DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • PEO Soldier
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Money Money Money » Army Threatens Retirements to Cut Budget

Army Threatens Retirements to Cut Budget

harvey_cheer.jpgActing deputy defense sec­re­tary Gordon England is telling the Army to get ready to cut $11.7 bil­lion from its bud­get over the next sev­eral years, Inside Defense is report­ing.
But instead of par­ing back its weapons sys­tems or its mas­sive mod­ern­iza­tion efforts, the Army is threat­en­ing to reduce the num­ber of sol­diers in the ser­vice.
In a highly unusual devel­op­ment, the Army has clas­si­fied how it would pay its por­tion of the England-​​directed cuts. However, sources famil­iar with the rec­om­men­da­tion say the ground ser­vice has turned not to its pro­cure­ment accounts to pay its share. Instead, the Army — already stretched thin by cur­rent deploy­ments to Iraq and Afghanistan — is propos­ing reduc­tions to its force struc­ture, these sources said.
Its a gold watch is what it is, said one indus­try offi­cial who believes the Army is fully aware that the Office of the Secretary of Defense would be loath to reduce the size of the ser­vice. Its caus­ing quite some per­tur­ba­tions, said the official.

Share |

November 2nd, 2005 | Money Money Money | 174827 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/11/02/army-threatens-retirements-to-cut-budget/Army+Threatens+Retirements+to+Cut+Budget2005-11-02+22%3A11%3A40dupont You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Stryker Sighting | Iran’s Arsenal for Sale » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. Nicholas Weaver says:
    November 2, 2005 at 6:40 pm

    Go Go Gadget Statue of Liberty Defense.

    Reply
  2. JSAllison says:
    November 3, 2005 at 9:40 am

    This is so trans­par­ent it’s dif­fi­cult to believe that the Rumster will let it fly.

    Reply
  3. Byron Skinner says:
    November 3, 2005 at 1:48 pm

    Don’t count Army noises now. This has already hap­pened. The next step will be RIFing. those who are not in crit­i­cal MOS’s.
    Hurricane Katrina out­ted this prob­lem when the Army couldn’t come up with troops for New Orleans. Most of those Regulars that did finally show up were AR/NG’s that have been acti­vated for Federal Service. Overnight the troop count in Iraq went from 143,000 to 155,000. Hum, a lit­tle mis­count here?
    ALLONS,
    Byron Skinner
    “Stewart’s”

    Reply
  4. Michael D. Elmore says:
    November 3, 2005 at 11:39 pm

    It looks like what I have always said, Some day
    some low tech coun­try with a lot of sol­diers is
    going to kick our ass. We are a coun­try of video
    games and high tech weapons, but we for­get that
    if we want to take and hold ground we need sol­diers. I feel we are play­ing a deadly game by cut­ting sol­diers for weapons, we can’t main­tain our own sol­dier security,protect civil­ians, build the coun­trys infra­stru­ture and seek out ter­ror­ist because we are under strength. I may not be a rock­ett sci­en­tist but I can plain­ley see some of our lead­ers are not either.

    Reply
  5. Joe Larney says:
    November 6, 2005 at 11:56 am

    The FAA just down­sized it’s con­troller work force by lay­ing off 2000 near retire­ment con­trollers by out­sourc­ing a whole option call Flight Service. The cur­rent admin­is­tra­tion cares lit­tle about indi­vid­ual gov­ern­ment employ­ees and more about con­tract­ing out. If they could they would out­source the whole army, shift the costs into con­tracts and say pat them­selves on the back. What chance does a GI have who chose ser­vice over col­lege if they will not be allowed to fin­ish their enlist­ment. Read more at http://​www​.gov​exec​.com under A76.

    Reply
  6. Scott Gilley says:
    November 7, 2005 at 8:50 am

    This is obvi­ously a way to send a strong mes­sage. The mil­i­tary can’t do more with less and hasn’t been able to for some time. The fluff is gone. During a time when we can’t even get armor to our troops until they’ve been in coun­try for a looong time, how can we cut any mod­ern­iza­tion pro­gram. During a time when we don’t have enough troops to meet all of our demands (includ­ing a new role in dis­as­ter relief) how can we cut peo­ple. Congress will pony up the fund­ing even­tu­ally. What’s a few more bil­lion in defecit? Just another bud­get drill…threaten to cut what you can least afford to cut and see what falls out.

    Reply
  7. J. says:
    November 7, 2005 at 12:41 pm

    I just want to know why England is wear­ing Terry Bradshaw’s foot­ball jersey.

    Reply
  8. Dan Jarvis says:
    November 13, 2005 at 2:17 am

    I’m sure the cuts are nec­es­sary at some level of gov­ern­ment expense, but the Military? Is this guy for real? Didn’t the Bush Administration research this guys resume? If President Clinton is listed as a ref­er­ence you might not want to hire him!!!!!!!!!!

    Reply
  9. John Middleton says:
    November 29, 2005 at 8:27 pm

    Army of one.…

    Reply
  10. Capt Tony says:
    December 2, 2005 at 8:11 am

    Ref your com­ments on the new Counter-​​IED equip­ment
    $12000 each!!???!!! that is such a load of you know what! Raytheon is scarf­ing on that one. As a for­mer team sergeant from a jam­ming team, I can tell you that a jam­mer is noth­ing spe­cial — it’s a basic trans­mit­ter that you can build at Radio Shack for prob­a­bly $50, then add the amp and the com­put­er­ized seek and destroy capa­bil­ity — ok you’re up to let’s say $1500 — that’s $10500 profit per unit and Raytheon should be ashamed of itself for rip­ping off sol­diers who could use the money else­where like light mod­u­lar armor for Humvees…and you said 6000 units are being pur­chased… sounds like some General is cov­er­ing his der­riere by say­ing look what we did to sup­port the troops — another Defence con­tract that is a CYA mea­sure and won’t really help the troops.
    By the way — the unit won’t have to trans­mit at 500W like a real jam­mer used in EW. Your aver­age garage opener, home cord­less phone, tv remote etc trans­mit at mili­watts, maybe 5w at most. Do you real­ize a FRS (Family Radio System) can only trans­mit at 1 and 5w, like a marine radio and a CB for that mat­ter. Of course you can tweak them up to maybe 12 to 15, but we’re talk­ing unso­phis­ti­cated IED’s — the elec­tron­ics used to cook them off can be bought at any Home Depot, Kmart etc…
    Do you think it’s worth $12000 a unit??

    Reply
  11. Franz Pietzsch says:
    December 11, 2005 at 11:29 am

    The jam­mers are a great asset, but we are for­get­ting that if you rely on tech­nol­ogy alone and for­get the basics, peo­ple will get killed. The peo­ple build­ing these arent stu­pid. If they can rig a motion detec­tor onto a bomb then maybe we should send our troops some remote con­trolled cars to run past the bombs. Hell, they only cost a few bucks!!

    Reply
  12. Don Martin says:
    December 13, 2005 at 5:51 am

    Improvements in elec­tronic war­fare are great. I just won­der why not go the other way, instead of jam­ming the sig­nals to the IED’s, install radio equip­ment in heli­copters that scan the entire spec­trum of radio fre­quen­cies and det­o­nate the IED’s in their fac­to­ries, deliv­ery vehi­cles and the ones already in place before our troops get there?

    Reply
  13. iro zeny says:
    August 13, 2008 at 7:49 pm

    95 lev­els, to me this had been a friend of the peo­ple around, the new ser­vice first hand the hand of a per­son to man­u­ally 95, it is really dif­fi­cult for my them­selves, but I have been have a lot of iro zeny.

    Reply
  14. buy rupees says:
    August 13, 2008 at 7:52 pm

    Leave for three years, I have quite repeat­edly returned to the Rappelz game. I con­tinue for good equip­ment to buy rupees. Three years of time I have played many games, but no a game can let me real input. By now I have found that the orig­i­nal is the lack of a per­son accom­pa­ny­ing me.

    Reply
  15. rf money says:
    August 13, 2008 at 8:14 pm

    So I know my par­adise Nana, and some friends. Bu then, I added AQQI. And a vari­ety of rea­sons, and the sum­mer of cake, magic rab­bit, blue shocks, such as sev­eral friends built a new coun­cil: Return of the King. And I rec­og­nized the beier­tuo broth­er­hood. As the help of this friends and will help in grow­ing, and this time sheikhs left the group B, the new pres­i­dent rose, lead us to defend the B group. We Society of Friends also actively par­tic­i­pated in the mine war­fare, win­ning glory for the fam­ily. Later, because a num­ber of rea­sons I left the RF. And I took my all RF money send my friends.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

By commenting on this topic you agree to the terms and conditions of our User Agreement

    Today's Hottest Topics
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • BREAK-BREAK: Units to Get New Camo Revealed
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    Recent Comments
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
      They are going to have to look at the whole...
      Wembley
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      Just look at this " picture " for a moment. The...
      Zandor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      I know LOSAT seemed awesome but wasn't it cancelled? I...
      JimboJones
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
      Yes you're quite right, I get to witness...
      JimboJones
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
      I'm disappointed. When are they going to make clothes...
      Nadnerbus
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part II : * USMC attempts to make a single seat (no...
      freefallingbomb
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
      Part I : I think we're not the only ones on the...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part III : Guided missiles will also be programmed to...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part II : If a tank shoots at another tank at only 5...
      freefallingbomb
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
      Part I : To the poster "Will" : You wrote:...
      freefallingbomb
    Recent Articles
    • Army Launches Examination of Armor Testing
    • New Camo Pattern on the Block
    • BAE to Market Mantis UAV to North America
    • Pinnacle’s New Armor
    • Zapping Drones from a Truck
    • Northrop Invests Own Money In Fire Scout
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Super Cavitation and the Truth
    • Mantis Begins Search For Prey
    Recent Hot Topics
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • The Osprey has Landed
    • UPDATED: Details on Army's New Afghanistan Duds
    • VTOL JSF Arrives at Pax River
    • Iraq Cyber Attack and the DigiSEALs
    • Pinnacle's New Armor
    • (Proof) The Osprey Has Landed
    • Grim Wanat Footage
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    • IMINT: French Fashion Mavens Model MultiCam
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage