DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Cloak and Dagger » Kinko Commandos

Kinko Commandos

Your com­mand­ing offi­cer wants you to crank out a whole bunch of pro­pa­ganda in a hurry. But you’re miles and miles from your base. And Kinko’s isn’t expected to open a branch in the Hindu Kush for a long, long time. What to do?
Copier_pregger.JPGSOCOM wants its com­man­dos to have a Humvee-​​mounted, deploy­able print pro­duc­tion cen­ter (DPPC) to han­dle their psy­cho­log­i­cal war­fare needs. Special Operations Technology mag­a­zine has the details:
A pre­ferred sys­tem, as a min­i­mum, must be capa­ble of pro­duc­ing 13,000 11-​​by-​​17 sheets, pro­duced two sided, sin­gle color, cut to pro­duce 100,000 leaflets in a 24-​​hour period. Preferably, the sys­tem will be able to pro­duce 13,000 11-​​by-​​17 sheets, pro­duced two sided, multi-​​color, cut to pro­duce 100,000 leaflets in a 24-​​hour period. The min­i­mum accept­able qual­ity is 600 dots per inch (dpi) with an objec­tive of 2,400 dpi…
Additionally, the DPPC must include an elec­tric paper cut­ter capa­ble of cutting/​trimming a 500-​​sheet stack of 11-​​by-​​17 inch paper, with an objec­tive of being able to cut/​trim a 1,000 sheet stack of 11-​​by-​​17 inch paper…
Not just your cor­ner copy shop, the DPPC must be designed to han­dle work at the secret level, and have appro­pri­ate pro­ce­dures to meet DoD Information Technology Security Certification and Accreditation Process requirements.

Share |

October 25th, 2005 | Cloak and Dagger | 172821 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/10/25/kinko-commandos/Kinko+Commandos2005-10-25+18%3A31%3A04dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Navy Prepping for Deep Cuts | $1.2 Bil in Guard Gear, Gone » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Dig Dug Dag says:
    October 25, 2005 at 3:19 pm

    Before Skinner gets in here and starts com­plain­ing about some­thing unre­lated to the issue, I’d like to jump in and say I’m not in the least sur­prised. No head­quar­ters in the last hun­dred years has been able to con­sume less than a two cubic feet of paper per shift.

    Reply
  2. AlphaGeek says:
    October 25, 2005 at 5:19 pm

    I’m dis­ap­pointed that they’re think­ing so small here — why not spec­ify a fully auto­mated sys­tem that will dis­perse the leaflets via com­pressed air can­non?
    And is it wrong to find it amus­ing that the sol­dier in the photo is so hugely preg­nant and obvi­ously hat­ing the fact that her pic­ture is being taken?
    –AG

    Reply
  3. JSAllison says:
    October 26, 2005 at 9:14 am

    Maternity BDUs…there’s some­thing dis­turb­ing about that…

    Reply
  4. Mark says:
    October 26, 2005 at 12:21 pm

    It’s my under­stand­ing that preg­nant women are imme­di­ately sus­pended from all active duty. I think she’s just fat.

    Reply
  5. BaxterWeiss says:
    October 26, 2005 at 12:35 pm

    And you would be incor­rect, Mark.

    Reply
  6. Tim says:
    October 26, 2005 at 1:35 pm

    No, preg­nant women are NOT sus­pended from active duty. They’re given light duty, and the option of stay­ing in the mil­i­tary. I know more than a few women that got preg­nant to get out of the Army while I was in. Sad, but there were even more that stayed in, and they worked up ’til the doc­tor said not to, and then came back after the birth.

    Reply
  7. Bob says:
    October 26, 2005 at 2:39 pm

    Haha, the title of the image above is copier_preggers.JPG.
    Classy, defenseTech, very classy.

    Reply
  8. James says:
    October 27, 2005 at 1:15 am

    Pregnant women are NOT given the “option” to stay in teh mil­i­tary. It’s be at least 15 years since that was true. Women who become preg­nant on Active Duty are required to com­plete their ser­vice oblig­a­tion. Most preg­nant servie women will usu­ally work in their nor­mal jobs until thier third trimester unless thier physi­cian deter­mines that she be assigned light duty at an ear­lier date.
    But yes, BDU’s look like a$$ on a preg­nant woman. LOL.

    Reply
  9. James says:
    October 27, 2005 at 1:22 am

    To clar­ify the above com­ment. In today’s mil­i­tary, women are NOT given an option of get­ting out if/​when they find out that they are preg­nant. This was the case 15+ years ago, no longer. They are REQUIRED to fin­ish their ser­vice oblig­a­tion.
    The prac­tice of releas­ing preg­nant women was stopped because it was dis­cov­ered that almost 50% of the women enter­ing the ser­vice were becom­ing preg­nant dur­ing their first year of ser­vice know­ing that the mil­i­tary would have to take care of their med­ical expenses until the baby was born before releas­ing them from their con­tracts thereby sav­ing the mem­ber sev­eral thou­sand dol­lars in hos­pi­tal fees all while still receiv­ing a steady income from Uncle Sam.

    Reply
  10. Conor says:
    October 27, 2005 at 11:35 am

    The option is still avail­able for sin­gle moth­ers or mil mar­ried to mil to get out if they get preg­nant. Just not everybody.

    Reply
  11. Melissa says:
    October 30, 2005 at 10:28 pm

    I think that wast­ing paper to pro­mote an immoral war is disgusting.

    Reply
  12. Darcy says:
    February 10, 2006 at 7:45 pm

    Yes it is still and option. When I was preg­nant with my son in 2001, I was able to get out…

    Reply
  13. cheap cronous cro says:
    August 5, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    And he has given 50W cheap cro­nous cro to me, I was smil­ing secretly, my mas­ter had not known my details.

    Reply
  14. Tibia Gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:45 pm

    One day, I read a arti­cle about Tibia Gold game. I was very dispir­ited and couldn’t help to give up Tibia coins.

    Reply
  15. buy sro gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:46 pm

    If you’re won­der­ing how to look out for bots, how to avoid them and what to do buy sro gold, you have come to the right place.

    Reply
  16. Silkroad gold says:
    August 19, 2008 at 11:49 pm

    Thanks for read­ing and hope­fully there will be a lot more Silkroad gold where that came from!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      "I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare...
      Sam
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      No. I am not saying a grenade launcher on a rifle is a hoax. I...
      Zandor
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      For someone who trashes all the readers of the blog you sure do...
      a1189
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
      These devices vibrate tissue and bone not just...
      WJS
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      So are you saying the grenade launcher is a hoax or the M-16?...
      WJS
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Dear Cannon Fodder; Only politically correct patriots should be accepted...
      Zandor
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
      LOL Still all this pissing an moaning about the editorial...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I'd say go read some history on fascist ideology and then compare that...
      Philo
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Islame isn't a race, genius……
      Philo
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
      I sure as hell don't need to have someone take pictures of me...
      Zandor
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage