Still no comments, people. But otherwise, we’re back in business.
* Behind the IED economy
* Secrecy jargon, decoded
* Body armor recalled
* Anti-missile at sea: bullseye (background here)
* EOD, intel recruits MIA
* Tehran: sat is for spying
* Auto-translator in warzone test
* ChoicePoint Intelligence Agency?
* $1.3 bil for missile-watching blimps
* Spooks on UFOs: Shhhh!
(Big ups: JQP, Russ)
November 18th, 2005 | Rapid Fire | 47742 Commentshttp%3A%2F%2Fdefensetech.org%2F2005%2F11%2F18%2Frapid-fire-111805%2FRapid+Fire+11%2F18%2F052005-11-18+12%3A50%3A27noahmaxhttp%3A%2F%2Fdeftech.usmilblog.com%2F2005%2F11%2F18%2Frapid-fire-111805%2F
Previous post: Small Arms in Iraq: What Worked, What Sucked What a Hoax?
Next post: “Climax” for Los Alamos Fight
Defense Tech examines the intersection of technology and defense from every angle and provides analysis on what’s ahead.
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
Good Morning Noah,
Just a though or three here Noah. On your IED story where is the money comming from?
Lets see stories in the news as of late $3.5 Billion in Iraqi rebuilding funds is unaccounted for, contractor takes and gives bribes, contractor has prision record.
No pipe line blown up in a while, business is getting back to as usual on the Iraqi street, IED ambushes of civilian transport down.
Iraqi insurgents seem to be well funded, al Qaeda request money form al Zarqawi.
Could any of this be commected?
Could the new found source of money to the insurgents be none other the us.
Naw, it could never happen. Not with the Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld team running things.
ALLONS,
Byron Skinner