<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: F/A/R/C/E-22 Raptor…cleans windows too!</title> <atom:link href="http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/</link> <description>The Future of the Military, Law Enforcement and National Security</description> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:29:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Facepalm</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-42181</link> <dc:creator>Facepalm</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-42181</guid> <description>Very useful files search engine. http://Indexoffiles.com is a search engine designed to search files in various file sharing and uploading sites. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very useful files search engine. <a href="http://Indexoffiles.com" rel="nofollow">http://Indexoffiles.com</a> is a search engine designed to search files in various file sharing and uploading sites.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kamal</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-42180</link> <dc:creator>kamal</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 10:46:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-42180</guid> <description>bon anny.cher amy.peur F/A/R/C/E-22 Raptor...cleans windows too! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bon anny.cher amy.peur F/A/R/C/E-22 Raptor…cleans windows too!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kowalsky</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118633</link> <dc:creator>kowalsky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 16:18:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118633</guid> <description>Hi Bo! I have tried the link you&#039;ve posted &#039;http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW_Setup_Files.exe.html&#039;, but the file does&#039;nt exist anymore in that site. If you cam say me where can I find it or if you can send it to me or post it in somewhere I can get, I&#039;ll be very glat you. Thanks! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Bo!<br /> I have tried the link you’ve posted ‘<a href="http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW_Setup_Files.exe.html&#039;" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW_Setup_Files.exe.html’</a>, but the file does’nt exist anymore in that site. If you cam say me where can I find it or if you can send it to me or post it in somewhere I can get, I’ll be very glat you. Thanks!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brad</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118632</link> <dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2006 09:31:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118632</guid> <description>Air superiority is key, and a constant effort should be made to advance it&#039;s technology. Good enough isn&#039;t. I&#039;m not saying don&#039;t Keep and upgrade the F18&#039;s, 16&#039;s, 15&#039;s, 14&#039;s, A-6&#039;s, F4&#039;s, and build more drones, but there will always be the need for such a machine as the F22. It flies in ways no other plane can, and boast a laundry list of advancements that alow it to do anything (Stealth missions, air to air, air to ground, whatever) on the fly while toggleing between modes. Why must we rely on 60&#039;s and 70&#039;s technology for our future? I say the F22 and F35 programs are over due. And when the next technology wave hits I hope our government has the forsight to build an even badder plane with more capeabilities so our future is more secure. (if they haven&#039;t already) Supercruise is great because it means more speed for less fuel! (what is better than that?) Lastly at the risk of sounding like a nut job what about aliens? Don&#039;t you want to be able to have a fighting chance if they come here in anger? Even the F22 falls way short of anything that might be able to overcome alien technology, so in a way we have a long way to go, and F22 is another step in the right direction. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air superiority is key, and a constant effort should be made to advance it’s technology. Good enough isn’t. I’m not saying don’t Keep and upgrade the F18’s, 16’s, 15’s, 14’s, A-6’s, F4’s, and build more drones, but there will always be the need for such a machine as the F22. It flies in ways no other plane can, and boast a laundry list of advancements that alow it to do anything (Stealth missions, air to air, air to ground, whatever) on the fly while toggleing between modes. Why must we rely on 60’s and 70’s technology for our future? I say the F22 and F35 programs are over due. And when the next technology wave hits I hope our government has the forsight to build an even badder plane with more capeabilities so our future is more secure. (if they haven’t already) Supercruise is great because it means more speed for less fuel! (what is better than that?) Lastly at the risk of sounding like a nut job what about aliens? Don’t you want to be able to have a fighting chance if they come here in anger? Even the F22 falls way short of anything that might be able to overcome alien technology, so in a way we have a long way to go, and F22 is another step in the right direction.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bo</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-42175</link> <dc:creator>Bo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 20:13:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-42175</guid> <description>Click here to download F-22 Total Air War (TAW) FULL by DiD http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW_Setup_Files.exe.html Enjoy! </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Click here to download F-22 Total Air War (TAW) FULL by DiD<br /> <a href="http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW_Setup_Files.exe.html" rel="nofollow">http://rapidshare.de/files/19936645/TAW_Setup_Files.exe.html</a><br /> Enjoy!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Will Wheeler</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118631</link> <dc:creator>Will Wheeler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 20:50:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118631</guid> <description>The is another problem with having an &quot;all in one solution&quot; to our battlefield woes.  What happens when China figures out how to hack into the electronics of the F-22?  If we have one weapon system, and that one system is compromised in battle, then what do we do?  I know that there will not be any major battles with China right now, but they have even admitted that their military wont catch up to ours for at least 25 years.  In terms of history 25 years is a blink.  I only hope that the people that are in more important positions see that and prepare for future threats as well as today&#039;s challenges. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The is another problem with having an “all in one solution” to our battlefield woes.  What happens when China figures out how to hack into the electronics of the F-22?  If we have one weapon system, and that one system is compromised in battle, then what do we do?  I know that there will not be any major battles with China right now, but they have even admitted that their military wont catch up to ours for at least 25 years.  In terms of history 25 years is a blink.  I only hope that the people that are in more important positions see that and prepare for future threats as well as today’s challenges.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118630</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2005 00:40:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118630</guid> <description>There is no point at all wasting the few F-22 Rapters the Airforce will be getting for anything else other then Air Superiority!! Why waste an air craft designed to be a &quot;F&quot; and nothing more, when you can modify other very capable aircraft like the F-15. This is pure idiocy. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no point at all wasting the few F-22 Rapters the Airforce will be getting for anything else other then Air Superiority!! Why waste an air craft designed to be a “F” and nothing more, when you can modify other very capable aircraft like the F-15. This is pure idiocy.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JSAllison</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118629</link> <dc:creator>JSAllison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 15:03:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118629</guid> <description>Just what particular capability does the  -22 offer that can&#039;t be retrofitted, hung on a hard point or reprogrammed into existing designs?  Supercruise? Anything else? So this fiscal electrolux is causing the AF to short sheet other programs (cargo, tanker, bomber, affordable attack aircraft, etc) so a couple of hundred members of the grand and glorious fighter jock mafia can supercruise the wild blue yonder? Outfit one wing for R&amp;D and get to work on armed UAVs and packages to retrofit the useful bits to existing (affordable) designs. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just what particular capability does the  –22 offer that can’t be retrofitted, hung on a hard point or reprogrammed into existing designs?  Supercruise? Anything else?<br /> So this fiscal electrolux is causing the AF to short sheet other programs (cargo, tanker, bomber, affordable attack aircraft, etc) so a couple of hundred members of the grand and glorious fighter jock mafia can supercruise the wild blue yonder?<br /> Outfit one wing for R&amp;D and get to work on armed UAVs and packages to retrofit the useful bits to existing (affordable) designs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118627</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 12:07:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118627</guid> <description>This is...well...stupid. I mean, who on earth would think of putting a capability that requires very long loiter time moving at the pace of the land battle on an air superiority fighter? Put gadget in box. Put box in C130. Simple! Better yet, hang gadget from Army tactical UAV.. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is…well…stupid. I mean, who on earth would think of putting a capability that requires very long loiter time moving at the pace of the land battle on an air superiority fighter?<br /> Put gadget in box. Put box in C130. Simple!<br /> Better yet, hang gadget from Army tactical UAV..</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stanley Jones, USN, Retired</title><link>http://defensetech.org/2005/12/01/farce-22-raptor-cleans-windows-too/#comment-118626</link> <dc:creator>Stanley Jones, USN, Retired</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2005 11:18:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://deftech.usmilblog.com/?p=2942#comment-118626</guid> <description>Interesting discussion, tell me something is the AF trying to say (which they have over and over again) that they can take over all missions including the ground warfighter?  This hyperbole of an all in one aircraft that can throw everything at you including the kitchen sink is getting old.  Now I don&#039;t think that the AF needs to go away however, I do think that they need to seriously get over the fact that the cold war is over.  For instance as highly trained as AF pilots are you don&#039;t see them out there landing on Carriers and they definitely can&#039;t be there on station and closer than the Navy gets.  We need all facets of our Armed Forces but seriously get a clue people. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting discussion, tell me something is the AF trying to say (which they have over and over again) that they can take over all missions including the ground warfighter?  This hyperbole of an all in one aircraft that can throw everything at you including the kitchen sink is getting old.  Now I don’t think that the AF needs to go away however, I do think that they need to seriously get over the fact that the cold war is over.  For instance as highly trained as AF pilots are you don’t see them out there landing on Carriers and they definitely can’t be there on station and closer than the Navy gets.  We need all facets of our Armed Forces but seriously get a clue people.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.004 seconds using apc
Object Caching 743/747 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via images.defensetech.org

Served from: defensetech.org @ 2012-02-10 06:06:27 -->
