union members are very solidarity, when some people have difficult, we all go to help. I also remembered once a people

    Reply
  11. cheap rappelz rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 7:36 pm

    And I apply a new number, I prepared to play with her, upgrade and earn cheap rappelz rupees together. I felt she is a good girl, I decided I must change myself for her. Later, we often played together, and we are very happy. She also became my wife. But after a few time, I met many things, I was very sad, and I did not spent a long time to play the game. I did not often to play with her. Finally, I said to her, I will leave the game. I let her find another husband. She was very sad, when I left the game, she also left.

    Reply
  12. icoft123 Roke says:
    October 31, 2008 at 3:54 am

    This company stock (ROKE) is set to take off. Worldwide client base in the mobile communications space. See the details at
    http://​www​.icoft​.com/​r​o​k​e​.​h​tml
    any clarification contact at
    icoft123@gmail.com

    Reply
  13. icoft123 Roke says:
    October 31, 2008 at 3:56 am

    This company stock (ROKE) is set to take off. Worldwide client base in the mobile communications space. See the details and any clarification contact at
    icoft123@gmail.com

    Reply
  14. icoft123 Roke says:
    October 31, 2008 at 4:04 am

    Worldwide client base in the mobile communications space. See the details and any clarification at
    icoft123@gmail.com

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Sorry, previous post meant to say the F16s were to be...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      There will be a reduced buy to save costs. That was...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      We shouldn't even be using STOVL fighters anymore....
      Sean
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes, but the 135 million price for the F35 factors in...
      STemplar
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Yes because USAF logic says older is bad, no matter how...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Agree completely. I also go further though – STOVL...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      You don't need to. The amphibious ships are primarily...
      Why
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Has anyone calculated out the per unit cost once you...
      Blight
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      I have always loved this idea. More survivable,...
      nraddin
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
      As an old ex-USAF cop, I am way out of my league...
      Sgt Ken
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage