DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • ‘Canes
  • Af-Cam
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the “Buzz”
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Crazy Ivan
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT’s Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • F-35 Watch
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Bubble with Joe Buff
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar’s Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples’ Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward’z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Nukes » Last Best Reminder

Last Best Reminder

m_cloud.jpgAnybody see Last Best Chance last night? Newsweek’s Johnathan Alter caught the nuclear terror docu-drama:

It lacks special effects (too expensive) and a satisfying ending (too unrealistic), but effectively offers an all-too-plausible scenario of how a Russian scientist desperate for cash could provide highly enriched uranium through middlemen to Arab jihadists. So, American Hiroshima begins, says one terrorist.
I couldnt get my kids to watch it. My daughter said it was Too much of a downer, which about describes the attitude of policymakers. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said early this year there was no huge problem with the security of nuclear materials in the former Soviet Union. But Lee Hamilton and Thomas Kean, co-chairs of the 9/11 Commission, which studied the issue at length, strongly disagree. They believe nuclear terrorism is a distinct possibility…
Of all the varieties of incompetence in this, the Age of Incompetence, the most deadly involves the potential of nuclear terrorism. After years of foot dragging, Presidents Bush and Putin have finally agreed at summit meetings this year that it is the single most serious threat in the world todayfar more likely than a nuclear exchange by superpowers. And yet they and their governments are not following through quickly enough to secure loose nukes at their source. At the pace were going, it will be 13 years2018before all of them are recovered and deactivated, by which time even the most sober analysts believe terrorists will likely have blown up and contaminated some city forever.

Share |

October 19th, 2005 | Nukes | 171422 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/10/19/last-best-reminder/%3Cem%3ELast+Best%3C%2Fem%3E+Reminder2005-10-19+12%3A52%3A26dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Rapid Fire 10/19/05 | Bioterror in DC? » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Byron Skinner says:
    October 19, 2005 at 2:55 pm

    It’s been kinda quiet around here the past week or so, maybe this will get a little action started. I will endeavor to upset everyone.
    One of President Bushe’s security measures that I don’t disagre with is maintaining the nuclear arsenal at a ready level. In the past during the Cold War MAD served to neutralize the use option on both the major sides. The minor players were in effect frozen out of the nuclear game.
    Now we have a different set of players. They have no country, no assets that they treasure or even their own lives that they consider worth perserving. The consequences of the use of nuclear weapons is of little or no concern to them.
    In that light the only option avaible to the United States in the event of a nuclear attack/strike on American soil would be retaliation in kind to any third party that would offered safe harbor or support to the group(s) who committed the act.
    It makes no difference who is President Republican or Democrat there would be no other option as in the Cold War.
    The current move to develope smaller yeld weapons like a 5Kt. war head or the bunker busting B85 are steps in the right direction. If nuclear weapons must be used, it is to everyone benefit to see that the most percise and lowest yeld weapons possable are used for a retaliatary strike.
    To wipe out a country or a civilization in retaliation for a single act against or with in the United States is not the American way. The use of nuclear weapons y the United States would be judicious but it would happen, make no mistake about that.
    The increasing boldness and desperation on the part of terrorits groups/organizations along with opportuntistic nations who will peddle both the technologly and the resources to construct and deliver a nuclear device says that these county(s) would be the target(s) of a U.S. strike(s).
    The most likely target(s) for U.S. retaliation(s) would be the country(s) who faciliated the creation and use of said nuclear device by the terrorists.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner
    “Stewart’s Platoon”

    Reply
  2. Chris Alemany says:
    October 19, 2005 at 5:45 pm

    “The most likely target(s) for U.S. retaliation(s) would be the country(s) who faciliated the creation and use of said nuclear device by the terrorists.“
    So… the Soviet Union? They don’t exist.
    And what if the radioactive material is of American origin (as portrayed in the The Sum of All Fears)…
    Or are “we” just going to pick some 3rd world country that is the base-of-operations-of-the-day?
    I don’t mean these questions in an argumentative way.. simply, I believe valid questions given where nuclear technology actually comes from and who is responsible for its’ spread and security.

    Reply
  3. Chris Alemany says:
    October 19, 2005 at 5:46 pm

    What if that country is Iraq?

    Reply
  4. Aaron says:
    October 19, 2005 at 9:42 pm

    What if the country is pakistan?

    Reply
  5. Byron Skinner says:
    October 19, 2005 at 11:59 pm

    To All,
    I really don’t think who the country of retaliation would make much difference if the U.S. took a direct attack. Like it or not this is the box that the Terrorists have put the United States into.
    For any country, be it Iran, Pakistan, Iraq or any other who worked with a Terrorist Organization to develope and or helped deploy a explosive nuclear devive that was used against the United States it would be an act of state suicide.
    If the weapon came from with in, I have no doubt that Islam in the United States would be over.
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner
    “Stewart’s Platoon”

    Reply
  6. iro zeny says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:17 am

    95 levels, to me this had been a friend of the people around, the new service first hand the hand of a person to manually 95, it is really difficult for my themselves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  7. buy rupees says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:20 am

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeatedly returned to the Rappelz game. I continue for good equipment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the original is the lack of a person accompanying me.

    Reply
  8. rf money says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:26 am

    So I know my paradise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a variety of reasons, and the summer of cake, magic rabbit, blue shocks, such as several friends built a new council: Return of the King. And I recognized the beiertuo brotherhood. As the help of this friends and will help in growing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new president rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively participated in the mine warfare, winning glory for the family. Later, because a number of reasons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply
  9. buy goonzu gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:31 am

    It is wind outside the window, and I numbness under the keyboard, watching the computer screen in a daze, reminiscent of the past acid sweet, think of all people cry. In this long Goonzu road, who join me through? The game the same as reality, it also need friends, need a paternity can go with own people. I spent some money to buy goonzu gold, so I can find to find together with in the other half Goonzu down and eventually found nothing, I despair, I gave up, I sad, and I cry.

    Reply
  10. Guild Wars Gold says:
    August 12, 2008 at 12:33 am

    One day, I was killed by other people, I told my brother, and I was dead. My brother said he come to help me. I said that people were very terrible, he had a lot of equipment, and I think he must be having much Guild Wars Gold. Mt brother said, no matter, he find friends come to help me. In this way, I recognized him.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

NOTE: Comments are limited to 2500 characters and spaces.

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Recent Articles
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
    • JFCOM’s Mattis Pushes Light IW Aircraft
    • And, the Vertical Landing
    • NLOS-LS Missile Fail Could Impact Navy’s LCS
    • JFCOM’s JOE Whacks Defense Industry
    • New F-35B Hover Video
    • China’s Shipbuilding in a Regional Context
    • Debating the Pros and Cons of LCS
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
    Recent Comments
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      As an European living in Germany I would have love to see...
      fightingirish
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gees the price is on the roof already. Maybe we just...
      roland
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      I was the driver for BoB Gaygos, B Co 6/31st Commander....
      Ricky houltzhouser
    • Ft. Irwin, Where You At?
      Luis, I was Captain Gaydos, driver Sgt. Houltzhouser in...
      Ricky Houltzhouser
    • Bigger, Badder IEDs in Afghanistan
      If you really want to win the war permanently, it will...
      steven
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      Another question, how would I physically obstruct the...
      Curious
    • Cover Your Computer Mics and WebCams
      whats a good way to physically cover my laptop webcam?...
      Curious
    • EADS Tanker, Not Dead Yet
      But, the Eurotrash airplane ISN'T better… The Boeing...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      Gee, I wonder why? Oh! Maybe it's because the...
      WillyPete
    • JSF Price Tag Jumps to $135 Million
      It would also help, a LOT to 'limit' excess...
      WillyPete
  • Channels:Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty |Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money |Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network:Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz |SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps |Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program |Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy |User Agreement| © 2010 Military Advantage