<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Rapid Fire 11/21/05</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:38:08 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Requiem money</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117815</link> <dc:creator>Requiem money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:46:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117815</guid> <description>Angels as we know them soft, cherubic heralds of Valentine&#039;s Day do not exist in Requiem money: Avenging Angel. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Angels as we know them soft, cherubic heralds of Valentine’s Day do not exist in Requiem money: Avenging Angel.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tibia money</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-41162</link> <dc:creator>Tibia money</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 01:46:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-41162</guid> <description>The following benefits are available to Tibia money players: </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The following benefits are available to Tibia money players:</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: http://www.buyageofconan.com</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117814</link> <dc:creator>http://www.buyageofconan.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 04:40:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117814</guid> <description>Buycheap aoc gold , Therefore we&#039;ve been mindful from the outset to create a world which is true to Howard&#039;s writing. There is majesty in Hyboria but it&#039;s of a monolithic, brutal and primitive kind - it certainly isn&#039;t &quot;high fairie&quot; where everything appears as though it was built only yesterday and is devoid of context.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buycheap aoc gold , Therefore we’ve been mindful from the outset to create a world which is true to Howard’s writing. There is majesty in Hyboria but it’s of a monolithic, brutal and primitive kind — it certainly isn’t “high fairie” where everything appears as though it was built only yesterday and is devoid of context.”</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: buy LOTRO Gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117810</link> <dc:creator>buy LOTRO Gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:48:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117810</guid> <description>As usual, there are games to task; of course, this is no exception, because this can be upgraded! Thus the results and get more money! Of course, you can also buy LOTRO Gold! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, there are games to task; of course, this is no exception, because this can be upgraded! Thus the results and get more money! Of course, you can also buy LOTRO Gold!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Requiem gold</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117809</link> <dc:creator>Requiem gold</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:48:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117809</guid> <description>My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My friends in order to help me, send me much Requiem gold, I was very thank him</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jishnu</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-41152</link> <dc:creator>Jishnu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 09:44:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-41152</guid> <description>Wait till the Bisons perform perform with AWACS. Fast interceptions at BVR by superior numbers of these cheaper planes maintaining radar silence themselves will drop anything without being discovered at all. Just why do you think the Stealth programme is being associated with the Bisons !! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait till the Bisons perform perform with AWACS. Fast interceptions at BVR by superior numbers of these cheaper planes maintaining radar silence themselves will drop anything without being discovered at all. Just why do you think the Stealth programme is being associated with the Bisons !!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dfens</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117805</link> <dc:creator>Dfens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 02:00:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117805</guid> <description>You think it is some ECM trick that makes the MiG-29 and Su-27 hot?  Have you ever wondered why the SR-71, F-14, and Boeings Transonic Cruiser all share a similar layout?  Then look at that MiG and Su, and see if you notice any similarities.  You can always add new avionics and displays to an airplane.  If the design of the airplane sucks, however, rarely can that be fixed, even if you change every part on it (F/A-18E/F).  And the MiG-21, it&#039;s just little, quick, and plentiful.  No secret there. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You think it is some ECM trick that makes the MiG-29 and Su-27 hot?  Have you ever wondered why the SR-71, F-14, and Boeings Transonic Cruiser all share a similar layout?  Then look at that MiG and Su, and see if you notice any similarities.  You can always add new avionics and displays to an airplane.  If the design of the airplane sucks, however, rarely can that be fixed, even if you change every part on it (F/A-18E/F).  And the MiG-21, it’s just little, quick, and plentiful.  No secret there.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Sven Ortmann</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117804</link> <dc:creator>Sven Ortmann</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 00:21:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117804</guid> <description>@Cernig
I don&#039;t care who wrote that &quot;F-15 Tomcat&quot;.
It just points out that there was some less-than-well-informed guy involved in the creation fo the story, no matter at which stage.
And for already mentioned political reasons (F22 justification), I don&#039;t care a lot about the results at all. Even if the U.S. pilots had lost 1:10 in 1on1, it would not mean much.
Learning about HOW some pilots in modern Suchois defeat western fighters (and F-15/16 aren&#039;t new at all, both in their basic design years older than the MiG-29 and Su-27). Learning about so far unknown tactical details would be great.
Some ECM trick, not so obvious engine handling characteristics, probably superior anti-G equipment...whatever. If there are identifiable reasons for superiority or competitiveness that are unknown to the interested public so far, it would be interesting news. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Cernig<br
/> I don’t care who wrote that “F-15 Tomcat”.<br
/> It just points out that there was some less-than-well-informed guy involved in the creation fo the story, no matter at which stage.<br
/> And for already mentioned political reasons (F22 justification), I don’t care a lot about the results at all. Even if the U.S. pilots had lost 1:10 in 1on1, it would not mean much.<br
/> Learning about HOW some pilots in modern Suchois defeat western fighters (and F-15/16 aren’t new at all, both in their basic design years older than the MiG-29 and Su-27). Learning about so far unknown tactical details would be great.<br
/> Some ECM trick, not so obvious engine handling characteristics, probably superior anti-G equipment…whatever. If there are identifiable reasons for superiority or competitiveness that are unknown to the interested public so far, it would be interesting news.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dfens</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117803</link> <dc:creator>Dfens</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 23:15:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117803</guid> <description>The whining about being out numbered just blows me away.  Out numbered by fighters costing a fraction of what an F-15 costs, go figure.  Here&#039;s an intelligence flash for the USAF, we don&#039;t have as many fighters as Russia or the Chinese.  If you&#039;re going to be successful against non-3rd world countries, maybe it&#039;s time you quit the whining and got busy figuring out what you&#039;re going to do when you are.  And as for the whole, &quot;they were just dogging it&quot; thing, I&#039;ve let people win at racquetball before, but they didn&#039;t beat me 21 to 2.  Mr. Cernig appropriately brings up that this time Lockmart is very interested in selling F-16s to the IAF, and they are unlikely to attract their business by losing.
As for the idea of building small, cheap, air defense fighters for the USAF, now there&#039;s someone who is thinking!  As I recall, the USAF didn&#039;t do a bang up job protecting either New York or Washington DC from the last air attack (9/11/01).  Now that they&#039;ve closed a whole bunch more bases, I doubt they&#039;ll do any better against the next attack.  I don&#039;t know about you, but I&#039;d feel a lot better knowing my country was defended by a bunch of little planes than by a few of these monuments to the fighter pilot ego. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whining about being out numbered just blows me away.  Out numbered by fighters costing a fraction of what an F-15 costs, go figure.  Here’s an intelligence flash for the USAF, we don’t have as many fighters as Russia or the Chinese.  If you’re going to be successful against non-3rd world countries, maybe it’s time you quit the whining and got busy figuring out what you’re going to do when you are.  And as for the whole, “they were just dogging it” thing, I’ve let people win at racquetball before, but they didn’t beat me 21 to 2.  Mr. Cernig appropriately brings up that this time Lockmart is very interested in selling F-16s to the IAF, and they are unlikely to attract their business by losing.<br
/> As for the idea of building small, cheap, air defense fighters for the USAF, now there’s someone who is thinking!  As I recall, the USAF didn’t do a bang up job protecting either New York or Washington DC from the last air attack (9/11/01).  Now that they’ve closed a whole bunch more bases, I doubt they’ll do any better against the next attack.  I don’t know about you, but I’d feel a lot better knowing my country was defended by a bunch of little planes than by a few of these monuments to the fighter pilot ego.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Edward Liu</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/11/21/rapid-fire-112105/comment-page-1/#comment-117802</link> <dc:creator>Edward Liu</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 17:01:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2916#comment-117802</guid> <description>I was going to suggest that the USAF grab a few Indian Air Force pilots and find out how they managed to outfly F-15&#039;s and F-16&#039;s in far less technologically advanced aircraft. My assumption is that we could either adapt those same techniques into something truly devastating in a more advanced aircraft, or use them to justify going in the exact OPPOSITE direction of the F/A-22 and go for cheaper airframes in quantity with better-trained pilots over hugely expensive technological terrors in small numbers.
After browsing this comment thread, though, I like Dfens&#039; suggestion of outsourcing air defense to India better, if only because it&#039;s funnier. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to suggest that the USAF grab a few Indian Air Force pilots and find out how they managed to outfly F-15’s and F-16’s in far less technologically advanced aircraft. My assumption is that we could either adapt those same techniques into something truly devastating in a more advanced aircraft, or use them to justify going in the exact OPPOSITE direction of the F/A-22 and go for cheaper airframes in quantity with better-trained pilots over hugely expensive technological terrors in small numbers.<br
/> After browsing this comment thread, though, I like Dfens’ suggestion of outsourcing air defense to India better, if only because it’s funnier.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/25 queries in 0.014 seconds using apc

Served from: unknown.dal.cologlobal.com @ 2010-03-20 17:09:17 -->