<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: $1.2 Bil in Guard Gear, Gone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/</link>
	<description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 17:42:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/#comment-11642</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2005 14:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1729#comment-11642</guid>
		<description>The report did not say that the equipment is missing or lost...
What the report said was that the Army has no plan to return or replace equipment that remains in theater to support other units.  They are required by law to produce this plan and have not done so.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report did not say that the equipment is missing or lost…<br />
What the report said was that the Army has no plan to return or replace equipment that remains in theater to support other units.  They are required by law to produce this plan and have not done so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROCK</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/#comment-11640</link>
		<dc:creator>ROCK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 01:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1729#comment-11640</guid>
		<description>IT&#039;S NOT HARD TO BELEVE THAT THAT MUCH GEAR IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR. I ALSO AGREE THAT MANY ITEMS WERE PASSED ALONG OR &quot;PROCURED&quot; BY SOMEONE WHO NEEDED IT. THE ONLY THING THAT BOTHERS ME IS I WONDER HOW MUCH OF THE GEAR GOT INTO THE HANDS OF THE OTHER SIDE AND IS BEING USED AGAINST US.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IT’S NOT HARD TO BELEVE THAT THAT MUCH GEAR IS NOT ACCOUNTED FOR. I ALSO AGREE THAT MANY ITEMS WERE PASSED ALONG OR “PROCURED” BY SOMEONE WHO NEEDED IT. THE ONLY THING THAT BOTHERS ME IS I WONDER HOW MUCH OF THE GEAR GOT INTO THE HANDS OF THE OTHER SIDE AND IS BEING USED AGAINST US.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byron Skinner</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/#comment-113589</link>
		<dc:creator>Byron Skinner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 19:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1729#comment-113589</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Folks,
I think there are two aspects at play here first it budget showdown time and the NG is &quot;phishing for phunds&quot;. The second part I believe what JSAllison said is the case, the equipment has been passed on to the units comming in, in relief.
Some was, also I&#039;m sure combat losses which have a habit of not being recorded for various reasons, the vehicle log book goes up in flames there goes the record of that vehicle, and also I&#039;m sure that some of the unaccounted for equipment has been turned over to the emerging Iraqi forces.
What ever the problems are and I&#039;m sure it&#039;s more then one, the amount of money being asked for is quite modest in compairson to other expenses for the GWOT.
I wouldn&#039;t be surprised that this is just another &quot;Much to do about nothing&quot; in the media&#039;s attempt &quot;To busy getty minds with  foreign wars.&quot;
The above quotes are off the top of my head so any ole (or young) English or Literature Teacher please feel free to correct.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner
&quot;Stewart&#039;s Platoon&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Folks,<br />
I think there are two aspects at play here first it budget showdown time and the NG is “phishing for phunds”. The second part I believe what JSAllison said is the case, the equipment has been passed on to the units comming in, in relief.<br />
Some was, also I’m sure combat losses which have a habit of not being recorded for various reasons, the vehicle log book goes up in flames there goes the record of that vehicle, and also I’m sure that some of the unaccounted for equipment has been turned over to the emerging Iraqi forces.<br />
What ever the problems are and I’m sure it’s more then one, the amount of money being asked for is quite modest in compairson to other expenses for the GWOT.<br />
I wouldn’t be surprised that this is just another “Much to do about nothing” in the media’s attempt “To busy getty minds with  foreign wars.“<br />
The above quotes are off the top of my head so any ole (or young) English or Literature Teacher please feel free to correct.<br />
ALLONS,<br />
Byron Skinner<br />
“Stewart’s Platoon”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtw</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/#comment-11637</link>
		<dc:creator>jtw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1729#comment-11637</guid>
		<description>Hopefully some of the stuff goes up on Ebay.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully some of the stuff goes up on Ebay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jtw</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/#comment-113587</link>
		<dc:creator>jtw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 17:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1729#comment-113587</guid>
		<description>That is unorganized.
How can you lose 600 million dollars worth of gear?
Probably is getting sold for haliburton profits.  Or maybe the soldiers have decided its time for them to start earning profits too.  Or maybe they wanted their own pair of NVG&#039;s for the house and wife.
Eh well I guess they deserve it,  they make minimum wage as it is.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is unorganized.<br />
How can you lose 600 million dollars worth of gear?<br />
Probably is getting sold for haliburton profits.  Or maybe the soldiers have decided its time for them to start earning profits too.  Or maybe they wanted their own pair of NVG’s for the house and wife.<br />
Eh well I guess they deserve it,  they make minimum wage as it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSAllison</title>
		<link>http://defensetech.org/2005/10/26/1-2-bil-in-guard-gear-gone/#comment-113586</link>
		<dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2005 14:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=1729#comment-113586</guid>
		<description>Need more info.  Was the stuff left behind for follow-on units to use.  Did it get &#039;liberated&#039; by other units?  Were they ordered to cough up stuff?  Did they just decide that it was easier to go home without the stuff and left it behind?  Some combination of the above?
While flag rankers and civilian bureaucrats have often been known to play games of this sort, loss of property accountability can be a career breaker for more junior sorts.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Need more info.  Was the stuff left behind for follow-on units to use.  Did it get ‘liberated’ by other units?  Were they ordered to cough up stuff?  Did they just decide that it was easier to go home without the stuff and left it behind?  Some combination of the above?<br />
While flag rankers and civilian bureaucrats have often been known to play games of this sort, loss of property accountability can be a career breaker for more junior sorts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

