About Defense Tech

Defense Tech exam­ines the inter­sec­tion of tech­nol­ogy and defense from every angle and pro­vides analy­sis on what’s ahead.

Tip Us Off

Tip for Defense Tech?

SEND IT!

It’s Confidential!

Archive for December, 2005

Four Star Blogger

Saturday, December 31st, 2005

During his talk at the IFPA “New Triad” Conference, General James “Hoss” Cartwright men­tioned his blog.
cartwright_computers.jpg
How did I miss this?
Back in March, “Timmer” at The Daily Brief noted that General Cartwright had been “talk­ing up his Command and Control Blog (you couldnt get to it even if I did link to it)” and posted some guid­ance that Cartwright issued about not let­ting the chain of com­mand get in the way the infor­ma­tion he needs. (Another blog­ger, with the han­dle Sgt. Mom, noted that a blog­ging 4-​​Star isn’t that odd.)
Any way, the story bumped around the blo­gos­phere (for exam­ple) before peter­ing out.
The Huntsville Times reported General Cartwright’s blog in August after he men­tioned it at the Annual Space and Missile Defense Conference.
Cartwright’s com­ments — as reported by Timmer and the Hunstville Times — sug­gest that he “gets” the poten­tial for blogging.

“The first thing that came out was ‘Don’t post any­thing on that blog with­out clear­ance from the com­man­der,’ ” Cartwright said. “We had to beat that down.“
The next fire­wall thrown up to Cartwright’s blog were responses that came from only senior staff offi­cers like cap­tains and majors “giv­ing me only what their com­man­ders wanted me to hear,” he said. “I called that the ‘teth­ered goat’ response and it wasn’t all that help­ful.
“What I wanted was infor­ma­tion and con­text to help with deci­sion mak­ing. I can’t wait for the per­fect advice,” Cartwright said. “If there is a bad deci­sion then that’s on me. That’s my respon­si­bil­ity.“
Finally after “blow­ing the doors down and sit­ting on” the blog nay-​​sayers, Cartwright is get­ting what he wants from STRATCOM’s Web tools, he said. 

Of course, one doesn’t become a flag offi­cer (or any­thing else essen­tially polit­i­cal) with­out some skill at self-​​promotion, so grain of salt and all.
I know that DefenseTech​.org (and Arms Control Wonk​.com, where this is cross posted) get lots of STRATCOM traf­fic — so, folks, I’d love to hear about how the STRATCOM blogs are work­ing. Drop one of us a line:

jeffrey-​​AT-​​armscontrolwonk-​​DOT-​​com
or
defense-​​AT-​​defensetech-​​DOT-​​org
Jeffrey Lewis

Not a Deal Maker, or an Arms Broker

Friday, December 30th, 2005

I feel ridicu­lous even typ­ing this. But enough com­pa­nies have writ­ten in, ask­ing me to help them mar­ket their prod­ucts to the Defense Department, that I feel obliged to respond. Here’s my answer, in a nut­shell: no.
I received the lat­est come-​​on just a few days ago, from a com­pany that claims to make radio fre­quency jammers.

…COMPANY is able to quickly pro­duce most pro­fes­sional [cus­tomized] solu­tions for Every require­ment of jam­mers, the best in the world, and most com­pet­i­tive in terms of price. The only issue is that cur­rently we don’t have yet con­nec­tions with the US Military.
Can you help us make the US Army imme­di­ately aware of our supe­rior capa­bil­i­ties ? because we under­stand that there’s an imme­di­ate top-​​urgent require­ment of Professional IED Jammers for the US Army troops in Iraq. Needless to say that if you help us in this mat­ter you (or your orga­ni­za­tion) will be highly com­pen­sated for the same.
Your prompt response will be very appre­ci­ated. Thank you very much in advance…

Look, I’m a jour­nal­ist. Not a deal maker. And not an arms bro­ker. I’m happy to con­sider writ­ing about your prod­uct, what­ever it is. But I’m not about to start lob­by­ing the gov­ern­ment to take the tech­nolo­gies I cover. That would pretty much shred what­ever last lit­tle bit of cred­i­bil­ity I still have. How could I appear to be an objec­tive observer if I’m pimp­ing gear behind the scenes? So, please, do every­one a favor — no mat­ter how rev­o­lu­tion­ary and awe­some your new doo­dad is: back off.

Sub’s Unmanned Buddy

Thursday, December 29th, 2005

A while back, I briefly men­tioned the Cormorant, Darpa’s idea for a sub-​​launched fly­ing drone. Reader DS points us to the agency’s quick write-​​up of the 19-​​foot “multi-​​purpose unmanned aer­ial vehi­cle,” or MPUAV.
cormorant.jpgThe idea is that the drone could han­dle “all-​​weather recon­nais­sance, bat­tle dam­age assess­ment, or spe­cial­ized mis­sion sup­port (e.g., spe­cial forces re-​​supply)” for the sub.
The Cormorants would be kept in the sub’s ICBM launch tubes, and released into the water as needed. From there, they’d be launched into the air “using two Tomahawk missile-​​derived solid rocket boosters.”

Upon mis­sion com­ple­tion, the tur­bo­fan engine-​​powered MPUAVs return to a des­ig­nated retrieval point at sea, ini­ti­ate engine shut down, and splash down to await recov­ery. During recov­ery, the sub­merged [sub] would deploy a remotely oper­ated vehi­cle to secure an in-​​haul cable from the [sub] to the recov­ery tether deployed by the MPUAV. The [sub] would then haul the MPUAV to its des­ig­nated launch tube [with a] sad­dle mech­a­nism, where it would be docked and retracted into the mis­sile tube.

StrategyPage, for one, isn’t so sure all that trou­ble is worth it.

Aircraft oper­at­ing off sub­marines is noth­ing new… [During World War II], the Japanese built 44 subs that could carry a small float plane for recon­nais­sance. This idea was fine in the­ory, but much less suc­cess­ful in prac­tice… Someone may read a his­tory book before that, or remem­ber that the United States has plenty of other satel­lite and long range UAVs that could pro­vide air recon­nais­sance needs of U.S. subs.

And Darpa admits there are a whole bunch of tech­ni­cal hur­dles to leap before the Cormorant would begin to make sense.
The launch and recov­ery pro­ce­dure — includ­ing that “sad­dle” thingy — would have to go through “key risk reduc­tion demon­stra­tions.” So so would the drone’s high-​​pressure tur­bo­fan engine.

Rapid Fire 12/​28/​05

Wednesday, December 28th, 2005

* Houston’s Katrina crime­wave
* Pentagon’s wire­less shift
* Old planes’ new net­works
* Nuke lab blog­ger bows out
* Chem plants still at risk
* Euro-​​GPS takes off
(back­ground here)
* Laser = IED finder
* DHS = lame
* Carter 1, eaves­drop­pers 0

(Big ups: JQP, Early Brief, RC, CA)

Free Press in Kurdistan, Take Two

Wednesday, December 28th, 2005

print_shop.jpgSo I tracked down the staff of Hawlati, the only inde­pen­dent news­pa­per in Kurdistan, to get their take on press free­dom in this coun­try so utterly dom­i­nated by two pow­er­ful polit­i­cal par­ties. Editor Faisal Khalid says that only Hawlati will tackle sto­ries related to gov­ern­ment cor­rup­tion, of which there is a lot in Kurdistan. In retal­i­a­tion, Hawlati staff have been threat­ened and, in a few cases, bribed by the gov­ern­ment to become infor­mants.
If the Hawlati staff believes an employee’s loy­alty is waver­ing, that employee is promptly fired. Recently three Hawlati reporters were jailed for cov­er­ing cor­rup­tion sto­ries; all three are out on bail await­ing trial. What makes this legally pos­si­ble is the absence of Miranda Rights in Kurdistan and a law pro­hibit­ing loosely-​​defined “slan­der”, which edi­tors have told me might include crit­i­cism of the major polit­i­cal par­ties.
Incredibly, even the coura­geous Hawlati staff cows away from cer­tain sub­jects. “Past the red line,” is how Khalid describes them. When I asked what sub­jects were past the line, he refused to answer, say­ing only that every­one knows what sub­jects are absolutely taboo. If gov­ern­ment cor­rup­tion is fair game in this place where gov­ern­ment is wor­shipped, what in the world is off-​​limits? My cyn­i­cal Western mind sus­pects that these sub­jects are related to sex and reli­gion. More on that later.
– David Axe

Hummer Limos Enter War Games

Tuesday, December 27th, 2005

hummer_limo.jpgThe next wave of Army fight­ing vehi­cles are still on the draw­ing board. So, in the mean­time, “Boeing is out­fit­ting 34 com­mer­cially pro­duced limousine-​​style Hummers with radios and com­puter net­work­ing equip­ment to stand in for the… vehi­cles dur­ing tests and exer­cises,” accord­ing to Inside Defense.

In early January, seven of the vehi­cles will drive up Californias Interstate 15 to Nellis Air Force Base, NV, located near Las Vegas, to be used in the Air Force-​​led Joint Expeditionary Force Experiment 2006
To find the actual vehi­cles, Boeing con­ducted two sep­a­rate com­pe­ti­tions — one among Hummer deal­er­ships near Huntington Beach, CA, and another among com­pa­nies that make vehi­cles into lim­ou­sines by cut­ting them in half and adding length to the mid­dle as needed. Hummer of West Covina, CA, and LA Custom Coach Inc. won out.
The Hummers were deliv­ered to the Huntington Beach SOSIL [System of Systems Integration Laboratory] facil­ity with an added alter­na­tor, dual oil fil­ters and run-​​flat tires. Then they were handed over to the lim­ou­sine com­pany, where their length was increased by 65 inches…
After the expan­sion to a six-​​door vehi­cle was com­plete, the Army added air con­di­tion­ing because the vehi­cles will be run­ning with com­put­ers and radios in the heat of the desert. They also were painted with the ser­vices sig­na­ture cam­ou­flage print.

On Growing Old (and Being Young) in Kurdistan

Monday, December 26th, 2005

There are few things rarer than an old Kurdish man. Decades of oppres­sion, poor nutri­tion and med­ical care, war, flight and start­ing over have taken their toll. The low life expectancy of Kurdish men goes a long way to explain why the sur­vivors are so revered.
Old_Kurd_Shaqlawa_market.jpgMore than most, Kurdish cul­ture is patri­ar­chal and personality-​​worshipping. And no patri­archs’ per­son­al­i­ties are more wor­shipped than the Barzanis. In every office, shop and home hang por­traits of Mustafa Barzani, the deceased Kurdish rev­o­lu­tion­ary, and his son Massoud, the cur­rent head of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, the dom­i­nant party in Erbil and, with the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan based in Sulaymaniyah, the heart of the Kurdish coali­tion that has been kick­ing ass at the polls since January.
Extremely high birth rates — an arti­fact of Kurds’ obses­sion with nuclear fam­i­lies — mean that despite his­tor­i­cally high death rates among men, Kurdish pop­u­la­tion is explod­ing. All Iraqi peo­ples have very very young pop­u­la­tions. (That many Arabs have mul­ti­ple wives con­tributes to this.) High birth rates aren’t all good. Feeding, cloth­ing and edu­cat­ing all these kids is a real chal­lenge. At the pub­lic hos­pi­tal in Shaqlawa, a resort town north of Erbil, Dr. Bestum Ali is doing all he can to keep thou­sands of kids healthy. That means up to 50 innoc­u­la­tions per day and aggres­sive chil­drea­r­ing edu­ca­tion for new moth­ers. Ali says things are get­ting bet­ter, espe­cially since the fall of Saddam. Medicine, per­son­nel and exper­tise move more freely, inter­na­tional aid is up, and expa­tri­ate doc­tors like Shaqlawa head of pedi­atrics Dr. Yusef are return­ing to Kurdistan from places like Zurich. The result of all this and of Kurdistan’s new era of peace, hope­fully, is that old Kurds will one day be as com­mon as young ones.
– David Axe

Merry Christmas, Iraq

Sunday, December 25th, 2005

At the Erbil Ministry of Culture’s media hall, the Iraqi-​​Kurdistan Symphony Orchestra has just struck the final chord of the Kurdish national anthem, and the audi­ence — Kurdish Christians and Muslims, Arabs and Turkomens, maybe even an Iraqi Jew or two, all in black ties and gowns — bursts into loud applause, foot-​​stomping and cheers. It’s Christmas Eve in the old­est city in the world, and the city’s million-​​and-​​some res­i­dents are in a pretty good mood. Maybe it’s the suc­cess­ful elec­tion they had just two weeks ago. symph.jpg
Maybe it’s the Christmas cheer of the city’s size­able Christian minor­ity rub­bing off on every­one else. Or maybe it’s just that Kurdistanis love being Kurdistanis.
Sure, Iraqi Kurdistan’s got trou­bles. Corruption ham­strings the econ­omy. Intense secu­rity lim­its civil rights. A dearth of nat­ural resources has min­is­ters beg­ging for for­eign invest­ment. But despite all this, and against the back­drop of a coun­try descend­ing into an Arab civil war, Kurdistan is pros­per­ing. People are mak­ing money, rais­ing their kids, going to school, trav­el­ling abroad, mak­ing plans, dream­ing and enjoy­ing life.
This is it folks, this is what a peace­ful, demo­c­ra­tic, multi-​​ethnic and religiously-​​tolerant Iraq looks like. The Western media’s myopic focus on Baghdad and Arab Iraq means it’s missed a quar­ter of the story, the north­ern quar­ter, where five mil­lion peo­ple are build­ing the Middle East’s first indige­nous democ­racy from scratch. Every day Kurds thank me, believ­ing I rep­re­sent all Americans. They thank me for free­ing them from a mur­der­ous tyrant. They thank me for sav­ing their lives and their fam­i­lies’ lives. They tell me that they under­stand we went to war for many rea­sons, some quite bad. Still, they say, no American has died in vain here, for even if there were no weapons of mass destruc­tion, even if Iraq had noth­ing to do with Sept. 11, there is at least one good rea­son to fight and die in Iraq.
In fact, there are five mil­lion.
Merry Christmas, America. Merry Christmas, Iraq.
–David Axe

NSA “Tapping Into… Telecom’s Main Arteries”

Saturday, December 24th, 2005

nsa_hq.jpg“The National Security Agency has traced and ana­lyzed large vol­umes of tele­phone and Internet com­mu­ni­ca­tions flow­ing into and out of the United States… by tap­ping directly into some of the American telecom­mu­ni­ca­tion system’s main arter­ies,” the Times is reporting.

The vol­ume of infor­ma­tion har­vested from telecom­mu­ni­ca­tion data and voice net­works, with­out court-​​approved war­rants, is much larger than the White House has acknowl­edged…
As part of the pro­gram approved by President Bush for domes­tic sur­veil­lance with­out war­rants, the N.S.A. has gained the coop­er­a­tion of American telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions com­pa­nies to obtain back­door access to streams of domes­tic and inter­na­tional communications.

When the NSA domes­tic spy­ing story broke last week, I had a hunch that the eaves­drop­ping tech­nol­ogy at work was a whole lot dif­fer­ent than what you’d find in an aver­age wire­tap. A for­mer sig­nals intel­li­gence spe­cial­ist won­dered whether the NSA “may have com­pro­mised… a tele­com car­rier.“
That guess looks to be dead-​​on.

Since the Sept. 11 attacks, the lead­ing com­pa­nies in the indus­try have been stor­ing infor­ma­tion on call­ing pat­terns and giv­ing it to the fed­eral gov­ern­ment to aid in track­ing pos­si­ble ter­ror­ists.
“All that data is mined with the coop­er­a­tion of the gov­ern­ment and shared with them, and since 9/​11, there’s been much more active involve­ment in that area,” said the for­mer man­ager, a telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions expert who did not want his name or that of his for­mer com­pany used because of con­cern about reveal­ing trade secrets.

The Times arti­cle also makes clear why Senator Jay Rockefeller com­pared the pro­gram to Total Information Awareness, the Pentagon’s uber-​​database project.

The N.S.A. has sought to ana­lyze com­mu­ni­ca­tions pat­terns to glean clues from details like who is call­ing whom, how long a phone call lasts and what time of day it is made, and the ori­gins and des­ti­na­tions of phone calls and e-​​mail mes­sages. Calls to and from Afghanistan, for instance, are known to have been of par­tic­u­lar inter­est to the N.S.A. since the Sept. 11 attacks, the offi­cials said.
This so-​​called “pat­tern analy­sis” on calls within the United States would, in many cir­cum­stances, require a court war­rant if the gov­ern­ment wanted to trace who calls whom.
The use of sim­i­lar data-​​mining oper­a­tions by the Bush admin­is­tra­tion in other con­texts has raised strong objec­tions, most notably in con­nec­tion with the Total Information Awareness sys­tem… [which was] ulti­mately scrapped after pub­lic out­cries over pos­si­ble threats to pri­vacy and civil lib­er­ties.
But the Bush admin­is­tra­tion regards the N.S.A.‘s abil­ity to trace and ana­lyze large vol­umes of data as crit­i­cal to its expanded mis­sion to detect ter­ror­ist plots before they can be car­ried out, offi­cials famil­iar with the pro­gram say. Administration offi­cials main­tain that the sys­tem set up by Congress in 1978 under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act does not give them the speed and flex­i­bil­ity to respond fully to ter­ror­ist threats at home.

Some will say this story is old news. The NSA has long been rumored to have the abil­ity to vac­uum up huge swaths of data at once.
“The NSA is inter­cept­ing huge streams of com­mu­ni­ca­tions, tak­ing in 2 mil­lion pieces of com­mu­ni­ca­tions an hour,” James Bamford, the author of two books on the NSA, told the Boston Globe on Friday.
“They have a capac­ity to lis­ten to every over­seas phone call,” added Tom Blanton, direc­tor of the National Security Archive at George Washington University.“
But the ques­tion has been: how do you turn all that data into some­thing use­ful? You’ve got to find a real­tively sim­ple way to get rid of 99.99999% of the calls and e-​​mails quickly. Otherwise, it’s like drink­ing from a fire­hose.
But as link analy­sis and data min­ing pro­grams have become more sophis­ti­cated, that sift­ing process has got­ten eas­ier. And, I’ll bet, it is sim­pler still when the tele­com com­pa­nies are play­ing ball.

Inside the Air Force’s Laser Lab

Thursday, December 22nd, 2005

I love the bit in Bond films where 007 goes round Qs lab­o­ra­tory check­ing out the lat­est top-​​secret gad­gets. Thats why I enjoyed talk­ing to Capt.Wegner and his col­leagues at ScorpWorks, source of a vari­ety of laser weapons and other one-​​of-​​a-​​kind devices.
ACCM.jpgThe ScorpWorks is the Air Force Research Laboratorys in-​​house devel­op­ment team for laser sys­tem pro­to­types. Although it has existed since 1992, they have shunned pub­lic­ity until this year. A laser weapon does not need to con­vert the tar­get into smok­ing rub­ble: they are much more ver­sa­tile than that.
The Laser AirCraft CounterMeasures (ACCM), which I detail in this week’s New Scientist, is a non­lethal coax­ial laser that sits along­side a heli­copter door gun. It daz­zles the tar­get, pre­vent­ing them from fir­ing accu­rately and pro­vid­ing pro­tec­tion for the heli­copter, but with­out risk­ing civil­ian casu­al­ties.
Its more than a daz­zler. Experience with the Saber 203 laser daz­zler in Somalia showed that it was too low-​​powered to affect vision, but any­one illu­mi­nated beat a hasty retreat as they knew a weapon was being aimed at them. The ACCM should have a sim­i­lar effect, scat­ter­ing poten­tial threats on the ground and leav­ing only the truly dan­ger­ous ones — and the 4,000 rpm mini­gun should deal with them.
The PHaSR laser-​​dazzling rifle unveiled a few weeks ago is sim­i­lar (and not a hoax). In a riot-​​control sit­u­a­tion, the idea is that light­ing peo­ple up with this portable laser will sep­a­rate peace­ful pro­test­ers from the stone-​​throwers. The PhaSRs dual-​​wavelength laser will also make coun­ter­mea­sures dif­fi­cult, and Capt. Wegner points out that the end prod­uct will prob­a­bly be very dif­fer­ent to the bulky pro­to­type.
The PHaSR is a rel­a­tive of the Portable Efficient Laser Testbed (PELT). This is another riot-​​control weapon, but one that works by heat “the first man-​​portable heat com­pli­ance weapon of its kind” Take a close look at the pic­ture of PELT on page 52 here and you’ll see a sig­na­ture Scorpion logo a rare vis­i­ble sign of ScorpWorks hand­i­work.
Elsewhere they’ve been uti­liz­ing the laser as a sen­sor. By pick­ing up the reflec­tions back from the human eye, invis­i­ble laser sen­sors can detect peo­ple look­ing at them — sim­i­lar to the way ani­mal eyes light up when you shine a flash­light on them. A sniper detec­tion sys­tem is in the works.
Even more sophis­ti­cated is BOSS, the Battlefield Optical Surveillance System. This is a vehicle-​​mounted setup which uses retro-​​reflection and a num­ber of other tech­nolo­gies to spot tar­gets in pitch dark­ness. It can be locate, iden­tify and invis­i­bly des­ig­nate tar­gets, so they wont even know they’ve been spot­ted until a laser-​​guided weapon hits (and prob­a­bly not even then). Exactly how far advanced BOSS or its suc­ces­sors are is not known.
The ScorpWorks name is a delib­er­ate echo of Lockheeds famous Skunk Works, renowned for pro­duc­ing world-​​beating air­craft like the F-​​117 stealth fighter and SR-​​71 Blackbird on time and within bud­get, a feat achieved fol­low­ing a set of bureaucracy-​​busting rules laid down by the leg­endary Kelly Johnson.
ScorpWorks reckon that many projects get com­pleted within two years and with pro­to­types built for less than $300k. At that price you could get about 20,000 dif­fer­ent projects for the price of one Airborne Laser.
The Skunk Works is famous for the many black pro­grams that orig­i­nated there, and you do get the impres­sion with ScorpWorks that what they have revealed is the tip of the ice­berg. We know their cus­tomers include Special Operations Command, Air Force, Marines, DARPA and the Joint Non-​​Lethal Weapons Directorate, but we dont know what they bought. Even their unclas­si­fied pro­grams can only be dis­cussed in broad terms. If they told me more, theyd prob­a­bly have to kill me but I bet theyd use a really impres­sive laser.
David Hambling