DefenseTech Military.com
  • Categories
  • Full Archives
  • Monthly Archives
  • About Defense Tech
Subscribe to RSS

About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Categories

  • 'Canes
  • Afghan Update
  • Ammo and Munitions
  • Armor
  • Around the Globe
  • Av Week Extra
  • Axe in Iraq (and Elsewhere)
  • Bizarro
  • Blimps
  • Blog Bidness
  • Body Armor Blues
  • Bomb Squad
  • Brownshoes in Action
  • Bubbleheads, etc.
  • Cammo Green
  • Catch the "Buzz"
  • Chem-Bio
  • Civilian Apps
  • Cloak and Dagger
  • Commandos
  • Comms
  • Contingency Ops
  • Cops and Robbers
  • Cyber-warfare
  • Data Diving
  • Defense Tech Poll
  • Defense Tech Radio
  • Dissent Tech
  • Door Kickers
  • Drones
  • DT Administrivia
  • Eat DT's Dust
  • Extra! Extra!
  • Eye on China
  • Fast Movers
  • FCS Watch
  • Fire for Effect
  • FOS Files
  • Friday Funnies
  • Gadgets and Gear
  • Going Green
  • Grand Ole Osprey
  • Ground Vehicles
  • Guns
  • Homeland Security
  • In the Weeds with Eric
  • Info War
  • Iraq Diary
  • Jarhead Jazz
  • JSF Watch
  • Just War Theories
  • Lasers and Ray Guns
  • Less-lethal
  • Logistics
  • Los Alamos and Labs
  • M4 Monopoly
  • Medic!
  • Mercs
  • Missiles
  • Money Money Money
  • Most Wanted
  • MRAP Edge
  • Net-Centric
  • Nukes
  • Old Skool
  • Our Shrinking Planet
  • Planes, Copters, Blimps
  • Podcast
  • Politricks
  • Polmar's Perspective
  • Popular Mechanics
  • Rapid Fire
  • Raptor Watch
  • Red Team
  • Retro-Futuro
  • Robots
  • Roll Your Own
  • Sabra Tech
  • Ships and Subs
  • Snipertech
  • Soldier Systems
  • Space
  • Special Ops
  • Star Wars
  • Strategery
  • Stray Trons
  • Tactical Development
  • Terror Tech
  • The Deadlies
  • The Defense Biz
  • The Peoples' Site
  • The Sunday Paper
  • The Tanker Tango
  • The View from Av Week
  • Those Nutty Norks
  • Training and Sims
  • Trimble on the Case
  • Uncategorized
  • Video Lounge
  • War Update
  • Ward'z Wonderz
  • You can run…

Archives

  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003
  • February 2003
  • January 2003

Home » Strategery » Limelight for Pentagon Withdrawal Plan

Limelight for Pentagon Withdrawal Plan

A week ago, this blog picked up on some­thing the big media had all-​​but-​​ignored: a Pentagon plan to draw the num­ber of U.S. troops down to about 92,000 by the end of next year.
casey_talk.jpg“I would think that the fact that the DOD announced we were low­er­ing the num­ber of troops in Iraq for 2006 would be huge news, but no one seems to care,” the site’s author, Pierce Wetter, e-​​mailed me.
That was before Rep. John Murtha’s call to bring the troops home. Now, sud­denly, with­drawal plans are all the rage. Especially ones “drafted by Gen. John Abizaid and Gen. George Casey, the two top U.S. com­man­ders of the war,” as NBC notes.

If Iraqi elec­tions are suc­cess­ful in December and a new par­lia­ment seated by January, with­drawal could begin almost imme­di­ately. Military offi­cials say it would be an incre­men­tal or phased with­drawal begin­ning slowly at first, with one or two bat­tal­ions up to 2,000 troops at a time.
Entire bat­tal­ions of sol­diers and Marines, now sched­uled for duty in Iraq next year, would also be told they don’t have to go. Some American troops would be placed on tem­po­rary standby in neigh­bor­ing Kuwait ready to respond, if needed, to any major out­breaks of vio­lence in Iraq.

THERE’S MORE: In the com­ments, Murdoc says the 92K num­ber doesn’t include Marines… And “Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, address­ing the renewed debate over American troops in Iraq, said today that any par­ing down of the forces there would depend on mil­i­tary and secu­rity con­di­tions, and that cur­rent troop lev­els must be main­tained at least until the December elec­tions in Iraq,” accord­ing to the Times.
AND MORE: John Robb, as usual, has smart things to say about this. Particularly, about the nat­ural consequence(s) of the iso­la­tion of US deci­sion mak­ers from the exter­nal ref­er­ence envi­ron­ment. Instead of mak­ing con­nec­tions, we sev­ered them,” he writes.

This iso­la­tion… drove: Bad deci­sion mak­ing. The will­ing­ness to accept flawed intel­li­gence on Iraq’s WMD capa­bil­i­ties. The fail­ure to stop the loot­ing after the inva­sion. The deci­sion to dis­band the Iraqi mil­i­tary. The fail­ure to send enough troops.
Ad hoc plan­ning and strat­egy devel­op­ment. The lack of a plan to win the peace in the Iraq. The plethora of dif­fer­ent mil­i­tary plans since then: build Sunni mili­tias (Fallujah), sta­bil­ity for elec­tions and a polit­i­cal solu­tions, aggres­sive counter-​​insurgent sweeps, clear-​​and-​​hold (oil-​​spots), etc. 

Share |

November 19th, 2005 | Strategery, War Update | 477893 Comments »http://defensetech.org/2005/11/19/limelight-for-pentagon-withdrawal-plan/Limelight+for+Pentagon+Withdrawal+Plan2005-11-19+18%3A37%3A36noahmax You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

« « Comments are Back On… | Old is the New New » »

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

  1. dan says:
    November 19, 2005 at 4:14 pm

    I think that the 2 oper­a­tive words in the report are “if” and “could”. There were troop draw­downs, IIRC, in early 2004, when the US troop com­ple­ment briefly touched 105,000; there are cur­rently about 150,000 deployed.
    And what would count as a “major” out­break of vio­lence? It strikes me that there are major out­breaks on a near daily basis already.

    Reply
  2. Shep_UK says:
    November 20, 2005 at 8:03 am

    er, its blind­ingly obvi­ous why this was not reported — because its very good news! Yes its that sim­ple cur­rent left­ist main­stream media only want you to think ‘quag­mire’ about iraq and the end is nigh. Hence this news story just dosn’t fit with what they want you to beleive.

    Reply
  3. atroll says:
    November 20, 2005 at 10:03 am

    > Hence this news story just dosn’t fit with
    > what they want you to beleive.
    Anyone who thinks the vul­tures aren’t already cir­cling Iraq, at this very moment, is sadly mis­taken.
    It may not be a quag­mire in quite the same way the Vietnam was and there may be no decern­able ho-​​chi-​​minh trail, but the real­ity is that the US had done noth­ing but has­ten the estab­lish­ment of an Islamic theoc­racy… this is *NOT* good news.
    The num­ber one indi­ca­tor, that things are really going south, will be if the exit plan trims troop lev­els every­where but loca­tions with easy exit plans (a la Siagon). Those loca­tions are the boarder with Jordan, Turkey and Kuwait. Hell, I bet Iran would even offer safe tran­sit for any troops/​contractors leav­ing Iraq at the last pos­si­ble moment. The only notable excep­tion would be Bagdad, which can’t be ignored… all eyes will be look­ing there for a good old fash­ion Siagon like flee­ing. If that’s the last note that the cur­rent admin­is­tra­tion goes out on, I think *every­one* can count on lots of changes hap­pen­ing very quickly in lots of places.
    In short, I don’t think it would be pos­si­ble to prop up the cur­rent paper tigers cur­rently masqerad­ing as Iraqi “secu­rity forces” long enough for a non-​​run-​​for-​​your-​​life type of withdrawal.

    Reply
  4. David Axe says:
    November 20, 2005 at 3:28 pm

    We’ve heard these kinds of reports before. I’ll believe a large-​​scale with­drawal of troops when I see it.

    Reply
  5. C-Low says:
    November 20, 2005 at 5:22 pm

    The Theocracy Iran proxy stuff is BS although if we pull our sup­port will hap­pen. Iran pre-​​mullahs were staunch US allies and they were Shia and they were Muslim. The Iraqi Shia over­whelm­ingly deny a Iran style Mullacracy short Sadr that is a small por­tion of fol­low­ers. The thing peo­ple point to in the Iraqi con­sti­tu­tion that they say is Teocracy proof is the part were it says its based on Islam which I would say sounds more like a wise move to avoid the prob­lem we are hav­ing today, our con­sti­tu­tion was based on chris­tian­ity, reli­gion is not bad reli­gion is a good thing but just like every­thing else bad peo­ple can turn it into a really bad thing. The pro­tec­tion of minori­ties and reli­gious free­dom is also writ­ten in so its not one way only just stat­ing the obvi­ous that if a group of mus­lims write a con­sti­tu­tion it will propably be heav­ily influ­enced by Islam. If we pull out early they will be forced into the Iranian arms and the fears will be reality.

    Reply
  6. Aaron says:
    November 21, 2005 at 4:08 am

    Once more we here the right’s dreams about how we’re build­ing an Iraqi army. is there any­thing other then US pro­nounce­ments on the sub­ject to let us know that this is actu­ally hap­pen­ing? that some large com­bat capa­ble force actu­ally exists?
    Yknow, other then the decep­ti­con admin­is­tra­tions pro­nouce­ments on this subject…

    Reply
  7. Stormhawk says:
    November 21, 2005 at 8:30 am

    Punctuation aside, C-​​Low does make some good points. As to Aaron’s com­ments, I would refer him to the infor­ma­tion com­ing out from the men and women on the ground in the region. Their words can be seen at Military​.com.
    A fur­ther indi­ca­tion of the com­ing sta­bil­ity is the invest money now com­ing into Iraq from Western sources and the Pacific Rim. There is also a story of a car bomb­ing in Iraq being foiled by a neigh­bor­hood watch. A neigh­bor­hood watch, in Iraq. Can you get more nor­mal­ized!
    People are real­iz­ing that for the first time in their lives, they can speak their minds and have it mean some­thing as well. Every protest march they make, every demon­stra­tion is not a neg­a­tive, it is a nail in the cof­fin of the ter­ror­ists. Now the peo­ple have begun to real­ize that they’ve been lied to, not by Bush, but by the mul­lahs, by the ter­ror­ists, by the left over Baathists, and they are doing some­thing about it.
    In Jordan, we had a pop­ulist demon­stra­tion against the ter­ror­ists (boy, did they strike at the wrong tar­get). Then with their lame excuse that the wed­ding was a cover for a an Israeli Mossad meet­ing and threat­en­ing the royal fam­ily, well, stick a fork in them, they’re done.
    Top this all off with fact that the host nations of the ter­ror­ists are begin­ning to come around to the notion that a proxy war is not as cost effec­tive as they first thought and you have a sit­u­a­tion that I wouldn’y call a los­ing one for our side.
    By the way, the infor­ma­tion and opin­ions I have stated here were not drawn from US news sources, with the excep­tion of Military​.com, rather they are taken from over­seas news sources and by my speak­ing with co-​​workers who are Iraqi and still work­ing here as they pass along to me what their rel­a­tives over there are say­ing and doing.
    I am also reminded from what my father told me of WWII, about weak spined peo­ple who lacked the will to win, who were fright­ened by the Nazis and the Shogunate, who said we couldn’t win then either. True, we had some dark days but, in the end, we pre­vailed. And we can and will pre­vail here if we ignore the coun­sel of cow­ardice, of fear, and of the weak of resolve.

    Reply
  8. dan says:
    November 21, 2005 at 10:22 am

    C-Low’s capac­ity to rewrite recent his­tory is quite star­tling. The Shah’s regime was staunchly pro-​​US, mainly because the Western pow­ers engi­neered the coup that returned him to absolute power, and for the next 25 years were instru­men­tal in main­tain­ing him in his posi­tion. The Iranian rev­o­lu­tion, if I remem­ber cor­rectly, was both pop­u­lar and extremely anti-​​American; it led to the down­fall of Carter — Mossadeq’s revenge as it were. Most Iranians are capa­ble of dis­tin­guish­ing between the US peo­ple and the US gov­ern­ment — they like the for­mer but are sus­pi­cious of the hege­monic record of the lat­ter; the par­al­lel sit­u­a­tion obtains with regards to America.
    As regards Sadr — I’m not aware that he sub­scribes to the Khomeinist posi­tion regard­ing the guardian­ship of the cler­ics; cer­tainly his object of emu­la­tion, before he was dis­owned by him, was one of the dis­si­dent Iranian cler­ics in this regard. However, that does not alter the fact that the default gov­ern­ment in Iraq will be dom­i­nated by reli­gious Shia par­ties that intend to insti­tute some form of Islamic gov­er­nance; it’s also notice­able that since Jafaari came to office that Iraq has signed a non-​​aggression pact with Iran, an eco­nomic coop­er­a­tion pact, and on Friday, a mutual secu­rity coop­er­a­tion agree­ment. I doubt that this goes down well with the neo­cons in Washington, who find them­selves in the awk­ward posi­tion of com­bat­ting a Sunni insur­gency for the ben­e­fit of Teheran-​​allied fac­tions in Iraq; it just wasn’t sup­posed to work out like that.
    As regards the bal­ance sheet — well to date OIF and OEF have lead to the deaths of at least 2350 US troops, plus an unknown num­ber of black-​​ops per­son­nel, plus well in excess of 100 US civil­ian con­trac­tors, plus some 250 allied troops and tens of thou­sands of Iraqi civil­ians; not to men­tion the vast num­bers of seri­ously injured, med­ically dis­abled and psy­chi­cally scarred vet­er­ans that this war is leav­ing in its wake. At the cur­rent rate the num­ber of US military/​contractor dead that sur­passes the vic­tims of 9/​11 will be reached by this time next year.
    Quite why you think that Iraqis who are cur­rently fight­ing the US mil­i­tary were ever likely can­di­dates for turn­ing up in the US to blow up churches and shop­ping malls escapes me; Iraq has how­ever clearly inspired a new gen­er­a­tion to blow up trains and buses in London and Madrid. It is unde­ni­able, how­ever, that the inva­sion and occu­pa­tion of Iraq has proved to be the gift that keeps on giv­ing as far as Jihadi recruit­ment is con­cerned — and if your fig­ure of 20% is to be believed, then we’re talk­ing about hav­ing to deal with some 120 mil­lion male Islamic extrem­ists glob­ally; thank­fully I know when peo­ple are just mak­ing shit up.
    This could have been avoided if the Bush admin­is­tra­tion had not piggy-​​backed a long-​​cherished strate­gic agenda on top of the 9/​11 tragedy; the foren­sic dis­man­tling of AQ would have been far eas­ier to accom­plish if the strat­egy for Afghanistan had been cor­rect, and there had been a sig­nif­i­cant US force on the ground at Tora Bora to actu­ally capture/​kill OBL and AAZ and their associates.

    Reply
  9. Pierce Wetter says:
    November 21, 2005 at 10:59 am

    Hmmm… No Marines? That’s true.
    Though some of the Marines there now were already part of OIF-​​4.
    As for not draw­ing down troops until after December, my under­stand­ing of the rota­tion plan is that we have a tem­po­rary “bump” from Oct-​​December from over­lap­ping the rota­tion plan, so there’s kind of a planned reduc­tion in January:
    http://​www​.opin​ion​at​ed​bas​tard​.com/​a​r​c​h​i​v​e​s​/​0​0​0​6​2​6​.​h​tml

    Reply
  10. jonik says:
    June 27, 2007 at 9:56 am

    cool site!

    Reply
  11. ankara nakliyat says:
    May 4, 2008 at 10:08 am

    good points.

    Reply
  12. ken says:
    July 27, 2008 at 10:29 am

    ??????? ?????
    ????????? ??????????
    ??????? ?????????
    ???????? BB????
    ?????? ???????/​????????
    ?????????????????? ????????????????
    ?????????????????? ?????????????
    ????????? ?????
    ????? BB????
    ????????????? ????????
    ????? ????????
    ????? ?????????
    ?????????? ?????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ?????
    ????? ???????
    ??????????? ?????
    ??????????? ????
    ??????????? ????
    ???? ????????
    ??????? ????????????????????.JP
    ????????????????.com
    ???????????????
    ?????? ??????
    ????? ??????????
    ????????????????/​?????????????
    ??? ????E???
    ???? BB????
    yahoo????????? ????
    ???????? ????????
    ????????? ???
    ???????????????? ????????
    ?????/?????DVD??????????etc BB????
    ??????????????????????????????????etc
    ???????????????????????? ??????
    ???????? ??????
    ??????? ???????
    ????? ?????
    ???? ??????????????
    ????????????????????
    ????????/​???????
    ?????????????
    ????????????E
    ???????????
    ????[ARA+DHA] ????[ARA+DHA]
    ??????????????
    ?????[??????Q10]??????
    ?? ?????? ??
    ?? ??
    ??????[??????????]
    ???? ?????
    ?????[diet’s]
    ???? ??????
    ????? ????
    ??? ????????? ??
    ???????????? ??400
    ????? ??????
    ????????????
    ???????????????
    ??????
    ?????? ? ???????
    ??????????????????????????
    ???????????
    ?????????????
    ???????????????????????
    ?????????? ???
    ?????????????????
    ???????????/​????????? ?????????
    ???????????????????

    Reply
  13. buy Hellgate Palladium says:
    August 1, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    Hellgate London, I played this game for four years, let me give up, I can not do. It is part of my life, although not for the life of all the games, over the past few years it has accounted for the major­ity of my space time, I find the time in ama­teur to own one of the sky, when I bored on it. In the game I spent a lot of money to buy Hellgate Palladium. And I bought my favorite things. I see a faith­fully accom­pany so many times through the friends and feel good when friends come to chat on a sin­gle share their hap­pi­ness, and feel very sat­is­fac­tory thing.

    Reply
  14. Pirates of the Burning Sea Gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 8:44 pm

    Fencing: in this game, play­ers have to learn how to actively Pinqiang for

    Reply
  15. potbs gold says:
    August 4, 2008 at 8:45 pm

    Ability to con­trol the sit­u­a­tion on whether the ini­tia­tive has become a yard­stick by. You can also buy potbs gold prove it. The game itself and its audi­ence is not a direct rival between the tug-​​of-​​war con­tests, game aims to want to show the clas­sic fenc­ing in the occu­pied upper hand skills.

    Reply
  16. 12sky money says:
    August 5, 2008 at 8:59 pm

    Players will 12sky money expe­ri­ence the 9-​​Tier Pagoda three times a week at a spec­i­fied time.

    Reply
  17. ??? says:
    August 7, 2008 at 3:57 am

    And what would count as a “major” out­break of vio­lence? It strikes me that there are major out­breaks on a near daily basis already.

    Reply
  18. Silkroad gold says:
    August 7, 2008 at 7:46 pm

    I only have quest from level 7–15. All quest of Silkroad gold are one time only unless oth­er­wise specified.

    Reply
  19. Requiem Lant says:
    August 7, 2008 at 8:10 pm

    Now I talk about some­thing about the Avenging Angel Preview of Requiem Lant.

    Reply
  20. buy 2moons dil says:
    August 11, 2008 at 8:55 pm

    do not because in order to buy 2moons dil then affray, it will affect other play­ers mood, all peo­ple play the game all hope can get the happy, so I really hope that all peo­ple can change their mood, staid­ness deal with the game.

    Reply
  21. dofus gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 8:58 pm

    although now I have enough dofus gold, but all things were changed, if in the game only have myself, then I think I will leave too.

    Reply
  22. cheap eve isk says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:00 pm

    Of course, if you want more real­ize EVE, a novice tuto­r­ial is a good choice too. So more and more peo­ple search which place can buy the cheap eve isk.

    Reply
  23. buy flyff penya says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:06 pm

    in order let the BB belong to myself I can spend many money to buy flyff penya, I can do not have lunch and sleep. Play the game can look the peo­ple diathe­sis, but I only know that we will not attack unless we are attacked; if we are attacked, we will cer­tainly coun­ter­at­tack. This is my principles.

    Reply
  24. cheap cronous cro says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:09 pm

    Please wait for me a moment I will return the Cronous, because I really can not for­get you, with my regret and the cheap cro­nous cro, I will come back.

    Reply
  25. Archlord cheap says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:10 pm

    Do not because Archlord cheap than ignore your favorite, If you ignore your favorite, you will regret a life­time. In the end I hope that we will not hurt the parents

    Reply
  26. buy fiesta Gold says:
    August 11, 2008 at 9:15 pm

    we often together to play, this feel­ing was very good, some­time we chat­ted, but we often have a same topic, that is how to buy fiesta Gold, every time we were very happy.

    Reply
  27. lastchaos gold. says:
    August 25, 2008 at 10:05 pm

    Facing death, I already was numb. At that time, I played this game fre­quently in sixth region. At that time also was oth­ers leaded me to pro­mote, his rank com­pared to mine high. He taught me many mat­ters and how to make the lastchaos gold

    Reply
  28. xsg2xdg@126.com says:
    August 29, 2008 at 3:15 am

    In short, I don’t think it would be pos­si­ble to prop up the cur­rent paper tigers cur­rently masqerad­ing as Iraqi “secu­rity forces” long enough for a non-​​run-​​for-​​your-​​life type of withdrawal

    Reply
  29. xsg2xdg@126.com says:
    August 29, 2008 at 3:18 am

    In short, I don’t think it would be pos­si­ble to prop up the cur­rent paper tigers cur­rently masqerad­ing as Iraqi “secu­rity forces” long enough for a non-​​run-​​for-​​your-​​life type of withdrawal

    Reply
  30. xsg2xdg@126.com says:
    August 29, 2008 at 3:19 am

    In short, I don’t think it would be pos­si­ble to prop up the cur­rent paper tigers cur­rently masqerad­ing as Iraqi “secu­rity forces” long enough for a non-​​run-​​for-​​your-​​life type of withdrawal

    Reply
  31. cabal gold says:
    September 1, 2008 at 2:41 am

    A game player who can earn a lot of cabal gold will be loved by many isomerisms.

    Reply
  32. linden dollars says:
    September 5, 2008 at 12:01 am

    My friends played very happy, but the time is very short, one day, he came my home again and told me that the lin­den dol­lars I gave him were used up.

    Reply
  33. ??? says:
    February 19, 2009 at 9:56 pm

    ???you love life?????????????100?????????????? -????????-??????????????????????????????????????????class??????????????happy line??????????????????????-007?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????

    Reply
  34. ??? says:
    March 1, 2009 at 8:42 pm

    ???you love life?????????????100?????????????? -????????-??????????????????????????????????????????class??????????????happy line??????????????????????-007?????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????

    Reply
  35. GHD Straighteners says:
    September 20, 2009 at 4:31 am

    buy cheap nokia n95 expe­ri­ence with­out nokia mobile learn­ing is bet­ter than learn­ing with­out excperi-​​ence. I have nokia 6300 but one lamp wait which my feet are guided; and that bose head­phones is the lamp of expe­ri­ence. I know of no way of judg­ing of the future but by the apple touch past. http://​www​.lead​soft​store​.com/

    Reply
  36. QuyBN says:
    September 28, 2009 at 4:30 am

    ??
    ????
    ??
    ???? ??
    ????
    ??????
    ?? ??????
    ???
    ???
    ????
    ???? ?????
    ?
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ?? ??????
    ??? ??????
    ?? ??????
    sod
    ???
    ???? ???
    ?? ????? ?????
    ????
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ?DVD
    ?DVD
    ?? ??
    ?? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ??
    ???? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????
    ??? ????

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

    Most Popular Posts
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Marines Quiet About Brutal New Weapon
    • Starship Troopers Meets G.I. Joe
    • Dowd's Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Adapting Women to Subs
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Semi-auto Grenade Thrower
    • Keep it Simple
    • Mystery Drone Revealed
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
    Recent Comments
    • Special Forces Say ‘No’ to M4 Barrel
      The first priority is to get a reliable...
      Brian
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      I've seen them to. Believe me, I hate those 19 just as much as...
      DualityOfMan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      You are funny.
      Zandor
    • Adapting Women to Subs
      Wow after reading these varied comments, I am surprised and educated. I...
      John
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      No one is saying that christains never do violent things we do all faiths...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      Hey look its zandor trying to make people think this is a hate site or...
      Valcan
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      It is sort of puzzeling that a room filled with highly trained US Army...
      Zandor
    • Keep it Simple
      Dear Big Daddy; Your last post is a laugh. You carried 100 lbs for 20 miles?...
      Zandor
    • Fort Hood Rampage
      All the Muslims in the USA should be immediately rounded up and shot. We...
      Zandor
    • REPLACEMENT ARM, GOOD AS NEW
      Yeah, and every president since Reagan has proposed a Mars...
      jmatt
    Recent Articles
    • Semi-​​auto Grenade Thrower
    • Market for Acoustic Defense Systems Heats Up
    • Fort Hood Rampage
    • Keep it Simple
    • Airbag Defense
    • Dowd’s Bogus Grief Deficit
    • Did Someone Move the Furniture Around?
    • Lockheed Says Sbirs Still on Track For 2010
    • What Does this Handle Do?
    • Adapting Women to Subs
  • Channels: Military.com | Military Benefits | Military News | Off Duty | Join the Military | Military Education | Veteran Jobs | Military Money | Military Deals | Military Family | Military Community
  • Military.com Network: Military.com | MilBlogging | Defense Tech | DoD Buzz | SpouseBuzz | Fred's Place | GI Bill Express
  • Services: Army | Navy | Air Force | Marine Corps | Coast Guard | National Guard | Military Spouse
  • About Military.com About Us | Advertise With Us | Press | Affiliate Program | Monster Network | Help | Feedback | Privacy Policy | User Agreement | © 2009 Military Advantage